1
|
Pérez-Blanco A, Acevedo M, Padilla M, Gómez A, Zapata L, Barber M, Martínez A, Calleja V, Rivero MC, Fernández E, Velasco J, Flores EM, Quindós B, Rodríguez ST, Virgós B, Robles JC, Nebra AC, Moya J, Trenado J, García N, Vallejo A, Herrero E, García Á, Rodríguez ML, García F, Lara R, Lage L, Gil FJ, Guerrero FJ, Meilán Á, Del Prado N, Fernández C, Coll E, Domínguez-Gil B. Assessing Outcomes of Patients Subject to Intensive Care to Facilitate Organ Donation: A Spanish Multicenter Prospective Study. Transpl Int 2024; 37:12791. [PMID: 38681973 PMCID: PMC11046399 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2024.12791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
Intensive Care to facilitate Organ Donation (ICOD) consists of the initiation or continuation of intensive care measures in patients with a devastating brain injury (DBI) in whom curative treatment is deemed futile and death by neurological criteria (DNC) is foreseen, to incorporate organ donation into their end-of-life plans. In this study we evaluate the outcomes of patients subject to ICOD and identify radiological and clinical factors associated with progression to DNC. In this first prospective multicenter study we tested by multivariate regression the association of clinical and radiological severity features with progression to DNC. Of the 194 patients, 144 (74.2%) patients fulfilled DNC after a median of 25 h (95% IQR: 17-44) from ICOD onset. Two patients (1%) shifted from ICOD to curative treatment, both were alive at discharge. Factors associated with progression to DNC included: age below 70 years, clinical score consistent with severe brain injury, instability, intracranial hemorrhage, midline shift ≥5 mm and certain types of brain herniation. Overall 151 (77.8%) patients progressed to organ donation. Based on these results, we conclude that ICOD is a beneficial and efficient practice that can contribute to the pool of deceased donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - María Acevedo
- Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Aroa Gómez
- Hospital Universitario Vall d’Hebrón, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Luis Zapata
- Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - María Barber
- Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | | | - María C. Rivero
- Complejo Hospitalario Universitario, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | | | - Julio Velasco
- Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | | | | | - Sergio T. Rodríguez
- Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - Beatriz Virgós
- Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | | | - José Moya
- Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
| | - Josep Trenado
- Hospital Universitario Mútua Terrasa, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Ana Vallejo
- Hospital Universitario de Araba, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
| | | | - Álvaro García
- Complejo Asistencial Universitario, Salamanca, Spain
| | | | | | - Ramón Lara
- Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Ángela Meilán
- Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
| | | | - Cristina Fernández
- Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Santiago, Santiago, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Krampe N, Nebra Puertas A, Povar Echeverría M, Elmer J, Povar Marco J. Comparing demographics of organ donor referrals from the Intensive Care Unit and Outside Units. Transpl Int 2021; 34:2146-2153. [PMID: 34338368 DOI: 10.1111/tri.14001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Revised: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Spanish organ donation system is a world leader in organ recovery. One of Spain's strategies is identification of organ donor referrals outside of the intensive care unit (ICU) for intensive care to facilitate organ donation (ICOD). There is limited data comparing the profiles of ICU-based and non-ICU ICOD referrals. METHODS This single-center retrospective chart review analyzed organ donor referrals of ICU and non-ICU patients to better understand the demographic and clinical differences between cohorts. The primary outcome was to understand if organ donation conversion rates were similar between ICU and non-ICU referrals. RESULTS We collected data from 745 organ donor referral candidates, 235 (32%) of whom entered ICOD protocols. Out of this cohort, 144 (61%) became an actual organ donor, 37 of whom (26%) were referred from non-ICU units. The ICU had the highest organ donor conversion rate (66% of ICU ICOD patients became actual organ donors) whereas non-ICU referrals had a 51% conversion rate. Non-ICU unit donors contributed to 21% and 26% of all kidney and liver donations, respectively. CONCLUSION Though organ referral candidates from non-ICU units contribute to a small proportion of actual donors, their donated organs are important to sustaining organ donation and transplant activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noah Krampe
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine
| | | | | | - Jonathan Elmer
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Weiss MJ, van Beinum A, Harvey D, Chandler JA. Ethical considerations in the use of pre-mortem interventions to support deceased organ donation: A scoping review. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2021; 35:100635. [PMID: 34174656 DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2021.100635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2021] [Revised: 06/03/2021] [Accepted: 06/05/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
