1
|
Sano M, Cummings J, Auer S, Bergh S, Fischer CE, Gerritsen D, Grossberg G, Ismail Z, Lanctôt K, Lapid MI, Mintzer J, Palm R, Rosenberg PB, Splaine M, Zhong K, Zhu CW. Agitation in cognitive disorders: Progress in the International Psychogeriatric Association consensus clinical and research definition. Int Psychogeriatr 2024; 36:238-250. [PMID: 36880250 PMCID: PMC10684256 DOI: 10.1017/s1041610222001041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The International Psychogeriatric Association (IPA) published a provisional consensus definition of agitation in cognitive disorders in 2015. As proposed by the original work group, we summarize the use and validation of criteria in order to remove "provisional" from the definition. METHODS This report summarizes information from the academic literature, research resources, clinical guidelines, expert surveys, and patient and family advocates on the experience of use of the IPA definition. The information was reviewed by a working group of topic experts to create a finalized definition. RESULTS We present a final definition which closely resembles the provisional definition with modifications to address special circumstances. We also summarize the development of tools for diagnosis and assessment of agitation and propose strategies for dissemination and integration into precision diagnosis and agitation interventions. CONCLUSION The IPA definition of agitation captures a common and important entity that is recognized by many stakeholders. Dissemination of the definition will permit broader detection and can advance research and best practices for care of patients with agitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Sano
- Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NYC NY and James J. Peters VAMC, Bronx NY
| | - Jeffrey Cummings
- Joy Chambers-Grundy Professor of Brain Science, Director, Chambers-Grundy Center for Transformative Neuroscience, Co-Director, Pam Quirk Brain Health and Biomarker Laboratory, Department of Brain Health, School of Integrated Health Sciences. University of Nevada Las Vegas (UNLV)
| | - Stefanie Auer
- Centre for Dementia Studies, University for Continuing Education Krems, Austria
| | - Sverre Bergh
- The research centre for age-related functional decline and disease, Innlandet hospital trust, Ottestad, Norway
| | - Corinne E. Fischer
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Debby Gerritsen
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud Alzheimer Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - George Grossberg
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Neuroscience, Division of Geriatric Psychiatry St Louis University School of Medicine
| | - Zahinoor Ismail
- Departments Psychiatry, Neurology, Epidemiology, and Pathology, Hotchkiss Brain Institute & O’Brien Institute for Public Health University of Calgary
| | - Krista Lanctôt
- Hurvitz Brain Sciences Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute; and Departments of Psychiatry and Pharmacology/Toxicology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Maria I Lapid
- Mayo Clinic Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jacobo Mintzer
- Psychiatrist, Ralph. H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC and Professor, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Rebecca Palm
- Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, 58455 Witten, Germany
| | - Paul B. Rosenberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
| | - Michael Splaine
- Owner Splaine Consulting, Managing Partner, Recruitment Partners LLC
| | - Kate Zhong
- Department of Brain Health, School of Integrated Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
| | - Carolyn W. Zhu
- Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine, NYC, NY and James J. Peters VAMC, Bronx NY
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cummings J, Hahn-Pedersen JH, Eichinger CS, Freeman C, Clark A, Tarazona LRS, Lanctôt K. Exploring the relationship between patient-relevant outcomes and Alzheimer's disease progression assessed using the clinical dementia rating scale: a systematic literature review. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1208802. [PMID: 37669257 PMCID: PMC10470645 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1208802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background People with Alzheimer's disease (AD) have difficulties in performing activities of daily living (ADLs) as the disease progresses, commonly experience neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS), and often have comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease. These factors all contribute to a requirement for care and considerable healthcare costs in AD. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale is a widely used measure of dementia staging, but the correlations between scores on this scale and patient-/care partner-relevant outcomes have not been characterized fully. We conducted a systematic literature review to address this evidence gap. Methods Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library were searched September 13, 2022, to identify published studies (no restriction by date or country) in populations with mild cognitive impairment due to AD or AD dementia. Studies of interest reported data on the relationships between CDR Global or CDR-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) scores and outcomes including NPS, comorbidities, ADLs, nursing home placement, healthcare costs, and resource use. Results Overall, 58 studies met the inclusion criteria (42 focusing on comorbidities, 14 on ADLs or dependence, five on nursing home placement, and six on economic outcomes). CDR/CDR-SB scores were correlated with the frequency of multiple NPS and with total scores on the Neuropsychiatric Inventory. For cardiovascular comorbidities, no single risk factor was consistently linked to AD progression. Increasing CDR/CDR-SB scores were correlated with decline in multiple different measures of ADLs and were also associated with nursing home placement and increasing costs of care. Conclusion NPS, ADLs, and costs of care are clearly linked to AD progression, as measured using CDR Global or CDR-SB scores, from the earliest stages of disease. This indicates that scores derived from the CDR are a meaningful way to describe the severity and burden of AD for patients and care partners across disease stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Cummings
