Severe Sepsis Mimicking Primary Nonfunction Following Liver Transplantation: Normothermic Machine Perfusion Is a Potential Environment for Bacterial Overgrowth and Transmission From Donor to Recipient. A Case Report

Infection and Prophylaxis During Normothermic Liver Perfusion: Audit of Incidence and Pharmacokinetics of Antimicrobial Therapy

BACKGROUND

Ex situ normothermic liver perfusion (NMP) in a blood-based perfusate is associated with a risk of microbe growth, resulting in life-threatening posttransplant sepsis. Antibiotics are widely used, but the pharmacokinetics of these agents are unknown as is their efficacy. We wished to assess the perfusate concentrations of the meropenem and fluconazole that we use and to audit the incidence of infection with this antimicrobial therapy.

METHODS

Fluconazole and meropenem (100 mg each) were added to the perfusate before NMP began, and serial samples were taken and assayed for drug concentrations. Perfusate cultures were available from 210 of the 242 perfusions performed between February 1, 2018, and April 6, 2023; these were reviewed.

RESULTS

Following administration of 100 mg fluconazole, levels fell slightly from a median of 24.9 mg/L at 1 h to 22.6 mg/L at 10 h. In contrast, meropenem concentrations fell over time, from a median of 21.8 mg/L at 1 h to 9.4 mg/L at 10 h. There were 4 significant microorganisms grown in the perfusions, including 3 Candida species and an Enterococcus faecium . All the Candida -infected livers were transplanted with no adverse consequences, the recipients being treated with anidulafungin upon identification of the infecting organism; the Enterococcus -infected liver was not transplanted.

CONCLUSIONS

Serious infection is a risk with NMP but appears to be mitigated with a protocol combining fluconazole and meropenem. This combination may not be appropriate in areas where resistance is prevalent. Routine culture of NMP perfusate is essential to identify breakthrough organisms early and enable recipient treatment.

Substantial decline of organ preservation fluid contamination following adoption of ischemia-free liver transplantation: a post-hoc analysis

INTRODUCTION

Preservation fluid (PF) contaminations are common in conventional liver transplantation (CLT) and presumably originate from organ or PF exposures to the external environment in a non-strict sterile manner. Such exposures and PF contamination may be avoided in ischaemia-free liver transplantation (IFLT) because of the strict sterile surgical procedures. In this study, the authors evaluated the impact of IFLT on organ PF contamination.

METHODS

A post-hoc analysis using data from the first randomized controlled trial of IFLT was performed to compare the incidence, pathogenic spectrum of PF contamination, and incidence of early recipient infection between IFLT and CLT. Multivariable logistic regression was used to explore risk factors for PF contamination.

RESULTS

Of the 68 cases recruited in the trial, 64 were included in this post-hoc analysis. The incidence of culture-positive PF was 9.4% (3/32) in the IFLT group versus 78.1% (25/32) in the CLT group ( P <0.001). Three microorganisms were isolated from PF in the IFLT group, while 43 were isolated in the CLT group. The recipient infection rate within postoperative day 14 was 3.1% (1/32) in the IFLT group vs 15.6% (5/32) in the CLT group, although this difference did not reach statistical significance ( P =0.196). Multivariate analysis revealed that adopting IFLT is an independent protective factor for culture-positive PF.

CONCLUSION

PF contamination is substantially decreased in IFLT, and IFLT application is an independent protective factor for PF contamination. Using rigorous sterile measures and effective antibiotic therapy during IFLT may decrease PF contamination.

Current Techniques and Indications for Machine Perfusion and Regional Perfusion in Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation

Since the advent of University of Wisconsin preservation solution in the 1980s, clinicians have learned to work within its confines. While affording improved outcomes, considerable limitations still exist and contribute to the large number of livers that go unused each year, often for fear they may never work. The last 10 years have seen the widespread availability of new perfusion modalities which provide an opportunity for assessing organ viability and prolonged organ storage. This review will discuss the role of in situ normothermic regional perfusion for livers donated after circulatory death. It will also describe the different modalities of ex situ perfusion, both normothermic and hypothermic, and discuss how they are thought to work and the opportunities afforded by them.

Microbial Contamination During Long-term Ex Vivo Normothermic Machine Perfusion of Human Livers

BACKGROUND

Normothermic machine perfusion permits the ex vivo preservation of human livers before transplantation. Long-term perfusion for days-to-weeks provides the opportunity for enhanced pretransplant assessment and potential regeneration of organs. However, this risks microbial contamination and infection of the recipient if the organ is transplanted. An understanding of perfusate microbial contamination is required to inform infection control procedures and antimicrobial prophylaxis for this technology.

METHODS

We modified a liver perfusion machine for long-term use by adding long-term oxygenators and a dialysis filter. Human livers that were not suitable for transplantation were perfused using a red-cell-based perfusate under aseptic and normothermic conditions (36 °C) with a goal of 14 d. Cephazolin was added to the perfusate for antimicrobial prophylaxis. Perfusate and bile were sampled every 72 h for microbial culture.

RESULTS

Eighteen partial human livers (9 left lateral segment grafts and 9 extended right grafts) were perfused using our perfusion system. The median survival was 7.2 d. All organs surviving longer than 7 d (9/18) had negative perfusate cultures at 24 and 48 h. Half of the grafts (9/18) became culture-positive by the end of perfusion. Microbial contaminants included Gram-negative ( Pseudomonas species, Proteus mirabilis, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia ) and Gram-positive bacteria ( Staphylococcus epidermidis , Enterococcus faecalis , and Bacillus species) as well as yeast ( Candida albicans ).

