Alemtuzumab and Minimization Immunotherapy in Kidney Transplantation: Long-Term Results of Comparison With Rabbit Anti-Thymocyte Globulin and Standard Triple Maintenance Therapy

The use of lymphocyte-depleting antibodies in specific populations of kidney transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Recommendations of the use of antibody induction treatments in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) are based on moderate quality and historical studies. This systematic review aims to reevaluate, based on actual studies, the effects of different antibody preparations when used in specific KTR subgroups.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE and CENTRAL and selected randomized controlled trials (RCT) and observational studies looking at different antibody preparations used as induction in KTR. Comparisons were categorized into different KTR subgroups: standard, high risk of rejection, high risk of delayed graft function (DGF), living donor, and elderly KTR. Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven RCT and 99 observational studies were finally included. Compared to anti-interleukin-2-receptor antibodies (IL2RA), anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) reduced the risk of acute rejection at two years in standard KTR (RR 0.74, 95%CI 0.61-0.89) and high risk of rejection KTR (RR 0.55, 95%CI 0.43-0.72), but without decreasing the risk of graft loss. We did not find significant differences comparing ATG vs. alemtuzumab or different ATG dosages in any KTR group.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite many studies carried out on induction treatment in KTR, their heterogeneity and short follow-up preclude definitive conclusions to determine the optimal induction therapy. Compared with IL2RA, ATG reduced rejection in standard-risk, highly sensitized, and living donor graft recipients, but not in high DGF risk or elderly recipients. More studies are needed to demonstrate beneficial effects in other KTR subgroups and overall patient and graft survival.

Early Posttransplant Blood Transfusion and Risk for Worse Graft Outcomes

Introduction

Blood transfusion is a risk factor for allosensitization. Nevertheless, blood transfusion posttransplant remains a common practice. We evaluated the effect of posttransplant blood transfusion on graft outcomes.

Methods

We included nonsensitized, first-time, kidney-alone recipients transplanted between 1 July 2015 and 31 December 2017. Patients were grouped based on receiving blood transfusion in the first 30 days posttransplant. The primary end point was a composite outcome of biopsy-proven acute rejection, death of any cause, or graft failure in the first year posttransplant. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the primary outcome and the cumulative incidence of de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSAs).

Results

Two hundred seventy-three patients were included. One hundred twenty-seven (47%) received blood transfusion. Patients in the transfusion group were more likely to be older, have had a deceased donor, and have received induction with basiliximab. There was no difference between groups in the composite primary outcome (adjusted hazard ratio = [HR] 1.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83–2.17; P = 0.23). The cumulative incidence of de novo DSAs during the first year posttransplant was similar between groups (12.8% transfusion vs. 10.9% no transfusion, P = 0.48).

Conclusion

Early transfusion of blood products in kidney transplant recipients receiving induction with lymphocyte depletion was not associated with an increased hazard of experiencing acute rejection, death from any cause, or graft loss.

Low-dose alemtuzumab induction in a tailored immunosuppression protocol for sensitized kidney transplant recipients

Background

Induction therapy is crucial in kidney transplantation and constitutes an important cornerstone for long-term allograft survival. Alemtuzumab is a depleting CD52-specific antibody with T- and B-cell activity, leading to prolonged lymphocyte depletion for up to 12 months, with profound immunosuppression and an associated risk of serious infections. Current concepts aim to optimize dosing strategies to reduce side effects. Here we present data from an ongoing centre protocol consisting of low-dose alemtuzumab induction and tailored immunosuppression in sensitized patients undergoing kidney transplantation.

Methods

10-year results of the protocol were analysed. Low-dose alemtuzumab induction consisted of a single dose of 20 mg intraoperatively, followed by tacrolimus and corticosteroids for initial immunosuppression, with mycophenolate mofetil suspended until a total lymphocyte count (TLC) >5% or 200/μl was reached.

Results

Between 01/2007 and 04/2017, 46 patients were treated in accordance with the protocol in 48 kidney transplantations. Median PRA_max was 43 [22-76; IQR] %; all patients had negative CDC-crossmatch prior to transplantation. Low-dose alemtuzumab was well tolerated. Median time to TLC recovery was 77 [62-127; IQR] d. Within a median follow-up of 3.3 [1.5-5.6; IQR] years, 12 (25%) patients developed BPAR, 10 of which were antibody-mediated (3 acute, 7 chronic ABMR). Death-censored 5-year allograft survival was 79.2%, with an excellent allograft function at the end of follow-up. There was no increased rate of infections, in particular viral infections.