- Chambers-Grundy Center for Transformative Neuroscience, Department of Brain Health, School of Integrated Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, United States
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Krista Lanctôt
- Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Thompson Z, Tamplin J, Vieira Sousa T, Carrasco R, Flynn L, Lamb KE, Lampit A, Lautenschlager NT, McMahon K, Waycott J, Vogel AP, Woodward-Kron R, Stretton-Smith PA, Baker FA. Content development and validation for a mobile application designed to train family caregivers in the use of music to support care of people living with dementia. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1185818. [PMID: 37250645 PMCID: PMC10213236 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1185818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Music therapy is increasingly recognized as an effective support for people living with dementia. However, with incidences of dementia increasing, and limited availability of music therapists, there is a need for affordable and accessible ways that caregivers can learn to use music-therapy based strategies to support the people they care for. The MATCH project aims to address this by creating a mobile application that can train family caregivers in the use of music to support people living with dementia. Methods This study details the development and validation of training material for the MATCH mobile application. Training modules developed based on existing research were assessed by 10 experienced music therapist clinician-researchers, and seven family caregivers who had previously completed personalized training in music therapy strategies via the HOMESIDE project. Participants reviewed the content and scored each training module based on content (music therapists) and face (caregivers) validity scales. Descriptive statistics were used to calculate scores on the scales, while thematic analysis was used to analyze short-answer feedback. Results Participants scored the content as valid and relevant, however, they provided additional suggestions for improvement via short-answer feedback. Conclusion The content developed for the MATCH application is valid and will be trailed by family caregivers and people living with dementia in a future study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zara Thompson
- Faculty of Fine Arts and Music, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jeanette Tamplin
- Faculty of Fine Arts and Music, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Tanara Vieira Sousa
- Faculty of Fine Arts and Music, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Romina Carrasco
- School of Computing and Information System, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - Libby Flynn
- Faculty of Fine Arts and Music, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Karen E. Lamb
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - Amit Lampit
- Academic Unit for Psychiatry of Old Age, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Nicola T. Lautenschlager
- Academic Unit for Psychiatry of Old Age, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- NorthWestern Mental Health, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Kate McMahon
- Faculty of Fine Arts and Music, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jenny Waycott
- School of Computing and Information System, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - Adam P. Vogel
- Center for Neuroscience and Speech, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Division of Translational Genomics of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Germany and Center for Neurology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Redenlab Inc., Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Robyn Woodward-Kron
- Department of Medical Education, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Felicity A. Baker
- Faculty of Fine Arts and Music, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Norwegian Academy of Music, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Eikelboom WS, van den Berg E, Coesmans M, Goudzwaard JA, Koopmanschap M, Lazaar N, van Bruchem-Visser RL, Driesen JJM, den Heijer T, Hoogers S, de Jong FJ, Mattace-Raso F, Thomeer EC, Vrenken S, Vroegindeweij LJHM, Zuidema SU, Singleton EH, van Swieten JC, Ossenkoppele R, Papma JM. Effects of the DICE Method to Improve Timely Recognition and Treatment of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Early Alzheimer's Disease at the Memory Clinic: The BEAT-IT Study. J Alzheimers Dis 2023:JAD230116. [PMID: 37182887 DOI: 10.3233/jad-230116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are highly prevalent in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and are associated with negative outcomes. However, NPS are currently underrecognized at the memory clinic and non-pharmacological interventions are scarcely implemented. