A comparative evaluation of immediate dental implant with autogenous versus synthetic guided bone regeneration

EFFECT OF AUTOGENOUS BONE GRAFT SITE ON DENTAL IMPLANT SURVIVAL AND DONOR SITE COMPLICATIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken to answer the following focus questions: Is the implant survival in augmented bone utilizing iliac crest bone grafts the same as while using intraoral autologous bone grafts? Is the incidence of postoperative donor site complications the same when using iliac crest bone grafts as opposed to intraoral grafts?

METHODS

Systematic searches of electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL) were performed to identify studies which reported on implant survival and postoperative complications for dental implants placed in grafted partially/completely edentulous human jaws. Studies were included if: they reported on 2-piece micro-rough surface root form dental implants placed in bone-augmented completely or partially edentulous human jaws, and the jaws must have been augmented with autologous bone graft materials. Time and nature of postoperative complications must have been reported. Two investigators performed data extraction and a Cohen's unweighted kappa was calculated for inter-investigator reliability. A meta-analysis was performed for the extracted data on implant survival rate in both iliac crest grafts and intra-oral grafts. A qualitative analysis was performed on the information extracted on graft donor site complications. Quality assessment of the included studies were done using the Cochrane collaboration tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa scales.

RESULTS

A total of 23 studies were included in the final analysis. The calculated kappa ranged between 0.77-0.89 for the literature search and identification process. Fourteen studies were included with data on implant survival including five randomized controlled clinical trials. The meta-analysis of included studies revealed that the implant survival rate of dental implants placed in jaws augmented with iliac crest grafts was lower than those placed in jaws augmented with intra-oral bone grafts at 6-months [ICG = 95.8% IOG = 98.4%; P < .001], 12-months [ICG = 97.0%, IOG = 98.4%; P < .001], 24-months [ICG = 85.9%, IOG = 98.2%; P < .001], 60-months [ICG = 90.0%, IOG = 91.5%; P < .001], and at 120-months [ICG = 88.8%, IOG = 95.2%; P < .001] follow-up periods. Iliac crest grafts were also frequently associated with donor site complications including pain / discomfort, gait disturbance, and sensory disturbance.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that implant survival is consistently higher in bone harvested from intraoral sites compared to iliac crest grafts. Donor site complications seemed to be a frequent finding with iliac crest grafts and mental grafts.

FUNDING

None.

REGISTRATION

The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO: International prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42021283738).

Comparison of Autogenous Tooth Materials and Other Bone Grafts

Autogenous odontogenic materials are a new, highly biocompatible option for jaw restoration. The inorganic component of autogenous teeth acts as a scaffold to maintain the volume and enable donor cell attachment and proliferation; the organic component contains various growth factors that promote bone reconstruction and repair. The composition of dentin is similar to that of bone, which can be a rationale for promoting bone reconstruction. Recent advances have been made in the field of autogenous odontogenic materials, and studies have confirmed their safety and feasibility after successful clinical application. Autogenous odontogenic materials have unique characteristics compared with other bone-repair materials, such as the conventional autogenous, allogeneic, xenogeneic, and alloplastic bone substitutes. To encourage further research into odontogenic bone grafts, we compared the composition, osteogenesis, and development of autogenous odontogenic materials with those of other bone grafts. In conclusion, odontogenic bone grafts should be classified as a novel bone substitute.

Guided bone regeneration

Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is a surgical procedure that utilizes bone grafts with barrier membranes to reconstruct small defects around dental implants. This procedure is commonly deployed on dehiscence or fenestration defects ≥2 mm, and mixing with autogenous bone is recommended on larger defects. Tension-free primary closure is a critical factor to prevent wound dehiscence, which is critical cause of GBR failure. A barrier membrane should be rigidly fixed without mobility. If the barrier is exposed, closed monitoring should be utilized to prevent secondary infection.

Immediate dental implant placement with or without autogenous bone graft: A comparative study

Introduction

Immediate dental implants are the most accepted contemporary treatment option for the replacement of missing teeth. One pitfall of immediate implant use, however, is the inevitable residual space that remains between the implant and the socket wall, called the jumping distance, which may lead to bone resorption and formation of a bony defect, decreasing the implant stability. When this jumping distance is more than 2 mm, use of bone grafts is recommended. However, the use of grafts when the jumping distance is <2 mm is not defined in the literature.

Aim

To evaluate the peri-implant hard and soft tissue changes following immediately placed implants with a jumping distance of 2 mm with or without autogenous bone grafts.

Settings

The study was conducted between January 2016 and December 2017 in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

Subjects and Methods

This was a prospective, single-center, two-arm, parallel, randomized study on patients undergoing replacement of missing anterior teeth with immediate implants. There were two groups: the study group which received bone graft and the control group which did not receive any graft. Temporary prosthesis was placed following implant placement which was replaced with definitive prosthesis 4 months later. Patients were followed up for a period of 9 months. The alveolar bone loss was evaluated radiologically using cone-beam computed tomography, and pain, suppuration, mobility, and periodontal probing depth were evaluated clinically.

