The role of HLA-DP mismatches and donor specific HLA-DP antibodies in kidney transplantation: a case series

Identification of the novel HLA-DPB1*1591:01 allele by next-generation sequencing

The novel HLA-DPB1*1591:01 allele was detected during the HLA typing for kidney transplantation.

HLA-DPB1 genotype variants predict DP molecule cell surface expression and DP donor specific antibody binding capacity

The contribution of alloresponses to mismatched HLA-DP in solid organ transplantation and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) has been well documented. Exploring the regulatory mechanisms of DPB1 alleles has become an important question to be answered. In this study, our initial investigation focused on examining the correlation between the rs9277534G/A SNP and DPB1 mRNA expression. The result showed that there was a significant increase in DPB1 mRNA expression in B lymphoblastoid cell lines (BLCLs) with the rs9277534GG genotype compared to rs9277534AA genotype. In addition, B cells with the rs9277534GG exhibited significantly higher DP protein expression than those carrying the rs9277534AA genotype in primary B cells. Furthermore, we observed a significant upregulation of DP expression in B cells following treatment with Interleukin 13 (IL-13) compared to untreated B cells carrying rs9277534GG-linked DPB1 alleles. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of DPB1 in BLCL demonstrated significant differences in both the cytoplasmic (p=0.0003) and nuclear (p=0.0001) localization of DP mRNA expression comparing DPB1*04:01 (rs9277534AA) and DPB1*05:01 (rs9277534GG) homozygous cells. The study of the correlation between differential DPB1 expression and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) showed that lnc-HLA-DPB1-13:1 is strongly associated with DP expression (r=0.85), suggesting the potential involvement of lncRNA in regulating DP expression. The correlation of DP donor specific antibody (DSA) with B cell flow crossmatch (B-FCXM) results showed a better linear correlation of DP DSA against GG and AG donor cells (R2 = 0.4243, p=0.0025 and R2 = 0.6172, p=0.0003, respectively), compared to DSA against AA donor cells (R2 = 0.0649, p=0.4244). This explained why strong DP DSA with a low expression DP leads to negative B-FCXM. In conclusion, this study provides evidence supporting the involvement of lncRNA in modulating HLA-DP expression, shedding lights on the intricate regulatory mechanisms of DP, particularly under inflammatory conditions in transplantation.

Report from the extended HLA-DPA1 ~ promoter ~ HLA-DPB1 haplotype of the 18th international HLA and immunogenetics workshop

The primary goal of the HLA-DPA1 ~ promoter ~ HLA-DPB1 haplotype component of the 18th IHIWS was to characterise the extended haplotypes within the HLA-DP region and survey the extent of genetic diversity in this region across human populations. In this report, we analysed single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 255 subjects from 6 different cohorts. The results from the HLA-DP haplotype component have validated findings from the initial pilot study. SNPs in this region were inherited in strong linkage, particularly HLA-DPA1, SNP-linked promoter haplotypes and motifs in exon 2 of HLA-DPB1. We reported 17 SNP-linked haplotypes in the promoter region. Together with HLA-DPA1 and HLA-DPB1 alleles, they formed 74 distinct extended HLA-DP haplotypes in 438 sequences. We also observed the presence of region-specific alleles and promoter haplotypes. Our approach involved phasing extended SNPs including promoter SNPs, HLA-DPA1 and HLA-DPB1 alleles, in a 22 kb region, GRCh38/hg38 (chr6:33,064,111-33,086,679), followed by clustering of these SNPs as one extended haplotype. This hierarchical clustering revealed four major clades, suggesting that haplotypes within each clade may have diverged from a common ancestral haplotype and undergone similar evolutionary processes. The correlation between HLA-DPA1 and the promoter region raises questions about the role of HLA-DPA1 antigen in the heterodimer. This finding requires validation on a larger sample size specifically designed for anthropological analysis. Nevertheless, the results from this study highlight the clinical potential of selecting better-matched donors for patients awaiting haematopoietic stem cell transplants from genetically overlapping groups that share common ancestral haplotypes.

HLA-DPB1 molecular mismatches are risk factors for acute rejection and low 5-year graft function in first kidney transplants

