5 year Comparison of Very Low-dose Cyclosporine and High-dose Everolimus vs Standard Cyclosporine and Enteric-coated Mycophenolate in Renal Transplantation Patients

Effects of Immunosuppressive Drugs on Serum Fatty Acids of Phospholipids Fraction in Renal Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Immunosuppressive medications often cause posttransplant hyperlipidemia. The effects of cyclosporine (CsA) and tacrolimus (Tac) on lipid profile is well-known; however, there are very few studies related to the effect of these immunosuppressants on fatty acids (FA) of phosholipids fraction (PL) in renal transplant recipients (RTR). We sought to analyze the FA profile in PL fraction of RTR treated with Tac or CsA.

METHODS

The study included 65 renal transplant patients on CsA (n = 24, group I) or Tac (n = 41, group II), and 14 healthy controls. Individual serum FA concentrations were measured by gas chromatography. Chemstation software was used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

No differences between studied groups and controls were noted for monounsaturated FA, polyunsaturated n-3 FA (PUFA n-3), PUFA n-6, or the ratio of PUFA n-6 to PUFA n-3. The following mean values of FA were significantly higher in the CsA-RTR and Tac-RTR as compared with controls: total FA (P < .01 in both cases), saturated FA (SFA; P < .02 in both cases), C12 (P < .003 in both cases), C18 (P < .003 in both cases), and C18:2 (P < .01 for CsA RTR; P < .02 for Tac RTR). No differences between the measurements in patients on CsA and in patients on Tac were noticed. Significant correlation between SFA and eGFR was observed only in the CsA RTR group (P < .05). A negative relationship between PUFA n-6 and the estimated glomerular filtration rate was seen, but the correlation was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunosuppressive drugs may affect FA metabolism, but the FA profile does not depend on the type of immunosuppressive drug administered.

Variances in the Use of Everolimus in Kidney Transplantation: A 2-Year Registry of Everyday Practice

BACKGROUND

Everolimus (EVL)-based immunosuppressive strategies may permit the reduction of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) and their side effects, while offering a safe and efficient treatment. Our aim was to describe our experience with EVL in everyday practice and provide information for its optimal utilization.

METHODS

Prospective, multicenter study of 181 kidney transplant recipients treated with EVL as part of their immunosuppressive regimen, with a follow-up of 24 months. We studied demographic data, transplant characteristics, clinical information, drugs used, serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), rejection episodes, and adverse events.

RESULTS

In total, 181 renal transplant recipients were included. Of these, 30 (16.6%) received EVL de novo and 151 (83.4%) were converted; median time from transplantation to conversion was 10 (range, 1-312) months. Main reasons for conversion were prevention of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (23.9%), intolerance to immunosuppressants (11.1%), neoplasia (13.9%), nephrotoxicity (8.9%), and cytomegalovirus infections (8.3%). The eGFR values at baseline, months 12, and 24 were 46.4 ± 27.4 mL/min, 54.8 ± 22.9 mL/min, and 55.9 ± 26.5 ml/min, respectively. Two of 181 (1.1%) patients died, 5 of 181 (2.8%) lost their grafts, 12 of 181 (6.6%) had an episode of acute rejection, 13 of 181 (7.2%) had ≥1 serious event and infection, and 85 of 181 (49.9%) had ≥1 nonserious adverse event or infection. Multivariate analysis showed that increased eGFR at month 24 was associated with lower donor age, shorter time from transplant to EVL introduction, and a baseline eGFR ≥40 mL/min.

CONCLUSION

Through different strategies among centers, the inclusion of EVL improved renal function during the first 12 months.

Impact of different immunosuppressive regimens on the health-related quality of life following orthotopic liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

The influence of immunosuppression on the recipients' quality of life (QoL) is of major importance after OLT and has not yet been evaluated.

METHODS

The impact of different immunosuppression regimens after OLT was evaluated in 275 patients using the Short Form 36 (SF-36) survey. The following immunosuppressive strategies were compared: (a) CNI, (b) mTOR inhibitors, and (c) mTOR combined with CNI. All regimens were prescribed alone (mono) or in combination (+) with prednisolone and/or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF).

RESULTS

Highest scores were evident in patients in the mTOR+ group. There were significantly higher values for general health perceptions (GH, p = 0.049), vitality (VIT, p = 0.020), and physical component summary (PCS, p = 0.041) when compared to CNImono and for GH (p = 0.042) and VIT (p = 0.043), when compared to mTORmono. Early conversion to mTOR inhibitors (<two months after OLT) was associated with higher values for 7 of 10 scales, when compared to a late conversion (>two months after OLT), with a statistically significant improvement for the dimension role-emotional (RE, p = 0.027).

DISCUSSION

mTOR inhibitor-based regimens appear to have beneficial effects on QoL after OLT, especially after an early conversion.