1
|
Dumortier J, Conti F, Hiriart JB, Dharancy S, Duvoux C, Besch C, Houssel-Debry P, Latournerie M, Chermak F, Meszaros M, Pageaux GP, Radenne S, Boillot O, Hardwigsen J, Kounis I, Kamar N, Saliba F, Erard D, Del Bello A. Treatment of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies-mediated rejection after liver transplantation: A French nationwide retrospective study. Liver Transpl 2023; 29:1313-1322. [PMID: 37367954 DOI: 10.1097/lvt.0000000000000200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
The deleterious effect of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) after liver transplantation (LT) has been increasingly recognized during the past decade. Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) represents a rare but severe complication in the presence of DSA. However, little is known concerning the treatment of AMR after LT. The nationwide French study aimed to describe LT recipients who received specific treatment of AMR. We performed a multicenter retrospective study on 44 patients who were treated with B-cell targeting agents from January 2008 to December 2020. Median patient age at the time of AMR treatment was 51.6 years (range: 17.9-68.0). AMR was classified as acute (n = 19) or chronic (n = 25). The diagnosis of AMR was made after a median time of 16.8 months (range: 0.4-274.2) after LT. The main therapeutic combination was plasma exchange/rituximab/IVIG (n = 25, 56.8%). The median follow-up after the treatment of AMR was 32 months (range: 1-115). After the treatment, 1-, 5- and 10-year patient and graft survivals were 77%, 55.9%, and 55.9%, and 69.5%, 47.0%, and 47.0%, respectively. Initial total bilirubin (Q1-Q3 vs. Q4) was significantly associated with patient survival (log-rank test, p = 0.005) and graft survival (log-rank test, p = 0.002). After a median follow-up of 21 months (range: 12-107), DSA became undetectable in 15/38 patients (39.5%) with available DSA monitoring. In conclusion, specific treatment of AMR in LT recipients has slowly emerged in France during the past decade and has probably been considered in the most severe patients; this explains the global poor outcome, even if the outcome was favorable in some cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jérôme Dumortier
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Fédération des Spécialités digestives, et Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Filomena Conti
- APHP, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Service d'hépatologie et transplantation hépatique, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Baptiste Hiriart
- CHU de Bordeaux, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Service de Chirurgie hépatobiliaire et de transplantation hépatique, Bordeaux, France
| | - Sébastien Dharancy
- CHU Lille, Hôpital Claude Huriez, Service des maladies de l'appareil digestif, Lille, France
| | | | - Camille Besch
- CHRU Hautepierre, Service de chirurgie hépato-bilio-pancréatique et transplantation hépatique, Strasbourg, France
| | - Pauline Houssel-Debry
- Hôpital Universitaire de Pontchaillou, Service d'Hépatologie et Transplantation hépatique, Rennes, France
| | - Marianne Latournerie
- CHU Dijon, Service d'Hépato-gastroentérologie et oncologie digestive, Inserm EPICAD LNC-UMR1231, Université de Bourgogne-Franche Comté, Dijon, France
| | - Faiza Chermak
- CHU de Bordeaux, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Service de Chirurgie hépatobiliaire et de transplantation hépatique, Bordeaux, France
| | - Magdalena Meszaros
- CHU Saint Eloi, Département d'hépato-gatroentérologie et transplantation hépatique, et Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Georges-Philippe Pageaux
- CHU Saint Eloi, Département d'hépato-gatroentérologie et transplantation hépatique, et Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Sylvie Radenne
- Hospices civils de Lyon, Hôpital de la Croix Rousse, Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Lyon, France
| | - Olivier Boillot
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Fédération des Spécialités digestives, et Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Jean Hardwigsen
- APHM, Hôpital La Timone, Service chirurgie générale et transplantation hépatique Marseille, France
| | - Ilias Kounis
- AP-HP, Hôpital Paul Brousse, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, INSERM, Unité 1193, Hepatinov, et Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Nassim Kamar
- CHU Rangueil, Département de Néphrologie et Transplantation d'Organes, Toulouse, France
| | - Faouzi Saliba
- AP-HP, Hôpital Paul Brousse, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, INSERM, Unité 1193, Hepatinov, et Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Domitille Erard
- Hospices civils de Lyon, Hôpital de la Croix Rousse, Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Lyon, France
| | - Arnaud Del Bello