Results

There were 16 participants in the study group and 17 in the control group. The alveolar bone loss was greater in the study group; however, pain, suppuration, and mobility showed no difference between the groups.

Conclusion

The immediate implants placed with or without bone grafts had similar alveolar hard and soft tissue changes when the jumping distance was <2 mm.

[Factors affecting osteointegration and the use of early functional load to reduce the duration of treatment in dental implantation]

The article presents literature data on the impact of the surface and shape of dental implants and early functional load with aesthetic and functional rehabilitation on osteointegration and stability of implants at various implantation terms.

Is Bone Graft or Guided Bone Regeneration Needed When Placing Immediate Dental Implants? A Systematic Review

AIMS

To systematically review the effect and type of bone graft and guided bone regeneration around immediate implants on hard and soft tissue changes.

METHODS

Three electronic databases were searched up to June 2015. Outcomes consisted of hard and soft tissue dimensional changes.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included according to inclusion criteria. Immediate implants with bone grafting had superior soft tissue stability and preserved horizontal ridge dimension and buccal plate thickness, when compared to no grafting. The use of a barrier alone significantly decreased buccal plate resorption and the remaining defects around the implants, and the use of both bone graft and membrane aided in soft tissue preservation. The optimal type of bone graft material was a combination of cortical autogenous and synthetic particulate when compared to each separately, whereas no difference was found between demineralized allograft and hydroxyapatite in decreasing bone loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative data analysis was not possible due to heterogeneity of the included studies. Further randomized clinical trials with homogenous samples and proper controls are needed to support the results of this report.

Guided bone regeneration using autogenous tooth bone graft in implant therapy: case series

Recently, techniques have been reported that involve the preparation of extracted teeth from patients used as particulated bone graft materials for bone graft purposes. For implant placement and bone graft, autogenous teeth bone graft materials were used in 15 patients, and clinically excellent results were obtained. In histological examination, favorable bony healing by osteoconduction was observed.

Osteogenic Potential of Human Oral-Periosteal Cells (PCs) Isolated From Different Oral Origin: An In Vitro Study

The periosteum is a specialized connective tissue containing multipotent stem cells capable of bone formation. In this study, we aimed at demonstrating that human oral periosteal cells derived from three different oral sites (upper vestibule, lower vestibule, and hard palate) represent an innovative cell source for maxillo-facial tissue engineering applications in terms of accessibility and self-commitment towards osteogenic lineage. Periosteal cells (PCs) were isolated from patients with different ages (20-30 yy, 40-50 yy, 50-60 yy); we then analyzed the in vitro proliferation capacity and the bone self-commitment of cell clones culturing them without any osteogenic supplement to support their differentiation. We found that oral PCs, independently of their origin and age of patients, are mesenchymal stem cells with stem cell characteristics (clonogenical and proliferative activity) and that, even in absence of any osteogenic induction, they undertake the osteoblast lineage after 45 days of culture. These results suggest that oral periosteal cells could replace mesenchymal cells from bone marrow in oral tissue-engineering applications.

Histomorphometric Analysis of Contaminated Autogenous Tooth Graft Materials After Various Sterilization

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate histomorphometrically contaminated autogenous tooth graft materials, which were resterilized.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The intentional defects (diameter: 8 mm, depth: 4 mm) were formed around implant fixture on the iliac crest of 6 mongrel dogs. Autogenous tooth graft materials were made by extracted premolars. After the contamination of the tooth materials, graft procedure was performed; no contaminated group (control group), contaminated groups (nonsterilization group [group 1], ethylene oxide [EO] gas group [group 2], and autoclave group [group 3]). The bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and the new bone formation rate (NBFR) were evaluated after sacrifice.

RESULTS

The BIC and NBFR of groups 1 and 3 were significantly lower than the control group after 4 weeks. The BIC and NBRF of group 3 were significantly lower than the control group after 8 weeks. However, the BIC and NBRF of group 2 was not significantly different comparing with the control group after 4 and 8 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Sterilization using EO gas may be more favorable than high-pressure sterilization in cases the reuse of contaminated autogenous tooth graft materials.

Use of buccal fat pad to repair post-extraction peri-implant bone defects in the posterior maxilla. A preliminary prospective study

Background

Extensive literature exists about the use of the BFP in the treatment of oral defects but, to our knowledge, no article refers to the use of the BFP as a substitute of the membrane barriers for treatment of peri-implant bone defects. The aim was to evaluate the use of the buccal fat pad as a coating material for bone grafting in the peri-implant bone defect regeneration of immediate implants placed in the posterior maxilla.

