Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Fusions as an Actionable Resistance Mechanism to EGFR TKIs in EGFR-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Top 20 EGFR+ NSCLC Clinical and Translational Science Papers That Shaped the 20 Years Since the Discovery of Activating EGFR Mutations in NSCLC. An Editor-in-Chief Expert Panel Consensus Survey

The year 2024 is the 20th anniversary of the discovery of activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Since then, tremendous advances have been made in the treatment of NSCLC based on this discovery. Some of these studies have led to seismic changes in the concept of oncology research and spurred treatment advances beyond NSCLC, leading to a current true era of precision oncology for all solid tumors. We now routinely molecularly profile all tumor types and even plasma samples of patients with NSCLC for multiple actionable driver mutations, independent of patient clinical characteristics nor is profiling limited to the advanced incurable stage. We are increasingly monitoring treatment responses and detecting resistance to targeted therapy by using plasma genotyping. Furthermore, we are now profiling early-stage NSCLC for appropriate adjuvant targeted treatment leading to an eventual potential "cure" in early-stage EGFR+ NSCLC which have societal implication on implementing lung cancer screening in never-smokers as most EGFR+ NSCLC patients are never-smokers. All these advances were unfathomable in 2004 when the five papers that described "discoveries" of activating EGFR mutations (del19, L858R, exon 20 insertions, and "uncommon" mutations) were published. To commemorate this 20th anniversary, we assembled a global panel of thoracic medical oncology experts to select the top 20 papers (publications or congress presentation) from the 20 years since this seminal discovery with December 31, 2023 as the cutoff date for inclusion of papers to be voted on. Papers ranked 21 to 30 were considered "honorable mention" and also annotated. Our objective is that these 30 papers with their annotations about their impact and even all the ranked papers will serve as "syllabus" for the education of future thoracic oncology trainees. Finally, we mentioned potential practice-changing clinical trials to be reported. One of them, LAURA was published online on June 2, 2024 was not included in the list of papers to be voted on but will surely be highly ranked if this consensus survery is performed again on the 25th anniversay of the discovery EGFR mutations (i.e. top 25 papers on the 25 years since the discovery of activating EGFR mutations).

Combined Dacomitinib and Selpercatinib Treatment for a Patient with EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Acquired CCDC6-RET Fusion

RET rearrangements are recognized drivers in lung cancer, representing a small subset (1-2%) of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Additionally, RET fusions also serve as a rare acquired resistance mechanism in EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Only a few NSCLC cases have been reported with co-occurrence of EGFR mutations and RET fusions as an acquired resistance mechanism induced by EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). A 68-year-old man diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR L858R mutation initially responded well to dacomitinib, a second-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Afterward, he developed acquired resistance accompanied by a RET rearrangement. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis revealed that the tumor possessed both the new CCDC6-RET fusion and the EGFR L858R mutation. Subsequently, he was treated with a combination of cisplatin, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab resulting in a partial response. Nevertheless, his condition deteriorated as the disease progressed, manifesting as hydrocephalus, accompanied by altered consciousness and lower limb weakness. The subsequent combined treatment with dacomitinib and selpercatinib resulted in a significant improvement in neurological symptoms. Here, we first identified acquired CCDC6-RET fusion with a coexisting EGFR L858R mutation following dacomitinib treatment. Our findings highlight the importance of NGS for identifying RET fusions and suggest the potential combination of dacomitinib and selpercatinib to overcome this resistance. For NSCLC patients with RET rearrangements and no access to RET inhibitors, pemetrexed-based chemotherapy provides a feasible alternative.

LIBRETTO-431: Confirming the Superiority of Selpercatinib to Chemotherapy and the Lack of Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced RET Fusion-Positive (RET+) NSCLC, Another Unique Never-Smoker Predominant Molecular Subtype of NSCLC

Selpercatinib, a potent and highly selective RET kinase inhibitor with significant CNS activity, has recently gained US approval for the treatment of NSCLC harboring RET fusions (RET+) based on a large-scale single-arm study. The LIBRETTO-431 trial was the global pivotal registration phase 3 trial comparing selpercatinib to platinum-based chemotherapy with or without pembrolizumab as the first-line treatment of patients with advanced RET+ NSCLC. Never-smokers constituted 67.4% of the RET+ NSCLC patients enrolled. KIF5B-RET made up the vast majority (77%) of the RET+ fusion variant with known fusion partner. The results of this study demonstrated significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) benefit as well as impressive intracranial disease response in participants treated with selpercatinib as compared to those treated with chemotherapy, with a HR [hazard ratio] of 0.46 (95% CI 0.33-0.70; P < 0.001) for the intention-to-treat (ITT)-pembrolizumab group and HR of 0.46 (95% CI 0.31-0.70, P < 0.001) for the overall ITT-group of patients. The addition of pembrolizumab to platinum/pemetrexed chemotherapy resulted in numerically identical PFS (11.2 months). These results point to selpercatinib's superiority to traditional chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of NSCLC harboring RET fusions and add to literature on the salience of targeted precision oncology and lack of efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor in NSCLC patients with never-smoker predominant actionable driver mutations. RET+ NSCLC should be added to the list of molecular subtypes (EGFR+, ALK+, ROS1+) of NSCLC to be excluded in chemoimmunotherapy trial.

Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma With Clear Cell Features and FGFR3::TACC3 Gene Rearrangement : Clinicopathologic and Next Generation Sequencing Study of 7 Cases

Seven cases of primary lung tumors characterized histologically by clear cell morphology and a distinctive FGFR3::TACC3 gene rearrangement are described. The tumors arose in 4 women and 3 men, aged 47 to 81 years (mean=68). They occurred in peripheral locations, predominantly subpleural, and ranged in size from 1.4 to 6.5 cm (mean=4.1 cm). All tumors showed a solid growth pattern with abundant central areas of necrosis and marked nuclear pleomorphism. The tumors demonstrated clear cell histology, with large cohesive tumor cells displaying atypical nuclei and abundant clear cytoplasm. Immunohistochemical stains identified a squamous phenotype in 5 cases and an adenocarcinoma phenotype in 2 cases. One case was a squamous cell carcinoma with focal glandular component, and one of the squamous cell carcinomas showed focal sarcomatoid changes. Next generation sequencing identified FGFR3::TACC3 gene rearrangements in all 7 cases. One case demonstrated a concurrent activating FGFR3 mutation and a second case demonstrated concurrent FGFR3 amplification. Two cases harbored a concurrent KRAS G12D mutation. One case harbored both KRAS and EGFR mutations, and 1 case had a concurrent TP53 mutation. Non-small cell lung carcinoma harboring FGFR3::TACC3 gene rearrangements is extremely rare, and this rearrangement may potentially be enriched in tumors that demonstrate clear cell histology. Identification of FGFR3::TACC3 in patients with lung carcinomas with clear cell features may be of importance as they could potentially be candidates for therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

A Clinical Viewpoint on the Use of Targeted Therapy in Advanced Gastric Cancer

The development of therapies for advanced gastric cancer (GC) has made significant progress over the past few years. The identification of new molecules and molecular targets is expanding our understanding of the disease's intricate nature. The end of the classical oncology era, which relied on well-studied chemotherapeutic agents, is giving rise to novel and unexplored challenges, which will cause a significant transformation of the current oncological knowledge in the next few years. The integration of established clinically effective regimens in additional studies will be crucial in managing these innovative aspects of GC. This study aims to present an in-depth and comprehensive review of the clinical advancements in targeted therapy and immunotherapy for advanced GC.

Expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of RET gene fusion non-small cell lung cancer in China

The rearranged during transfection (RET) gene is one of the receptor tyrosine kinases and cell-surface molecules responsible for transmitting signals that regulate cell growth and differentiation. In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), RET fusion is a rare driver gene alteration associated with a poor prognosis. Fortunately, two selective RET inhibitors (sRETi), namely pralsetinib and selpercatinib, have been approved for treating RET fusion NSCLC due to their remarkable efficacy and safety profiles. These inhibitors have shown the ability to overcome resistance to multikinase inhibitors (MKIs). Furthermore, ongoing clinical trials are investigating several second-generation sRETis that are specifically designed to target solvent front mutations, which pose a challenge for first-generation sRETis. The effective screening of patients is the first crucial step in the clinical application of RET-targeted therapy. Currently, four methods are widely used for detecting gene rearrangements: next-generation sequencing (NGS), reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Each of these methods has its advantages and limitations. To streamline the clinical workflow and improve diagnostic and treatment strategies for RET fusion NSCLC, our expert group has reached a consensus. Our objective is to maximize the clinical benefit for patients and promote standardized approaches to RET fusion screening and therapy.

Reviving immunogenic cell death upon targeting TACC3 enhances T-DM1 response in HER2-positive breast cancer

Immunogenic cell death (ICD), an immune-priming form of cell death, has been shown to be induced by several different anti-cancer therapies. Despite being the first and one of the most successful antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) approved for refractory HER2-positive breast cancer, little is known if response and resistance to trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) involves ICD modulation that can be leveraged to enhance T-DM1 response. Here, we report that T-DM1 induces spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC)-dependent ICD in sensitive cells by inducing eIF2α phosphorylation, surface exposure of calreticulin, ATP and HMGB1 release, and secretion of ICD-related cytokines, all of which are lost in resistance. Accordingly, an ICD-related gene signature correlates with clinical response to T-DM1-containing therapy. We found that transforming acidic coiled-coil containing 3 (TACC3) is overexpressed in T-DM1 resistant cells, and that T-DM1 responsive patients have reduced TACC3 protein while the non-responders exhibited increased TACC3 expression during T-DM1 treatment. Notably, genetic or pharmacological inhibition of TACC3 revives T-DM1-induced SAC activation and induction of ICD markers in vitro. Finally, TACC3 inhibition elicits ICD in vivo shown by vaccination assay, and it potentiates T-DM1 by inducing dendritic cell (DC) maturation and enhancing infiltration of cytotoxic T cells in the human HER2-overexpressing MMTV.f.huHER2#5 (Fo5) transgenic model. Together, our results show that ICD is a key mechanism of action of T-DM1 which is lost in resistance, and that targeting TACC3 restores T-DM1-mediated ICD and overcomes resistance.

Small Molecule Inhibitors as Therapeutic Agents Targeting Oncogenic Fusion Proteins: Current Status and Clinical

Oncogenic fusion proteins, arising from chromosomal rearrangements, have emerged as prominent drivers of tumorigenesis and crucial therapeutic targets in cancer research. In recent years, the potential of small molecular inhibitors in selectively targeting fusion proteins has exhibited significant prospects, offering a novel approach to combat malignancies harboring these aberrant molecular entities. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of small molecular inhibitors as therapeutic agents for oncogenic fusion proteins. We discuss the rationale for targeting fusion proteins, elucidate the mechanism of action of inhibitors, assess the challenges associated with their utilization, and provide a summary of the clinical progress achieved thus far. The objective is to provide the medicinal community with current and pertinent information and to expedite the drug discovery programs in this area.

Understanding and targeting resistance mechanisms in cancer

Resistance to cancer therapies has been a commonly observed phenomenon in clinical practice, which is one of the major causes of treatment failure and poor patient survival. The reduced responsiveness of cancer cells is a multifaceted phenomenon that can arise from genetic, epigenetic, and microenvironmental factors. Various mechanisms have been discovered and extensively studied, including drug inactivation, reduced intracellular drug accumulation by reduced uptake or increased efflux, drug target alteration, activation of compensatory pathways for cell survival, regulation of DNA repair and cell death, tumor plasticity, and the regulation from tumor microenvironments (TMEs). To overcome cancer resistance, a variety of strategies have been proposed, which are designed to enhance the effectiveness of cancer treatment or reduce drug resistance. These include identifying biomarkers that can predict drug response and resistance, identifying new targets, developing new targeted drugs, combination therapies targeting multiple signaling pathways, and modulating the TME. The present article focuses on the different mechanisms of drug resistance in cancer and the corresponding tackling approaches with recent updates. Perspectives on polytherapy targeting multiple resistance mechanisms, novel nanoparticle delivery systems, and advanced drug design tools for overcoming resistance are also reviewed.

