Clinical Outcomes and Results of Pathological Findings of 1-year Protocol Biopsy in Recipients of ABO-Incompatible Living Donor Kidney Transplantants

Success rate and safety of living donor kidney transplantation in ABO blood group incompatible relatives: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation is considered an ideal treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) because it provides a longer and better quality of life than dialysis. ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) kidney transplantation relies on two principles: (i) removal of antibodies from a blood group; and (ii) inhibition of reappearance of blood group antibodies by intensifying the induction and maintenance of immunosuppression. This systematic review aimed to analyze the success and safety of ABO-I live-donor kidney transplantation.

METHODS

Databases, including Google Scholar, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Medline were searched. Search duration was from the database establishment to December 2022. A thorough search was performed for relevant studies investigating the success and safety of ABO-I live-donor kidney transplantation. Two investigators independently extracted literature information and assessed the quality of the included studies. Heterogeneity test was performed using Cochrane's Q and chi-squared tests. All statistical analyses were performed using R software (version 4.2.1).

RESULTS

The search for relevant literature in the five electronic databases yielded 1238 articles. Of the 1238 articles, only 15 were included. Meta-analysis of outcomes from five studies showed a survival rate of 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88 to 0.97, P < 0.001) after ≥3 years, while outcomes from 12 studies revealed a short-term patient survival rate of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92 to 0.96, P = 0.75). In contrast, long- and short-term graft survival rates were 0.89 (95% CI: 0.75 to 0.96, P < 0.001) and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.90 to 0.97, P < 0.001), respectively. Incidence rates of infectious, surgical, and medical complications were 0.31 (95% CI: 0.22 to 0.41, P < 0.001), 0.12 (95% CI: 0.05 to 0.25, P < 0.001), and 0.38 (95% CI: 0.17 to 0.66, P < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Good long- and short-term patient outcomes and graft survival rates were observed after ABO-I kidney transplantation. Similarly, the safety of performing kidney transplantations from living donors with ABO-I blood groups was established by the results of the current meta-analysis. Therefore, ABO-I live-donor kidney transplantations should be encouraged to reduce the time recipients spend on waiting lists and supplement the existing paired-exchange donor program.

Effects of Treating Subclinical Rejection 2 Weeks After Kidney Transplantation, as Determined by Analyzing 1-Year Histologic Outcomes

Subclinical rejection (SCR) is associated with chronic allograft nephropathy. Therefore, early detection and treatment of SCR through a protocol biopsy (PB) can reduce the incidence of pathologic changes. This study evaluates the impact of early detection and treatment of SCR using a routine PB 2 weeks after kidney transplantation (KT) by examining histologic outcomes 1 year later. We reviewed 624 KT recipients at the Samsung Medical Center between August 2012 and December 2018. Protocol biopsy was planned 2 weeks and 1 year after transplantation. We compared the histologic changes between the 2 biopsies. After a propensity score matching analysis, we divided the patients into 2 groups: the proven normal group (n = 256) and the rejection group (n = 96) at the PB taken 2 weeks post-transplant. The rejection group showed no significant difference from the normal group in the flow of graft function or the Kaplan-Meier curve for graft survival. In the histologic outcomes, the pathologic differences between the groups significantly improved between the 2 time points. Treating SCR through a PB 2 weeks after KT can contribute to the maintenance of graft function and improve histologic changes 1 year after KT.

ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplant Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

ABO blood group-incompatible kidney transplantation is considered a safe procedure, with noninferior outcomes in large cohort studies. Its contribution to living kidney transplantation programs is substantial and growing. Outcomes compared with center-matched ABO blood group-compatible control patients have not been ascertained.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Comprehensive searches were conducted in Embase, Medline, Cochrane, Web-of-Science, and Google Scholar. Meta-analyses Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology study guidelines for observational studies and Newcastle Ottawa bias scale were implemented to assess studies. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3. A subgroup analysis on antibody removal technique was performed.

RESULTS

After identifying 2728 studies addressing ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation, 26 studies were included, describing 1346 unique patients who were ABO-incompatible and 4943 ABO-compatible controls. Risk of bias was low (all studies ≥7 of 9 stars). Baseline patient characteristics revealed no significant differences in immunologic risk parameters. Statistical heterogeneity of studies was low (I2 0% for graft and patient survival). One-year uncensored graft survival of patients who were ABO-incompatible was 96% versus 98% in ABO-compatible controls (relative risk, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.96 to 0.98; P<0.001). Forty-nine percent of reported causes of death in patients who were ABO-incompatible were of infectious origin, versus only 13% in patients who were ABO-compatible (P=0.02). Antibody-mediated rejection (3.86; 95% confidence interval, 2.05 to 7.29; P<0.001), severe nonviral infection (1.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.13 to 1.82; P=0.003), and bleeding (1.92; 95% confidence interval, 1.36 to 2.72; P<0.001) were also more common after ABO-incompatible transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

ABO-incompatible kidney transplant recipients have good outcomes, albeit inferior to center-matched ABO-compatible control patients.

Landscape of ABO-Incompatible Live Donor Kidney Transplantation in the US

BACKGROUND

Widespread implementation of ABO-incompatible (ABOi) living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) has been proposed as a means to partially ameliorate the national shortage of deceased donor kidneys. Acceptance of this practice has been encouraged by reports from experienced centers demonstrating acute rejection (AR) rates similar to those obtained with ABO-compatible (ABOc) LDKT. Acute rejection rate and graft survival after ABOi LDKT on a national level have yet to be fully determined.

STUDY DESIGN

We studied adult (>18 years) LDKT recipients, from 2000 to 2015, reported to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Acute rejection rates in the first post-transplant year (modified Poisson regression) and graft survival (Cox proportional hazards) were assessed by ABO compatibility status (ABOi: 930; ABOc: 89,713).

RESULTS

Patients undergoing ABOi LDKT had an AR rate of 19.4% compared with 10.5% for ABOc recipients (p < 0.0001). After adjusting for recipient- and donor-related risk factors, patients undergoing ABOi LDKT were found to have a 1.76-fold greater risk for AR within 1 year of transplantation compared with ABOc LDKT recipients (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 1.76; 95% CI 1.54 to 2.01). Moreover, there was a 2.34-fold greater risk of death-censored graft loss at 1-year post-transplant among ABOi vs ABOc LDKT recipients (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.34; 95% CI 1.85 to 2.96).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on these findings, the low rates of AR and excellent short-term graft survival presented in single center series may not be sustainable on a national level. These findings highlight the potential utility for identification of centers of excellence and regionalization of ABOi LDKT.