Candida species contamination of preservation fluid-outcome of renal transplantation in 6 patients

Assessing the impact of positive cultures in preservation fluid on renal transplant outcomes: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Infection following kidney transplantation is a significant risk factor for adverse outcomes. While the donor may be a source of infection, microbiological assessment of the preservation fluid (PF) can mitigate potential recipient contamination and help curb unnecessary antibiotic use. This scoping review aimed to describe the available literature on the association between culture-positive preservation fluid, its clinically relevant outcomes, and management.

METHODS

Following the Joanna Briggs Institute's scoping review recommendations, a comprehensive search in databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, and gray literature) was conducted, with data independently extracted by two researchers from selected studies.

RESULTS

We analysed 24 articles involving 12,052 samples, predominantly published post-2000, 91% of which retrospective. The prevalence of culture-positive preservation fluid varied from 0.86 to 77.8%. Coagulase-negative staphylococci emerged as the most frequently isolated pathogen in 14 studies. The presence of ESKAPE pathogens (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species), observed in two studies involving 1074 donors, was significantly associated with an increased risk of probable donor-derived infections (p-DDI). Of the reviewed articles, 14 reported on probable donor-derived infections, while 19 addressed the topic of preemptive antibiotic therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine culturing of preservation fluid is crucial for the identification of pathogenic organisms, facilitates targeted treatment and prevents probable donor-derived infections. Furthermore, this approach helps avoid the treatment of low-virulence contaminants, thereby reducing unnecessary antimicrobial use and the risk of antibiotic resistance. In cases where ESKAPE or Candida species are detected, preemptive therapy appears to be an important strategy. Given that the current evidence primarily stems from retrospective studies, there is a pressing need for large-scale, prospective trials to corroborate these recommendations. This scoping review currently represents the most thorough compilation of evidence on how contamination of preservation fluids affects kidney transplant management.

Effect of preservation fluid contamination and associated possible donor-derived infections on early postoperative prognosis in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

The study aims to analyze the epidemiology of preservation fluid (PF) contamination and investigate the impact of PF contamination and possible donor-derived infections(p-DDI) on early postoperative prognosis in kidney transplant (KT) recipients.

METHODS

A total of 256 PF samples were collected for microbiological evaluation from all KT recipients who received deceased donor donations in our hospital from June 2018 to August 2022. Data on the baseline and clinical characteristics of these PF corresponding to recipients and donors were extracted from the electronic medical record. It mainly included the early postoperative complications and prognosis of KT recipients.

RESULTS

From June 2018 to August 2022, 597 kidney transplants were performed in our center, with 260 recipients receiving kidney transplantation from donation after citizens' death. A total of 256 samples of PF were collected, of which 64.5% (165/256) were culture positive, and 24.6% (63/165) of the culture-positive PF were polymicrobial contamination. A total of 238 strains were isolated, of which coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) had the highest proportion of 34.0% (81/238), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae with 20.6% (49/238) and Escherichia coli with 8.8% (21/238). Recipients with culture-positive PF had a significantly higher incidence of postoperative infection (55.8% vs. 20.9%, P < 0.001) and DGF (38.2% vs. 24.2%, P = 0.023). In addition, the incidence of p-DDI was 12.9% (33/256). CRKP was the most common pathogen causing p-DDI. The recipients who developed p-DDI had a higher rate of graft loss (9.1% vs. 0.4%, P < 0.001), mortality (12.1% vs. 3.1%, P = 0.018), and longer postoperative hospital stay (30 days (19.5-73.5) vs. (22 days (18-32), P < 0.05) compared with recipients who did not develop p-DDI.

CONCLUSIONS

Culture-positive PF is potentially significant for KT recipients, and p-DDI may increase the risk of poor prognosis for recipients. Prophylactic anti-infective treatment should be actively performed for highly virulent or multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens (especially Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, CRKP) in PF to avoid the occurrence of p-DDI.