Unraveling the Impact of Intratumoral Heterogeneity on EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Resistance in EGFR-Mutated NSCLC

The advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for treating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been a game changer in lung cancer therapy. However, patients often develop resistance to the drugs within a few years. Despite numerous studies that have explored resistance mechanisms, particularly in regards to collateral signal pathway activation, the underlying biology of resistance remains largely unknown. This review focuses on the resistance mechanisms of EGFR-mutated NSCLC from the standpoint of intratumoral heterogeneity, as the biological mechanisms behind resistance are diverse and largely unclear. There exist various subclonal tumor populations in an individual tumor. For lung cancer patients, drug-tolerant persister (DTP) cell populations may have a pivotal role in accelerating the evolution of tumor resistance to treatment through neutral selection. Cancer cells undergo various changes to adapt to the new tumor microenvironment caused by drug exposure. DTP cells may play a crucial role in this adaptation and may be fundamental in mechanisms of resistance. Intratumoral heterogeneity may also be precipitated by DNA gains and losses through chromosomal instability, and the role of extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) may play an important role. Significantly, ecDNA can increase oncogene copy number alterations and enhance intratumoral heterogeneity more effectively than chromosomal instability. Additionally, advances in comprehensive genomic profiling have given us insights into various mutations and concurrent genetic alterations other than EGFR mutations, inducing primary resistance in the context of tumor heterogeneity. Understanding the mechanisms of resistance is clinically crucial since these molecular interlayers in cancer-resistance mechanisms may help to devise novel and individualized anticancer therapeutic approaches.

Combatting acquired resistance to osimertinib in EGFR-mutant lung cancer

The discovery of activating mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in non-small-cell lung cancer transformed the care and prognosis of patients and heralded the era of 'personalized medicine' in thoracic oncology. Osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR inhibitor, has been established as the preferred EGFR inhibitor for newly diagnosed patients which urged the need to develop treatment options for patients progressing on first-line osimertinib. However, acquired resistance invariably emerges and numerous efforts have been attempted to delay or overcome acquired resistance. In this article, we thoroughly reviewed the current understanding of osimertinib resistance mechanisms and explored the established and emerging treatment options. Newer treatment strategies targeting EGFR-dependent or -independent resistance mechanisms, novel approaches using bispecific antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates will be discussed. Moreover, what to do with brain only progression, and how to incorporate immunotherapy in EGFR-mutant lung cancer will be discussed. Lastly, future perspectives on the ongoing clinical trials and combination of front-line therapy will be introduced.

Survival benefit of combinatorial osimertinib rechallenge and entrectinib in an EGFR-mutant NSCLC patient with acquired LMNA-NTRK1 fusion following osimertinib resistance

Acquired resistance to osimertinib is inevitable and heterogeneous despite its documented efficacy against EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Subsequent therapeutic options assume the dominant form of the resistance mechanism; however, the more rare oncogenic driver, NTRK1 fusion, has also reportedly conferred osimertinib resistance. Nevertheless, clear-cut options when NSCLCs are driven by EGFR mutation and the subsequent NTRK fusion are lacking. This is a case of NSCLC wherein exon 19 deletion in EGFR (19del) and acquired LMNA-NTRK1 fusion were accompanied by the persistence of EGFR T790M. The patient underwent peritoneal metastasis after multiple targeted therapies: gefitinib, osimertinib, chemotherapy, and anlotinib plus docetaxel (in clinical trials). Osimertinib was subsequently re-administered with the NTRK fusion inhibitor entrectinib, resulting in remission of peritoneal metastases even after slow progression of pancreatic metastasis over the following 5 months. An extensive literature review to identify the efficacies of therapies for NTRK fusion as the means to acquired resistance to EGFR TKIs revealed that blocking both the EGFR mutation and the subsequent NTRK fusion can provide clinical benefits following EGFR TKIs resistance; however, the efficacy and safety of combination therapies must be further investigated. To precisely manage EGFR-mutated NSCLCs, it is also essential to identify the resistance mechanisms by repeating biopsies.

Genomic and biological study of fusion genes as resistance mechanisms to EGFR inhibitors

The clinical significance of gene fusions detected by DNA-based next generation sequencing remains unclear as resistance mechanisms to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer. By studying EGFR inhibitor-resistant patients treated with a combination of an EGFR inhibitor and a drug targeting the putative resistance-causing fusion oncogene, we identify patients who benefit and those who do not from this treatment approach. Through evaluation including RNA-seq of potential drug resistance-imparting fusion oncogenes in 504 patients with EGFR mutant lung cancer, we identify only a minority of them as functional, potentially capable of imparting EGFR inhibitor resistance. We further functionally validate fusion oncogenes in vitro using CRISPR-based editing of EGFR mutant cell lines and use these models to identify known and unknown drug resistance mechanisms to combination therapies. Collectively, our results partially reveal the complex nature of fusion oncogenes as potential drug resistance mechanisms and highlight approaches that can be undertaken to determine their functional significance.

RET fusions as primary oncogenic drivers and secondary acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

RET fusions are rare oncogenic drivers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While activating RET rearrangements are found in NSCLC patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) genetic alterations at resistance to EGFR inhibitors, the extent to which co-occurring genomic alterations exist and how they might affect prognosis or therapy response is poorly understood.

METHODS

Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) was used to assess 380 baseline patients with primary RET fusions and 71 EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients who acquired RET fusions after developing resistance to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs).