Conclusions

Our protocol, comprising low-dose alemtuzumab induction, initial suspension of mycophenolate mofetil and triple maintenance immunosuppression, provides excellent patient and allograft outcome in sensitized renal allograft recipients.

Utility of Serial Protocol Biopsies Performed After 1 Year in Predicting Long-Term Kidney Allograft Function According to Histologic Phenotype

OBJECTIVES

Prognostic implications of early protocol biopsies have been studied; however, the value of late protocol biopsy in predicting graft outcome has not been well defined. Here, we compared the effects of early and late protocol biopsy histologic findings in stable kidney allografts and aimed to understand the significance of "borderline" rejection on allograft function.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied 261 biopsies from 159 renal transplant recipients who were on a steroid-free, calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate mofetil regimen and who received transplants between 2004 and 2012 with mean follow-up of 5 years. Early (between 3 and 9 mo) and subsequent late (between 12 and 24 mo) protocol biopsies were performed. Biopsies were classified as normal, interstitial fibrosis and/or tubular atrophy, subclinical acute rejection with interstitial fibrosis and/or tubular atrophy, and borderline rejection with interstitial fibrosis and/or tubular atrophy. A linear mixed-effects model was used to determine the effects of early and late protocol biopsies on estimated glomerular filtration rate changes, with baseline time for estimated glomerular filtration rate fixed at 12 months.

RESULTS

The adjusted model showed that estimated glomerular filtration rate at 3 months, donor age, delayed graft function, and early protocol biopsies were associated with baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate at 12 months. Estimated glomerular filtration rate changes over time were associated with findings of interstitial fibrosis and/or tubular atrophy at early biopsy and subclinical acute rejection and borderline rejection at late biopsy. At last follow-up, final estimated glomerular filtration rate was significantly associated with interstitial fibrosis and/or tubular atrophy at early biopsy and with subclinical acute rejection at late biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

Although early protocol biopsy predicted baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate, late biopsy was important for predicting changes in function over time. In addition, a diagnosis of "borderline" rejection on protocol biopsies predicted long-term graft function.

Alemtuzumab (Campath-1H) experience in kidney transplantation what we have learned; current practices; and scope for the future?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Alemtuzumab (Campath) usage as a preconditioning agent in kidney transplantation has gained considerable interest in the recent future. Alemtuzumab is currently available only by special request from Sanofi through its Campath distribution program. It is restricted to transplant programs with prior and continued experience with the agent. There may be a resurgence of interest for the utilization of this agent because of its ease of administration, and less cost and comparable or improved outcome in comparison to other induction agents.

RECENT FINDINGS

Alemtuzumab when combined with standard calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate mofetil is well tolerated and efficacious as an induction therapy and allows for long-term steroid avoidance in high-risk renal transplant recipients.

SUMMARY

The transplant community has advanced through a learning curve with the use of alemtuzumab over time; starting from an agent that was tried out to induce proper tolerance, minimization of nephrotoxic calcineurin inhibitors, and currently as a comparable depletional therapy that can reduce acute rejection in high-risk kidney transplant recipients.

Comparison of alemtuzumab vs. antithymocyte globulin induction therapy in primary non-sensitized renal transplant patients treated with rapid steroid withdrawal

Alemtuzumab and rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) are commonly used for induction therapy in renal transplantation. This retrospective, single-center, cohort study evaluated cumulative incidence of one-yr biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) among 200 consecutive primary non-sensitized kidney transplant recipients who received either alemtuzumab (n = 100) or rATG (n = 100) induction followed by rapid steroid taper, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil. Protocol biopsies, plasma and urine BK virus PCR, serum creatinine and iothalamate glomerular filtration rate (iGFR), were obtained at 1, 4, and 12 months from transplantation. The one-yr BPAR rates were similar between the alemtuzumab and rATG groups; however, rejection Banff IA and higher was more common in the alemtuzumab arm (18% vs. 5%, p = 0.047). After adjusting for confounding variables, alemtuzumab was still associated with Banff IA and higher rejection (adjusted OR: 3.7, CI: 1.2-10.5, p = 0.02). Despite similar rates of BK viremia, more patients in the alemtuzumab arm developed BK nephropathy (16% vs. 3%, p = 0.046). One-year iGFR (53.4 ± 20.2 vs. 71.9 ± 27.2 mL/min/1.73 m(2), p = 0.002) and three-yr graft survival (89.5% vs. 95%, p = 0.05) were lower in the alemtuzumab group. In low immunological risk kidney transplant recipients on steroid-free immunosuppression, alemtuzumab was associated with more severe rejection and BK nephropathy compared to rATG.