HLA-A2 reactive antibodies in a patient who types as HLA-A2: The importance of high resolution typing and epitope-based antibody analysis

Establishment and clinical application of the HLA genotype database of platelet-apheresis donors in Suzhou

The establishment of a platelet-apheresis donor database may provide a feasible solution to improve the efficacy of platelet transfusion in patients with immune platelet transfusion refractoriness (PTR). This study aimed to establish HLA genotype database in Suzhou, to provide HLA-I compatible platelets for PTR patients to ensure the safety and effectiveness of platelet transfusions. We used a polymerase chain reaction sequence-based typing (PCR-SBT) method to establish the database by performing high-resolution HLA-A, -B, and -C genotyping on 900 platelet-apheresis donors. HLA-I antibody was detected in patients using a Luminex device, and HLA-I gene matching was performed by an HLA-Matchmaker. We found that the highest frequency of the HLA-A allele was A*11:01 (17.06 %), followed by A*24:02 (14.67 %) and A*02:01 (13.61 %). The highest frequency of the HLA-B allele was B*46:01 (9.78 %), followed by B*40:01 (8.39 %) and B*13:02 (33 %). After the detection of platelet antibodies in 74 patients with immune PTR, we found 30 HLA-A antibodies and 48 HLA-B antibodies, and there were a variety of high frequency antibodies whose alleles were low in the donor database, such as HLA-A*68:02, and B*57:01. After avoiding donor-specific antibodies (DSA) matching, 102 of 209 platelet-compatible transfusions were effective, resulting in an effective rate of 48.8 %, which significantly improved the efficacy of platelet transfusion. The establishment of a platelet donor database is of great significance to improve the therapeutic effect of platelet transfusion in patients with hematologic disorder, and save blood resources, and it is also the premise and guarantee of precise platelet transfusion.

Toward defining the immunogenicity of HLA epitopes: Impact of HLA class I eplets on antibody formation during pregnancy

Eplets are functional units of structural epitopes on donor HLA, potentially recognized by complementarity-determining regions of the paratope of the recipients' B-cell receptors or antibodies (Ab). Their individual immunogenicity is poorly described, yet this feature would be of clinical importance for pretransplant risk assessment. The aim of this study was to determine the relative immunogenicity of HLA class I eplets in the pregnancy setting, where mismatched eplets are present on paternal HLA antigens of the unborn child. One hundred fifty-nine predominantly Caucasian mothers giving birth at the University Hospital Basel and their first newborns were HLA-typed at high-resolution by next-generation sequencing (NGS) (NGSgo Workflow and NGSengine from GenDx; sequencing with a Miseq from Illumina) and eplets were determined using HLAMatchmaker. HLA class I specific IgG Ab was assessed in maternal sera drawn immediately after full-term delivery, by OneLambda LABScreen single antigen ibeads. The Ab profile was subsequently evaluated for eplet-associated patterns. All 72 currently Ab-verified HLA class I eplets were examined for their immunogenicity according to the frequency of child-specific HLA Ab (CSA) directed against their structures. Four hundred twelve of 477 (86.4%) paternal HLA-A, -B or -C alleles were mismatched. CSA were present in 46 mothers (28.9%), directed against 80 (19.4%) of these mismatches. The 10 most immunogenic eplets were 62GK, 145KHA, 144TKH, 62GE, 107W, 80I, 82LR, 41T, 127K, 45KE with immunogenicity rates between 45.8% and 27.3%. This pregnancy study also identified five non-reactive eplets: 62RR, 76ESN, 80TLR, 156DA, 163RW. Based on our results, immunogenic hot and cold spots on the surface of HLA class I molecules were localized and visualized on 3D models. This study strengthens the presumption that different eplets represent different immunogenic potentials. Validation of these results in the clinical transplant setting is an essential next step in identifying those eplets representing a particularly high-risk potential.

The value of high-resolution HLA in the perioperative period of non-sensitized lung transplant recipients

Background

The importance of HLA antigen matching is widely recognized and accepted worldwide. With the improvement of diagnostic methods, recent studies have shown that eplet mismatched for organ transplantation is essential. In the field of lung transplantation, eplet mismatch (MM) is closely related to chronic rejection after lung transplantation. To further investigate the relationship between early graft failure and acute rejection, we performed high-resolution HLA analysis on 59 patients in our center.