The study aimed to investigate the impact of HLA-DPB1 allelic and molecular mismatches on the occurrence of acute rejection (AR) and low 5-year graft function (5Y-GF) in first kidney transplant (KT) recipients. This is a single center retrospective study of 130 deceased donor KT recipients transplanted between 2014 and 2016. HLA-DPB1 allelic MM and the following molecular MM (mMM) were analyzed: expression MM with the high expression G allele in the donor; T cell epitope MM (TCE MM); epitope MM (EMM), considering all six hypervariable regions (EMM-ABCDEF HVR), or only ABEF regions (EMM-ABEF HVR); eplet MM (EpMM); antibody-verified eplet MM (AbVer EpMM); and solvent accessible amino acid MM (SAMM). There was no association of allelic MM with AR or 5Y-GF. The variables independently associated (Cox regression analyses) with AR were high donor final creatinine, nonpermissive TCE MM, ABCDEF EMM load ≥6, EpMM load ≥6; SAMM load ≥5, and AbVer EpMM load ≥3. No association between any HLA-DPB1 mMM and 5Y-GF was observed when all 130 transplant recipients were considered. However, when transplants from expanded criteria donors were excluded, independent associations were detected (logistic regression analyses) with AbVerEpMM load ≥2, SAMM load ≥7, cerebro-vascular death, donor age, and AR. To our knowledge, this is the first study that shows that some HLA-DPB1 mMM are associated with AR and low 5Y-GF in a population of exclusively first kidney transplant recipients.

The impact of preformed and de novo HLA-DP antibodies in renal transplantation, a meta-analysis

The impact of preformed and de novo HLA-DP antibodies after renal transplantation remains controversial and unclear. To address the clinical relevance of HLA-DP antibodies on the outcomes in renal transplantation, we performed a random effect model meta-analysis through a systematic review from inception to December 31, 2021. The outcome was graft loss or acute rejection. Finally five articles were identified as our inclusion criteria. The study which reported 1166 patients included in the final meta-analysis of de novo HLA-DP antibodies after transplantation showed an increased risk of graft loss or acute rejection (OR = 3.6, 95% CI = 1.6-8.10, P = 0.002, I²  = 52%). In the subgroup study, we established that patients with HLA-DP DSA after renal transplantation had a 8.85-fold increased risk of graft loss or acute rejection compared with patients without HLA-DP DSA (p = 0.003).While as for HLA-DP NDSA after renal transplantation, 2.73-fold increased risk of graft loss or acute rejection compared with patients without HLA-DP antibodies (p = 0.04). Besides, the studies which reported 487 patients included in the final meta-analysis of preformed HLA-DP antibodies did not show an increased risk of graft loss or acute rejection (OR = 4.55, 95% CI = 0.79-26.16, P = 0.09, I²  = 57%). The results of our meta-analysis suggested that de novo HLA-DP antibodies especially de novo HLA-DP DSA had a significant deleterious impact on the renal transplant risk of graft loss or acute rejection, while preformed HLA-DP antibodies had a no significant deleterious impact on the risk. The routine detection of HLA-DP antibodies after renal transplantation seems to be very important and may be as one of noninvasive biomarker-guided risk stratification.

Extended genomic HLA typing identifies previously unrecognized mismatches in living kidney transplantation

Introduction

Antibody mediated rejection (ABMR) is the most common cause of long-term allograft loss in kidney transplantation (KT). Therefore, a low human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch (MM) load is favorable for KT outcomes. Hitherto, serological or low-resolution molecular HLA typing have been adapted in parallel. Here, we aimed to identify previously missed HLA mismatches and corresponding antibodies by high resolution HLA genotyping in a living-donor KT cohort.

Methods

103 donor/recipient pairs transplanted at the University of Leipzig Medical Center between 1998 and 2018 were re-typed using next generation sequencing (NGS) of the HLA loci -A, -B, -C, -DRB1, -DRB345, -DQA1, -DQB1, -DPA1, and -DPB1. Based on these data, we compiled HLA MM counts for each pair and comparatively evaluated genomic HLA-typing with pre-transplant obtained serological/low-resolution HLA (=one-field) typing results. NGS HLA typing (=two-field) data was further used for reclassification of de novo HLA antibodies as "donor-specific".

Results

By two-field HLA re-typing, we were able to identify additional MM in 64.1% (n=66) of cases for HLA loci -A, -B, -C, -DRB1 and -DQB1 that were not observed by one-field HLA typing. In patients with biopsy proven ABMR, two-field calculated MM count was significantly higher than by one-field HLA typing. For additional typed HLA loci -DRB345, -DQA1, -DPA1, and -DPB1 we observed 2, 26, 3, and 23 MM, respectively. In total, 37.3% (69/185) of de novo donor specific antibodies (DSA) formation was directed against these loci (DRB345 ➔ n=33, DQA1 ➔ n=33, DPA1 ➔ n=1, DPB1 ➔ n=10).

Conclusion

Our results indicate that two-field HLA typing is feasible and provides significantly more sensitive HLA MM recognition in living-donor KT. Furthermore, accurate HLA typing plays an important role in graft management as it can improve discrimination between donor and non-donor HLA directed cellular and humoral alloreactivity in the long range. The inclusion of additional HLA loci against which antibodies can be readily detected, HLA-DRB345, -DQA1, -DQB1, -DPA1, and -DPB1, will allow a more precise virtual crossmatch and better prediction of potential DSA. Furthermore, in living KT, two-field HLA typing could contribute to the selection of the immunologically most suitable donors.