Material and Methods

A preliminary prospective study of patients involving immediate implants in which the buccal fat pad was used as a coating material to peri-implant bone defects was carried out. The outcome measures assessed were: postoperative pain and swelling, complications related to buccal fat pad surgery, implant survival and success rates and peri-implant marginal bone loss at 12 months of prosthetic loading.

Results

Twenty-seven patients (17 women and 10 men) with a mean age of 55.3 ± 8.9 years, and a total of 43 implants were included. Two-thirds of the patients reported either no pain or only mild intensity pain and moderate inflammation, two days after surgery. Post-operative period was well tolerated by the patients and no serious complications occurred. None wound dehiscence occurred. Implant survival and success rates were 97.6% and the average marginal bone loss 1 year after loading was 0.58 ± 0.27 mm.

Conclusions

Within the limits of this preliminary study, the use of the buccal fat pad as a coating material for bone grafting in peri-implant bone defects placed in the upper posterior maxilla was a well-tolerated technique by patients; high implant success rate was achieved with a minimal peri-implant marginal bone loss at 12 months of prosthetic loading.

Key words:Buccal fat pad, immediate implant, peri-implant bone defect.

Histomorphometric analysis of bone formation in bony defects around implants in adult dogs: a comparison of grafts of low and high heat-treated autogenous tooth ash

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the bone formation of autogenous tooth ash treated with different temperatures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Heat treatment was rendered by powder after extraction of teeth from dogs. The bony defects were made at iliac and resorbable blast medium surfaced implant placement and bone graft was performed; no bone graft group (control group), low heat-treated tooth ash group (group 1), high heat-treated tooth ash group (group 2). Right side had healing periods of 12 weeks, and the left side had 6 weeks. Histomorphometrical analysis was performed at 12 weeks.

RESULTS

The control group had poor bone formation and showed large loose connective tissue. Group 1 displayed good healing and bone formation. Group 2 showed higher rate of bone formation than group 1 and the control group. The high heat-treated tooth ash group showed a statistically significant increase in the rate of bone formation in the early stage.

CONCLUSION

The heat-treated autogenous tooth ash powder showed excellent new bone formation. The temperature of heat treatment is an important factor in new bone formation. The high heat treatment was the optimal treatment method for making tooth ash than the low heat treatment.

Immediate Loading in the Maxillary Arch: Evidence-Based Guidelines to Improve Success Rates: A Review

The reliability of immediately loaded dental implants in the mandible has prompted many to investigate their application in the maxilla. Although the body of literature is growing, the long-term survivability of immediate loading in the maxilla is still pending. This review of literature investigates the status of immediate loading of dental implants in the maxilla to determine its predictability as a treatment option for partial and complete maxillary edentulism. Current terminology in the field is summarized first. Subsequently, the rationale and advantages of immediate loading in the maxilla are reviewed, and the relationships between immediate loading and osseointegration, primary stability, implant design, micromotion, immediate implant placement, and bone character are explored. The importance of a prosthodontically driven implant treatment plan emphasizing the role of splinting a high-precision and passively fitting implant restoration with reduced micromotion under function is summarized. The reliability and predictability of immediately loaded implants as a treatment option are proposed, and recommended guidelines for the successful delivery of immediately loaded implants in the maxilla are presented.

Effect of Tisseel on bone healing with particulate dentin and plaster of Paris mixture

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of Tisseel on the early healing of bone defects in the skulls of rats.

STUDY DESIGN

Forty-eight rats were randomly assigned to 4 groups, and each group was further divided into 3 subgroups which were examined at 4 and 8 weeks after the defects were filled. The 4 different groups were animals containing: no graft (group 1); particulate dentin and plaster of Paris mixture graft (group 2); Tisseel and particulate dentin and plaster of Paris mixture graft (group 3); and Tisseel graft (group 4). After killing the animals at 4 and 8 weeks after surgery, all implant blocks were prepared for histologic sections and histomorphometric analysis.

RESULTS

The overall new bone formation was significantly different between the 4-week samples and the 8-week samples. Significant differences between groups 1 and 2, groups 1 and 3, groups 1 and 4, groups 2 and 4, and groups 3 and 4 were observed at 4 weeks after surgery. At 8 weeks after surgery, significant differences between groups 1 and 2, groups 1 and 3, groups 1 and 4, and groups 2 and 4 were observed. As expected, effective bone formation was observed when the defects were filled with either particulate dentin, Tisseel, or particulate dentin-Tisseel combination. It was also observed from this study that particulate dentin is especially effective, followed by the particulate dentin-Tisseel combination and Tisseel.

CONCLUSION

It was concluded that the use of Tisseel may be an alternative therapy for regenerating bone in defects when used in combination with particulate dentin.