Methods

We conduct high-resolution HLA matching and Donor specific antibody (DSA) monitoring on 59 lung transplantation donors and recipients from April 1, 2018, to June 30, 2019. Baseline data were collected composed of both recipient characteristics and transplant-related features. Clinical outcomes were primary graft dysfunction (PGD) and acute rejection (AR).

Results

Overall, for these 59 patients, HLA antigen mismatch is 7.19±1.61, eplet mismatch is 8.31±1.75 (P=0.0005). As the number of mismatch sites increases, the severity of PGD increased significantly, especially when presented both eplet mismatch and HLA-DQ mismatch. In this group of patients, 2 cases of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) occurred after transplantation, eplet MM 9 (HLA-DQ MM 2) and eplet MM 5 (HLA-DQ MM1). Both patients developed DSA after operation, and they are DQB1 06:01 and C07:02, respectively. There were 9 cases of death during the perioperative period. Five of them died of severe PGD, and 4 died of severe infection. All these 9 patients were with high-level eplet MM and HLA-DQ MM.

Conclusions

Perioperative PGD and AR closely related to HLA mismatches, especially eplet and HLA-DQ MM. It might be noteworthy to do complementary detection of eplet matching and DSA in lung transplant donors and recipients, to predict the risk of early PGD and acute rejection after lung transplantation.

The quest to decipher HLA immunogenicity: Telling friend from foe

Molecular mismatch load analysis was recently introduced as a means for performing risk stratification following organ transplantation. However, although good correlation was demonstrated between molecular mismatch load and generation of de novo donor-specific HLA antibody (DSA), quite a few exceptions exist, and the underlying factors that define HLA immunogenicity remain unclear. Herein, we present a new paradigm to interrogate differences between molecular mismatches that lead to the generation of de novo DSA and those that do not (the 2MM1DSA cohort). Specifically, patients transplanted across 2 HLA-DQ mismatches, who formed de novo DSA only to one mismatch (foe) but not the other (friend), provide a unique environment in which patient-specific factors that affect the immune response other than immunogenicity, such as infection and immunosuppression, can be controlled for. It further permits focusing on mismatches uniquely exhibited by the de novo DSA allele, rather than mismatches shared by both DSA and non-DSA alleles. This concept paper illustrates several examples, highlights the need for center-specific or population-specific cutoff values for posttransplant risk stratification, and mostly argues that if there is no direct correlation between molecular mismatch load and immunogenicity, then molecular mismatch load must not be adopted as an approach for equitable organ allocation.

Comparison of sequence-specific oligonucleotide probe vs next generation sequencing for HLA-A, B, C, DRB1, DRB3/B4/B5, DQA1, DQB1, DPA1, and DPB1 typing: Toward single-pass high-resolution HLA typing in support of solid organ and hematopoietic cell transplant programs

Many clinical laboratories supporting solid organ transplant programs use multiple HLA genotyping technologies, depending on individual laboratory needs. Sequence‐specific primers and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) serve the rapid turnaround necessary for deceased donor workup, while sequence‐specific oligonucleotide probe (SSOP) technology is widely employed for higher volumes. When clinical need mandates high‐resolution data, Sanger sequencing‐based typing (SBT) has been the “gold standard.” However, all those methods commonly yield ambiguous typing results that utilize valuable laboratory resources when resolution is required. In solid organ transplantation, high‐resolution typing may provide critical information for highly sensitized patients with donor‐specific anti‐HLA antibodies (DSA), particularly when DSA involve HLA alleles not discriminated by SSOP typing. Arguments against routine use of SBT include assay complexity, long turnaround times (TAT), and increased costs. Here, we compare a next generation sequencing (NGS) technology with SSOP for accuracy, effort, turnaround time, and level of resolution for genotyping of 11 HLA loci among 289 specimens from five clinical laboratories. Results were concordant except for SSOP misassignments in eight specimens and 21 novel sequences uniquely identified by NGS. With few exceptions, SSOP generated ambiguous results while NGS provided unambiguous three‐field allele assignments. For complete HLA genotyping of up to 24 samples by either SSOP or NGS, bench work was completed on day 1 and typing results were available on day 2. This study provides compelling evidence that, although not viable for STAT typing of deceased donors, a single‐pass NGS HLA typing method has direct application for solid organ transplantation.