Virtual crossmatching and epitope analysis in kidney transplantation: What the physician involved in kidney transplantation should know?

Solid-phase single antigen bead (SAB) assay for detection of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies and high-resolution HLA typing have enabled tremendous progress in virtual crossmatch (VXM) technology in recent years. However, misinterpretation of the SAB assay may result in detrimental consequences after kidney transplantation. Meanwhile, epitope analysis could be an effective method to estimate immunizing eplets, which may provide ancillary information for better understanding of the SAB assay. To perform epitope analysis appropriately, it is necessary to understand the basic principles related to histocompatibility testing and the characteristics of the SAB assay. Therefore, knowledge of the properties and limitations of the SAB assay is critical. In this review, we aim to describe the fundamental concepts regarding immunobiological assessment, including HLA, anti-HLA antibodies, and SAB assay, and explain epitope analysis using examples.

Misidentification of preformed anti-HLA-DP antibodies leads to antibody-mediated kidney transplant rejection: a case report

Background

Patients who are HLA-sensitized are at high risk for early antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and worse outcomes. Therefore, it is crucial to detect the presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) using pretransplant antibody identification and crossmatch assays. An error in antibody identification can lead to disastrous clinical outcomes. We present a case of acute AMR associated with preformed HLA-DPα and HLA-DPβ DSAs that were not identified before transplantation.

Case presentation

A 27-year-old woman received a second kidney transplant from a deceased donor. Her pretransplant panel-reactive antibody level was 94%. The complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch was negative for T and B cells at the time of transplantation. She experienced early acute AMR proven by a kidney biopsy. Single antigen bead testing of the patient’s serum at the time of rejection as well as the pre-second transplant serum revealed strong antibodies against the DPA1*01:03 and DPB1*02:01 alleles in the second donor. These antibodies were not identified by phenotypic bead assay during the patient’s time on the waiting list. The patient was treated with plasmapheresis and anti-thymocyte globulin. However, she experienced abdominal pain on day 37 post-transplantation. Surgical exploration revealed a laceration on the transplanted kidney, which was then repaired. Subsequently, infected hematoma was suspected and the transplanted kidney was removed.

Conclusion

The present case highlights the clinical significance of preformed HLA-DPα and HLA-DPβ DSAs. Accuracy in determination of HLA antibodies before transplantattion is critical for transplant outcome. HLA-DP typing and single antigen bead testing are recommended for a precise antibody interpretation, especially in highly sensitized patients. Careful interpretation of antibody testing results is essential for the success of organ transplantation.

Determination of unacceptable HLA antigen mismatches in kidney transplant recipients

With the introduction of the virtual allocation crossmatch in the Eurotransplant (ET) region in 2023, the determination of unacceptable antigen mismatches (UAM) in kidney transplant recipients is of utmost importance for histocompatibility laboratories and transplant centers. Therefore, a joined working group of members from the German Society for Immunogenetics (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Immungenetik, DGI) and the German Transplantation Society (Deutsche Transplantationsgesellschaft, DTG) revised and updated the previous recommendations from 2015 in light of recently published evidence. Like in the previous version, a wide range of topics is covered from technical issues to clinical risk factors. This review summarizes the evidence about the prognostic value of contemporary methods for HLA antibody detection and identification, as well as the impact of UAM on waiting time, on which these recommendations are based. As no clear criteria could be determined to differentiate potentially harmful from harmless HLA antibodies, the general recommendation is to assign all HLA against which plausible antibodies are found as UAM. There is, however, a need for individualized solutions for highly immunized patients. These revised recommendations provide a list of aspects that need to be considered when assigning UAM to enable a fair and comprehensible procedure and to harmonize risk stratification prior to kidney transplantation between transplant centers. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Emerging monitoring technologies in kidney transplantation

Non-invasive technologies to monitor kidney allograft health utilizing high-throughput assays of blood and urine specimens are emerging out of the research realm and slowly becoming part of everyday clinical practice. HLA epitope analysis and eplet mismatch score determination promise a more refined approach to the pre-transplant recipient-donor HLA matching that may lead to reduced rejection risk. High-resolution HLA typing and multiplex single antigen bead assays are identifying potential new offending HLA antibody subtypes. There is increasing recognition of the deleterious role non-HLA antibodies play in post-transplant outcomes. Donor-derived cell-free DNA detected by next-generation sequencing is a promising biomarker for kidney transplant rejection. Multi-omics techniques are shedding light on discrete genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic signatures that correlate with and predict allograft outcomes. Over the next decade, a comprehensive approach to optimize kidney matching and monitor transplant recipients for acute and chronic graft dysfunction will likely involve a combination of those emerging technologies summarized in this review.