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of the Describe, Investigate, Create, Evaluate (DICE) method™ to improve the care for NPS in AD at the memory clinic. METHODS We enrolled sixty community-dwelling people with mild cognitive impairment or AD dementia and NPS across six Dutch memory clinics with their caregivers. The first wave underwent care as usual (n = 36) and the second wave underwent the DICE method (n = 24). Outcomes were quality of life (QoL), caregiver burden, NPS severity, NPS-related distress, competence managing NPS, and psychotropic drug use. Reliable change index was calculated to identify responders to the intervention. A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed and semi-structured interviews with a subsample of the intervention group (n = 12). RESULTS The DICE method did not improve any outcomes over time compared to care as usual. Half of the participants of the intervention group (52%) were identified as responders and showed more NPS and NPS-related distress at baseline compared to non-responders. Interviews revealed substantial heterogeneity among participants regarding NPS-related distress, caregiver burden, and availability of social support. The intervention did not lead to significant gains in quality-adjusted life years and well-being years nor clear savings in health care and societal costs. CONCLUSION The DICE method showed no benefits at group-level, but individuals with high levels of NPS and NPS-related distress may benefit from this intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willem S Eikelboom
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center Erasmus MC, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther van den Berg
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center Erasmus MC, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel Coesmans
- Department of Psychiatry, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jeannette A Goudzwaard
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marc Koopmanschap
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Najoua Lazaar
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center Erasmus MC, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jan J M Driesen
- Department of Neurology, Franciscus Vlietland, Schiedam, The Netherlands
| | - Tom den Heijer
- Department of Neurology, Franciscus Gasthuis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Susanne Hoogers
- Department of Neurology, Spijkenisse Medical Center, Spijkenisse, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Jan de Jong
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center Erasmus MC, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Francesco Mattace-Raso
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Elsbeth C Thomeer
- Department of Neurology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Suzanne Vrenken
- Department of Geriatrics, Spijkenisse Medical Center, Spijkenisse, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sytse U Zuidema
- Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen H Singleton
- Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - John C van Swieten
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center Erasmus MC, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Janne M Papma
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center Erasmus MC, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kruse C, Maier F, Spottke A, Bach JP, Bartels C, Buerger K, Fellgiebel A, Fliessbach K, Frölich L, Hausner L, Hellmich M, Klöppel S, Klostermann A, Kornhuber J, Laske C, Peters O, Priller J, Richter-Schmidinger T, Schneider A, Shah-Hosseini K, Teipel S, von Arnim CAF, Wiltfang J, van der Wurp H, Dodel R, Jessen F. Apathy in patients with Alzheimer's disease is a cost-driving factor. Alzheimers Dement 2023. [PMID: 36588502 DOI: 10.1002/alz.12915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2022] [Revised: 04/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Apathy is the most frequent neuropsychiatric symptom in patients with dementia of the Alzheimer's type (DAT). We analyzed the influence of apathy on the resource use of DAT patients and their caregivers. METHODS Included were baseline data of 107 DAT patients from a randomized clinical trial on apathy treatment. The Resource Utilization in Dementia (RUD) instrument assessed costs over a 1-month period prior to baseline. Cost predictors were determined via a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). RESULTS On average, total monthly costs were €3070, of which €2711 accounted for caregivers' and €359 for patients' costs. An increase of one point in the Apathy Evaluation Scale resulted in a 4.1% increase in total costs. DISCUSSION Apathy is a significant cost driving factor for total costs in mild to moderate DAT. Effective treatment of apathy might be associated with reduced overall costs in DAT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Kruse
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Center for Translational Neurological and Behavioural Research, University Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany
| | - Franziska Maier
- Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, Cologne, Germany
| | - Annika Spottke
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.,Department of Neurology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Jan-Philipp Bach
- Department of Neurology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Claudia Bartels
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Goettingen (UMG), Georg-August-University, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Katharina Buerger
- Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität LMU, Munich, Germany.,German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas Fellgiebel
- Center for Mental Health in Old Age, Landeskrankenhaus (AöR), Mainz, Germany
| | - Klaus Fliessbach
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
| | - Lutz Frölich
- Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, Zentralinstitut für Seelische Gesundheit Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Lucrezia Hausner
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Martin Hellmich
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stefan Klöppel
- University Hospital of Old Age Psychiatry, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Arne Klostermann
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Psychiatry, Charité Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johannes Kornhuber