RESULTS

Primary RET fusions were more likely associated with females and younger age, with KIF5B being the predominant fusion partner. In baseline patients, both SMAD4 (5.3% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.044) and MYC copy-number gain variants (6.9% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.009) were more frequently co-mutated with KIF5B-RET than CCDC6-RET. By contrast, CDKN2A (11.3% vs. 2.4%, P = 0.003) mutations were significantly enriched in CCDC6-RET-rearranged baseline patients. A significant increase in the proportion of CCDC6-RET was observed in acquired RET-rearranged patients (47.3% vs. 22.5%, P < 0.001). The median progression-free survival (PFS) of patients harboring RB1 and TP53 double-mutations (5.5 vs. 10.0 months, P = 0.020) or ERBB2 amplification (5.6 vs. 10.0 months, P = 0.041) was significantly shorter than the wild-type counterparts. Moreover, we identified that RET fusions were more likely associated with acquired resistance (AR) to third-generation EGFR-TKIs than previous generations of EGFR-TKIs.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, we depicted the mutational profiles of NSCLC patients who harbor RET fusions at baseline or after resistance to EGFR-TKIs. Furthermore, our results suggest that RET fusions mediate secondary resistance to third-generation EGFR-TKIs and might be associated with poor prognosis in patients with NSCLC.

PET/CT Based EGFR Mutation Status Classification of NSCLC Using Deep Learning Features and Radiomics Features

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the performance of radiomics and deep learning in predicting EGFR mutation status in patients with lung cancer based on PET/CT images, and tried to explore a model with excellent prediction performance to accurately predict EGFR mutation status in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Method: PET/CT images of 194 NSCLC patients from Xijing Hospital were collected and divided into a training set and a validation set according to the ratio of 7:3. Statistics were made on patients' clinical characteristics, and a large number of features were extracted based on their PET/CT images (4306 radiomics features and 2048 deep learning features per person) with the pyradiomics toolkit and 3D convolutional neural network. Then a radiomics model (RM), a deep learning model (DLM), and a hybrid model (HM) were established. The performance of the three models was compared by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, calibration curves, and decision curves. In addition, a nomogram based on a deep learning score (DS) and the most significant clinical characteristic was plotted. Result: In the training set composed of 138 patients (64 with EGFR mutation and 74 without EGFR mutation), the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of HM (0.91, 95% CI: 0.86-0.96) was higher than that of RM (0.82, 95% CI: 0.75-0.89) and DLM (0.90, 95% CI: 0.85-0.95). In the validation set composed of 57 patients (32 with EGFR mutation and 25 without EGFR mutation), the AUC of HM (0.85, 95% CI: 0.77-0.93) was also higher than that of RM (0.68, 95% CI: 0.52-0.84) and DLM (0.79, 95% CI: 0.67-0.91). In all, HM achieved better diagnostic performance in predicting EGFR mutation status in NSCLC patients than two other models. Conclusion: Our study showed that the deep learning model based on PET/CT images had better performance than radiomics model in diagnosing EGFR mutation status of NSCLC patients based on PET/CT images. Combined with the most statistically significant clinical characteristic (smoking) and deep learning features, our hybrid model had better performance in predicting EGFR mutation types of patients than two other models, which could enable NSCLC patients to choose more personalized treatment schemes.

Brief report: Response to pralsetinib observed in meningeal-metastatic EGFR-mutant NSCLC with acquired RET fusion

Introduction

RET is well known as an important driver gene in NSCLC. Moreover, RET is a rare acquired resistance mechanism to EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Only 36 NSCLC cases of coexistence of EGFR and RET were reported previously worldwide. So far, there have been no reports on the following: (1) whether combination of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and RET TKI works for meningeal metastasis; (2) the concentrations of EGFR TKI and RET TKI in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma; and (3) whether RET fusions and EGFR mutation happened in the same clone or not.

Methods

We reported a patient with an EGFR-mutant NSCLC with acquired RET fusions and meningeal metastasis treated with pralsetinib and osimertinib; the specimen was analyzed by next-generation sequencing (Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform). Symptom improvement and magnetic resonance imaging scan were used for effect evaluation. Furthermore, we determined the concentrations of pralsetinib and osimertinib in CSF and plasma by means of liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. We also detected RET fusion and EGFR L858R mutation by methods of fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry with continuous sections to analyze whether RET fusions coexist with EGFR mutation in the same clone or not.

Results

The allele frequency of the RET fusion was detected to be 12.88%. This patient achieved a partial response, indicating pralsetinib combined with osimertinib may be clinically beneficial for meningeal metastasis in patients harboring acquired coexistent RET fusions. The concentrations of pralsetinib in the CSF and plasma were 704.76 nM and 91.31 μM, whereas those of osimertinib in the CSF and plasma were 23.70 nM and 2148.94 nM, respectively. RET fusion was found in the same clone of EGFR L858R mutation.

Conclusions

Our finding of this case indicated that RET fusion and EGFR mutation occur in the same population of cell clones, rather than in different cell clones. Combined pralsetinib may be an effective way to overcome the resistance, even for meningeal metastasis, owing to high CSF distribution of pralsetinib.

EGFR signaling pathway as therapeutic target in human cancers

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) enacts major roles in the maintenance of epithelial tissues. However, when EGFR signaling is altered, it becomes the grand orchestrator of epithelial transformation, and hence one of the most world-wide studied tyrosine kinase receptors involved in neoplasia, in several tissues. In the last decades, EGFR-targeted therapies shaped the new era of precision-oncology. Despite major advances, the dream of converting solid tumors into a chronic disease is still unfulfilled, and long-term remission eludes us. Studies investigating the function of this protein in solid malignancies have revealed numerous ways how tumor cells dysregulate EGFR function. Starting from preclinical models (cell lines, organoids, murine models) and validating in clinical specimens, EGFR-related oncogenic pathways, mechanisms of resistance, and novel avenues to inhibit tumor growth and metastatic spread enriching the therapeutic portfolios, were identified. Focusing on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), where EGFR mutations are major players in the adenocarcinoma subtype, we will go over the most relevant discoveries that led us to understand EGFR and beyond, and highlight how they revolutionized cancer treatment by expanding the therapeutic arsenal at our disposal.