CONCLUSIONS

Microbial contamination of perfusate is common during long-term perfusion of human livers with both exogenous and endogenous sources. Enhanced infection control practices and review of targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis are likely to be necessary for translation into the clinical arena.

Perfusion fluid-related infections in liver transplant recipients: A 5-year, single-center, retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Perfusion fluid (PRF) is employed in liver transplantation (LTx) to maintain graft viability. Still, it represents a new potential way of infection transmission in LTx recipients (LTRs). Currently, no systematic research has investigated this topic.

METHODS

Five-year single-center retrospective study conducted on LTRs from January 2017 to December 2021. We analyzed the incidence of positive PRF culture (PRF+) and perfusion fluid-related infections (PRF-RI) and their associated factors. We also assessed 1-year mortality, both overall and infection-related.

RESULTS

Overall, 234 LTx were included. PRF+ were found in 31/234 (13.2%) LTx for a total of 37 isolates, with >1 isolate identified in 5 (2.1%) cases. High-risk microorganisms (Enterobacterales 13/37, Enterococcus spp. 4/37, S. aureus 3/37, P. aeruginosa 2/37) were isolated in 25/37 (67.6%) LTRs, the remaining being coagulase-negative staphylococci (12/37, 32.4%). Antimicrobial prophylaxis was administered to all LTRs, always active against the isolate even if suboptimal in 19 cases (61.3%). PRF-RI developed in 4/234 LTx (1.7%), and prophylaxis was considered suboptimal in 2/4 of them. The isolation of >1 microorganism in PRF culture was associated with an increased risk of developing PRF-RI (OR 37.5 [95%CI 2.6-548.4], p = .01). PRF-RI were associated with longer ICU stays (p = .005) and higher 1-year mortality, both overall and related to infections (p = .001).

CONCLUSION

Despite PRF+ being infrequent, only a minority of patients develops PRF-RI. Nonetheless, once occurred, PRF-RI seems to increase morbidity and mortality rates.

Bacterial and Viral Infections in Liver Transplantation: New Insights from Clinical and Surgical Perspectives

End-stage liver disease patients undergoing liver transplantation are prone to develop numerous infectious complications because of immunosuppression, surgical interventions, and malnutrition. Infections in transplant recipients account for the main cause of mortality and morbidity with rates of up to 80%. The challenges faced in the early post-transplant period tend to be linked to transplant procedures and nosocomial infections commonly in bloodstream, surgical, and intra-abdominal sites. Viral infections represent an additional complication of immunosuppression; they can be donor-derived, reactivated from a latent virus, nosocomial or community-acquired. Bacterial and viral infections in solid organ transplantation are managed by prophylaxis, multi-drug resistant screening, risk assessment, vaccination, infection control and antimicrobial stewardship. The aim of this review was to discuss the epidemiology of bacterial and viral infections in liver transplants, infection control issues, as well as surgical frontiers of ex situ liver perfusion.

Long-term normothermic machine preservation of human livers: what is needed to succeed?

Although short-term machine perfusion (≤24 h) allows for resuscitation and viability assessment of high-risk donor livers, the donor organ shortage might be further remedied by long-term perfusion machines. Extended preservation of injured donor livers may allow reconditioning, repairing, and regeneration. This review summarizes the necessary requirements and challenges for long-term liver machine preservation, which requires integrating multiple core physiological functions to mimic the physiological environment inside the body. A pump simulates the heart in the perfusion system, including automatically controlled adjustment of flow and pressure settings. Oxygenation and ventilation are required to account for the absence of the lungs combined with continuous blood gas analysis. To avoid pressure necrosis and achieve heterogenic tissue perfusion during preservation, diaphragm movement should be simulated. An artificial kidney is required to remove waste products and control the perfusion solution's composition. The perfusate requires an oxygen carrier, but will also be challenged by coagulation and activation of the immune system. The role of the pancreas can be mimicked through closed-loop control of glucose concentrations by automatic injection of insulin or glucagon. Nutrients and bile salts, generally transported from the intestine to the liver, have to be supplemented when preserving livers long term. Especially for long-term perfusion, the container should allow maintenance of sterility. In summary, the main challenge to develop a long-term perfusion machine is to maintain the liver's homeostasis in a sterile, carefully controlled environment. Long-term machine preservation of human livers may allow organ regeneration and repair, thereby ultimately solving the shortage of donor livers.

Primary Nonfunction of the Liver Allograft

Severe allograft dysfunction, as opposed to the expected immediate function, following liver transplantation is a major complication, and the clinical manifestations of such that lead to either immediate retransplant or death are the catastrophic end of the spectrum. Primary nonfunction (PNF) has declined in incidence over the years, yet the impact on patient and healthcare teams, and the burden on the organ pool in case of the need for retransplant should not be underestimated. There is no universal test to define the diagnosis of PNF, and current criteria are based on various biochemical parameters surrogate of liver function; moreover, a disparity remains within different healthcare systems on selecting candidates eligible for urgent retransplantation. The impact on PNF from traditionally accepted risk factors has changed somewhat, mainly driven by the rising demand for organs, combined with the concerted approach by clinicians on the in-depth understanding of PNF, optimal graft recipient selection, mitigation of the clinical environment in which a marginal graft is reperfused, and postoperative management. Regardless of the mode, available data suggest machine perfusion strategies help reduce the incidence further but do not completely avert the risk of PNF. The mainstay of management relies on identifying severe allograft dysfunction at a very early stage and aggressive management, while excluding other identifiable causes that mimic severe organ dysfunction. This approach may help salvage some grafts by preventing total graft failure and also maintaining a patient in an optimal physiological state if retransplantation is considered the ultimate patient salvage strategy.