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Christoph Laske
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Tübingen, Germany.,Section for Dementia Research, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research and Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Oliver Peters
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Psychiatry, Charité Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Josef Priller
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Neuropsychiatry, Charité Berlin & Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tanja Richter-Schmidinger
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anja Schneider
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.,Klinik für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen und Gerontopsychiatrie, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Kija Shah-Hosseini
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stefan Teipel
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock, Germany.,Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | | | - Jens Wiltfang
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Goettingen (UMG), Georg-August-University, Goettingen, Germany.,German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Goettingen, Germany
| | - Hendrik van der Wurp
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Center for Translational Neurological and Behavioural Research, University Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany.,Department of Statistics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Richard Dodel
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Center for Translational Neurological and Behavioural Research, University Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany.,Department of Neurology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Frank Jessen
- Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, Cologne, Germany.,German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.,Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pathogenesis and Personalized Interventions for Pharmacological Treatment-Resistant Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Alzheimer’s Disease. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12091365. [PMID: 36143150 PMCID: PMC9501542 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12091365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Revised: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia, with cognitive impairment as a core symptom. Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPSs) also occur as non-cognitive symptoms during the disease course, worsening the prognosis. Recent treatment guidelines for NPSs have recommended non-pharmacological treatments as the first line of therapy, followed by pharmacological treatments. However, pharmacological treatment for urgent NPSs can be difficult because of a lack of efficacy or an intolerance, requiring multiple changes in psychotropic prescriptions. One biological factor that might be partly responsible for this difficulty is structural deterioration in elderly people with dementia, which may cause a functional vulnerability affecting the pharmacological response. Other causative factors might include awkward psychosocial interpersonal relations between patients and their caregiver, resulting in distressful vicious circles. Overlapping NPS sub-symptoms can also blur the prioritization of targeted symptoms. Furthermore, consistent neurocognitive reductions cause a primary apathy state and a secondary distorted ideation or perception of present objects, leading to reactions that cannot be treated pharmacologically. The present review defines treatment-resistant NPSs in AD; it may be necessary and helpful for clinicians to discuss the pathogenesis and comprehensive solutions based on three major hypothetical pathophysiological viewpoints: (1) biology, (2) psychosociology, and (3) neurocognition.
Collapse
|
7
|
Nagata T, Shinagawa S, Nakajima S, Noda Y, Mimura M. Pharmacotherapeutic combinations for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2022; 23:727-737. [PMID: 35230200 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2022.2042514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia, and four medications are currently available as symptomatic therapies: three cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEI) and memantine. In June 2021, aducanumab was approved in the United States under an accelerated approval pathway as the first novel putative disease-modifying therapy (p-DMT) targeting the β-amyloid (Aβ) cascade in the brain. The combination of several monotherapies to address the multifactorial pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases is an anticipated next step. AREAS COVERED The cholinergic hypothesis and the amyloid cascade hypothesis have been proposed as explanations for the pathogenesis of AD. Given the limited effectiveness of monotherapies based on these hypotheses, approaches using combination therapy are attempting to address the complexity of AD pathogenesis, including putative causative proteins-related neurodegeneration, neurotransmitters, and neuroinflammation, in a comprehensive manner. EXPERT OPINION The efficacy of an initial or add-on combination approach to counteracting neurodegenerative processes and functional deterioration has been investigated. The combination of symptomatic therapies with approved anti-dementia medicines (one ChEI and memantine) has been found to be functionally effective for a moderately severe disease stage. Furthermore, combination strategies involving p-DMTs, symptomatic therapies, and neuro-regeneration may be useful in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomoyuki Nagata
- Department of Psychiatry, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Psychiatry, Airanomori Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan
| | | | - Shinichiro Nakajima
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Noda
