Knowledge, Attitude, and Perception About Renal Transplantation of CKD Patients, Caregivers, and General Population

The Level of Knowledge of Organ Transplantation and Attitudes Toward Organ Donation of Carers of Patients Receiving Hemodialysis

Purpose: Renal transplantation is the most effective treatment method for chronic renal failure and helps improve the quality of life of patients and caregivers.In the present study, the purpose was to determine the knowledge level of the primary caregivers of patients receiving hemodialysis treatment about organ transplantation and their attitudes toward organ donation.Method: The study was conducted in a descriptive fashion with the relatives of 71 patients who were receiving treatment in the hemodialysis unit for the end-stage renal failure of a state hospital between 01.08.2022 and 15.10.2022. The data of the study were collected face to face with a questionnaire form, Organ Donation Attitude Scale, and Organ Tissue Donation and Transplantation Information Scale. The SPSS 24 package program was used in the analysis of the data. Descriptive statistics, numbers, percentages, and mean values were used in the analysis of the data. The One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test was used to evaluate the homogeneity of the data. The Studentt test, the One-Way Analysis of Variance, the Kruskal-Wallis Test, and the Tukey Post-Hoc Test were used for the analysis between the groups. Statistical significance was taken as p < .05.Results: The benevolence and moral values/beliefs sub-dimension score average of the participants was found to be 98.44 ± 14.61, the fear of medical neglect was 32.10 ± 10.09, and the mean bodily injury sub-dimension score was 30.45 ± 11.28. It was also found that the mean score of the Organ-Tissue Donation and Transplant Information Scale was 11.41 ± 2.59. A statistically significant and negative relationship was detected between the participants' medical neglect and bodily injury attitudes and the Organ-Tissue Donation and Transplant Information Scale score averages (p < .05).Conclusion and Suggestions: As a result, it was found that the positive attitudes of the caregivers of individuals receiving hemodialysis treatment about organ donation were at a good level, and as the level of organ transplantation knowledge increased, negative attitudes towards organ donation decreased. In this context, it can be suggested that healthcare professionals provide training on organ transplantation and donation to the relatives of patients receiving hemodialysis treatment.

An integrative literature review of kidney transplantation knowledge tools

PURPOSE

This study aimed to identify knowledge measurement tools for kidney transplantation (KT) and confirm their assessment methods, domains, and validity to provide useful information.

DESIGN

An integrative review based on Whittemore and Knafl's (2005) framework and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines.

METHODS

An integrative search was conducted using four English databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library) and the top three Korean databases (RISS, DBpia, and KISS). Search terms and strategies included ("kidney transplant*" OR "renal transplant*" OR "kidney replace*" OR "renal replace*" OR "kidney graft" OR "renal graft") & (knowledge OR awareness) & (scale OR tool OR instrument OR questionnaire OR inventory). The time limit was set to February 2022. The extracted data included the content of the tools, participants, and psychometrics. Quality of life was assessed using a psychometric grading framework.

RESULTS

A total of 15 studies and 13 tools were reviewed. Of these, seven studies (46.7%) targeted KT patients, five (33.3%) targeted KT candidates, and three (20.0%) included both groups. The number of items in the tools ranged from five to 33 items. Furthermore, seven tools comprised true-false questions and eight multiple-choice questions. The domains of the KT knowledge measurement tool used in each study differed across study participants. Both reliability and validity were confirmed in six tools, and only two showed a grade of "adequate" or higher.

CONCLUSION

A validated tool is required to measure KT knowledge. These tools can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of educational interventions in promoting self-management after KT.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022334559.

Sufficiency of Knowledge Processed in Patient Education in Dialysis Care

PURPOSE

Patient education improves health and treatment adherence of patients with chronic kidney disease. However, evidence about the sufficiency of patients' knowledge processed in patient education is limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate subjective and objective sufficiency of knowledge processed in patient education in dialysis care and treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study design was used. The sample (n=162) comprised patients in predialysis or home dialysis. All eligible patients during the data collection timeframe (2016-2017) in two university hospital districts in Finland were invited to participate. Subjective sufficiency was evaluated with a structured questionnaire having 34 items divided into six dimensions of empowering knowledge (bio-physiological, functional, social, experiential, ethical, and financial) on a Likert scale (1=not sufficient at all, 4=very sufficient). Objective sufficiency was evaluated with a structured knowledge test with 10 items (score range 0-10, correct=1, wrong/no knowledge=0) based on the multidimensional content of patient education emphasizing bio-physiological dimension.

RESULTS

In subjective sufficiency of knowledge, the mean was 3.27 (SD 0.54). The bio-physiological dimension of empowering knowledge was the most sufficient (mean 3.52, SD 0.49) and the experiential the least (mean 2.8, SD 0.88). In objective sufficiency, the means ranged 5.15-5.97 (SD 2.37-2.68) among patients in different modalities of dialysis care and treatment. The least sufficient objective scores were bio-physiological and functional knowledge. The subjective and objective sufficiency did not correlate with each other.

CONCLUSION

Patients' knowledge, either subjective or objective, does not seem to be sufficient. Hence, attention should be paid to supporting patients with more personalized knowledge. Furthermore, the relationship between subjective and objective sufficiency needs future consideration, as their non-correspondence was a new discovery.

Obesity and gender-biased access to deceased donor kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Despite the survival advantage of transplantation over dialysis, obese patients are less likely to be listed on the deceased donor waiting list and subsequently transplanted. This study aimed to determine the association between obesity and access to deceased donor transplantation and whether any association observed was applicable to men and women equally.

METHODS

Cox proportional hazards models were conducted to determine the association between obesity and waitlisting for transplantation and then subsequent receipt of a kidney transplant using data from the Australian and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (2007-14).

RESULTS

Of 11633 patients included, 4408 (37.9%) were obese. Over a follow-up period of 26306 patient-years during waitlisting and 5607 patient-years from waitlisting to transplantation, 3515 candidates were listed (28.4% obese) and 1662 were transplanted (29.3% obese). Obesity was associated with a reduced likelihood of waitlisting {adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.66 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58-0.76]} but not kidney transplantation once waitlisted [aHR 1.10 (95% CI 0.97-1.24)]. The impact of obesity and waitlisting was modified by gender (P-value for interaction = 0.01). Women who were obese were 34% less likely to be listed than normal-weight women [aHR 0.66 (95% CI 0.58-0.76)], compared with obese men who were 14% less likely [aHR 0.86 (95% CI 0.77-0.97)].

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, obesity reduces the likelihood of being listed for deceased donor transplantation, especially among women, but not transplantation once listed. Transplant physicians who regulate access to the deceased donor waiting list should be aware of this apparent inequity and seek to understand and ameliorate contributing factors.