Bone Disease and Liver Transplantation: A Review

Bone Loss after Solid Organ Transplantation: A Review of Organ-Specific Considerations

This review article investigates solid organ transplantation-induced osteoporosis, a critical yet often overlooked issue, emphasizing its significance in post-transplant care. The initial sections provide a comprehensive understanding of the prevalence and multifactorial pathogenesis of transplantation osteoporosis, including factors such as deteriorating post-transplantation health, hormonal changes, and the impact of immunosuppressive medications. Furthermore, the review is dedicated to organ-specific considerations in transplantation osteoporosis, with separate analyses for kidney, liver, heart, and lung transplantations. Each section elucidates the unique challenges and management strategies pertinent to transplantation osteoporosis in relation to each organ type, highlighting the necessity of an organ-specific approach to fully understand the diverse manifestations and implications of transplantation osteoporosis. This review underscores the importance of this topic in transplant medicine, aiming to enhance awareness and knowledge among clinicians and researchers. By comprehensively examining transplantation osteoporosis, this study contributes to the development of improved management and care strategies, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes in this vulnerable group. This detailed review serves as an essential resource for those involved in the complex multidisciplinary care of transplant recipients.

Evolving challenges with long-term care of liver transplant recipients

The number of liver transplants (LT) performed worldwide continues to rise, and LT recipients are living longer post-transplant. This has led to an increasing number of LT recipients requiring lifelong care. Optimal care post-LT requires careful attention to both the allograft and systemic issues that are more common after organ transplantation. Common causes of allograft dysfunction include rejection, biliary complications, and primary disease recurrence. While immunosuppression prevents rejection and reduces incidences of some primary disease recurrence, it has detrimental systemic effects. Most commonly, these include increased incidences of metabolic syndrome, various malignancies, and infections. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to optimize immunosuppression regimens to prevent allograft dysfunction while also decreasing the risk of systemic complications. Institutional protocols to screen for systemic disease and heightened clinical suspicion also play an important role in providing optimal long-term post-LT care. In this review, we discuss these common complications of LT as well as unique considerations when caring for LT recipients in the years after transplant.

Evaluation of Bone Mineral Metabolism After Liver Transplantation by Bone Mineral Densitometry and Biochemical Markers

AIM

This study aimed to evaluate the course of bone and mineral metabolism after liver transplantation (LT) in patients with chronic liver disease.

METHODS

One hundred four patients who had undergone LT and had a minimum of 6 months of follow-up after LT were included in this prospective cohort study. The following parameters were evaluated for each patient: preoperative and postoperative (postoperative day [POD]30, POD90, POD180) osteocalcin, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP), type 1 collagen, beta-C-terminal end telopeptide (β-CTx), vitamin D, parathyroid hormone (PTH), ALP, calcium, phosphate, sedimentation, and bone mineral densitometer scores (L2, L4, L total, and F total). The parameters were compared in terms of sex, presence of liver tumor (hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC; n = 19] vs non-HCC [n = 85]), and presence of autoimmune liver disease (autoimmune liver disease [ALD; n = 8] vs non-ALD [n = 96]).

RESULTS

The median age of the patients (n = 81 men and n = 23 women) was 52 years (95% CI, 50-56). There was a significant change in the defined time intervals in parameters such as osteocalcin (P < .001), BALP (P < .001), β-CTx (P < .001), vitamin D (P < .001), PTH (P < .001), ALP (P = .001), calcium (P < .001), phosphate (P = .001), L2 (P = .038), L total (P = .026), and F total (P < .001) scores. There was a significant difference in POD90 ALP (P = .033), POD180 calcium (P = .011), POD180 phosphate (P = .011), preoperative sedimentation (P = .032), and POD180 F total (P = .013) scores between both sexes. There was a significant difference in POD180 osteocalcin (P = .023), POD180 β-CTx (P = .017), and preOP calcium (P = .003) among the HCC and non-HCC groups. Furthermore, we found significant differences in preoperative ALP (P = .008), preoperative sedimentation (P = .019), POD90 (P = .037) and POD180 L2 (P = .005) scores, preoperative (P = .049) and POD180 L4 (P = .017), and POD180 L total (P = .010) and F total (P = .022) scores between the patients with and without ALD.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that the bone and mineral metabolism of the LT recipients was negatively affected after LT. In addition, we showed that bone and mineral metabolism was more prominent in patients with HCC, and bone mineral density scores were higher in patients with ALD.

