Lung Allocation Score: A Single-Center Simulation

Outcomes of Lung Transplantation in Patients With Combined Pulmonary Fibrosis and Emphysema: A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) is a distinct clinical entity that can progress to end-stage lung disease. Patients with CPFE may develop pulmonary hypertension and face a predicted 1-year mortality of 60%. Lung transplantation is the only curative therapeutic option for CPFE. This report describes our experience after lung transplantation in patients with CPFE.

METHODS

This retrospective, single-center study describes short- and long-term outcomes for adult patients who underwent lung transplant for CPFE.

RESULTS

The study included 19 patients with explant pathology-proven diagnosis of CPFE. The patients were transplanted between July 2005 and December 2018. Sixteen recipients (84%) had pulmonary hypertension before transplant. Of the 19 patients, 7 (37%) had primary graft dysfunction at 72 hours post-transplant. 1-, 3-, and 5-year freedom from bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome was 100%, 91% (95% CI, 75%-100%), and 82% (95% CI, 62%-100%), respectively. One-, 3-, and 5-year survival was 94% (95% CI, 84%-100%), 82% (95% CI, 65%-100%), and 74% (95% CI, 54%-100%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our experience demonstrates the safety and feasibility of lung transplant for patients with CPFE. Significant morbidity and mortality without lung transplant coupled with favorable post-transplant outcomes merit prioritization of CPFE in the Lung Allocation Score algorithm for lung transplant candidacy.

Post-COVID-19 Lung Transplantation Italian Pivotal Protocol: Some Ethical Considerations

SARS‑CoV‑2 mostly affects the respiratory system with clinical patterns ranging from the common cold to fatal pneumonia. During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, owing to the high number of patients who were infected with SARS‑CoV‑2 and subsequently recovered, it has been shown that some patients with post-COVID-19 terminal respiratory failure need lung transplantation for survival. There is increasing evidence coming from worldwide observations that this procedure can be performed successfully in post-COVID-19 patients. However, owing to the scarcity of organs, there is a need to define the safety and efficacy of lung transplant for post-COVID-19 patients as compared to patients waiting for a lung transplant for other pre-existing conditions, in order to ensure that sound ethical criteria are applied in organ allocation. The Milan's Policlinic Lung Transplant Surgery Unit, with the revision of the National Second Opinion for Infectious Diseases and the contribution of the Italian Lung Transplant Centres and the Italian National Transplant Centre, set up a pivotal observational protocol for the lung transplant of patients infected and successively turned negative for SARS‑CoV‑2, albeit with lung consequences such as acute respiratory distress syndrome or some chronic interstitial lung disease. The protocol was revised and approved by the Italian National Institute of Health Ethics Committee. Description of the protocol and some ethical considerations are reported in this article.

The Surplus Transplant Lung Allocation System in Italy: An Evaluation of the Allocation Process via Stochastic Modeling

Background: Lung transplantation is a specialized procedure used to treat chronic end-stage respiratory diseases. Due to the scarcity of lung donors, constructing fair and equitable lung transplant allocation methods is an issue that has been addressed with different strategies worldwide. This work aims to describe how Italy’s “national protocol for the management of surplus organs in all transplant programs” functions through an online app to allocate lung transplants. We have developed two probability models to describe the allocation process among the various transplant centers. An online app was then created. The first model considers conditional probabilities based on a protocol flowchart to compute the probability for each area and transplant center to receive each n-th organ in the period considered. The second probability model is based on the generalization of the binomial distribution to correlated binary variables, which is based on Bahadur’s representation, to compute the cumulative probability for each transplant center to receive at least nth organs. Our results show that the impact of the allocation of a surplus organ depends mostly on the region where the organ was donated. The discrepancies shown by our model may be explained by a discrepancy between the northern and southern regions in relation to the number of organs donated.