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masaru Mimura
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yoshida S, Kashima S, Ishii S, Koike S, Matsumoto M. Effects of the 2018 Japan Floods on long-term care insurance costs in Japan: retrospective cohort study. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:341. [PMID: 35177009 PMCID: PMC8855556 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-12492-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Climate change has increased the frequency and severity of torrential rains and floods around the world. Estimating the costs of these disasters is one of the five global research priorities identified by WHO. The 2018 Japan Floods hit western Japan causing extensive destruction and many deaths, especially among vulnerable elderly. Such affected elderly would need long-term care due to the various health problems caused by the disaster. A Long-Term Care Insurance (LTCI) system provides care services in Japan. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the 2018 Japan Floods on LTCI costs and service utilization. METHODS The participants of this retrospective cohort study were all verified persons utilizing LTCI services in Hiroshima, Okayama and Ehime prefectures. The observation period was from 2 months before to 6 months after the disaster. We used Generalized Estimating Equations (GEEs) to examine the association between disaster status (victims or non-victims) and the monthly total costs of LTCI service (with gamma-distribution/log-link) by residential environment (home or facility). Among home residents, we also examined each service utilization (home-based service, short-stay service and facility service), using the GEEs. After the GEEs, we estimated Average Marginal Effects (AME) over all observation periods by months as the attributable disaster effect. RESULTS The total number of participants was 279,578. There were 3024 flood victims. The disaster was associated with significantly higher total costs. The AME for home residents at 2 months after was $214 (Standard Error (SE): 12, p < 0.001), which was the highest through the observation period. Among facility residents, the AME immediately after the disaster increased by up to $850 (SE: 29, p < 0.001). The service utilization among home residents showed a different trend for each service. The AME of home-based services decreased by up to - 15.2% (SE:1.3, p < 0.001). The AME for short-stay service increased by up to 8.2% (SE: 0.9, p < 0.001) and the AME for facility service increased by up to 7.4% (SE: 0.7, p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS The 2018 Japan Floods caused an increase in LTCI costs and the utilization of short-stay and facility services, and a decrease in utilization of home-based services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuhei Yoshida
- Department of Community-Based Medical System, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima-ken, Hiroshima-shi, 734-8551, Japan.
| | - Saori Kashima
- Environmental Health Sciences Laboratory, Graduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Hiroshima University, 1-3-2 Kagamiyama, Hiroshima-ken, Higashi-Hiroshima-shi, Japan
| | - Shinya Ishii
- Department of Medicine for Integrated Approach to Social Inclusion, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Soichi Koike
- Division of Health Policy and Management, Center for Community Medicine, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Tochigi-ken, Shimotsuke-shi, 329-0498, Japan
| | - Masatoshi Matsumoto
- Department of Community-Based Medical System, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima-ken, Hiroshima-shi, 734-8551, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jones E, Aigbogun MS, Pike J, Berry M, Houle CR, Husbands J. Agitation in Dementia: Real-World Impact and Burden on Patients and the Healthcare System. J Alzheimers Dis 2021; 83:89-101. [PMID: 34250934 PMCID: PMC8461728 DOI: 10.3233/jad-210105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Background: At least 90%of patients with dementia experience behavioral or neuropsychiatric symptoms including agitation, psychotic symptoms, apathy, depression, and sleep disturbances. Agitation has been reported to be experienced by 60%of patients with mild cognitive impairment and 76%of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Objective: We aimed to assess the impact of agitation in patients with dementia on healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and healthcare costs. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of physician-reported patient data from a point-in-time survey. Patients included were aged≥50 years, with early cognitive impairment or dementia. Agitated and non-agitated patients were compared. Regression analyses assessed the relationship of agitation score (calculated from number/severity of agitation symptoms) with outcomes, with covariates including age and Mini-Mental State Examination score. Sensitivity analyses compared patients with 0 and≥2 agitation symptoms following propensity score matching on the base-case covariates. Results: Data were included for 1,349 patients (agitated, n = 693; non-agitated, n = 656). Based on regression analyses, agitation score was correlated with proportion of patients with professional caregivers (p < 0.01), institutionalized (p < 0.01), hospitalized in a psychiatric ward (p < 0.05), and receiving an antipsychotic/antidepressant (both p < 0.001); number of consultations with a healthcare professional (HCP), psychiatrist, or psycho-geriatrician; number and cost of hospitalizations (p < 0.01); cost of HCP consultations (p < 0.001); and total direct healthcare costs (p < 0.001). Sensitivity analyses generally supported the base-case analysis. Conclusion: Agitation in dementia is associated with increased HCRU and healthcare costs. Effective therapies are needed to address agitation in dementia, with the potential to alleviate patient impact, HCRU, and healthcare costs.
