1
|
Hinojosa-González DE, Baca-Arzaga A, Salgado-Garza G, Roblesgil-Medrano A, Herrera-Carrillo FE, Carrillo-Martínez MÁ, Rodríguez-Montalvo C, Bosques-Padilla F, Flores-Villalba E. Operative safety of orthotopic liver transplant in patients with prior transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts: A 20-year experience. REVISTA DE GASTROENTEROLOGIA DE MEXICO (ENGLISH) 2024; 89:4-10. [PMID: 35902343 DOI: 10.1016/j.rgmxen.2022.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND AIMS Orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) is the definitive treatment of most types of liver failure. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and portocaval shunt placement procedures reduce the systemic vascular complications of portal hypertension. TIPS placement remains a "bridge" therapy that enables treatment of refractory symptoms until transplantation becomes available. The aim of the present study was to describe the operative impact of TIPS prior to OLT. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective review was conducted on patients that underwent liver transplant at the Hospital San José within the timeframe of 1999 and February 2020. RESULTS We reviewed a total of 92 patients with OLT. Sixty-six patients were male and 26 were female, with a mean age of 52 years. Nine (9.8%) of the 92 patients had a TIPS, before the OLT. Preoperative Child-Pugh class, MELD score, and sodium and platelet levels were similar between groups. We found no difference in the means of intensive care unit stay, operative time, or blood transfusions for liver transplant, with or without previous TIPS. There was no significant difference between groups regarding vascular and biliary complication rates or the need for early intervention. The overall one-year mortality rate in the TIPS group was 11%. CONCLUSIONS TIPS is an appropriate therapeutic bridge towards liver transplant. We found no greater operative or postoperative complications in patients with TIPS before OLT, when compared with OLT patients without TIPS. The need for transfusion, operative time, and ICU stay were similar in both groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D E Hinojosa-González
- Tecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
| | - A Baca-Arzaga
- Tecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
| | - G Salgado-Garza
- Tecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
| | - A Roblesgil-Medrano
- Tecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
| | - F E Herrera-Carrillo
- Tecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
| | - M Á Carrillo-Martínez
- Tecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
| | - C Rodríguez-Montalvo
- Tecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
| | - F Bosques-Padilla
- Tecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
| | - E Flores-Villalba
- Tecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico; Tecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ayoub CH, Dakroub A, El-Asmar JM, Ali AH, Beaini H, Abdulfattah S, El Hajj A. Preoperative MELD score predicts mortality and adverse outcomes following radical cystectomy: analysis of American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ther Adv Urol 2022; 14:17562872221135944. [PMID: 36407007 PMCID: PMC9669693 DOI: 10.1177/17562872221135944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 08/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) has been widely used to predict the mortality and morbidity of various surgical procedures. OBJECTIVES We aimed to correlate a high preoperative MELD score with adverse 30-day postoperative complications following radical cystectomy. DESIGN AND METHODS Patients who underwent elective, non-emergency radical cystectomy were identified from the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database from 2005 to 2017. Patients were categorized according to a calculated MELD score. The primary outcomes of this study were 30-day postoperative mortality, morbidity, and length of hospital stay following radical cystectomy. For further sensitivity analysis, propensity score matching was used to yield a total of 1387 matched pairs and primary outcomes were also assessed in the matched cohort. RESULTS Compared with patients with a MELD < 10, those with MELD ⩾ 10 had significantly higher rates of mortality [odds ratio (OR) = 1.71, p = 0.004], major complications (OR = 1.42, p < 0.001), and prolonged hospital stay (OR = 1.29, p < 0.001) on multivariate analysis. Following risk-adjustment for race, propensity-matched groups revealed that patients with MELD score ⩾ 10 were significantly associated with higher mortality (OR = 1.85, p = 0.008), major complications (OR = 1.34, p < 0.001), yet similar length of hospital stay (OR = 1.17, p = 0.072). CONCLUSION MELD score ⩾ 10 is associated with higher mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing radical cystectomy compared with lower MELD scores. Risk-stratification using MELD score may assist clinicians in identifying high-risk patients to provide adequate preoperative counseling, optimize perioperative conditions, and even consider nonsurgical alternatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Habib Ayoub
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery,
American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Ali Dakroub
- American University of Beirut Medical School,
American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Jose M. El-Asmar
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery,
American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Adel Hajj Ali
- Cleveland Clinic, Heart, Vascular &
Thoracic Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Hadi Beaini
- American University of Beirut Medical School,
American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Suhaib Abdulfattah
- American University of Beirut Medical School,
American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Albert El Hajj
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery,
American University of Beirut Medical Center, PO BOX: 11-0236, Riad El Solh,
Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ballester MP, Lluch P, Gómez C, Capilla M, Tosca J, Martí-Aguado D, Guijarro J, Mínguez M. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt reduces hospital care burden in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Intern Emerg Med 2021; 16:1519-1527. [PMID: 33400160 DOI: 10.1007/s11739-020-02602-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Patients with decompensated cirrhosis frequently require hospital admissions, which are associated with worse prognosis. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of TIPS on the need for hospital care. Secondary objectives were to assess the clinical and biological impact of TIPS and to identify predictors of post-TIPS hospital care. METHODS An observational, retrospective study of patients with decompensated cirrhosis treated with TIPS from January 2008 until March 2019. Exclusion criteria were TIPS placed for non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (PH) and patients referred from another hospital without prior or subsequent follow-up at our Unit. Hospital care, PH-related complications, and laboratory data were compared before and after TIPS. RESULTS The final cohort comprised 104 patients (72% male) with a mean age of 60 (± 10) years. Follow-up from first decompensation until TIPS and that from procedure to study completion were 7 (4.2-9.8) and 20 (4.6-35.4) months, respectively. TIPS was indicated mainly for refractory ascites (50%) and variceal bleeding (39%). Hemodynamic and clinical success rates were 97% and 92%, respectively. The number of emergency department visits and hospital admissions decreased after the procedure (p < 0.001). Improvement was seen in MELD and Child-Pugh scores, renal function, hyponatremia, and anemia after TIPS. Variceal bleeding as the indication for TIPS (OR 0.047; 95 CI 0.006-0,39; p < 0.05) together with early creation of the shunt (stage 3 vs 5; p < 0.05) were associated with a reduction in risk of post-TIPS hospital care. CONCLUSION TIPS is a safe and effective procedure that reduces hospital care burden by improving PH-related complications, hepatic, renal function, hyponatremia, and anemia. Variceal bleeding as the indication and early placement of the device were associated with a reduction in post-TIPS hospital care. These findings support a role for this treatment, predominantly in the early stages of cirrhosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Pilar Ballester
- Digestive Disease Department, Clinic University Hospital of Valencia, Blasco Ibañez 17, 46010, Valencia, Spain.
- Neurological Impairment Research Unit, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute of Clinic University Hospital of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
| | - Paloma Lluch
- Digestive Disease Department, Clinic University Hospital of Valencia, Blasco Ibañez 17, 46010, Valencia, Spain
- Department of Medicine. Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Concepción Gómez
- Digestive Disease Department, Clinic University Hospital of Valencia, Blasco Ibañez 17, 46010, Valencia, Spain
| | - Maria Capilla
- Digestive Disease Department, Clinic University Hospital of Valencia, Blasco Ibañez 17, 46010, Valencia, Spain
| | - Joan Tosca
- Digestive Disease Department, Clinic University Hospital of Valencia, Blasco Ibañez 17, 46010, Valencia, Spain
| | - David Martí-Aguado
- Digestive Disease Department, Clinic University Hospital of Valencia, Blasco Ibañez 17, 46010, Valencia, Spain
- Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain
| | - Jorge Guijarro
- Interventional Radiology Department, Clinic University Hospital of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Miguel Mínguez
- Digestive Disease Department, Clinic University Hospital of Valencia, Blasco Ibañez 17, 46010, Valencia, Spain
- Department of Medicine. Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Does Preoperative MELD Score Predict Adverse Outcomes Following Pancreatic Resection: an ACS NSQIP Analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2020; 24:2259-2268. [PMID: 31468333 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04380-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2019] [Accepted: 08/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Higher MELD scores correlate with adverse operative outcomes regardless of the presence of liver disease, but their impact on pancreatectomy outcomes remains undefined. We aimed to compare 30-day adverse postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing elective pancreatectomy stratified by MELD score. METHODS Elective pancreatoduodenectomies (PDs) and distal pancreatectomies (DPs) were identified from the 2014-2016 ACS NSQIP Procedure Targeted Pancreatectomy Participant Use Data Files. Outcomes examined included mortality, cardiopulmonary complications, prolonged postoperative length-of-stay, discharge not-to-home, transfusion, POPF, CR-POPF, any complication, and serious complication. Outcomes were compared between MELD score strata (< 11 vs. ≥ 11) as established by the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS). Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to examine the risk-adjusted impact of MELD score on outcomes. RESULTS A total of 7580 PDs and 3295 DPs had evaluable MELD scores. Of these, 1701 PDs and 223 DPs had a MELD score ≥ 11. PDs with MELD ≥ 11 exhibited higher risk for mortality (OR = 2.07, p < 0.001), discharge not-to-home (OR = 1.26, p = 0.005), and transfusion (OR = 1.7, p < 0.001). DP patients with MELD ≥ 11 demonstrated prolonged LOS (OR = 1.75, p < 0.001), discharge not-to-home (OR = 1.83, p = 0.01), and transfusion (OR = 2.78, p < 0.001). In PD, MELD ≥ 11 was independently predictive of 30-day mortality (OR = 1.69, p = 0.007) and transfusion (OR = 1.55, p < 0.001). In DP, MELD ≥ 11 was independently predictive of prolonged LOS (OR = 1.42, p = 0.026) and transfusion (OR = 2.3, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION A MELD score ≥ 11 is associated with a near twofold increase in the odds of mortality following pancreatoduodenectomy. The MELD score is an objective assessment that aids in risk-stratifying patients undergoing pancreatectomy.