Next-generation sequencing and clinical histocompatibility testing

Histocompatibility testing is essential for donor identification and risk assessment in solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Additionally, it is useful for identifying donor specific alleles for monitoring donor specific antibodies in post-transplant patients. Next-generation sequence (NGS) based human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing has improved many aspects of histocompatibility testing in hematopoietic stem cell and solid organ transplant. HLA disease association testing and research has also benefited from the advent of NGS technologies. In this review we discuss the current impact and future applications of NGS typing on clinical histocompatibility testing for transplant and non-transplant purposes.

Analysis of de novo donor-specific HLA-DPB1 antibodies in kidney transplantation

HLA matching and avoidance of unacceptable mismatches are important aspects in the selection of donors for solid organ transplantation. The impact of HLA-DPB1 incompatibility on the outcomes of kidney transplantation is not fully understood. We investigated a potential effect of mismatching for HLA-DPB1 at allele, eplet, or Terasaki epitope (TerEp) level on the formation of de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) and also asked whether polymorphisms associated with HLA-DPB1 expression level may influence dnDSA induction. Furthermore, we analyzed the correlation between graft survival and HLA-DPB1 mismatches defined by different approaches. A cohort of 366 patients who received a kidney transplant at the Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany, with availability of pre- and post-transplant HLA antibody results by single antigen testing as well as of donor and recipient HLA-DPB1 high-resolution typing were analyzed retrospectively. Susceptibility to increased HLA-DPB1 expression was predicted by the linked dimorphism rs9277534 A/G of the HLA-DPB1 gene. Neither HLA-DPB1 mismatches at allele, eplet or TerEp level nor exposure to donor's high HLA-DPB1 expression were significantly associated with the risk of developing dnDSA against HLA-DPB1. However, HLA-DPB1 eplet and TerEp mismatches had a significant negative impact on graft survival (p < 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively). Matching for HLA-DPB1 at epitope instead of allele level appears to have potential to improve graft survival in kidney transplantation.

Histologic Antibody-Mediated Kidney Allograft Rejection in the Absence of Donor Specific HLA Antibodies

Histologic antibody-mediated rejection (hAMR) is defined as a kidney allograft biopsy satisfying the first 2 Banff criteria for diagnosing antibody-mediated rejection (AMR): tissue injury and evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with the endothelium. In approximately one-half of such cases, circulating HLA donor specific antibodies (DSA) are not detectable by current methodology at the time of biopsy. Some studies indicated a better prognosis for HLA-DSA-negative cases of hAMR compared to those with detectable HLA-DSA, whereas others found equally poor survival compared to hAMR-negative cases. We reviewed the literature regarding the pathophysiology of HLA-DSA-negative hAMR. We find 3 nonmutually exclusive possibilities: 1) HLA-DSA are involved, but just not detected; 2) non-HLA DSA (allo- or autoantibodies) are pathogenically involved; and/or 3) antibody-independent NK cell activation is mediating the process through "missing self" or other activating mechanisms. These possibilities are discussed in detail. Recommendations regarding the approach to such patients are made. Clearly, more research is necessary regarding the measurement of non-HLA antibodies, recipient/donor NK cell genotyping, and the use of antibody reduction therapy or other immunosuppression in any subset of patients with HLA-DSA-negative hAMR.

Pretransplant Calculated Panel Reactive Antibody in the Absence of Donor-Specific Antibody and Kidney Allograft Survival

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Panel reactive antibody informs the likelihood of finding an HLA-compatible donor for transplant candidates, but has historically been associated with acute rejection and allograft survival because testing methods could not exclude the presence of concomitant donor-specific antibodies. Despite new methods to exclude donor-specific antibodies, panel reactive antibody continues to be used to determine the choice of induction and maintenance immunosuppression. The study objective was to determine the clinical relevance of panel reactive antibody in the absence of donor-specific antibodies.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Retrospective observational study of kidney allograft survival among 4058 zero HLA-A-, B-, DR-, and DQB1-mismatched transplant recipients without antibodies to donor kidney antigens encoded by these HLA gene loci.

RESULTS

Among 4058 first and repeat transplant recipients, patients with calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) 1%-97% were not at higher risk of transplant failure, compared with patients with cPRA of 0% (death censored graft loss: hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.82 to 1.41). Patients with cPRA ≥98% had a higher risk of graft loss from any cause including death (hazard ratio, 1.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.08 to 1.79) and death censored allograft failure (hazard ratio, 1.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.27 to 2.49). In stratified analyses, the higher risk of graft loss among patients with cPRA ≥98% was only observed among repeat, but not first, transplant recipients. In subgroup analysis, there was no association between cPRA and graft loss among living related transplant recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

Calculated panel reactive antibody is poorly associated with post-transplant immune reactivity to the allograft in the absence of donor-specific antibody.

PODCAST

This article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2021_01_25_CJN13640820_final.mp3.