Collapse
|
10
|
Edwin TH, Strand BH, Persson K, Engedal K, Selbaek G, Knapskog AB. Neuropsychiatric symptoms and comorbidity: Associations with dementia progression rate in a memory clinic cohort. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2021; 36:960-969. [PMID: 33462872 DOI: 10.1002/gps.5500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Revised: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 12/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are associated with dementia severity and progression rate. NPS clusters have different neurobiological underpinnings; therefore, their effect on dementia progression may differ. Furthermore, little is known about whether individual comorbidities affect progression rate. We investigated the effect of NPS clusters and individual comorbidities on dementia progression. METHODS A memory clinic cohort with all-cause dementia (N = 442) was followed for up to 3 years from diagnosis. Previously, we found trajectory groups of dementia progression in this cohort: one with slow progression and two with rapid progression. In the present study, using principal component analysis, three symptom clusters of NPS were identified on the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q): agitation, affective and psychosis symptom clusters. Data regarding comorbidity were collected by linkage to the Norwegian Patient Registry. Multinomial logistic regression was applied to explore the association between NPS clusters and comorbidity with trajectory-group membership. RESULTS Adjusted for demographics, dementia aetiology, comorbidity and cognition, we found that, at the time of dementia diagnosis, for every point within the psychosis symptom cluster of the NPI-Q, the risk of rapid progression increased by 53%; for every point within the affective symptom cluster, the risk of rapid progression increased by 29%. A previous diagnosis of mental and behavioural disorders (excluding dementia) decreased the risk of rapid dementia progression by 65%. CONCLUSIONS Psychosis and affective symptom clusters at the time of diagnosis were associated with rapid progression of dementia. Previous diagnoses of mental and behavioural disorders (excluding dementia) were associated with slow progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trine Holt Edwin
- Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Ageing and Health, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway.,Department of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bjørn Heine Strand
- Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Ageing and Health, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Chronic Diseases and Ageing Oslo, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Karin Persson
- Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Ageing and Health, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway.,Department of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Knut Engedal
- Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Ageing and Health, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway.,Department of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Geir Selbaek
- Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Ageing and Health, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway.,Department of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nakanishi M, Niimura J, Ziylan C, Bakker TT, Granvik E, Nägga K, Shindo Y, Nishida A. Time Investment for Program Implementation to Manage Neuropsychiatric Symptoms: An Observational Longitudinal Study in In-Home and Residential Care Settings. J Alzheimers Dis Rep 2020; 4:441-453. [PMID: 33283165 PMCID: PMC7683103 DOI: 10.3233/adr-200235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There are no studies on how the same psychosocial dementia care program is adapted to both in-home and residential care settings. Objective To evaluate the time investment required by professionals to implement a psychosocial dementia care program to manage neuropsychiatric symptoms. Methods A prospective observational study design was used. The program consisted of 1) a one-day training course, 2) three interdisciplinary discussion meetings in five months, and 3) a web-based tool for the continued assessment of neuropsychiatric symptoms. Care professionals implemented the intervention in in-home (19 in-home care management agencies and 14 multiple in-home service providers) and residential care settings (19 group homes and eight nursing homes) in Japan from October 2019 to February 2020. The level of neuropsychiatric symptoms for the participants was evaluated using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI: 0-144). The time investment was reported by participating professionals. A total of 125 persons with dementia were included at baseline. Results Neuropsychiatric symptoms were significantly decreased at the final follow-up in all types of providers (Cohen's drm = 0.44-0.61). The mean (SD) time required for the five-month implementation was 417.9 (219.8) minutes. There was a mean (SD) decrease of 8.6 (14.0) points in the total NPI score among the 103 persons with completed interventions. The time investment was significantly lower in in-home care management agencies than in group homes, and lower in follow-ups than at baseline assessment. Conclusion The program implementation may incur a substantial time investment regardless of setting. An additional benefit scheme to reward the time investment would be helpful to encourage implementation until the follow-ups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miharu Nakanishi
- Research Center for Social Science & Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Junko Niimura
- Research Center for Social Science & Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Canan Ziylan
- Research Centre Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ton Tjem Bakker
- Research Centre Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Stichting Wetenschap Balans, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eva Granvik
- Center of Excellence in Dementia, University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Katarina Nägga
