Rejection quantity in kidney transplant recipients is associated with increasing intracellular interleukin-2 in CD8+ T-cells

Getting immunosuppression just right: the role of clinical biomarkers in predicting patient response post solid organ transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Actually, immunosuppression selection isn't based on individual immune alloreactivity, and immunosuppressive drug dosing is mainly based on the development of toxicity and the achievement of specific target concentrations. Since a successful outcome requires optimal patient risk stratification and treatment, several groups have evaluated candidate biomarkers that have shown promise in the assessment of individual immune responses, the prediction of personal pharmacodynamic effects of immunosuppressive drugs and the prognosis and diagnosis of graft outcomes..

AREAS COVERED

This review includes biomarkers that the Scientific Community in Solid Organ Transplantation currently considers to have potential as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of graft evolution. We have focused on recent scientific advances and expert recommendations regarding the role of specific and non-specific pharmacodynamic biomarkers that are mainly involved in the T-cell-mediated response.

EXPERT OPINION

Integral pharmacologic monitoring that combines pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenetics and predictive pharmacodynamic biomarkers may provide crucial information and allow personal adjustment of immunosuppressive drugs at an early stage before severe adverse events ensue. Multicentre, randomized, prospective and interventional trials are needed to fine tune the established cut-off values for each biomarker and the optimal monitoring frequency for each biomarker and to accurately evaluate possible clinical confounding factors to enable correct clinical qualification.

Maintenance Immunosuppression in Solid Organ Transplantation: Integrating Novel Pharmacodynamic Biomarkers to Inform Calcineurin Inhibitor Dose Selection

Calcineurin inhibitors, the primary immunosuppressive therapy used to prevent alloreactivity of transplanted organs, have a narrow therapeutic index. Currently, treatment is individualized based on clinical assessment of the risk of rejection or toxicity guided by trough concentration monitoring. Advances in immune monitoring have identified potential markers that may have value in understanding calcineurin inhibitor pharmacodynamics. Integration of these markers has the potential to complement therapeutic drug monitoring. Existing pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) data is largely limited to correlation between the biomarker and trough concentrations at single time points. Immune related gene expression currently has the most evidence supporting PK-PD integration. Novel biomarker-based approaches to pharmacodynamic monitoring including development of enhanced PK-PD models are proposed to realize the full clinical benefit.

Effectiveness of Perioperative Immunologic Markers Monitoring for Predicting Early Acute Cellular Rejection After Living Donor Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to determine whether perioperative immunologic markers monitoring could predict early acute cellular rejection (ACR) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From September 2010 to June 2013, a total of 172 patients underwent LDLT at our transplant center. Of them, 26 patients were excluded because of infection. We retrospectively reviewed the remaining 146 patients. CD4 lymphocyte activity, T cell subsets test, and serum cytokine panel were checked on the day before transplantation and at 20 days after transplantation. These patients were divided into 3 groups: 1. normal liver function test (LFT) group; 2. increased LFT without rejection group; and 3. early ACR group. We excluded the increased LFT without rejection group in order to rule out multiple factors influencing immunologic factors.

RESULTS

CD4 lymphocyte activity (P = .004) was significantly increased while CD4+/CD25+/FOXP3+ cells (P < .001) and interleukin (IL)-17 (P = .002) levels were significantly decreased during the perioperative period. Pretransplant IL-6 (P = .014) and IL-17 (P = .029) levels in the early ACR group were significantly lower than those in the normal LFT group. The proportion of patients with increased IL-6 during perioperative period in the early ACR group was higher than that in the normal LFT group, although the difference was not statistically significant (P = .065).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that IL-6 and IL-17 levels are associated with early ACR in LDLT patients. However, whether monitoring perioperative immunologic markers could predict early ACR remains unclear. Further prospective studies are needed to reach a definite conclusion.

Clinical Operational Tolerance and Immunosuppression Minimization in Kidney Transplantation: Where Do We Stand?

BACKGROUND

The 20th century represents a breakthrough in the transplantation era, since the first kidney transplantation between identical twins was performed. This was the first case of tolerance, since the recipient did not need immunosuppression. However, as transplantation became possible, an immunosuppression-free status became the ultimate goal, since the first tolerance case was a clear exception from the hard reality nowadays represented by rejection.

METHODS

A plethora of studies was described over the past decades to understand the molecular mechanisms responsible for rejection. This review focuses on the most relevant studies found in the literature where renal tolerance cases are claimed. Contrasting, and at the same time, encouraging outcomes are herein discussed and a glimpse on the main renal biomarkers analyzed in this field is provided.

RESULTS

The activation of the immune system has been shown to play a central role in organ failure, but also it seems to induce a tolerance status when an allograft is performed, despite tolerance is still rare to register. Although there are still overwhelming challenges to overcome and various immune pathways remain arcane; the immunosuppression minimization might be more attainable than previously believed.

