Teamwork Makes the Dream Work: Maximizing Surgical Intervention at the Time of Living Donor Renal Transplantation

Safety and utility of panniculectomy in renal transplant candidates and end stage renal disease patients

BACKGROUND

As the obesity crisis in the United States continues, some renal transplantation centers have liberalized their BMI criteria necessary for transplant eligibility. More individuals with larger body-habitus related comorbidities with End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) now qualify for renal transplantation (RT). Surgical modalities from other fields also interact with this patient population.

METHODS

In order to assess surgical outcomes of panniculectomy in the context of renal transplantation and ESRD, the authors performed a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Due to a paucity of existing primary studies, we retrospectively collected data on patients with ESRD undergoing panniculectomy from the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) to evaluate outcomes of body contouring in this patient population.

RESULTS

From the systematic review, a total of 783 ESRD patients underwent panniculectomy among the studies identified. Of these, 91 patients underwent panniculectomy simultaneously to RT while 692 had their pannus resected prior to kidney transplant. The most common complication was hematoma followed by wound dehiscence. From the NSQIP database, 24 868 patients met the inclusion criteria for analysis. In the setting of renal transplant status, patients with diabetes, hypertension requiring medication, and requiring dialysis were more likely to suffer postoperative complications (OR 1.31, 1.15, and 2.2, respectively). However, upon sub-analysis of specific types of complications, the only retained association was between diabetes and wound complication.

CONCLUSION

Preliminary data show that panniculectomy in ESRD patients appears to be safe, though with a nominal increased risk for complications. Pannus resection does not appear to impact post-transplantation outcomes, including long-term allograft survival. Larger, higher powered, randomized studies are needed to confirm the safety, utility, and medical benefit of panniculectomy in the context of renal transplantation.

Abdominal Panniculectomy Can Simplify Kidney Transplantation in Obese Patients

BACKGROUND

Obesity is frequently present in patients suffering from end-stage renal disease (ESRD). However, overweight kidney transplant candidates are a challenge for the transplant surgeon. Obese patients tend to develop a large abdominal panniculus after weight loss creating an area predisposed to wound-healing disorders. Due to concerns about graft survival and postoperative complications after kidney transplantation, obese patients are often refused in this selective patient cohort. The study aimed to analyze the effect of panniculectomies on postoperative complications and transplant candidacy in an interdisciplinary setting.

METHODS

A retrospective database review of 10 cases of abdominal panniculectomies performed in patients with ESRD prior to kidney transplantation was conducted.

RESULTS

The median body mass index was 35.2 kg/m2 (range 28.5-53.0 kg/m2) at first transplant-assessment versus 31.0 kg/m2 (range 28.0-34.4 kg/m2) at panniculectomy, and 31.6 kg/m2 (range 30.3-32.4 kg/m2) at kidney transplantation. We observed no major postoperative complications following panniculectomy and minor wound-healing complications in 2 patients. All aside from 1 patient became active transplant candidates 6 weeks after panniculectomy. No posttransplant wound complications occurred in the transplanted patients.

CONCLUSION

Abdominal panniculectomy is feasible in patients suffering ESRD with no major postoperative complications, thus converting previously ineligible patients into kidney transplant candidates. An interdisciplinary approach is advisable in this selective patient cohort.

Post-Abdominal Transplant Hernia: Can We Predict Size and Onset?

INTRODUCTION

Abdominal organ transplant is a life-saving treatment. However, the resultant weakening of abdominal muscles leaves patients susceptible to incisional hernia. Obesity, smoking, and diabetes mellitus are common risk factors for post-transplant hernia. However, the literature is void on the impact these risk factors have on timing and size of hernia.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of all post-abdominal transplant patients who underwent hernia repair in 2010-2017 at a single institution. Primary outcomes were hernia size and time from transplant to hernia repair.

RESULTS

We identified 31 patients. The majority of patients were female (15 male, 16 female), and the average patient was 56 ± 8.7 years old and obese (body mass index 30.6). Smoking (26.7%, n = 8) and diabetes mellitus (51.6%, n = 16) were prevalent. Transplant types represented were renal (n = 24), simultaneous pancreas-kidney (n = 5), liver (n = 1), and liver with subsequent kidney (n = 1). The median size of hernia was 100.0 cm² (interquartile range [IQR]: 78.5-234.0), and median time to hernia repair was 53.0 months (IQR: 12.5-110.0). Risk factors (obesity, smoking, and diabetes) did not influence hernia size, nor alter time to hernia repair.

CONCLUSION

Obesity, smoking, and diabetes mellitus are not prognostic of size or onset of post-transplant incisional hernia. Large cohort studies are needed to determine predictive factors of size and onset of hernia.