Effects of re-augmenting maintenance immunosuppression on post-transplant donor-specific HLA antibodies in liver transplantation

Detailed Analysis of Simultaneous Renal and Liver Allografts in the Presence of DSA

Liver allografts protect renal allografts from the same donor from some, but not all, preformed donor specific alloantibodies (DSA). However, the precise mechanisms of protection and the potential for more subtle alterations/injuries within the grafts resulting from DSA interactions require further study.

Methods

We reevaluated allograft biopsies from simultaneous liver-kidney transplant recipients who had both allografts biopsied within 60 d of one another and within 30 d of DSA being positive in serum (positive: mean florescence intensity ≥5000). Routine histology, C4d staining, and specialized immunohistochemistry for Kupffer cells (KCs; CD163) and a C4d receptor immunoglobulin-like transcript-4 were carried out in 4 patients with 6 paired biopsies.

Results

Overt antibody-mediated rejection was found in 3 of 4 renal and liver allografts. One patient had biopsy-confirmed renal and liver allograft antibody-mediated rejection despite serum clearance of DSA. All biopsies showed KC hypertrophy (minimal: 1; mild: 2; moderate: 1; severe: 2) and cytoplasmic C4d KC staining was easily detected in 2 biopsies from 2 patients; minimal and negative in 2 biopsies each. Implications of which are discussed. Control 1-y protocol liver allograft biopsies from DSA- recipients showed neither KC hypertrophy nor KC C4d staining (n = 6).

Conclusions

Partial renal allograft protection by a liver allograft from the same donor may be partially mediated by phagocytosis/elimination of antibody and complement split products by KCs, as shown decades ago in controlled sensitized experimental animal experiments.

Incidence and risk factors of subclinical rejection after pediatric liver transplantation, and impact on allograft fibrosis

INTRODUCTION

Subclinical rejection (SCR) is a common injury in protocol biopsy after pediatric liver transplantation (pLT), but its effect on the recipient is not clearly understood. We herein investigated the incidence and risk factors involved in SCR and analyzed the relationship between SCR and allograft fibrosis (AF).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the biopsy results from 507 children between May 2013 and May 2019, and 352 patients underwent protocol biopsy 2 years after pLT, 203 underwent protocol biopsy 5 years after pLT, and 48 underwent protocol biopsy both 2 and 5 years after pLT.

RESULTS

The incidence of SCR in the 5-year group was higher than that in the 2-year group (20.2% vs.13.4%, respectively, p = .033). The number of patients with mild and moderate SCR in the 5-year group was also higher than that in the 2-year group (p = .039). Logistic regression analysis showed that acute rejection before liver biopsy and deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) were independent risk factors for SCR in the two groups, and that the incidence and severity of AF in protocol biopsies at both periods in the SCR group were higher than those in the non-SCR group (p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence and severity of SCR increased with the prolongation of protocol biopsy time. We postulate that acute rejection and DDLT are independent risk factors for SCR after transplantation. As the occurrence of SCR also augmented the incidence and severity of AF.

ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation with high preoperative antibody titer: A case report

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation (ABOi-LDLT) is essential for expanding the donor pool. ABOi-LDLT prognosis has improved since desensitization treatment with rituximab; however, patients with high antibody titers are considered to be at high risk of antibody mediated rejection (AMR). Nevertheless, the preoperative antibody titer cutoff levels that preclude ABOi-LDLT have not yet been determined. In this study, the highest preoperative antibody titer was 1:4096, and the recipient had good outcomes. There has been only one report of good outcomes with a preoperative antibody titer of more than 1:4096. We hypothesized that high preoperative antibody titers in ABOi-LDLT may not be associated with AMR in protocols involving rituximab.

CASE PRESENTATION

The recipient was a 22-year-old man with biliary atresia and underwent ABOi-LDLT (B to O). We administered 500 mg of rituximab 14 days prior and then 300 mg of rituximab one day prior to ABOi-LDLT. The recipients preoperative IgG antibody titer was 1:4096. Postoperative immunosuppressive protocol involved steroids, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil. The patient had satisfactory graft function three years following ABOi-LDLT.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

The antibody that is responsible for posttransplant AMR should be newly synthesized after transplantation as a result of sensitization by antigens on the vascular endothelial cells of the graft. In ABOi-LDLT, natural antibodies may not cause AMR.

CONCLUSIONS

The most important factor for preventing AMR in recipients undergoing ABOi-LDLT is the suppression of de novo antibodies. High preoperative antibody titers may not necessarily preclude ABOi-LDLT, provided that rituximab is used in desensitization.

Strategies for Liver Transplantation Tolerance

Liver transplant (LT) recipients require life-long immunosuppression (IS) therapy to preserve allograft function. The risks of chronic IS include an increased frequency of malignancy, infection, renal impairment, and other systemic toxicities. Despite advances in IS, long-term LT outcomes have not been improved over the past three decades. Standard-of-care (SoC) therapy can, in rare cases, lead to development of operational tolerance that permits safe withdrawal of maintenance IS. However, successful IS withdrawal cannot be reliably predicted and, in current prospective studies, is attempted several years after the transplant procedure, after considerable exposure to the cumulative burden of maintenance therapy. A recent pilot clinical trial in liver tolerance induction demonstrated that peri-transplant immunomodulation, using a regulatory T-cell (Treg) approach, can reduce donor-specific alloreactivity and allow early IS withdrawal. Herein we review protocols for active tolerance induction in liver transplantation, with a focus on identifying tolerogenic cell populations, as well as barriers to tolerance. In addition, we propose the use of novel IS agents to promote immunomodulatory mechanisms favoring tolerance. With numerous IS withdrawal trials underway, improved monitoring and use of novel immunomodulatory strategies will help provide the necessary knowledge to establish an active liver tolerance induction protocol for widespread use.