Timing it right: the challenge of recipient selection for lung transplantation

Selection criteria for the referral and potential listing of patients for lung transplantation (LTx) have changed considerably over the last three decades but one key maxim prevails, the ultimate focus is to increase longevity and quality of life by careful utilization of a rare and precious resource, the donor organs. In this article, we review how the changes have developed and the outcomes of those changes, highlighting the impact of the lung allocation score (LAS) system. Major diseases, including interstitial lung disease (ILD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and pulmonary hypertension are considered in detail as well as the concept of retransplantation where appropriate. Results from bridging to LTx using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are discussed and other potential contraindications evaluated such as advanced age, frailty and resistant infections. Given the multiplicity of risk factors it is a credit to those working in the field that such excellent and improving results are obtained with an ongoing dedication to achieving best practice.

Transplant options for end stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the context of multidisciplinary treatments

Lung transplantation (LTx) in advanced stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients is associated with significant improvement in lung function and exercise capacity. However, demonstration that the procedure also provides a survival benefit has been more elusive compared to other respiratory conditions. Identification of patients with increased risk of mortality is crucial: a low forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) is perhaps the most common reason for referral to a lung transplant center, but in itself is insufficient to identify which COPD patients will benefit from LTx. Many variables have to be considered in the selection of candidates, time for listing, and choice of procedure: age, patient comorbidities, secondary pulmonary hypertension, the balance between individual and community benefit. This review will discuss patient selection, transplant listing, potential benefits and critical issues of bilateral (BLTx) and single lung (SLTx) procedure, donor-to-recipient organ size-matching; furthermore, it will describe LTx outcomes and its effects on recipient survival and quality of life.

Lung Transplant From Donor With Tracheal Bronchus: Case Report and Literature Review

Donor lung abnormalities are quite rare; one of them is the presence of bronchial anomalies, whose incidence range is from 0.1% to 0.5%. The upper right tracheal bronchus is one of the most frequent anatomic variations. We present a case of successful double lung transplant in a young female patient affected by cystic fibrosis from a donor with upper right tracheal bronchus, emerging 2 rings before the tracheal carina. During implantation of the left lung, we performed a double apical segmentectomy on back table; therefore, the right lung was implanted with the standard technique. Four cases of graft transplant characterized by the presence of tracheal bronchus are reported in the scientific literature; the authors report 4 different technical solutions to tackle the problem of anatomic anomaly. We report the first case of graft segmentectomy at back table suggesting a simple, safe, and time-sparing procedure. In conclusion, provided that the team has sufficient skill in reductive surgery at the back table and the anthropometric data are permissive, we stress the opportunity to downsize the graft in order to minimize anastomotic risks and save time.

Lung Allocation Score System: First Italian Experience

BACKGROUND

Lung transplantation is an established therapeutic option for patients with end-stage pulmonary disease. In May 2005, the lung allocation score (LAS) was introduced in the United States to maximize the benefit to the recipient population and reduce waiting list mortality. The LAS has been applied in a region of Italy since March 2016 on a provisional basis. The aims of the study were describing waiting list characteristics and short-term outcomes after lung transplantation before and after LAS introduction.

METHODS

All the patients who received transplants between January 1, 2011, and March 15, 2017, were included in our retrospective study. The study population was divided into 2 cohorts (historical cohort and post-LAS cohort) and a comparison among the main perioperative data was performed.

RESULTS

The historical cohort consisted of 415 patients on the waiting list with 91 deaths and 199 lung transplants; the post-LAS cohort consisted of 134 patients with 10 deaths on the waiting list and 51 transplants. Median waiting time and mortality on the list decreased from 223 to 106 days (P = .03) and from 11.2% to 7.5% (P > .05), respectively. The transplantation rate increased from 25% to 38% (P = .001) and the probability to receive a transplant in the first year in the post-LAS era increased significantly (P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the introduction of the LAS system in our region are encouraging and have not shown any adverse short-term effects. The regional coordination decided to prolong the experimental application of LAS in order to accumulate more data and to evaluate medium-term outcomes.