Blockade of deubiquitinase YOD1 degrades oncogenic PML/RARα and eradicates acute promyelocytic leukemia cells

In most acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) cells, promyelocytic leukemia (PML) fuses to retinoic acid receptor α (RARα) due to chromosomal translocation, thus generating PML/RARα oncoprotein, which is a relatively stable oncoprotein for degradation in APL. Elucidating the mechanism regulating the stability of PML/RARα may help to degrade PML/RARα and eradicate APL cells. Here, we describe a deubiquitinase (DUB)-involved regulatory mechanism for the maintenance of PML/RARα stability and develop a novel pharmacological approach to degrading PML/RARα by inhibiting DUB. We utilized a DUB siRNA library to identify the ovarian tumor protease (OTU) family member deubiquitinase YOD1 as a critical DUB of PML/RARα. Suppression of YOD1 promoted the degradation of PML/RARα, thus inhibiting APL cells and prolonging the survival time of APL cell-bearing mice. Subsequent phenotypic screening of small molecules allowed us to identify ubiquitin isopeptidase inhibitor I (G5) as the first YOD1 pharmacological inhibitor. As expected, G5 notably degraded PML/RARα protein and eradicated APL, particularly drug-resistant APL cells. Importantly, G5 also showed a strong killing effect on primary patient-derived APL blasts. Overall, our study not only reveals the DUB-involved regulatory mechanism on PML/RARα stability and validates YOD1 as a potential therapeutic target for APL, but also identifies G5 as a YOD1 inhibitor and a promising candidate for APL, particularly drug-resistant APL treatment.

ORIENT-31 as the Sakigake “Charging Samurai” Born of IMpower150 but Will MARIPOSA-2 IMPRESS in the “Meiji Modernization” of Post-3G EGFR TKI Progression?

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have become the preferred first line therapy for those patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. Given superior progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) when compared to earlier generations, third generation EGFR TKIs have become the first choice therapy in many parts of the world. Even though multiple strategies are in development to target both “on-target” and “off-target” resistance, the continuation of EGFR TKIs at the time of progression remains a controversial topic. This commentary focuses on both the ”classic” clinical trials of IMpower150 and IMPRESS and compares them to the recently reported ORIENT-31 and ongoing MARIPOSA-2 to discuss the future therapeutic strategies in the setting of progression post-third generation EGFR TKIs.

Targeting tumor endothelial hyperglycolysis enhances immunotherapy through remodeling tumor microenvironment

Vascular abnormality is a hallmark of most solid tumors and facilitates immune evasion. Targeting the abnormal metabolism of tumor endothelial cells (TECs) may provide an opportunity to improve the outcome of immunotherapy. Here, in comparison to vascular endothelial cells from adjacent peritumoral tissues in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), TECs presented enhanced glycolysis with higher glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) expression. Then an unbiased screening identified that osimertinib could modify the GAPDH and thus inhibit its activity in TECs. Low-dose osimertinib treatment caused tumor regression with vascular normalization and increased infiltration of immune effector cells in tumor, which was due to the reduced secretion of lactate from TECs by osimertinib through the inhibition of GAPDH. Moreover, osimertinib and anti-PD-1 blockade synergistically retarded tumor growth. This study provides a potential strategy to enhance immunotherapy by targeting the abnormal metabolism of TECs.

Comparative Clinical Efficacy of 'Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and Anlotinib' Than CCRT in Patients with Locally Advanced ESCC

Objective: Radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy has been preferred as the clinical therapeutic modalities to combat locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The aim of this retrospective study is to ascertain combinatorial efficacy of anlotinib with concurrent radiotherapy (CCRT) rather than CCRT alone. Methods: Locally advanced ESCC patients registered between August 2018 to April 2019 in the third People's hospital of Zhengzhou, the First affiliated hospital of Zhengzhou University, Anyang Cancer Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University were selected for this retrospective study; and these patients segregated into two groups subsequently who received combinatorial regimen with CCRT and anlotinib compared for treatment-related toxicity, response rates, safety, survival outcomes, than CCRT alone. Results: Progression free survival (PFS) was 0.577 (95% CI, 0.333-0.902, P  =  0.014); the median overall survival time was 5 months (95% CI, 4.1-7.5) for the CCRT group, whereas 9 months (95% CI, 7.3-18.0) for the group received ‘anlotinib with CCRT’ (HR  =  0.578, 95% CI, 0.337-0.924, P  =  0.021). Overall objective response rates were considerable with a statistical difference between the two groups at 6 months (P1  =  0.027, P2  =  0.015) and 12 months (P1  =  0.012, P2  =  0.027). Overall adverse events are mitigated in combinatorial regimen than CCRT alone except the incidence of hypertension, which was higher in ‘anlotinib with CCRT’ group than CCRT group (P  =  0.023). Total 13 patients exhibited hand-foot skin reactions in the group that received anlotinib in combination with CCRT. Anlotinib in combination with CCRT enhanced the overall survival (OS) rates, whereas incidence of treatment-related toxicity is minimized than CCRT alone. Conclusion: Combinatorial regimen of anlotinib with CCRT significantly enhanced clinical efficacy, safety and may benefit for treating the locally advanced ESCC patients.

