Long-term Allograft Survival After Kidney Transplantation

Graft survival and delayed graft function with normothermic regional perfusion and rapid recovery after circulatory death in kidney transplantation: a propensity score matching study

BACKGROUND

A shortage of kidney grafts has led to the implementation of various strategies, including donations after circulatory death. The in situ normothermic regional perfusion technique has been introduced to improve graft quality by reducing warm ischemia times. However, there is limited evidence available on its mid- and long-term outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the incidence of delayed graft function, graft function, and survival at three years among three groups: brain death donors, rapid recovery, and normothermic regional perfusion.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a cohort of kidney transplantations was conducted at a single referral center between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019. Univariate and multivariate regression models and propensity score matching analysis were performed to compare recipient-related, transplantation procedure-related, donor-related, and kidney function variables.

RESULTS

A total of 327 patients were included, with 256 kidneys from brain death donors, 52 kidneys from rapid recovery, and 19 patients from normothermic regional perfusion. After propensity score matching, univariate and multivariate analyses showed a higher incidence of delayed graft function in the rapid recovery group compared to the others (OR: 2.39 CI95%: 1.19, 4.77) with a longer hospital stay (median 11, 15 and 10 days, respectively). However, no differences in 1- and 3-year graft function and survival were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Normothermic regional perfusion offers advantages over rapid recovery, with a reduced incidence of delayed graft function and a shorter hospital stay. However, no differences in mid-term graft function and survival were found.

Kidney Survival Impact of Delayed Graft Function Depends on Kidney Donor Risk Index: A Single-Center Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a significant challenge in renal transplantation, particularly with deceased donors, necessitating early postoperative dialysis. The prolonged effects of medium- and long-term DGF remain uncertain, marked by contradictory graft survival outcomes. This incongruity might arise from the inherent graft resilience and regenerative capacity during transplantation. This study investigates DGF's impact on graft survival, focusing on grafts displaying favorable (KDRI < 1) and unfavorable outcomes (KDRI ≥ 1).

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study (January 2015-December 2019), we assessed kidney transplants at our center, excluding multiorgan simultaneous cases, primary non-functioning grafts, and surgical complications causing graft loss. Patients were categorized into DGF presence or absence groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses, alongside propensity score matching (PSM), were performed.

RESULTS

The study encompassed 322 deceased donor kidneys, with 83 encountering DGF. Grafts with higher KDRI indices (KDRI ≥ 1) and DGF exhibited a notably increased graft loss risk (HR: 4.17, 95% CI: 1.93-9.01). However, lower-KDRI donor grafts displayed no significant disparities between the DGF and non-DGF groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed graft function (DGF) development significantly contributes to graft loss in kidney transplants, particularly in grafts with KDRI ≥ 1.

Orthotopic Kidney Transplant as a Fifth Intra-Abdominal Organ after Two Previous Kidney and Two Previous Pancreas Transplants

Background

Patients with more than two prior kidney transplant procedures pose unique surgical challenges. Once both the right and left retroperitoneal spaces have been dissected, intra-abdominal implantation is usually necessary. If the external iliac arteries have been used previously, it is sometimes necessary to use the aorta and vena cava for implantation. Gaining safe exposure in these cases can be complicated by history of prior laparotomy, adhesive disease, and other surgical histories. Case Presentation. A 58-year-old female with type 1 diabetes and end-stage renal disease presented for surgical evaluation for kidney transplant. Surgical history was notable for prior simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant followed by both a living donor kidney transplant and a pancreas after kidney transplant. She had undergone both an allograft nephrectomy and an allograft pancreatectomy and currently had a nonfunctioning kidney in the left retroperitoneal position and a nonfunctioning pancreatic allograft on the right common iliac artery. The entire distal aortoiliac system was surgically inaccessible. She was listed for transplantation, and a cadaveric graft was allocated. Intraoperatively, severe lower abdominal and pelvic adhesions prevented any use of the iliac system. A left native nephrectomy was performed, and the allograft was implanted in the left orthotopic position. The native left renal vein was used for outflow, the donor renal artery was joined end-to-side to the infrarenal aorta, and a uretero-ureterostomy was created. The operation was uneventful. The allograft functioned without delay, and almost one year later, the GFR is approximately 50 mg/dL.

Conclusion

The left orthotopic position can be a good choice for kidney transplant candidates with histories of prior complex lower abdominal surgery.

A Single-Center Experience With Third and Fourth Kidney Transplants and Second Kidney Transplant After Pancreas-Kidney Transplant: Surgical Aspects and Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

Overall, 25% to 33% of patients on kidney transplant wait lists present with prior graft loss. In addition, the number of patients who require a retransplant seems to be increasing. Here, we describe our experience with patients who had a second kidney transplant after a previous pancreas-kidney transplant or a third or fourth kidney transplant. We focused specifically on the technical aspects and outcomes related to this patient group.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-center retrospective study was performed. The cohortincluded 15 patients > 18 years old who had received a second kidney graft after pancreas-kidney transplant or a second or greater kidney graft between 2013 and 2019.

