Reconstruction of Middle Hepatic Vein Tributaries With Artificial Vascular Grafts in Living Donor Liver Transplant Using Right Lobe Grafts: A Case Series. Transplant Proc. 2019;51:1506-1510. [PMID: 31010699 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.01.118]

Prolonged warm ischemia time in the recipient is associated with post-transplant biliary stricture following living-donor liver transplantation

PURPOSE

Post-transplant biliary stricture (PBS) is a common and important complication following orthotopic liver transplantation (LT). This study clarified the incidence of PBS and identified its risk factors.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 67 patients who underwent living-donor LT (LDLT) at our institute between June 2010 and July 2022 and analyzed their clinical characteristics, prognosis, and risk factors for PBS.

RESULTS

Of the 67 patients, 26 (38.8%) developed PBS during the observation period. Multivariate analyses revealed the following independent risk factors for PBS formation: increased red cell transfusion volume per body weight (> 0.2 U/kg; hazard ratio [HR], 3.8; P = 0.002), increased portal vein pressure (PVP) at the end of LT (> 16 mmHg; HR, 2.88; P = 0.032), postoperative biliary leakage (HR, 4.58; P = 0.014), and prolonged warm ischemia time (WIT) (> 48 min; HR, 4.53; P = 0.008). In patients with PBS, the cumulative incidence of becoming stent free was significantly higher in patients with a WIT ≤ 48 min than in those with a WIT > 48 min (P = 0.038).

CONCLUSION

Prolonged WIT is associated with intractable PBS following LDLT.

Left renal vein graft and in situ hepatic perfusion in hepatectomy for complete tumor invasion of hepatic veins: hemodynamic optimization and surgical technique

Purpose

Assessing hepatic vein reconstruction using a left renal vein graft and in situ hypothermic liver perfusion in an extended liver resection.

Methods

Patients included in this study were those with liver tumors undergoing curative surgery with resection and reconstruction of hepatic veins. Hepatic vein was reconstructed using a left renal vein graft. We describe the technical aspects of liver resection and vascular reconstruction, the key aspects of hemodynamic management, and the use of in situ hypothermic liver preservations during liver transection (prior to and during vascular clamping).

Results

The right hepatic vein was reconstructed with a median left renal venal graft length of 4.5 cm (IQR, 3.1–5.2). Creatinine levels remained within normal limits in the immediate postoperative phase and during follow-up. Median blood loss was 500 ml (IQR, 300–1500) and in situ perfusion with cold ischemia was 67 min (IQR, 60.5–77.5). The grafts remained patent during the follow-up with no signs of thrombosis. No major postoperative complications were observed.

Conclusion

Left renal vein graft for the reconstruction of a hepatic vein and in situ hypothermic liver perfusion are feasible during extended liver resection.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00423-022-02451-6.

Importance of reconstruction of middle hepatic vein tributaries of right-lobe grafts in living donor liver transplantation: demonstration of the reconstruction technique

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study on living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using a right-lobe graft without the middle hepatic vein (MHV) was to investigate the clinical impact of MHV tributary reconstruction using our criteria and techniques.

METHODS

The medical records of 40 patients who underwent adult LDLT using a right-lobe graft without the MHV between April 2008 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. In this cohort, the criterion for MHV tributary reconstruction was estimated drainage volume of each MHV tributary greater than 100 mL. The drainage vein of segment 8 (V8) was reconstructed as the common orifice of the right hepatic vein and V8 using a venous patch graft, and that of segment 5 was reconstructed using artificial vascular grafts. The outcomes were compared between the groups with and without MHV tributary reconstruction. Factors associated with postoperative massive ascites were also investigated.

RESULTS

Twenty patients underwent MHV tributary reconstruction. There were no significant differences in the amount of postoperative ascites, Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ III postoperative complications, and 90-day in-hospital mortality between the groups (P = 0.678, P = 1.000, and P = 0.244, respectively). On multivariate analyses, a low-estimated functional graft-to-recipient weight ratio, which was calculated using estimated graft volume minus the territory of MHV tributaries that was not reconstructed, was identified as an independent predictor of postoperative massive ascites (odds ratio, 40.479; 95% confidence interval, 3.823-428.622).

CONCLUSION

The present study suggests that selective MHV tributary reconstruction might be useful for achieving successful graft function.

Is right lobe liver graft without main right hepatic vein suitable for living donor liver transplantation?

BACKGROUND

Since the first living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) was performed by Raia and colleagues in December 1988, LDLT has become the gold standard treatment in countries where cadaveric organ donation is not sufficient. Adequate hepatic venous outflow reconstruction in LDLT is essential to prevent graft congestion and its complications including graft loss. However, this can be complex and technically demanding especially in the presence of complex variations and congenital anomalies in the graft hepatic veins.

CASE SUMMARY

Herein, we aimed to present two cases who underwent successful right lobe LDLT using a right lobe liver graft with rudimentary or congenital absence of the right hepatic vein and describe the utility of a common large opening drainage model in such complex cases.

CONCLUSION

Thanks to this venous reconstruction model, none of the patients developed postoperative complications related to venous drainage. Our experience with venous drainage reconstruction models shows that congenital variations in the hepatic venous structure of living liver donors are not absolute contraindications for LDLT.