- CHU Rangueil, Département de Néphrologie et Transplantation d'Organes, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Townsend M, Pidborochynski T, Cantor RS, Khoury M, Campbell P, Halpin A, Urschel S, Kim D, Nahirniak S, West LJ, Buchholz H, Conway J. Prospective examination of HLA sensitization after VAD implantation in children and adults. Transpl Immunol 2023; 80:101892. [PMID: 37419373 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2023.101892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/01/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ventricular assist devices (VADs) have improved survival to heart transplantation (HTx). However, VADs have been associated with development of antibodies against human leukocyte antigen (HLA-Ab) which may limit the donor pool and decrease survival post-HTx. Since HLA-Ab development after VAD insertion is poorly understood, the purpose of this prospective single-center study was to quantify the incidence of and evaluate risk factors for HLA-Ab development across the age spectrum following VAD implantation. METHODS Adult and pediatric patients undergoing VAD placement as bridge to transplant or transplant candidacy between 5/2016 and 7/2020 were enrolled. HLA-Ab were assessed pre-VAD and at 1-, 3-, and 12-months post-implant. Factors associated with HLA-Ab development post-VAD implant were explored using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS 15/41 (37%) adults and 7/17 (41%) children developed new HLA-Ab post-VAD. The majority of patients (19/22) developed HLA-Ab within two months of implant. New class I HLA-Ab were more common (87% adult, 86% pediatric). Prior pregnancy was strongly associated with HLA-Ab development in adults post-VAD (HR 16.7, 95% CI 1.8-158, p = 0.01). Of the patients who developed new HLA-Ab post-VAD, in 45% (10/22) the HLA-Ab resolved while in 55% (12/22) the HLA-Ab persisted. CONCLUSION More than one-third of adult and pediatric VAD patients developed new HLA-Ab early after VAD implant with the majority having class I antibodies. Prior pregnancy was strongly associated with post-VAD HLA-Ab development. Further studies are needed to predict regression or persistence of HLA-Ab developed post-VAD, to understand modulation of individuals' immune responses to sensitizing events, and to determine whether transiently detected HLA-Ab post-VAD recur and have long-term clinical impact post-heart transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madeleine Townsend
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Stollery Children's Hospital, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
| | - Tara Pidborochynski
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Stollery Children's Hospital, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Ryan S Cantor
- Kirklin Solutions, Birmingham, AL, United States of America
| | - Michael Khoury
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Stollery Children's Hospital, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Alberta Transplant Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Canada Donation And Transplantation Research Program, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Patricia Campbell
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Alberta Transplant Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Anne Halpin
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Alberta Transplant Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Simon Urschel
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Stollery Children's Hospital, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Alberta Transplant Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Canada Donation And Transplantation Research Program, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Daniel Kim
- Alberta Transplant Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Susan Nahirniak
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Lori J West
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Stollery Children's Hospital, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Alberta Transplant Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Canada Donation And Transplantation Research Program, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Holger Buchholz
- Stollery Children's Hospital, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Jennifer Conway
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Stollery Children's Hospital, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Alberta Transplant Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lee BT, Fiel MI, Schiano TD. Antibody-mediated rejection of the liver allograft: An update and a clinico-pathological perspective. J Hepatol 2021; 75:1203-1216. [PMID: 34343613 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.07.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2021] [Revised: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Antibody-mediated rejection after liver transplantation is an under-recognised cause of allograft injury. While definitions of acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection have increased clinical awareness, timely identification and management of antibody-mediated rejection remain difficult because of complexities in diagnosis and histopathology, lack of treatment protocols, and unclear long-term outcomes. While recent cohort studies assessing the importance of donor-specific antibodies have aided in its diagnosis, literature on the treatment of antibody-mediated rejection in liver transplantation remain limited to case reports and small series. Further increasing the awareness and timely recognition of antibody-mediated rejection post-liver transplantation is crucial in order to stimulate future research and the development of protocols for its diagnosis and treatment. This review will summarise recent advances in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of antibody-mediated rejection in liver transplantation, as well as some of the histopathologic features (on liver biopsy tissue) of acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian T Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Transplant Institute, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