[Advances in the Treatment of RET Fusion-positive Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]

Rearranged during transfection (RET) fusions are found in 0.7% to 2% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Fusions between RET gene and other domains represent the distinct biological and clinicopathological subtypes of NSCLC. Recent years have witnessed the remarkable advancement of RET fusion-positive advanced NSCLC therapy. Conventional chemotherapy produced moderate clinical benefits. Prior to the introduction of targeted therapy or in the context of unavailability, platinum-based systemic regimens are initial therapy options. Immunotherapy predicted minimal response in the presence of RET fusions while currently available data have been scarce, and the single-agent immunotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy regimens are not recommended as initial systemic therapy in this population. The repurpose of multi-target kinase inhibitors in patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC showed encouraging therapeutic activity, with only cabozantinib and vandetanib being recommended as initial or subsequent options under certain circumstances. However, there are still unmet clinical needs. Pralsetinib and selpercatinib have been developed as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) selectively targeting RET variation of fusions or mutations, and both agents significantly improved the prognosis of patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC. Pralsetinib and selpercatinib have been established as preferred first-line therapy or subsequent therapy options. As observed with other TKIs treatment, resistance has also been associated with RET targeted inhibition, and the acquired resistance eventually affect the long-term therapeutic effectiveness, leading to limited subsequent treatment options. Therefore, it is essential to identify resistance mechanisms to TKI in RET fusion-positive advanced NSCLC to help reveal and establish new strategies to overcome resistance. Here, we review the advances in the treatment of RET fusion-positive advanced NSCLC.
.

Deepening the Knowledge of ROS1 Rearrangements in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Diagnosis, Treatment, Resistance and Concomitant Alterations

ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) rearrangements are reported in about 1-2% of non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). After efficacy of crizotinib was demonstrated, identification of ROS1 translocations in advanced disease became fundamental to give patients the chance of specific and effective treatment. Different methods are available for detection of rearrangements, and probably the real prevalence of ROS1 rearrangements is higher than that reported in literature, as our capacity to detect gene rearrangements is improving. In particular, with next generation sequencing (NGS) techniques, we are currently able to assess multiple genes simultaneously with increasing sensitivity. This is leading to overcome the "single oncogenic driver" paradigm, and in the very near future, the co-existence of multiple drivers will probably emerge more frequently and represent a therapeutic issue. Since recently, crizotinib has been the only available therapy, but today, many other tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are emerging and seem promising both in first and subsequent lines of treatment. Indeed, novel inhibitors are also able to overcome resistance mutations to crizotinib, hypothesizing a possible sequential strategy also in ROS1-rearranged disease. In this review, we will focus on ROS1 rearrangements, dealing with diagnostic aspects, new therapeutic options, resistance issues and the coexistence of ROS1 translocations with other molecular alterations.

Genomic characterization and outcome evaluation of kinome fusions in lung cancer revealed novel druggable fusions

Kinase fusions represent an important type of somatic alterations that promote oncogenesis and serve as diagnostic markers in lung cancer. We aimed to identify the landscape of clinically relevant kinase fusions in Chinese lung cancer and to explore rare kinase rearrangements; thus, providing valuable evidence for therapeutic decision making. We performed genomic profiling of 425 cancer-relevant genes from tumor/plasma biopsies from a total of 17,442 Chinese lung cancer patients using next generation sequencing (NGS). Patients’ clinical characteristics and treatment histories were retrospectively studied. A total of 1162 patients (6.66%; 1162/17,442) were identified as having kinase fusions, including 906 adenocarcinomas (ADCs) and 35 squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs). In ADC, 170 unique gene fusion pairs were observed, including rare kinase fusions, SLC12A2-ROS1, NCOA4-RET, and ANK3-RET. As for SCC, 15 unique gene fusions were identified, among which the most frequent were EML4-ALK and FGFR3-TACC3. Analyses of oncogenic mutations revealed a dual role for the gene fusions, CCDC6-RET and FGFR3-TACC3, in driving oncogenesis or serving as acquired resistance mechanisms to kinase inhibitors. In addition, our real-world evidence showed that patients with recurrent kinase fusions with low frequency (two occurrences) could benefit from treatment with kinase inhibitors’ off-label use. Notably, patients with stage IV ADC who had novel RORB-ALK or AFF2-RET fusions, but no other known oncogenic driver mutations, demonstrated favorable clinical outcomes on tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Our data provide a comprehensive overview of the landscape of oncogenic kinase fusions in lung cancer, which assist in recognizing potentially druggable fusions that can be translated into therapeutic applications.

EGFR-mutant NSCLC: emerging novel drugs

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite the significant advances in EGFR-mutant nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), some challenges remain. One of the permanent and inevitable issues is the emergence of acquired resistance. Therefore, blocking the activation of EGFR pathway and overcoming drug resistance with novel agents are still in high demand. Here, we review the development of novel drugs in EGFR-mutant, advanced NSCLC, including targeting EGFR exon 20 insertion (EGFR20ins), and novel role of epidermal growth factor receptor, tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKIs) in early-stage NSCLC.

RECENT FINDINGS

EGFR-TKIs as adjuvant therapy or neoadjuvant therapy in patients with early-stage NSCLC with EGFR-sensitizing mutations have shown promising efficacy. The resistance mechanisms of third-generation EGFR-TKIs can be divided into two types: EGFR dependent and EGFR independent. Several clinical trials have demonstrated that the addition of MET inhibitors to EGFR-TKIs was an effective option for patients who had acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs caused by hepatocyte growth factor receptor gene (MET) amplification or overexpression. Novel compounds that selectively and potently inhibit EGFR20ins are being investigated in phase III studies.

SUMMARY

A better characterization and understanding of resistance mechanisms to first-line osimertinib and adjuvant osimertinib is helpful to guide further treatment.