The value of organ and tissue biovigilance: a cross-sectional analysis

Introduction

Biovigilance (BV) systems aim to improve the quality and safety of tissues and organs for transplantation. This study describes the Catalan BV system and analyzes its utility.

Methods

It is a retrospective analysis of notifications on serious adverse events (SAEs) and reactions (SARs) since the implementation of the BV system (2008 for tissues and 2016 for organs) until 2020. Variables are presented to describe the most common critical steps of the pathway and complications associated with the quality and safety of tissues and organs.

Results

A total of 154 and 125 notifications were reported to the Tissue and the Organ BV systems, respectively. Most SAEs were related to unexpected donor diseases and implemented actions were assured on those deemed preventable. Regarding SARs, donor-transmitted infections and malignancies (only organs) were the most common, followed by graft failure (tissues) and process-related (organs). The incidence of SAEs and SARs related to tissue was 3.44‰ and 0.22‰, respectively. The corresponding figures for organs were 31.48‰ and 8.8‰, respectively.

Discussion

The analysis of the notifications to the Catalan BV systems has provided useful information about existing risks associated with the quality and safety of tissues and organs, and enabled the implementation of actions targeted to diminish risks and mitigate damage.

Clinical impact of preservation fluid contamination on kidney transplant patients

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation is associated with a high risk of infectious complications due to immunosuppressive therapy. Although infections may be transmitted from donor to transplant recipient through contaminated preservation solution (PS), the clinical impact of this is not well-understood.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated PS contamination rates in a series of 339 patients who underwent cadaveric renal transplant at our centre. All patients with a positive culture received targeted preemptive therapy (PET).

RESULTS

Of the 339 PS samples, 136 (40.1%) were positive for a microorganism, mainly coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS; n = 89;60.5%), gram-negative bacilli (n = 31;21.1%), non-CoNS gram-positive cocci (n = 18;12.2%), and Candida spp (n = 2;1.4%). Of the 136 positive cases, 42 (30.9%) received PET (12.4% of the cohort). No cases of urinary tract infection, surgical site infection, or graft loss were observed. Overall, our findings indicate that PS contamination, mainly by saprophytic skin flora (CoNS) is common. Only 8% of patients required antibiotic or antifungal therapy.

CONCLUSION

The infection transmission rate from donors to recipients was negligible (0%), perhaps due to the early initiation of a targeted PET after isolation of a recognized pathogen. More data from large, prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Candida chorioretinitis in renal transplant recipient with candidemia related to contaminated organ preservation fluid: A role for dilated fundus examination in its management

Infection by Candida spp is a potentially life-threatening condition among both immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients. Candida chorioretinitis can occur as a complication of candidemia and may develop into endophthalmitis if not detected and treated early, which can lead to irreversible visual loss. Here, we report on a 52-year-old diabetic woman who developed candidemia complicated by bilateral chorioretinitis following kidney transplantation. Antifungal therapy was immediately started but fundoscopic examination highlighted multiple bilateral chorioretinal lesions. Given new onset of vomiting and increased number of retinal lesions on repeat fundus examination a few weeks later, the patient underwent a positron emission tomography (PET) which revealed a mycotic arterial pseudoaneurysm at the renal graft anastomosis. It led ineluctably to transplantectomy, aneurysm flattening and vascular reconstruction a few days later. Blood cultures remained negative and fundus examination progressively showed a regression of chorioretinal lesions until their complete disappearance a few months later. Our case emphasizes the importance of a non-invasive examination which allowed to accelerate and optimize in a consequential way the management of the patient leading to her recovery after a long antifungal treatment.

The impact of preservation fluid culture on graft site arteritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The role of culturing the graft preservation fluid (PF) is controversial and its impact on graft arteritis development remains unclear.