| | - M Isabel Fiel
- Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-Based Medicine, Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Thomas D Schiano
- Division of Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rituximab Desensitization in Liver Transplant Recipients With Preformed Donor-specific HLA Antibodies: A Japanese Nationwide Survey. Transplant Direct 2021; 7:e729. [PMID: 34291151 PMCID: PMC8288898 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Revised: 04/03/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. The significance of preformed donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) in liver transplant recipients is controversial. Moreover, there has been no established desensitization protocol for DSA-positive recipients. Methods. A Japanese nationwide survey was performed to investigate the clinical practice among preformed DSA-positive patients with special reference to rituximab desensitization. Results. There was a total of 47 cases, including 2 pediatric cases, in which rituximab (287 ± 159 mg [319 (50–916)/m2]) was administered to desensitize preformed DSA. The decision for the indication of rituximab desensitization was based on a single-antigen assay in the majority of cases (83%, 39/47), and the most frequent protocol was rituximab monotherapy (n = 12) followed by quadruple treatment with rituximab tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and plasmapheresis (n = 11). The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-y graft and patient survival rates among adult patients were 85%, 83%, 83%, and 81%, 77%, 74%, respectively, while neither graft loss nor death was observed in the 2 pediatric cases. The 1-, 3-, and 12-mo cumulative incidence of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) was 11%, 13%, and 13%, respectively. The incidence of AMR was significantly higher in the lower rituximab dose group than in the higher rituximab dose group (cutoff 300 mg/m2, 4% versus 24%, P = 0.041). The rate of infusion-related adverse drug reactions (ADRs) was 4.4%, and all ADRs were mild and self-limiting. A total of 99 ADRs among 27 patients were reported, none of which were severe adverse events associated with rituximab. Conclusions. The rituximab induction was well tolerated among DSA-positive liver transplant recipients with a satisfactory outcome. A rituximab dose >300 mg/m2 was observed to achieve less incidence of the development of AMR.
Collapse
|
5
|
Ünlü S, Lachmann N, Jara M, Ritschl PV, Wiering L, Eurich D, Denecke C, Biebl M, Chopra S, Gül-Klein S, Schöning W, Schmelzle M, Reinke P, Tacke F, Pratschke J, Öllinger R, Dziodzio T. Treatment of Anti-HLA Donor-Specific Antibodies Results in Increased Infectious Complications and Impairs Survival after Liver Transplantation. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9123986. [PMID: 33317012 PMCID: PMC7763868 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9123986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Revised: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies (DSA) are controversially discussed in the context of liver transplantation (LT). We investigated the relationship between the presence of DSA and the outcome after LT. All the LTs performed at our center between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2015 were examined. Recipients < 18 years, living donor-, combined, high-urgency-, and re-transplantations were excluded. Out of 510 LTs, 113 DSA-positive cases were propensity score-matched with DSA-negative cases based on the components of the Balance of Risk score. One-, three-, and five-year survival after LT were 74.3% in DSA-positive vs. 84.8% (p = 0.053) in DSA-negative recipients, 71.8% vs. 71.5% (p = 0.821), and 69.3% vs. 64.9% (p = 0.818), respectively. Rejection therapy was more often applied to DSA-positive recipients (n = 77 (68.1%) vs. 37 (32.7%) in the control group, p < 0.001). At one year after LT, 9.7% of DSA-positive patients died due to sepsis compared to 1.8% in the DSA-negative group (p = 0.046). The remaining causes of death were comparable in both groups (cardiovascular 6.2% vs. 8.0%; p = 0.692; hepatic 3.5% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.788; malignancy 3.5% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.788). DSA seem to have an indirect effect on the outcome of adult LTs, impacting decision-making in post-transplant immunosuppression and rejection therapies and ultimately increasing mortality due to infectious complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sinem Ünlü
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (S.Ü.); (M.J.); (P.V.R.); (L.W.); (D.E.); (C.D.); (M.B.); (S.C.); (S.G.-K.); (W.S.); (M.S.); (J.P.); (R.Ö.)
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, H&I Laboratory, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Nils Lachmann
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, H&I Laboratory, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Maximilian Jara
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (S.Ü.); (M.J.); (P.V.R.); (L.W.); (D.E.); (C.D.); (M.B.); (S.C.); (S.G.-K.); (W.S.); (M.S.); (J.P.); (R.Ö.)
| | - Paul Viktor Ritschl
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (S.Ü.); (M.J.); (P.V.R.); (L.W.); (D.E.); (C.D.); (M.B.); (S.C.); (S.G.-K.); (W.S.); (M.S.); (J.P.); (R.Ö.)