Acquired resistance to third-generation EGFR-TKIs and emerging next-generation EGFR inhibitors

The discovery that mutations in the EGFR gene are detected in up to 50% of lung adenocarcinoma patients, along with the development of highly efficacious epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), has revolutionized the treatment of this frequently occurring lung malignancy. Indeed, the clinical success of these TKIs constitutes a critical milestone in targeted cancer therapy. Three generations of EGFR-TKIs are currently approved for the treatment of EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The first-generation TKIs include erlotinib, gefitinib, lapatinib, and icotinib; the second-generation ErbB family blockers include afatinib, neratinib, and dacomitinib; whereas osimertinib, approved by the FDA on 2015, is a third-generation TKI targeting EGFR harboring specific mutations. Compared with the first- and second-generation TKIs, third-generation EGFR inhibitors display a significant advantage in terms of patient survival. For example, the median overall survival in NSCLC patients receiving osimertinib reached 38.6 months. Unfortunately, however, like other targeted therapies, new EGFR mutations, as well as additional drug-resistance mechanisms emerge rapidly after treatment, posing formidable obstacles to cancer therapeutics aimed at surmounting this chemoresistance. In this review, we summarize the molecular mechanisms underlying resistance to third-generation EGFR inhibitors and the ongoing efforts to address and overcome this chemoresistance. We also discuss the current status of fourth-generation EGFR inhibitors, which are of great value in overcoming resistance to EGFR inhibitors that appear to have greater therapeutic benefits in the clinic.

•

EGFR gene mutations are detected in about 50% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients worldwide

•

The three generations of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are critical milestones for NSCLC patients

•

Like other targeted therapies, new EGFR mutations and coupled drug resistances emerge rapidly after TKI treatment, posing formidable obstacles to cancer management

•

The investigational fourth-generation EGFR inhibitors are of great promise, through a number of novel mechanisms, in overcoming these resistances after third-generation TKI treatment, and will bring more benefits to NSCLC patients

[NSCLC and new oncogenic mutations: Diagnosis and perspectives]

The development of new targeted therapies in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) depends on a better understanding of the molecular basis of carcinogenesis, a knowledge of the role of molecular aberrations in disease progression and the development of molecular biology platforms with the capacity to identify new biomarkers. In the current article, we review the techniques routinely used in cancer molecular biology platforms as well as new techniques under development. These new NSCLC biomarkers have been made available to clinicians and biologists in parallel with the development of targeted drugs. New molecular abnormalities of EGFR exon 20, HER2, MET, RET, BRAF, ROS1 and NTRK have been identified and there have been clinical trials of the most innovative targeted drugs.

Overcoming Resistance to Tumor-Targeted and Immune-Targeted Therapies

Resistance to anticancer therapies includes primary resistance, usually related to lack of target dependency or presence of additional targets, and secondary resistance, mostly driven by adaptation of the cancer cell to the selection pressure of treatment. Resistance to targeted therapy is frequently acquired, driven by on-target, bypass alterations, or cellular plasticity. Resistance to immunotherapy is often primary, orchestrated by sophisticated tumor-host-microenvironment interactions, but could also occur after initial efficacy, mostly when only partial responses are obtained. Here, we provide an overview of resistance to tumor and immune-targeted therapies and discuss challenges of overcoming resistance, and current and future directions of development. SIGNIFICANCE: A better and earlier identification of cancer-resistance mechanisms could avoid the use of ineffective drugs in patients not responding to therapy and provide the rationale for the administration of personalized drug associations. A clear description of the molecular interplayers is a prerequisite to the development of novel and dedicated anticancer drugs. Finally, the implementation of such cancer molecular and immunologic explorations in prospective clinical trials could de-risk the demonstration of more effective anticancer strategies in randomized registration trials, and bring us closer to the promise of cure.

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor: Key to Selective Intracellular Delivery

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is an integral surface protein mediating cellular response to a number of growth factors. Its overexpression and increased activation due to mutations is one of the most common traits of many types of cancer. Development and clinical use of the agents, which block EGFR activation, became a prime example of the personalized targeted medicine. However, despite the obvious success in this area, cancer cure remains unattainable in most cases. Because of that, as well as the result of the search for possible ways to overcome the difficulties of treatment, a huge number of new treatment methods relying on the use of EGFR overexpression and its changes to destroy cancer cells. Modern data on the structure, functioning, and intracellular transport of EGFR, its natural ligands, as well as signaling cascades triggered by the EGFR activation, peculiarities of the EGFR expression and activation in oncological disorders, as well as applied therapeutic approaches aimed at blocking EGFR signaling pathway are summarized and analyzed in this review. Approaches to the targeted delivery of various chemotherapeutic agents, radionuclides, immunotoxins, photosensitizers, as well as the prospects for gene therapy aimed at cancer cells with EGFR overexpression are reviewed in detail. It should be noted that increasing attention is being paid nowadays to the development of multifunctional systems, either carrying several different active agents, or possessing several environment-dependent transport functions. Potentials of the systems based on receptor-mediated endocytosis of EGFR and their possible advantages and limitations are discussed.

Diagnostics, therapeutics and RET inhibitor resistance for RET fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancers and future perspectives

Selective RET inhibitors is the current hot topic, making multikinase inhibitors a thing of the past. However, the limitation of various test approaches, coupled with lack of knowledge of acquired resistance mechanisms, and specific patient groups that bear special consideration, remains a challenge. Herein, we outline utility of various diagnostic techniques, provide evidence to guide management of RET-fusion-positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients, including specific patient groups, such as EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients who acquired RET fusions after resisting EGFR TKIs, and offer a compendium of mechanisms of acquired resistance to RET targeted therapies. This review further provides a list of ongoing clinical trials and summarizes perspectives to guide future development of drugs and trials for this population.

Emerging oncogenic fusions other than ALK, ROS1, RET, and NTRK in NSCLC and the role of fusions as resistance mechanisms to targeted therapy

Recent evidence has shown that gene fusions caused by chromosomal rearrangements are frequent events in the initiation and during progression of solid tumors, including non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). Since the discoveries of ALK and ROS1 fusions in 2007 and the subsequent successes of pharmacological targeting for these fusions, numerous efforts have identified additional oncogenic driver fusions in NSCLCs, especially in lung adenocarcinomas. In this review, we will summarize recent advances in this field focusing on novel oncogenic fusions other than ALK, ROS1, NTRK, and RET fusions, which are summarized in other articles in this thematic issue. These novel gene fusions include neuregulin-1 (NRG1) fusions, MET fusions, fusion genes involving fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) family members, EGFR fusions, and other rare fusions. In addition, evidence has suggested that acquisition of gene fusions by cancer cells can be a molecular mechanism of acquired resistance to targeted therapies. Most of the current data are from analyses of resistance mechanisms to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in lung cancers with oncogenic EGFR mutations. However, a few recent studies suggest that gene fusions can also be a resistance mechanism to ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors in lung cancers with oncogenic ALK fusions. Detection, validation, and pharmacological inhibition of these fusion genes are becoming more important in the treatment of NSCLC patients.