Second update of the International Registry of HLA Epitopes. I. The HLA-ABC Epitope Database

The International Registry of HLA Epitopes (http://www.epregistry.com.br) is a website-based resource for HLA epitopes important in transplant rejection and platelet transfusion refractoriness. Its primary goal is to document epitopes that are verified experimentally with specific antibodies. Such epitopes can be defined by single eplets and by eplets paired with certain polymorphic residues within a 15-Å radius, the dimension of the corresponding structural epitope. This report is an update of the HLA-ABC repertoire including descriptions of 72 antibody-verifications of epitopes defined by eplets and/or eplet pairs. The newly updated version 2.0 EpRegistry shows also the polymorphic residue compositions of structural epitopes corresponding to eplets shared between groups of alleles. At present, 151 eplets have not been antibody-verified, and we ranked them with a so-called ElliPro score as a potential predictor of immunogenicity. Sixty eplets with low ElliPro scores might be considered non-epitopes incapable of inducing specific antibodies.

Are We Ready for Epitope-Based HLA Matching in Clinical Organ Transplantation?

This overview describes recent developments demonstrating the significance of epitopes in HLA antibody responses and matching for organ transplantation. HLA epitopes are defined by molecular modeling and amino acid comparisons between HLA alleles and the HLAMatchmaker algorithm considers eplets as essential components. Each allele represents a distinct string of eplets and matching is done by aligning donor and recipient strings. Evidence is summarized how mismatched eplet loads affect antibody responses and transplant outcomes. Epitope-based matching has been applied not only to identify acceptable mismatches for sensitized transplant candidates but also to identify more suitably mismatched donors for nonsensitized patients. Three recently proposed theories will further our understanding of the immunogenicity of individual HLA eplets.It has become apparent that epitope-based matching is superior to antigen matching; we should be ready soon to apply this principle in the clinical transplant setting very soon.

Reflections on HLA Epitope-Based Matching for Transplantation

HLA antibodies are primary causes of transplant rejection; they recognize epitopes that can be structurally defined by eplets. There are many reviews about HLA epitope-based matching in transplantation. This article describes some personal reflections about epitopes including a historical perspective of HLA typing at the antigen and allele levels, the repertoires of antibody-verified HLA epitopes, the use of HLAMatchmaker in determining the specificities of antibodies tested in different assays, and, finally, possible strategies to control HLA antibody responses.

Epitope analysis of DQ6-reactive antibodies in sera from a DQ6-positive transplant candidate sensitized during pregnancy

This case report describes DQ6-reactive serum antibody reactivity in a patient who types as DQ6. DNA typing showed DQB1*06:09 on the antibody producer and serum reactivity with DQB1*06:01, *06:02 and *06:03 but not with *06:04 and *06:09. HLAMatchmaker serum analysis showed antibody reactivity with a new antibody-verified 85VA eplet on DQB but additional reactivity with DQB1*02:01 could not be readily interpreted. After applying the nonself-self algorithm of HLA immunogenicity we have identified a new DQB epitope structurally described as 140A2+130R+135D and shared by DQB1*02:01 and DQB1*05:01 and DQB1*06:02 of the immunizer.

Identification of epitopes on HLA-DRB alleles reacting with antibodies in sera from women sensitized during pregnancy

This report describes a HLAMatchmaker-based antibody analysis of post-pregnancy sera with antibodies against child-specific HLA-DR epitopes. These sera were reactive in IgG-binding assays with single allele bead (SAB) panels on a Luminex platform. The antibody specificity analysis focused on DRB epitopes that have been recorded in the International HLA Epitope Registry (http://www.epregistry.com.br) as experimentally verified with informative antibodies but we also considered other eplets that predict potential epitopes. The SAB panel has in several instances two or more alleles corresponding to the same serologically defined DR antigen and we selected six sera were with different reactivity patterns with DR1, DR4, DR13 and/or DR52 alleles. We demonstrate here how amino acid differences between these alleles can provide useful information in the determination of new epitope specificities of antibodies in these sera. Eight newly antibody-verified epitopes were identified including three that correspond to eplets paired with self-residue configurations. Epitope specificity information appears to be useful in the prediction of mismatch acceptability of non-SAB alleles within serological DR antigen groups.