CONCLUSION

. Multiple biomarkers and tolerance mechanisms suspected to be involved in renal transplantation have been investigated to understand their real role, with still no clear answers on the topic. Thus, the actual knowledge provided necessarily leads to more in-depth investigations, although many questions in the past have been answered, there are still many issues on renal tolerance that need to be addressed.

Immunological biomarkers of tolerance in human kidney transplantation: An updated literature review

The half-life of transplanted kidneys is <10 years. Acute or chronic rejections have a negative impact on transplant outcome. Therefore, achieving to allograft tolerance for improving long-term transplant outcome is a desirable goal of transplantation field. In contrast, there are evidence that distinct immunological characteristics lead to tolerance in some transplant recipients. In contrast, the main reason for allograft loss is immunological responses. Various immune cells including T cells, B cells, dendritic cells, macrophages, natural killer, and myeloid-derived suppressor cells damage graft tissue and, thereby, graft loss happens. Therefore, being armed with the comprehensive knowledge about either preimmunological or postimmunological characteristics of renal transplant patients may help us to achieve an operational tolerance. In the present study, we are going to review and discuss immunological characteristics of renal transplant recipients with rejection and compare them with tolerant subjects.

T-Cell Cytokines as Predictive Markers of the Risk of Allograft Rejection

Over the last decade, several biomarkers and surrogate markers have surfaced as promising predictive markers of risk of rejection in solid organ transplantation. The monitoring of these markers can help to improve graft and recipient care by personalizing immunomodulatory therapies. The complex immune system response against an implanted graft can change during long-term follow-up, and the dynamic balance between effector and regulatory T-cell populations is a crucial factor in antidonor response, risk of rejection, and immunosuppression requirements. Therefore, at any time before and after transplantation, T-effector activity, which is associated with increased production and release of proinflammatory cytokines, can be a surrogate marker of the risk of rejection and need for immunosuppression. In addition, immunosuppressive drugs may have a different effect in each individual patient. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of these drugs show high interpatient variability, and pharmacodynamic markers, strongly associated with the specific mechanism of action, can potentially be used to measure individual susceptibility to a specific immunosuppressive agent. The monitoring of a panel of valid biomarkers can improve patient stratification and the selection of immunosuppressive drugs. After transplantation, therapy can be adjusted based on the prediction of rejection episodes (maintained alloreactivity), the prognosis of allograft damage, and the individual's response to the drugs. This review will focus on current data indicating that changes in the T-cell production of the intracellular cytokines interferon-γ and interleukin-2 could be used to predict the risk of rejection and to guide immunosuppressive therapy in transplant recipients.

Renal transplant immunology in the last 20 years: A revolution towards graft and patient survival improvement

To deride the hope of progress is the ultimate fatuity, the last word in poverty of spirit and meanness of mind. There is no need to be dismayed by the fact that we cannot yet envisage a definitive solution of our problems, a resting-place beyond which we need not try to go. -P.B. Medawar, 1969 * Thomas E. Starlz, also known as the Father of Clinical Transplantation, once said that organ transplantation was the supreme exception to the rule that most major advances in medicine spring from discoveries in basic science [Starzl T. The mystique of organ transplantation. J Am Coll Surg 2005 Aug;201(2):160-170]. In fact, the first successful identical-twin kidney transplantation performed by Murray's team in December 1954 (Murray J et al. Renal homotransplantations in identical twins. Surg Forum 1955;6:432-436) was the example of an upside down translation medicine: Human clinical transplantation began and researchers tried to understand the underlying immune response and how to control the powerful rejection pathways through experimental models. In the last 20 years, we have witnessed an amazing progress in the knowledge of immunological mechanisms regarding alloimmune response and an outstanding evolution on the identification and characterization of major and minor histocompatibility antigens. This review presents an historical and clinical perspective of those important advances in kidney transplantation immunology in the last 20 years, which contributed to the improvement in patients' quality of life and the survival of end-stage renal patients. In spite of these significant progresses, some areas still need substantial progress, such as the definition of non-invasive biomarkers for acute rejection; the continuous reduction of immunosuppression; the extension of graft survival, and finally the achievement of real graft tolerance extended to HLA mismatch donor: recipient pairs.

Immunological characteristics of renal transplant tolerance in humans

Establishing allograft tolerance is a highly desirable therapeutic goal in kidney transplantation, from which recipients would greatly benefit by withdrawing or minimizing immunosuppression. Identifying biomarkers in predicting tolerance or early diagnosing rejection is essential to direct personalized management. Recent findings have revealed that multiple populations of immune cells have involved in promoting long-term graft function or inducing rejection in renal transplant recipients. Thus, roles of immune cells add another level to predict the renal tolerant state; tailoring their functional and/or phenotypic characteristics would provide insights into mechanism involved in transplant tolerance that may aid in designing new therapies. Here, we review these findings and discuss the current understanding immunological characteristics of renal transplant tolerance in humans, and their potential clinical translation to immune tolerance biomarkers.