ROS1-dependent cancers - biology, diagnostics and therapeutics

The proto-oncogene ROS1 encodes a receptor tyrosine kinase with an unknown physiological role in humans. Somatic chromosomal fusions involving ROS1 produce chimeric oncoproteins that drive a diverse range of cancers in adult and paediatric patients. ROS1-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are therapeutically active against these cancers, although only early-generation multikinase inhibitors have been granted regulatory approval, specifically for the treatment of ROS1 fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancers; histology-agnostic approvals have yet to be granted. Intrinsic or extrinsic mechanisms of resistance to ROS1 TKIs can emerge in patients. Potential factors that influence resistance acquisition include the subcellular localization of the particular ROS1 oncoprotein and the TKI properties such as the preferential kinase conformation engaged and the spectrum of targets beyond ROS1. Importantly, the polyclonal nature of resistance remains underexplored. Higher-affinity next-generation ROS1 TKIs developed to have improved intracranial activity and to mitigate ROS1-intrinsic resistance mechanisms have demonstrated clinical efficacy in these regards, thus highlighting the utility of sequential ROS1 TKI therapy. Selective ROS1 inhibitors have yet to be developed, and thus the specific adverse effects of ROS1 inhibition cannot be deconvoluted from the toxicity profiles of the available multikinase inhibitors. Herein, we discuss the non-malignant and malignant biology of ROS1, the diagnostic challenges that ROS1 fusions present and the strategies to target ROS1 fusion proteins in both treatment-naive and acquired-resistance settings.

Catalog of 5' fusion partners in RET+ NSCLC Circa 2020

Since the discovery of RET fusion-positive (RET+) NSCLC around late 2011 to early 2012, clinical trials of multikinase inhibitors and highly potent and selective RET tyrosine kinase inhibitors have indicated that RET fusion is an actionable oncogenic driver in NSCLC. There seems to be a differential response to multikinase inhibitors depending on the fusion partner (KIF5B-RET versus non-KIF5B-RET); thus, knowledge of the fusion partners in RET+ NSCLC is important. To date, we identified 48 unique fusion partners in RET from published literature and congress proceedings. Two of the novel fusion partners (CCNYL2 and TRIM24) were identified in RET fusions that emerged as resistant to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. In addition, multiple intergenic rearrangements were identified.

RET Fusion: Joining the Ranks of Targetable Molecular Drivers in NSCLC

The era of precision medicine has resulted in the identification of a number of genomic alterations that can be targeted with novel therapies. In lung adenocarcinomas, a histology structure that accounts for nearly 50% of all cases of lung cancer, and a number of genomic targets have been linked with effective targeted therapies. For patients with advanced-stage lung adenocarcinomas, molecular testing is now a standard part of diagnostic workup; for patients that have specific driver molecular events, targeted therapies have resulted in substantial improvement in efficacy without excessive toxicity.

RET gene fusions are present in approximately 1% to 2% of NSCLC. It is emerging as a new targetable driver for this population. Despite sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy and conflicting small reports regarding the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors, there have been limited treatment approaches for this subset of patients. Multiple nonselective RET tyrosine kinase inhibitors exhibited modest anti-RET activity with an increased off-target toxicity profile that often required dose interruption, reduction, or treatment cessation. Recently, novel selective RET inhibitors pralsetinib (BLU-667) and selpercatinib (LOXO-292) have exhibited promising clinical activity with low adverse effect profile in early clinical trials. These new agents are poised to represent a new hope for this special subgroup with unmet needs.

Molecular mechanisms of resistance to BRAF and MEK inhibitors in BRAFV600E non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

BRAF is a confirmed therapeutic target in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), as the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib, in combination with the MEK inhibitor trametinib, is approved for the treatment of NSCLC harbouring BRAF V600E mutation. Scant evidence is available concerning the mechanisms of resistance to BRAF/MEK inhibitors in BRAF^V600E NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with BRAF^V600E NSCLC with acquired resistance to BRAF/MEK inhibitors were included in the institutional, prospective MATCH-R (from "Matching Resistance") trial and underwent tumour and liquid biopsies at the moment of radiological progression. Extensive molecular analyses were performed, including targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS), whole-exome sequencing (WES), RNA sequencing and comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) array.

RESULTS

Of the 11 patients included, eight had progressed on dabrafenib-trametinib combination, two on dabrafenib monotherapy and one on vemurafenib (BRAF inhibitor). Complete molecular analyses were available for seven patients, whereas an additional case had only targeted NGS and CGH array data. Among these eight patients, acquired molecular events potentially responsible for resistance were detected in three who progressed on dabrafenib-trametinib combination, that is, MEK1 K57N, RAS viral (v-ras) oncogene homolog (NRAS) Q61R and rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) Q61R mutations. One patient progressing on dabrafenib monotherapy developed a PTEN frameshift mutation. No molecular hints addressing resistance emerged in the remaining four patients with analyses performed. Tumour mutational burden, evaluated by WES in seven patients, was low (median = 2.06 mutations/megabase, range = 1.57-3.75 mut/Mb).

CONCLUSIONS

Novel resistance mechanisms to BRAF/MEK inhibitors in BRAF^V600E NSCLC were identified, pointing out the recurring involvement of the MAPK pathway and guiding the development of new treatment strategies.