Distribution of Anti-ABO Immunoglobulin G Subclass and C1q Antibody in ABO-incompatible Kidney Transplantation

Hyperacute rejection in ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation: Significance of isoagglutinin subclass

INTRODUCTION

ABO-incompatible transplantation has expanded the limited donor pool for kidney transplantation. Despite the successful desensitization protocols and immunosuppression, undesirable cases of hyperacute rejection occurs.

OBJECTIVE

Flow cytometry was used to measure isoagglutinin titer and its IgG subclasses in assessment of the cause of hyperacute rejection in ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The recipient was admitted for kidney transplantation due to end-stage renal disease. Pre-transplantation work-up for ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation included blood group typing, HLA DNA typing and HLA antibody analyses. HLA crossmatch analysis was conducted using donor lymphocytes and anti-HLA antibody assay using Luminex panel reactive antibody test (One Lambda, Inc., Canoga Park, CA). Desensitization protocol was composed of therapeutic plasma exchange sessions and rituximab.

RESULTS

Despite negative HLA crossmatch results, a case of hyperacute rejection occurred after living donor kidney transplantation. Rejection resulted in immediate removal of graft, and the patient later received a second kidney transplantation. Retrospective evaluation of isoagglutinin titer and its subclasses using flow cytometry identified the cause of rejection to increased IgG1 subclass. Desensitization protocol for ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation now implements further caution for blood group O recipients.

DISCUSSION

Hyperacute rejection resulting from increased IgG1 isoagglutinin subclass has not been previously confirmed using flow cytometry. Unfortunate outcome of this rejection case provides insight to how we should approach and ensure successful ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation.

Excellent outcome after desensitization in high immunologic risk kidney transplantation

Introduction

HLA-incompatible (HLAi) and ABO-incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation (KT) has been on the increase over the last decade. However, there are wide variations in outcomes from these procedures. In this study we evaluated the graft and patient outcomes in incompatible KT and non-sensitized KT.

Methods

Patients who underwent KT between January 2012 and April 2018 were enrolled and reviewed. We divided kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) into five groups as follows: HLAi (n = 50); ABOi (n = 65); HLAi+ABOi (n = 5); control (n = 428); and living-donor control (LD control, n = 218). We compared the risk of rejection, graft function, graft survival, and patient survival between incompatible KTRs and control/LD control KTRs.

Results

Although the incidence of active antibody-mediated rejection in HLAi group tends to be higher than in control and LD control groups (6.0% vs. 2.8%, P = 0.20; 6.0% vs. 3.7%, P = 0.44, respectively), the rejection-free survival, graft survival, and patient survival were not significantly different from those of the control and LD control groups in all three incompatible KT groups (all P>0.05). Graft function during the study period was also not different between incompatible KTRs and control/LD control groups (both P>0.05). Using Cox regression analysis, neither HLAi nor ABOi were risk factors for graft failure. Some infectious diseases such as urinary tract infection and cytomegalovirus infection were more common in the HLAi group than in the control/LD control group (both P<0.05), but only one infection-related death occurred in HLAi KTRs. Infection risks were similar in the ABOi and HLAi+ABOi groups compared to controls.

Conclusion

Our results showed favorable outcomes for incompatible KT after desensitization. Although desensitization therapy for incompatible KT has improved access to transplantation for KT candidates with high immunological risk, more clinical data are clearly needed.