METHODS

Systematic literature search retrieving observational studies comparing solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with culture-positive PF versus culture-negative PF. The quality of included studies was independently assessed according to the ROBINS-I tool for observational studies. Meta-analysis was performed using Mantel-Haenszel random-effect models. Graft site arteritis within 180 days from transplant was selected as the primary outcome.

RESULTS

Twenty-one observational studies (N = 2208 positive PF vs. 4458 negative) were included. Among positive PF, 857 (38.8%) were classified as high-risk group pathogens and 1351 (61.2%) as low-risk pathogens. Low-risk and negative PF showed similar odds ratios. A significant higher risk of graft arteritis was found in SOT recipients with a PF yielding a high-risk pathogen (odds ratio [OR] 18.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.83-43.40) compared to low-risk and negative PF, with low heterogeneity (I² = 2.24%). Similar results were found considering separately high-risk bacteria (OR 12.02, 95%CI 4.88-29.60) and fungi (OR 71.00, 95%CI 28.07-179.56), with no heterogeneity (I² = 0%), and in the subgroup analyses of the liver (OR 16.78, 95%CI 2.95-95.47) and kidney (OR 19.90, 95%CI 4.78-82.79) recipients. However, data about diagnostic features of graft arteritis were very limited, indeed for only 11 of the 93 events histological or microbiological results were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results may support the performance of PF culturing and a preemptive diagnostic or therapeutic management upon isolation of high-risk pathogens. Further studies based on a reliable diagnosis of graft arteritis are needed.

Management of early graft candidiasis in a kidney transplant recipient

Balancing adequate immunosuppression with the risk of infection after renal transplantation remains a challenge. The presence of comorbidities adds to the challenge. Although infrequent, invasive fungal infections result in high morbidity and mortality risk in renal transplant recipients. This can be attributed to the intense immunosuppression in the first 6 months after renal transplantation, minimal symptomatology and the high mortality associated with fungal infections.

Due to minimal available evidence, clinical judgement guides management of graft candidiasis. There is a need to develop evidence-based management guidelines for the treatment of fungal infections in renal transplants. Here, we report a case of early-onset candidiasis in a transplanted kidney and present the histological findings, multidisciplinary discussions and treatment given.

Candida Contamination in Kidney and Liver Organ Preservation Solution: Does It Matter?

INTRODUCTION

Fungal infections remain a major challenge affecting outcomes after kidney (KT) and liver transplantation (LT).

METHODS

In this retrospective single center study, the incidence of Candida contamination in renal and hepatic graft preservation solution (PS) was evaluated. In addition, Candida associated infections in recipients and related complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall, the PS of 1248 hepatic and 1273 renal grafts were evaluated. The incidence of fungal contamination in the PS of hepatic and renal grafts was 1.2% and 0.86%, respectively. Additionally, the hepatic PS of one patient who underwent a combined liver-kidney transplant had Candida contamination. Candida albicans was the most common organism (70.4%) and 65.4% of the patients received antifungal treatment. Candida-associated complications in the recipients was 19%. Complications in LT patients included Candida peritonitis and Candida sepsis. Two KT recipients with contaminated PS developed a mycotic aneurysm at the anastomotic site resulting in severe bleeding. The 1-year mortality in patients with PS contamination for LT and KT recipients was 33% and 18%, respectively. Although the incidence of fungal contamination of PS was low, contaminated PS was associated with a high mortality.

CONCLUSION

The results of the study suggest that PS should be evaluated for fungal growth.