AIM Pre-mortem interventions (PMIs) are performed on patients before the determination of death in order to preserve or enhance the possibility of organ donation. These interventions can be ethically controversial, and we thus undertook a scoping review of the ethical issues surrounding diverse PMIs. METHODS Using modified scoping review methods, we executed a search strategy created by an information specialist. Screening and iterative coding of each article was done by two researchers using qualitative thematic analysis, and narrative summaries of coded themes were presented. RESULTS We identified and screened 5365 references and coded 196 peer-reviewed publications. The most frequently cited issues were related to possible harms to the patient who is a potential donor, and legitimacy of consent. The most controversial issue was that PMIs may place patients at risk for physical harm, yet benefit is accrued mainly to recipients. Some authors argued that lack of direct medical benefit to the still living patient precluded valid consent from surrogate decision makers (SDMs), while many stated that some medical risk could be approved by SDMs if it aligns with non-medical benefits valued by the patient. CONCLUSION PMIs require consensus that benefit includes concepts beyond medical benefit to the patient who is a potential donor. Informed consent must be confirmed for each PMI and not assumed to be part of general consent for donation. Risk must be proportionate to the potential benefit and newly proposed interventions should be reviewed carefully for medical efficacy and potential risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Weiss
- Transplant Québec, 4100 Rue Molson #200, Montréal, QC H1Y 3N1, Canada; Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program (CDTRP), Room 6002, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Research Innovation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E1, Canada; Division of Pediatric Intensive Care, Centre Mère-Enfant Soleil du CHU de Québec, 2705 boul Laurier, Québec, Québec, Canada.
| | - Amanda van Beinum
- Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program (CDTRP), Room 6002, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Research Innovation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E1, Canada; Department of Sociology and Anthropology, B750 Loeb Building, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
| | - Dan Harvey
- Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trust, Derby Road, Nottingham NG72UH, UK; University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG72RD, UK; National Health Services Blood & Transplant, Fox Den Road, Stoke Gifford, Avon, Bristol BS348RR, UK
| | - Jennifer A Chandler
- Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program (CDTRP), Room 6002, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Research Innovation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E1, Canada; Bertram Loeb Research Chair, University of Ottawa, 57 Louis Pasteur St., Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5, Canada; Centre for Health Law, Policy and Ethics, Faculty of Law, University of Ottawa, 57 Louis Pasteur St., Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Castillo-Angeles M, Li G, Bain PA, Stinebring J, Salim A, Adler JT. Systematic review of hospital-level metrics and interventions to increase deceased organ donation. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2021; 35:100613. [PMID: 33744820 DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2021.100613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Revised: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Efforts to ameliorate the organ shortage have predominantly focused on improving processes and interventions at multiple levels in the organ donation process, but no comprehensive review of hospital-level features contributing to organ donation exists. We undertook a systematic review of the literature to better understand current knowledge and knowledge gaps about hospital-level metrics and interventions associated with successful organ donation. METHODS We searched six electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Health Business Elite, and Google scholar) and conference abstracts for articles on hospital-level features associated with the final outcome of organ donation (PROSPERO CRD42020187080). Editorials, letters to the editor, and reviews without original data were excluded. Our main outcomes were conversion rate, donation rate, number of organs recovered, number of donors, and authorization rate. RESULTS Our search yielded 2177 studies, and after a thorough assessment, 72 articles were included in this systematic review. Studies were thematically categorized into 1) Hospital-level interventions associated with metrics of organ donation; these included patient- and family-centric measures (i.e. standardized interviews, collaborative requesting and decoupling, and dedicated in-house coordinators), and donor management goals that significantly increased conversion rates by up to 64%; 2) Hospital-level multi-stage programs/policies; which increased authorization rates between 30 and 50%; and 3) Hospital characteristics and qualities; being an academic center, trauma center and larger hospital correlated with higher authorization and conversion rates. Most studies had considerable risk of bias and were of low quality. CONCLUSIONS There is a lack of well-designed studies on hospital-level metrics and interventions associated with organ donation. The use of thoughtful, patient- and family-centric approaches to authorization generally is associated with more organ donors. Future work can build on what is known about the hospital role in organ donation to improve the entire organ donation process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Castillo-Angeles
- Division of Trauma, Burn, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - George Li
- Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, United States of America
| | - Paul A Bain
- Countway Library, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Jill Stinebring
- New England Donor Services, Waltham, MA, United States of America
| | - Ali Salim
- Division of Trauma, Burn, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Joel T Adler
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|