Clinical Courses of Renal Transplant Recipients with High BK Viremia

Effect of steroid pulses in severe BK virus allograft nephropathy with extensive interstitial inflammation

INTRODUCTION

As there is no specific antiviral treatment currently available for BK polyomavirus associated nephropathy (BKVAN), its management relies on immunosuppression reduction in kidney transplant patients. Data on efficacy of steroid pulses in this indication are lacking.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective monocenter study on 64 patients diagnosed with biopsy-proven BKVAN. Patients within the "pulse group" (n = 37) received IV methylprednisolone 10 mg/kg 3 days consecutively. In the "low dose" steroid group (n = 27), patients were continued oral prednisone 5 mg daily.

RESULTS

Mean follow up was 78 months in the steroid pulse group and 56 months in the low dose group (p = 0.15). Mean eGFR values at diagnosis were comparable, as well as other demographic characteristics. Mean BK plasma viral load was higher in "pulse" than in "low dose" steroid group. Pulse group had higher inflammation and tubulitis (p < 0.05). Graft loss reached 57% in the "pulse" group versus 41% in the "low dose" group, p = 0.20. Rejection events were similar. No major adverse event was statistically associated with steroid pulse, including infections, cancer, and de novo diabetes.

CONCLUSION

No significant differences were found in the evolution of both groups of patients, despite patients receiving "pulse" steroids were identified as the most severe sharing higher BK viral load and more frequent active lesions on histology.

Usefulness of BK virus-specific interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunospot assay for predicting the outcome of BK virus infection in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To investigate if BK virus (BKV)-specific T cell immunity measured by an interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay can predict the outcome of BK virus infection in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs).

METHODS

We included 68 KTRs with different viremia status (no viremia [n = 17], BK viremia [n = 27], and cleared viremia [n = 24]) and 44 healthy controls (HCs). The BK viremia group was divided into controller (< 3 months) and noncontroller (> 3 months) according to sustained duration of BKV infection. We compared BKV-ELISPOT results against five BKV peptides (large tumor antigen [LT], St, VP1-3).

RESULTS

BKV-ELISPOT results were higher in three KTRs groups with different BKV infection status than the HCs group (p < 0.05). In KTR groups, they were higher in cleared viremia group than no viremia or BK viremia group. Within the BK viremia group, controller group had higher LT-ELISPOT results compared to noncontroller group (p = 0.032). Also, KTRs without BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVN) had higher LT, St, VP1, and VP2-ELISPOT results than those with BKVN (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

BKV-ELISPOT assay may be effective in predicting clinical outcomes of BKV infection in terms of clearance of BK virus and development of BKVN.

Quantitative nucleic acid amplification methods and their implications in clinical virology

Recently, a number of techniques have been approved for quantification of viral nucleic acids in clinical samples. Viral load (VL) tests have considerable importance in the management of patients and are widely used in routine diagnosis. In clinical virology, VL testing are important to monitor the antiviral treatment, to initiate preemptive therapy, to understand pathogenesis, and to evaluate the infectivity. These tests have now become a part of many diagnostic and treatment guidelines. Considering the various challenges for in-house viral testing related to the standardization, validation, and precision; they are gradually being replaced by the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) cleared tests. This review summarizes the various viral quantification methods and also discusses the clinical applicability of these in human immunodeficiency virus, Hepatitis B virus, Hepatitis C virus, Cytomegalovirus, and Epstein Barr virus infected patients. Further the challenges and future perspectives of VL testing have also been discussed.

High-dose steroid therapy in BK viremia adversely affected the long-term graft function after kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Although high-dose steroid therapy has been attempted for the management of clinically suspected allograft rejection, before testing for BK viral activity or acute cellular rejection accompanied by BK polyomavirus nephropathy, its long-term outcome remains unknown. We investigated the impact of high-dose steroids on BK viral activity and long-term graft outcomes in patients with BK viremia.

METHODS

The study population comprised 144 kidney transplant recipients with BK viremia. They were divided into 2 groups based on the amount of steroids administered: low-dose group (<2 g, n=123) or high-dose group (≥2 g, n=21).

RESULTS

The baseline serum BK viral loads were 5.4±1.1 log cp/mL in the low-dose group and 6.0±1.3 in the high-dose group (P=.054). These changed to 5.2±1.3 and 6.1±1.4, 1 month after steroid treatment (P=.03) and 4.9±1.3 and 5.9±1.4 at 2 months (P=.033), respectively. From 3 months to 1 year, the serum BK viral titers were not different between groups. Kaplan-Meier analyses demonstrated that the rates of the decline of graft function and graft failure were higher in the high-dose group (P=.02 and P=.04, respectively). High-dose steroids (P=.012, hazard ratio [HR] 5.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.42-17.85) and log serum BK viral load at 2 months after steroid treatment (P=.042, HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.02-2.28) were independent risk factors for the decline of graft function.

CONCLUSION

High-dose steroids induced BK viral activation and subsequently resulted in poor long-term graft function and early graft failure in patients with BK viremia.