The Value of Perfusion Fluid Culture Analysis in Deceased Donor Renal Transplants: A 10-Year Single-Center Experience

Microbiological analysis of kidney perfusion/transport solution is not routinely performed in all transplant centers. This paper gives a 10-year descriptive single-center experience of the routine culture of perfusion fluid in deceased donor renal transplant recipients as well as the prophylactic treatment of certain organisms if identified. Data were collected retrospectively on all deceased donor transplants performed between 2009 and 2018. Organisms detected were classified as either pathologic, of uncertain pathogenicity, or contaminants. Treatment was guided by the microbiology team. A total of 661 specimens were analyzed. Organisms were cultured in 168 of 661 (25.4%) of these samples. The most frequent organisms identified were skin and oral flora (n = 95, 42%). The majority of organisms identified (131 of 226, 58%) necessitated prophylactic treatment on the advice of our microbiology department. On 7 (4.2%) occasions, the perfusion fluid cultures grew organisms not covered by the routine antimicrobial prophylaxis, and on 15 occasions Candida albicans was isolated. Candida isolates were treated preemptively with 1 month of antifungal treatment. There were no infective sequelae in this group.

Risk factors for intra-abdominal fungal infection after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: A single-center retrospective experience

BACKGROUND

Data on the risk factors and outcome of intra-abdominal fungal infections (IAFI) following simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (PKT) are scarce.

MATERIALS/METHODS

A retrospective monocentric study was conducted on all patients who underwent simultaneous PKT from January 2007 to December 2016. Deep sites positive cultures for fungi during the first post-transplantation year were collected. Clinical, radiological, and microbiological data of proven and probable invasive fungal infections were analysed.

RESULTS

Among sixteen PKT patients, 15 were included. Seven patients (47%) developed an invasive fungal infection, exclusively IAFI (six proven, one probable). The proven IAFI included four peritonitis, one pancreatic necrosis with infected hematoma, and one patient with positive preservation fluid only (PF). Candida albicans (n = 4) was the most prevalent species (associated with Galactomyces candidus in one case), C glabrata, C dubliniensis, and C krusei were found in one case each. Three patients had either a positive direct examination and/or culture for renal or pancreatic PF and the culture of PF was positive for the same species that caused IAFI. IAFIs were significantly associated with pancreatic graft arterial thrombosis (5/7 vs 0/8, P = .007) and fungal contamination of PF (3/7 vs 0/8, P = .008). Among patients with IAFI, all required an early surgical revision post-transplantation [1-18 days] and six had early or delayed pancreatic graft removal. One patient died in the first post-transplant year.

CONCLUSION

IAFI is a common complication in PKT, associated with pancreatic graft thrombosis or fungal contamination of the graft PF, and can sometimes lead to pancreatic detransplantation.

Antibiotic therapy in case of positive cultures of kidney transplant preservation fluid: a nationwide survey of prescribing practices

Our survey aimed to describe current prescribing practices for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in French kidney transplant centers. We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional clinical vignette-based survey that we sent via email to hospital practitioners involved in perioperative management of kidney transplant patients (KTR). Nearly half of practitioners contacted (182/427, 42.6%) were respondents. A total of 167 getting enough kidney transplant activity were eligible for the survey. The response rate was 50.7% (68/134) among interns and 33.8% (99/293) among seniors. Positive perfusion fluids (PF) cultures for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus were associated with antibiotic prescribing in 35% of cases, with no difference in prescribing in patients with diabetes, obesity, or delayed graft function. Antibiotic prescribing was most frequent with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (67%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae strains producing extended spectrum β-lactamases (57%). About 77%, 16%, and 13% of respondents, respectively, reported the existence of local practice guidelines for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis, a standardized approach for antibiotic prescribing in case of positive kidney transplant PF cultures, and local practice guidelines for systematical antibiotic prophylaxis in the early post-transplant period. In France, antibiotic prophylaxis practices in the perioperative kidney transplant period are very heterogeneous. To prevent unnecessary prescribing and bacterial resistance, evidence-based practice guidelines should be developed.

The Impact of Culturing the Organ Preservation Fluid on Solid Organ Transplantation: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study

Background

We analyzed the prevalence, etiology, and risk factors of culture-positive preservation fluid and their impact on the management of solid organ transplant recipients.

Methods

From July 2015 to March 2017, 622 episodes of adult solid organ transplants at 7 university hospitals in Spain were prospectively included in the study.

