Alternative Methods of Repositioning Impacted Maxillary Canines in the Dental Arch—En Bloc Autotransplantation of a Tooth

Combined application of artificial bone powders and concentrated growth factor membranes on the autotransplantation of mature third molars: A 5-year retrospective case series

AIM

This study aimed to observe the efficacy and outcomes of the combined application of artificial bone powder and concentrated growth factor (CGF) membranes for tooth transplantation in cases with wide recipient sockets and small donor teeth.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 36 teeth from 36 patients with wide recipient sockets and small donor teeth were enrolled. Autogenous tooth transplantation was performed using bone powders and CGF membranes. After transplantation, the visual analog scale (VAS) score, Landry Wound Healing Index, probing depth (PD), mobility, and gray value of the alveolar bone around the transplanted teeth were measured, and a patient satisfaction questionnaire was administered. All patients underwent clinical and radiographic examinations during follow-up.

RESULTS

The VAS score of 16 (44.4%) cases after 1 week was 0, and 26 (72.2%) patients showed excellent gingival healing after 2-4 weeks. The PD of a few cases was deeper than 3 mm during the first month; however, returned to normal after 3 months. Although the majority of the transplanted teeth possessed mobility greater than grade I during the first month, the mobility gradually improved within 3 months. The gray value of the alveolar bone around the transplanted teeth, 1 year postoperatively showed no difference with pre-operation (p > .05). During the mean follow-up period of 42.7 months (range 20-72 months), 33 of the 36 transplanted teeth remained in situ without clinical or radiographic complications, with an overall success rate of 91.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the PD and mobility of the transplanted teeth were not ideal during the early stages of healing, most of the transplanted teeth had good clinical outcomes. In cases with large recipient sites accompanied by small donor teeth, autotransplantation of teeth using artificial bone powder combined with CGF membranes is a viable option and can lead to optimistic results with favorable success rates.

Unusual Indications of Teeth Transplantation: A Literature Review

Dental implants are one of the best valid tooth replacement options, though these are not always appropriate in growing young patients. Tooth autotransplantation can be indicated then. However, this is not the only scenario where dental transplantation can be indicated. This comprehensive literature review discusses a wide range of unusual indications of dental transplantation as reported throughout the medical literature. Surprisingly, these indications include management of some developmental dental anomalies, hypodontia, oroantral communications, alveolar clefts, deficient alveolar ridges, ectopic teeth, and maxillofacial injuries. Limited high-quality evidence in this field regarding most of these unusual indications warrants further research of high-quality design.

Aesthetic and functional restoration of the dental arch continuity in difficult cases of impacted teeth within the frontal segment

Impacted teeth are a fairly common defect with the incidence ranging from 2.9 to 13.7%. Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of various treatment modalities in patients with impacted teeth within the frontal segment of the maxilla. The retrospective evaluation covered treatment outcomes in 81 patients with impacted teeth within the aesthetic segment. The subjects were divided into 3 groups. Patients with the impacted tooth uncovered and orthodontically repositioned in the arch were assigned to group 1. Group 2 consisted of patients with the impacted tooth qualified for extraction and the gap augmented and restored with an implant. Group 3 included subjects, who underwent en-bloc autotransplantation of the impacted tooth. In 38 group 1 subjects 47 teeth were uncovered with a mean efficacy of 58.1% (96.3% and 70% in patients below 18 yoa and adults, respectively). The excellent aesthetic treatment outcome was obtained in 75% and good in 25% of patients. In group 2 twenty-six adult subjects were treated with 100% efficacy. In 65.4% of patients, augmentation with a bone block was performed and in the remaining 34.6%, implantation and augmentation with bone granulate. In 88.3% subjects a satisfying treatment outcome was obtained. In group 3 eighteen teeth in a block were grafted with the efficacy of 88.9%. Excellent aesthetics was obtained in 56.25% of cases and good in 31.25%. Orthodontic repositioning of the impacted teeth in the arch in adult patients bears the risk of failure. Surgical treatment modalities in impacted teeth are effective and provide high aesthetics of the treatment outcome improved by prior orthodontic treatment of the concomitant malocclusion and augmentation of the vertical bone atrophy before implantation.