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Acute Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Yumi Shindo
- National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Aichi, Japan
| | - Atsushi Nishida
- Research Center for Social Science & Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Magierski R, Sobow T, Schwertner E, Religa D. Pharmacotherapy of Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia: State of the Art and Future Progress. Front Pharmacol 2020; 11:1168. [PMID: 32848775 PMCID: PMC7413102 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.01168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2019] [Accepted: 07/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The core symptoms of different dementia subtypes are the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) and its neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS). BPSD symptoms may occur at any stage in the case of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease (AD), whereas they tend to occur early on in the case of its behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia or dementia with Lewy bodies and are essential for diagnosis. BPSD treatment consists of non-pharmacological as well as pharmacological interventions, with non-pharmacological interactions being suggested as first-line treatment. Agitation, psychotic features, apathy, depression, and anxiety may not respond to acetylcholinesterase inhibitors or memantine in AD cases; therefore, antipsychotics, antidepressants, sedative drugs or anxiolytics, and antiepileptic drugs are typically prescribed. However, such management of BPSD can be complicated by hypersensitivity to antipsychotic drugs, as observed in DLB, and a lack of effective pro-cognitive treatment in the case of frontotemporal dementia. The present paper reviews current knowledge of the management of BPSD and its limitations and discusses on-going clinical trials and future therapeutic options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Radoslaw Magierski
- Department of Old Age Psychiatry and Psychotic Disorders, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Tomasz Sobow
- Dialog Therapy Centre, Warsaw & Institute of Psychology, University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Emilia Schwertner
- Center for Alzheimer Research, Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Dorota Religa
- Center for Alzheimer Research, Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.,Tema Aging, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Nagata T, Shinagawa S, Nakajima S, Noda Y, Mimura M. Pharmacological management of behavioral disturbances in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2020; 21:1093-1102. [DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2020.1745186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tomoyuki Nagata
- Department of Psychiatry, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Psychiatry, Airanomori Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan
| | | | - Shinichiro Nakajima
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Noda
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masaru Mimura
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
REASONS FOR THE STUDY The Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) has been used for studies of neuropsychiatric symptoms in neurodegenerative disorders for the past 25 years. This article reviews the history of the development and application of the NPI. MAIN FINDINGS The NPI consists of 10 (or 12) items that are assayed with questions, subquestions, and ratings of frequency and severity. The NPI has been shown to be valid and reliable. The NPI has been translated into approximately 40 languages; it has 4 of versions designed for different clinical applications. The NPI studies show contrasting profiles of behavioral symptoms in different neurologic disorders. The NPI has been used in approximately 350 clinical trials. In economic studies, the NPI captures the cost of behavioral symptoms in dementias. PRINCIPLE CONCLUSIONS The NPI is a useful instrument for capturing behavioral changes in Alzheimer disease and other neurodegenerative disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Cummings
- Department of Brain Health, School of integrated Health Sciences, UNLV, Las Vegas, NV, USA,Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Cleveland Clinic, Las Vegas, NV, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gottesman RT, Stern Y. Behavioral and Psychiatric Symptoms of Dementia and Rate of Decline in Alzheimer's Disease. Front Pharmacol 2019; 10:1062. [PMID: 31616296 PMCID: PMC6768941 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Alzheimer’s disease causes both cognitive and non-cognitive symptoms. There is increasing evidence that the presentation and course of Alzheimer’s disease is highly heterogenous. This heterogeneity presents challenges to patients, their families, and clinicians due to the difficulty in prognosticating future symptoms and functional impairment. Behavioral and psychiatric symptoms are emerging as a significant contributor to this clinical heterogeneity. These symptoms have been linked to multiple areas of neurodegeneration, which may suggest that they are representative of network-wide dysfunction in the brain. However, current diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer’s disease focus exclusively on the cognitive aspects of disease. Behavioral and psychiatric symptoms have been found in multiple studies to be related to disease severity and to contribute to disease progression over time. A better understanding of how behavioral and psychiatric symptoms relate to cognitive aspects of Alzheimer’s disease would help to refine the models of disease and hopefully lead to improved ability to develop therapeutic options for this devastating disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reena T Gottesman
- Division of Aging and Dementia, Department of Neurology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Yaakov Stern
- Division of Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|