RESULTS

Median age of recipients was 45 years (range, 20-58 y). In 10 patients, the transperitoneal approach was selected. In 5 patients, the retroperitoneal heterotopic kidney retransplant technique was used. Early surgical complications (≤ 30 days posttransplant) were reported in 4 patients. Three patients had late ureteral stenosis (> 90 days posttransplant). All grafts were functioning at time of patient discharge. Mean creatinine level was 2.69 mg/dL (range, 1.23-6.26 mg/dL). The 1-year and 2-year graft survivalrates were 85% and 75%, respectively. No grafts were lost because of surgical complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Retransplant of a second graft after pancreas-kidney transplant or retransplant of a third or fourth renal graft is challenging but feasible, with evidence of reasonably positive outcomes after retransplant.

What is the impact of human leukocyte antigen mismatching on graft survival and mortality in renal transplantation? A meta-analysis of 23 cohort studies involving 486,608 recipients

Background

The magnitude effects of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatching on post-transplant outcomes of kidney transplantation remain controversial. We aim to quantitatively assess the associations of HLA mismatching with graft survival and mortality in adult kidney transplantation.

Methods

We searched PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library from their inception to December, 2016. Priori clinical outcomes were overall graft failure, death-censored graft failure and all-cause mortality.

Results

A total of 23 cohort studies covering 486,608 recipients were selected. HLA per mismatch was significant associated with increased risks of overall graft failure (hazard ratio (HR), 1.06; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.05–1.07), death-censored graft failure (HR: 1.09; 95% CI 1.06–1.12) and all-cause mortality (HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.02–1.07). Besides, HLA-DR mismatches were significant associated with worse overall graft survival (HR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.05–1.21). For HLA-A locus, the association was insignificant (HR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.98–1.14). We observed no significant association between HLA-B locus and overall graft failure (HR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.90–1.15). In subgroup analyses, we found recipient sample size and ethnicity maybe the potential sources of heterogeneity.

Conclusions

HLA mismatching was still a critical prognostic factor that affects graft and recipient survival. HLA-DR mismatching has a substantial impact on recipient’s graft survival. HLA-A mismatching has minor but insignificant impact on graft survival outcomes.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12882-018-0908-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Renal Allograft Outcome After Simultaneous Heart and Kidney Transplantation

Chronic kidney disease frequently accompanies end-stage heart failure and may result in consideration of simultaneous heart and kidney transplantation (SHKT). In recent years, there has been a significant increase in SHKT. This single-center cohort consisted of 35 patients who underwent SHKT during 1996 to 2015. The aim of this study was to review factors that may predict better long-term outcome after SKHT. Thirteen patients (37%) had delayed graft function (DGF) after transplant (defined as the need for dialysis during the first 7 days after transplant), which was significantly associated with mechanical circulatory support device therapy and high right ventricular systolic pressure before transplant. Most of the recipients had glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ≥50 ml/min/1.73 m² at 1 and 3 years after transplant (21 of 26 [81%] and 20 of 21 [95%], respectively). Higher donor age was associated with reduced 1-year GFR (p = 0.017), and higher recipient pretransplant body mass index was associated with reduced 3-year GFR (p = 0.008). There was a significant association between DGF and reduced median GFR at 1 and 3 years after transplant (p <0.005). Patient survival rates at 6 months, 1, and 3 years after transplant were 97%, 91%, and 86% respectively. In conclusions, our data support good outcomes after SHKT. Mechanical circulatory support device therapy and pulmonary hypertension before transplant are associated with DGF, which is a risk factor for poor long-term renal allograft function.

Urine--a waste or the future of regenerative medicine?

In recent years, urine has emerged as a source of urine cells. Two different types of cells can be isolated from urine: urine derived stem cells (USCs) and renal tubular cells called urine cells (UCs). USCs have great differentiation properties and can be potentially used in genitourinary tract regeneration. Within this paper, we attempt to demonstrate that such as easily accessible source of cells, collected during completely non-invasive procedures, can be better utilized. Cells derived from urine can be isolated, stored, and used for the creation of urine stem cell banks. In the future, urine holds great potential to become a main source of cells for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Impact of graft infection on long-term survival after kidney transplant

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing transplantation procedures are at a high risk of developing infections because of the need for immunosuppression. Infections presenting directly after renal transplantation greatly influence the overall success of the procedure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of postoperative infection on the length of survival after renal transplant.

METHODS

In 2009 a multicenter prospective trial evaluating the factors that influence the occurrence of postoperative infective complications was published by the authors. That study reported that 25 out of 232 recipients of a renal transplant were diagnosed with an infection. The present study shows the effect of postoperative infection on the length of survival after renal transplantation during a 15-year observation period. Statistical methods involved monofactorial and multifactorial Kaplan-Meier analysis for the length of survival and the Cox proportional hazards model for mortality prediction. A P value of <.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

RESULTS

The analysis demonstrated that the lifespan of renal transplant recipients was decreased in those with postoperative infection, at both year 10 of the observation period (P = .013) and 15 years after transplantation (P = .012). Moreover, it was ascertained that an infection in the postoperative period was an independent risk factor increasing the mortality after renal transplantation: P = .026; hazard ratio 2.90 (95% confidence interval, 1.13-7.41).

CONCLUSIONS

The occurrence of an infection in the postoperative period significantly decreases the lifespan of a renal transplantation recipient.