Association Between Post-transplantation Immunoglobulin A Deposition and Reduced Allograft Function

Serological and histopathological assessment of galactose-deficient immunoglobulin A1 deposition in kidney allografts: A multicenter prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Recurrent immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy is an important risk factor for kidney allograft loss. However, there is no classification system for IgA deposition in kidney allografts based on serological and histopathological evaluation of galactose-deficient IgA1 (Gd-IgA1). This study aimed to establish a classification system for IgA deposition in kidney allografts based on serological and histological evaluation of Gd-IgA1.

METHODS

This multicenter prospective study included 106 adult kidney transplant recipients in whom an allograft biopsy was performed. Serum and urinary Gd-IgA1 levels were investigated in 46 transplant recipients who were IgA-positive and classified into four subgroups according to the presence or absence of mesangial Gd-IgA1 (KM55 antibody) deposits and C3.

RESULTS

Minor histological changes without an acute lesion were observed in recipients with IgA deposition. Fourteen (30%) of the 46 IgA-positive recipients were KM55-positive and 18 (39%) were C3-positive. The C3 positivity rate was higher in the KM55-positive group. Serum and urinary Gd-IgA1 levels were significantly higher in KM55-positive/C3-positive recipients than in the other three groups with IgA deposition. Disappearance of IgA deposits was confirmed in 10 of 15 IgA-positive recipients in whom a further allograft biopsy was performed. The serum Gd-IgA1 level at the time of enrollment was significantly higher in recipients in whom IgA deposition continued than in those in whom it disappeared (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The population with IgA deposition after kidney transplantation is serologically and pathologically heterogeneous. Serological and histological assessment of Gd-IgA1 is useful for identifying cases that should be carefully observed.

Correlation of Anti-HLA IgA Alloantibodies and Fc Receptor Motives with Kidney Allograft Survival

Immunoglobulin A (IgA) is the most abundant antibody isotype in humans and anti-HLA IgA was found in sera of transplant recipients. Focusing on patients awaiting kidney re-transplantation, we tested the impact of anti-HLA-class I/II IgA antibodies on graft survival. We analyzed 276 patients with and 238 without allograft failure. Eight motives of the Fcα receptor (FCAR) and Fcγ receptor were analyzed in patients with allograft failure. The distribution of anti-HLA IgA1/A2 and IgG antibodies differed significantly (p < 0.0001) between both patient groups, and IgA1 plus IgA2 antibodies were more abundant in patients with allograft failure. Allograft survival was significantly impaired if anti-HLA-class I plus II IgA was present, in the first 105 months (9 years) of follow-up (median of 43 vs. >105 months, p = 0.007). Patients with anti-HLA IgA and IgG vs. anti-HLA IgG only had a significantly shorter allograft survival within that follow-up period (88 vs. >105 months, p = 0.008). Moreover, allograft survival was shorter (p = 0.02) in carriers of GG vs. AA + AG genotypes of FCAR rs16986050. Thus, the presence of anti-HLA IgA plus IgG vs. IgG only was associated with shorter kidney allograft survival and FCAR motives may impact on graft survival.

Post-transplant immunoglobulin A deposition and nephropathy in allografts

Post-transplant immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy (IgAN) in the allograft is the major cause of allograft loss. Using a protocol biopsy, latent mesangial IgA deposition (IgAD) can be detected in the allograft. Latent IgAD is distinguished from IgAN by the absence of urinary abnormalities, although IgA is observed in the mesangium. However, the pathophysiology and most appropriate treatment strategy for latent mesangial IgAD in the allograft remain to be fully determined. Importantly, it is unknown whether all cases of post-transplant asymptomatic IgAD progress to symptomatic IgAN; indeed, IgA deposits disappear in some cases. The differences in allograft prognosis between asymptomatic IgAD and IgAN have also not been determined. Non-invasive methods of diagnosis of IgAD in the allograft using serological and pathological biomarkers are being developed. Possible serum biomarkers include serum galactose-deficient IgA1 (Gd-IgA1), Gd-IgA1-specific IgG and Gd-IgA1-specific IgA, and its immune complexes. Immunofluorescence analysis using Gd-IgA1 monoclonal antibody may provide a pathological biomarker. These serological and pathological biomarkers may be suitable for the characterization of the stage of IgAD. However, there is insufficient information regarding whether serological and pathological biomarkers can predict the progression of asymptomatic IgAD to symptomatic IgAN. We propose that the pathogenesis of IgAN can be defined through the clinical study of IgAD in the allograft using protocol biopsies conducted by nephrologists involved in clinical kidney transplantation.

Anti-HLA alloantibodies of the IgA isotype in re-transplant candidates part II: Correlation with graft survival

We reported previously on the widespread occurrence of anti-HLA alloantibodies of the IgA isotype (anti-HLA IgA) in the sera of solid-organ re-transplantation (re-tx) candidates (Arnold et al., ). Specifically focussing on kidney re-tx patients, we now extended our earlier findings by examining the impact of the presence and donor specificity of anti-HLA IgA on graft survival. We observed frequent concurrence of anti-HLA IgA and anti-HLA IgG in 27% of our multicenter collective of 694 kidney re-tx patients. This subgroup displayed significantly reduced graft survival as evidenced by the median time to first dialysis after transplantation (TTD 77 months) compared to patients carrying either anti-HLA IgG or IgA (TTD 102 and 94 months, respectively). In addition, donor specificity of anti-HLA IgA had a significant negative impact on graft survival (TTD 74 months) in our study. Taken together, our data strongly indicate that presence of anti-HLA IgA, in particular in conjunction with anti-HLA-IgG, in sera of kidney re-tx patients is associated with negative transplantation outcome.

Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy in a Living Kidney Donor Diagnosed and Treated After Transplantation: A Case Report

OBJECTIVE

We report the clinical course and pathologic findings of a kidney transplant donor who was diagnosed with immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy by means of preimplantation biopsy and was later treated with methylprednisolone and tonsillectomy.

CASE REPORT

The patient was a 57-year-old woman who met the criteria for kidney donation and was accepted as a donor. Donor nephrectomy was performed, and the preimplantation biopsy revealed that the donor had IgA nephropathy. One month after the nephrectomy, the donor's laboratory findings indicated proteinuria and hematuria. Because these findings indicated active IgA nephropathy, we decided to perform tonsillectomy and methylprednisolone pulse therapy. Soon after these treatments, the patient's proteinuria and hematuria were no longer observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Subclinical IgA nephropathy can be incidentally found on preimplantation biopsies of living kidney donors. As demonstrated in this case, IgA nephropathy can become exacerbated and requires therapeutic intervention after kidney donation. Informed consent and careful observation should be used before and after transplantation, even for donors who have been determined to be eligible for kidney donation.