Results

The prevalence of culture-positive preservation fluid was 62.5% (389/622). Nevertheless, in only 25.2% (98/389) of the cases were the isolates considered "high risk" for pathogenicity. After applying a multivariate regression analysis, advanced donor age was the main associated factor for having culture-positive preservation fluid for high-risk microorganisms. Preemptive antibiotic therapy was given to 19.8% (77/389) of the cases. The incidence rate of preservation fluid-related infection was 1.3% (5 recipients); none of these patients had received preemptive therapy. Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with high-risk culture-positive preservation fluid receiving preemptive antibiotic therapy presented both a lower cumulative incidence of infection and a lower rate of acute rejection and graft loss compared with those who did not have high-risk culture-positive preservation fluid. After adjusting for age, sex, type of transplant, and prior graft rejection, preemptive antibiotic therapy remained a significant protective factor for 90-day infection.

Conclusions

The routine culture of preservation fluid may be considered a tool that provides information about the contamination of the transplanted organ. Preemptive therapy for SOT recipients with high-risk culture-positive preservation fluid may be useful to avoid preservation fluid-related infections and improve the outcomes of infection, graft loss, and graft rejection in transplant patients.

Prevention and Treatment of Yeast and Endemic Fungal Infections

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) remain an important complication of solid organ transplantation owing to their significant morbidity and mortality and include infections due to Candida, Cryptococcus, endemic mycosis, and other rare yeasts and molds. IFIs occur in different intervals posttransplantation and depend on a number of extrinsic and intrinsic risk factors, some of which are specific to the type of organs transplanted, surgical techniques, and type of immunosuppressive medications. Donor-derived IFIs and emergence of new multidrug-resistant yeasts have been reported in various healthcare settings. Clinical manifestations of yeast and endemic fungal infections vary in different types of organ transplants. Diagnosis of IFIs in SOT recipients is challenging due to their nonspecific signs and symptoms owing to the impaired inflammatory responses as a result of immunosuppression and the lack of highly sensitive and specific diagnostic modalities. Early diagnosis is key to successful therapy, and physicians should have a high index of suspicion based on risk factors and epidemiology of these pathogens. Antifungal treatment strategies for yeast infections have been outlined in various society guidelines. Management of complications that arise before or during antifungal therapy is critical for optimizing clinical response.

Clinical impact of culture-positive preservation fluid on solid organ transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Contamination of the preservation fluid (PF) used for donated organs is a potential source of post-transplant infection. However, the information on this issue is scarce. We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the incidence of culture-positive PF and its impact on solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Seventeen studies were identified and included. The overall incidence of culture-positive PF was 37% (95% CI: 27% to 49%), and the incidence of PF-related infections among SOT recipients with PF cultures that grew pathogenic microorganisms was 10% (95% CI: 7% to 15%). There were differences in the rates of infections due to pathogenic microorganisms between SOT recipients who received pre-emptive treatment and those who did not, but without statistical significance. The mortality rate among SOT recipients with PF-related infection was 35% (95% CI: 21% to 53%). In conclusion, although contamination of the PF of donated organs is frequent, the incidence of PF-related infection is relatively low. A closely clinical and microbiologic monitoring of the SOT recipient in case of culture-positive PF, regardless of the type of microorganism isolated might be do in order to establish a prompt diagnosis of PF-related infection.

Fifty-one cases of fungal arteritis after kidney transplantation: A case report and review of the literature

Fungal arteritis affecting graft arteries is a rare but life-threatening complication in kidney transplantation (KT). Here, we report the case of a patient with Aspergillus arteritis who experienced renal artery rupture 8 days after KT. We also reviewed 50 other reported cases of fungal arteritis after KT. We found that fungal contamination can occur during kidney graft harvest, preservation, and/or transplantation. Typically, early diagnosis, timely antifungal treatment, and emergency surgery seem crucial for avoiding life-threatening vascular complications.