- BIH Charité Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), 10178 Berlin, Germany
| | - Leke Wiering
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (S.Ü.); (M.J.); (P.V.R.); (L.W.); (D.E.); (C.D.); (M.B.); (S.C.); (S.G.-K.); (W.S.); (M.S.); (J.P.); (R.Ö.)
| | - Dennis Eurich
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (S.Ü.); (M.J.); (P.V.R.); (L.W.); (D.E.); (C.D.); (M.B.); (S.C.); (S.G.-K.); (W.S.); (M.S.); (J.P.); (R.Ö.)
| | - Christian Denecke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (S.Ü.); (M.J.); (P.V.R.); (L.W.); (D.E.); (C.D.); (M.B.); (S.C.); (S.G.-K.); (W.S.); (M.S.); (J.P.); (R.Ö.)
| | - Matthias Biebl
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (S.Ü.); (M.J.); (P.V.R.); (L.W.); (D.E.); (C.D.); (M.B.); (S.C.); (S.G.-K.); (W.S.); (M.S.); (J.P.); (R.Ö.)
| | - Sascha Chopra
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (S.Ü.); (M.J.); (P.V.R.); (L.W.); (D.E.); (C.D.); (M.B.); (S.C.); (S.G.-K.); (W.S.); (M.S.); (J.P.); (R.Ö.)
| | - Safak Gül-Klein
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (S.Ü.); (M.J.); (P.V.R.); (L.W.); (D.E.); (C.D.); (M.B.); (S.C.); (S.G.-K.); (W.S.); (M.S.); (J.P.); (R.Ö.)
| | - Wenzel Schöning
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (S.Ü.); (M.J.); (P.V.R.); (L.W.); (D.E.); (C.D.); (M.B.); (S.C.); (S.G.-K.); (W.S.); (M.S.); (J.P.); (R.Ö.)
| | - Moritz Schmelzle
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (S.Ü.); (M.J.); (P.V.R.); (L.W.); (D.E.); (C.D.); (M.B.); (S.C.); (S.G.-K.); (W.S.); (M.S.); (J.P.); (R.Ö.)
| | - Petra Reinke
- Department of Nephrology and Internal Intensive Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Frank Tacke
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (S.Ü.); (M.J.); (P.V.R.); (L.W.); (D.E.); (C.D.); (M.B.); (S.C.); (S.G.-K.); (W.S.); (M.S.); (J.P.); (R.Ö.)
| | - Robert Öllinger
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (S.Ü.); (M.J.); (P.V.R.); (L.W.); (D.E.); (C.D.); (M.B.); (S.C.); (S.G.-K.); (W.S.); (M.S.); (J.P.); (R.Ö.)
| | - Tomasz Dziodzio
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (S.Ü.); (M.J.); (P.V.R.); (L.W.); (D.E.); (C.D.); (M.B.); (S.C.); (S.G.-K.); (W.S.); (M.S.); (J.P.); (R.Ö.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +48-(030)-450552001
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Donor-specific antibodies in liver transplantation: challenges in diagnosis and determining clinical impact. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2020; 25:549-554. [PMID: 33105198 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Our understanding of the clinical impact of donor-specific antibodies in liver transplant recipients has evolved in recent years as outcomes for liver allografts have improved and advances in diagnostic testing have made recognition of antibody mediated rejection in transplant patients more sensitive. RECENT FINDINGS Two main types of donor-specific antibodies - preformed and de novo - have been reported in the literature to have a negative impact on graft survival, and researchers have been able to further identify subclasses of class II donor-specific antibodies as being the most clinically impactful. Furthermore, there is evidence that donor-specific antibody formation can augment cellular rejection in liver grafts and lead to worsened clinical outcomes. Recent data have shown a higher prevalence of donor-specific antibody formation than previously reported. SUMMARY This review explores the most recent literature regarding the clinical impact of both preformed and de-novo donor-specific antibodies and potential management guidelines for patients undergoing liver transplantation. The best practice guidelines for undergoing monitoring for donor-specific antibody formation and protocol biopsies in sensitized patients will depend on further multiinstitutional studies.
Collapse
|