High risk of osteoporosis and fracture following solid organ transplantation: a population-based study

Background

Osteoporosis and fractures increase morbidity and mortality rates after solid organ transplantation (SOT), but few studies have analyzed the risk of osteoporosis and related fractures after SOT. In this retrospective cohort study, we investigated the risk of osteoporosis and fractures in different SOT recipients.

Methods

This study was a retrospective cohort study using a nationally representative database in Taiwan. We collected the data of SOT recipients and used the propensity score matching method to obtain a comparison cohort. To reduce bias, we excluded patients who had been diagnosed with osteoporosis or fracture before inclusion. All participants were followed up until the date of diagnosis as having a pathological fracture, death, or the end of 2018, whichever occurred first. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate the risk of osteoporosis and pathological fracture in SOT recipients.

Results

After adjustment for the aforementioned variables, SOT recipients were observed to have a higher risk of osteoporosis (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.46, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.29-1.65) and fracture (HR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.01-1.39) than the general individuals. Among the different SOT recipients, the highest risk of fractures was noted in heart or lung transplant recipients, with a HR of 4.62 (95% CI: 2.05-10.44). Among the age groups, patients aged >61 years had the highest HRs for osteoporosis (HR: 11.51; 95% CI, 9.10-14.56) and fracture (HR: 11.75, 95% CI: 8.97-15.40).

Conclusion

SOT recipients had a higher risk of osteoporosis and related fractures than the general population, with the highest risks observed in patients receiving heart or lung transplants, older patients, and patients with CCI scores of >3.

Liver Transplantation for the Nonhepatologist

Liver transplantation (LT) is a life-saving and evidence-based intervention for patients with acute liver failure and chronic end-stage liver disease. Significant progress has been made in advancing pre-LT management, transplant techniques, post-LT long-term care, and immunosuppression regimes. However, as rates of DC continue to increase, causes of liver disease and indications for LT continue to be investigated to ensure equity and further improve liver allocation models, waitlist outcomes, and post-LT outcomes for all patient populations.

Long-term Care of the Adult Liver Transplant Recipient

While outcomes after liver transplantation have increased over the last two decades, this is primarily as a consequence of a reduction in early deaths and survival of those who survive the first 6 months has not significantly changed. Causes of premature death and graft loss include cardiovascular disease, renal impairment, malignancy and some infections. As the number of transplant recipients increase, care is being given by primary and secondary care clinicians. Management of the well patient is crucially dependent on careful assessment and where appropriate intervention, especially of cardiovascular risk - such as advice about avoidance of weight gain; management of hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and diabetes; and provision of appropriate lifestyle advice. Other interventions include surveillance for de novo malignancies, active management of immunosuppressive regimen with the need to tailor immunosuppression to the individual. Prompt investigation of abnormalities of liver function is essential. Immune-mediated graft damage still occurs but is less common as a cause for graft loss. Adherence is sometimes an issue, especially in teenagers and young adults, and should be considered and support given where needed. Immunisations (avoiding live and attenuated vaccines) should be encouraged. Recurrence of disease remains an issue, and some interventions (such as appropriate use of antiviral therapy for those grafted with viral hepatitis, use of ursodeoxycholic acid for those grafted for primary biliary cholangitis or long-term steroids for those grafted for autoimmune disease) may improve and maintain graft function. Close collaboration between recipient and the attending clinicians in primary, secondary and tertiary care and close attention to modifiable conditions will lead to improved outcomes.