Analysis of Histologic Changes During Early Rejection After Renal Transplantation by Performing Protocol Biopsy at 1 Year After Kidney Transplantation

Effects of Treating Subclinical Rejection 2 Weeks After Kidney Transplantation, as Determined by Analyzing 1-Year Histologic Outcomes

Subclinical rejection (SCR) is associated with chronic allograft nephropathy. Therefore, early detection and treatment of SCR through a protocol biopsy (PB) can reduce the incidence of pathologic changes. This study evaluates the impact of early detection and treatment of SCR using a routine PB 2 weeks after kidney transplantation (KT) by examining histologic outcomes 1 year later. We reviewed 624 KT recipients at the Samsung Medical Center between August 2012 and December 2018. Protocol biopsy was planned 2 weeks and 1 year after transplantation. We compared the histologic changes between the 2 biopsies. After a propensity score matching analysis, we divided the patients into 2 groups: the proven normal group (n = 256) and the rejection group (n = 96) at the PB taken 2 weeks post-transplant. The rejection group showed no significant difference from the normal group in the flow of graft function or the Kaplan-Meier curve for graft survival. In the histologic outcomes, the pathologic differences between the groups significantly improved between the 2 time points. Treating SCR through a PB 2 weeks after KT can contribute to the maintenance of graft function and improve histologic changes 1 year after KT.

The Protective Role of Protocol Biopsy for Allograft Kidney Maintenance in Kidney Transplantation

Many studies have reported that protocol biopsy (PB) may help preserve kidney function in kidney transplant recipients. Early detection and treatment of subclinical rejection may reduce the incidence of chronic antibody-mediated rejection and graft failure. However, no consensus has been reached regarding PB effectiveness, timing, and policy. This study aimed to evaluate the protective role of routine PB performed 2 weeks and 1 year after kidney transplantation. We reviewed 854 kidney transplant recipients at the Samsung Medical Center between July 2007 and August 2017, with PBs planned at 2 weeks and 1 year after transplantation. We compared the trends in graft function, chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression, new-onset CKD, infection, and patient and graft survival between the 504 patients who underwent PB and 350 who did not undergo PB. The PB group was again divided into 2 groups: the single PB group (n = 207) and the double PB group (n = 297). The PB group was significantly different from the no-PB group in terms of the trends in graft function (estimated glomerular filtration rate). The Kaplan-Meier curve showed that PB did not significantly improve graft or overall patient survival. However, in the multivariate Cox analysis, the double PB group had advantages in graft survival, CKD progression, and new-onset CKD. PB can play a protective role in the maintenance of kidney grafts in kidney transplant recipients.

Early Steroid Withdrawal in Recipients of a Kidney Transplant From a Living Donor: Experience of a Single Mexican Center

BACKGROUND

Early steroid withdrawal (ESW) can improve lipid and hemodynamic profiles without severe acute rejection (AR) events in renal transplant patients. Our objective was to evaluate the effects of ESW on the frequency and severity of AR.

METHODS

A randomized, open-label, controlled clinical trial was performed on renal transplant recipients with a follow-up of 12 months. In the ESW group, patients were selected for corticosteroid treatment withdrawal on the fifth day post transplantation. In the Control group, patients continued with steroid treatment. All patients were over 18 years of age with panel reactive antibody (PRA) class I and II HLA <20%.

RESULTS

In total, 71 patients, 37 in the ESW group (52.1%) and 34 in the Control group (47.9%), had comparable AR incidences at the end of the follow-up (16% vs 15%) (NS) (RR = 1.20, 95% CI = 0.32-3.33). Although renal graft survival was similar between the ESW and Control groups (87% vs 94%), renal function was superior in the ESW group (85 vs 75 mL/min). Additionally, hypertension was less frequent in the ESW group (3% vs 35%), requiring the use of fewer antihypertensives (8% vs 50%).

CONCLUSIONS

ESW was also associated with better blood pressure control and similar AR risk. The ESW group exhibited stable renal function.