Collapse
|
5
|
Unger LW, Berlakovich GA, Trauner M, Reiberger T. Management of portal hypertension before and after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2018; 24:112-121. [PMID: 28752925 DOI: 10.1002/lt.24830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2017] [Revised: 07/23/2017] [Accepted: 07/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) represents a curative treatment option for end-stage liver disease (ESLD). Although epidemiology of ESLD has recently changed due to the rising prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and the decreased burden of hepatitis C virus infections due to highly effective antiviral regimens, the management of portal hypertension (PHT) remains a clinical challenge in the pre- and post-OLT setting. The measurement of the hepatic venous pressure gradient represents the most reliable but invasive tool for assessment of the severity of PHT. Although novel liver ultrasound and magnetic resonance-based elastography methods have been developed, their value to screen for liver fibrosis and PHT in transplanted patients remains to be established. Nonselective beta-blockers represent the cornerstone of medical treatment of PHT, but more studies on their effects on clinical endpoints after OLT are needed. Statins are widely used to treat hyperlipidemia, which is a common condition after OLT. Although a growing body of evidence suggests that statins decrease portal pressure and PHT-related complications in ESLD, studies on potential benefits of statins after OLT are lacking. Finally, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) are effective in decreasing PHT and seem to decrease mortality on the OLT waiting list. Moreover, TIPS does not have an impact on liver function nor complicate the transplant surgical procedures. TIPS may also be used after OLT, but the evidence is limited. In conclusion, whereas the management of PHT in patients with ESLD is based on strong evidence, further data on the value of noninvasive monitoring tools as well as on medical and invasive treatment options in the post-OLT setting are needed to improve management strategies in patients with recurrent PHT after liver transplantation. Liver Transplantation 24 112-121 2018 AASLD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Michael Trauner
- Vienna Hepatic Hemodynamic Laboratory, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas Reiberger
- Vienna Hepatic Hemodynamic Laboratory, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fagiuoli S, Bruno R, Debernardi Venon W, Schepis F, Vizzutti F, Toniutto P, Senzolo M, Caraceni P, Salerno F, Angeli P, Cioni R, Vitale A, Grosso M, De Gasperi A, D'Amico G, Marzano A. Consensus conference on TIPS management: Techniques, indications, contraindications. Dig Liver Dis 2017; 49:121-137. [PMID: 27884494 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2016.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2016] [Revised: 09/27/2016] [Accepted: 10/17/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The trans jugular intrahepatic Porto systemic shunt (TIPS) is no longer viewed as a salvage therapy or a bridge to liver transplantation and is currently indicated for a number of conditions related to portal hypertension with positive results in survival. Moreover, the availability of self-expandable polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-covered endoprostheses has dramatically improved the long-term patency of TIPS. However, since the last updated International guidelines have been published (year 2009) new evidence have come, which have open the field to new indications and solved areas of uncertainty. On this basis, the Italian Association of the Study of the Liver (AISF), the Italian College of Interventional Radiology-Italian Society of Medical Radiology (ICIR-SIRM), and the Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Intensive Care (SIAARTI) promoted a Consensus Conference on TIPS. Under the auspices of the three scientific societies, the consensus process started with the review of the literature by a scientific board of experts and ended with a formal consensus meeting in Bergamo on June 4th and 5th, 2015. The final statements presented here were graded according to quality of evidence and strength of recommendations and were approved by an independent jury. By highlighting strengths and weaknesses of current indications to TIPS, the recommendations of AISF-ICIR-SIRM-SIAARTI may represent the starting point for further studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Fagiuoli
- Gastroenterologia Epatologia e Trapiantologia, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy.
| | - Raffaele Bruno
- Dept. of Infectious Diseases, Hepatology Outpatients Unit, University of Pavia-Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Wilma Debernardi Venon
- Gastroepatologia, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Molinette Hospital, Torino, Italy
| | - Filippo Schepis
- Department of Gastroenterology University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Francesco Vizzutti
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Toniutto
- Medical Liver Transplant Section, Department of Medical Sciences Experimental and Clinical, Internal Medicine, University of Udine, Italy
| | - Marco Senzolo
- Unità di Trapianto Multiviscerale, Gastroenterologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche e Gastroenterologiche, Università-Ospedale di Padova, Italy
| | - Paolo Caraceni
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco Salerno
- Department of Internal Medicine, Policlinico IRCCS San Donato, University of Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Angeli
- Internal Medicine and Hepatology Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padova, Italy
| | - Roberto Cioni
- Dipartimento di Radiologia Diagnostica e Interventistica, UO di Radiologia Interventistica, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Alessandro Vitale
- U.O.C. di Chirurgia Epatobiliare e del Trapianto Epatico, Azienda Ospedaliera Università di Padova, Italy
| | - Maurizio Grosso
- Department of Radiology S. Croce and Carle Hospital Cuneo, Italy
| | - Andrea De Gasperi
- 2° Servizio Anestesia e Rianimazione-Ospedale Niguarda Ca Granda, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Alfredo Marzano
- Gastroepatologia, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Molinette Hospital, Torino, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|