Two-dimensional radiographic and clinical references of the tooth crown for orthodontic mini-implant insertion: A guide-free technique

Three-dimensional changes after maxillary molar distalization with a miniscrew-anchored cantilever

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the changes after maxillary molar distalization in Class II malocclusion using the miniscrew-anchored cantilever with an extension arm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The sample included 20 patients (9 male, 11 female; mean age 13.21 ± 1.54 years) with Class II malocclusion, treated with the miniscrew-anchored cantilever. Lateral cephalograms and dental models obtained before (T1) and after molar distalization (T2) were evaluated using Dolphin software and 3D Slicer. Superimposition of digital dental models using regions of interest on the palate was performed to evaluate three-dimensional displacement of maxillary teeth. Intragroup change comparisons were performed using dependent t-test and Wilcoxon test (P < 0.05).

RESULTS

The maxillary first molars were distalized to overcorrected Class I. The mean distalization time was 0.43 ± 0.13 years. Cephalometric analysis demonstrated significant distal movement of the maxillary first premolar (-1.21 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.45, -1.96) and maxillary first (-3.38 mm, 95% CI: -2.88, -3.87) and second molars (-2.12 mm, 95% CI: -1.53, -2.71). Distal movements increased progressively from the incisors to the molars. The first molar showed small intrusion (-0.72 mm, 95% CI: 0.49, -1.34). In the digital model analysis, the first and second molars showed a crown distal rotation of 19.31° ± 5.71° and 10.17° ± 3.84°, respectively. The increase in maxillary intermolar distance, evaluated at the mesiobuccal cusps, was 2.63 ± 1.56 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

The miniscrew-anchored cantilever was effective for maxillary molar distalization. Sagittal, lateral, and vertical movements were observed for all maxillary teeth. Distal movement was progressively greater from anterior to posterior teeth.

Influence of the growth pattern on cortical bone thickness and mini-implant stability

INTRODUCTION

Controversial reports suggest a relationship between growth pattern and cortical alveolar bone thickness, and its effect in the use of mini-implants.

OBJECTIVE

The main purpose of this study was to assess the influence of the growth pattern on the cortical alveolar bone thickness and on the stability and success rate of mini-implants.

METHODS

Fifty-six mini-implants were inserted in the buccal region of the maxilla of 30 patients. These patients were allocated into two groups, based on their growth pattern (horizontal group [HG] and vertical group [VG]). Cortical thickness was measured using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Stability of mini-implants, soft tissue in the insertion site, sensitivity during loading and plaque around the mini-implants were evaluated once a month. Intergroup comparisons were performed using t tests, Mann-Whitney tests, and Fisher exact tests. Correlations were evaluated with Pearson's correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

The cortical bone thickness was significantly greater in the HG at the maxillary labial anterior region and at the mandibular buccal posterior and labial anterior regions. There was a significant negative correlation between Frankfort-mandibular plane angle (FMA) and the labial cortical thickness of the maxilla, and with the labial and lingual cortical bone thicknesses of the mandible. No significant intergroup difference was found for mini-implant mobility and success rate. No associated factor influenced stability of the mini-implants.

CONCLUSIONS

Growth pattern affects the alveolar bone cortical thickness in specific areas of the maxilla and mandible, with horizontal patients presenting greater cortical bone thickness. However, this fact may have no influence on the stability and success rate of mini-implants in the maxillary buccal posterior region.

Additional intraoral radiographs may change the judgment regarding the final position of orthodontic mini-implants

Objective:

This study aimed to assess if additional vertical bitewing (VBW) and/or occlusal (OC) radiographs may change initial judgment based only on periapical radiograph (PAR) about the final position of orthodontic mini-implants (OMI).

Methods:

Subjective and objective analyses were performed. Radiographic images of 26 OMI were divided into four groups: PAR, PAR+VBW, PAR+OC and ALL (PAR+VBW+OC). For subjective analysis, five observers were asked to assess if the position of OMI was favorable to its success, using questionnaires with a four-point scale for responses: 1= definitely not favorable, 2= probably not favorable, 3= probably favorable, or 4= definitely favorable. Each group containing sets of images was presented to them in four different viewing sessions. Objective evaluation compared horizontal distances between OMI tip and the root nearest to the device in PAR and VBW.

Results:

Most of observers (3 out of 5) changed their initial judgment based on PAR about OMI position when additional radiographs were analyzed. Differences between groups (i.e. PAR vs. PAR+VBW; PAR vs. PAR+OC; and, PARvs.ALL) were statistically significant for these observers. For those that changed their judgment about OMI position, confidence level could significantly increase, decrease or even be maintained, not indicating a pattern. There was no agreement for distances between OMI tip and the root nearest to the device in PAR and VBW.

Conclusion:

Considering the limitations of the study, it is concluded that additional radiographic images may change the judgement about OMI final position without necessarily increasing the degree of certainty of such judgment.

Orthodontic miniscrew failure rate and root proximity, insertion angle, bone contact length, and bone density

OBJECTIVES

To test the hypothesis that there is no significant correlation between miniscrew failure rate and root proximity, insertion angle, bone contact length, and bone density.

SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION

This study included 107 patients in whom 190 miniscrews had been placed from April 2008 to October 2009 in Tohoku University Hospital (Sendai, Japan).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cone beam computed tomography scans (CBCT) and periapical radiographs were taken before and after miniscrew placement. Differences in root proximity, screw insertion angle, bone contact length, and bone density were statistically compared; comparisons were also made between the CBCT images and periapical radiographs.

RESULTS

A significantly higher success rate was observed in the maxilla than in the mandible. The distance between the miniscrew and the root surface was significantly smaller in the failure group. There were no significant differences in the insertion angle, bone contact length, or bone density between the success group and the failure group. The concordance rate between the periapical dental radiographs and CBCT images was 46.5%.

CONCLUSION

While bone contact length, miniscrew angle, and bone density did not exert major effects on miniscrew failure, root proximity was the factor that most affected miniscrew failure, especially for miniscrews placed in the mandible. CBCT was superior to periapical dental X-rays for evaluating the proximity of miniscrews to the root. Correction of the X-ray attenuation coefficient value was necessary for measuring bone density using CBCT.

Accuracy of a cone beam computed tomography-guided surgical stent for orthodontic mini-implant placement

OBJECTIVE

To validate the accuracy of a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided surgical stent for orthodontic mini-implant (OMI) placement by quantitatively evaluating the difference between CBCT-prescribed and actual position of mini-implants in preoperative and postoperative CBCT images.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A surgical stent was fabricated using Teflon-Perfluoroalkoxy, which has appropriate biological x-ray attenuation properties. Polyvinylsiloxane impression material was used to secure the custom-made surgical stent onto swine mandibles. CBCT scanning was done with the stent in place to virtually plan mini-implants using a three-dimensional (3D) software program. An appropriate insertion point was determined using 3D reconstruction data, and the vertical and horizontal angulations were determined using four prescribed angles. A custom-designed surveyor was used to drill a guide hole within the surgical stent as prescribed on the CBCT images for insertion of 32 OMIs. The mandibles with a surgical stent in place were rescanned with CBCT to measure the deviations between the virtual planning data and surgical results.

RESULTS

The difference between the prescribed and actual vertical angle was 1.01 ± 7.25, and the horizontal difference was 1.16 ± 6.08. The correlation coefficient confirms that there was no intrarater variability in either the horizontal (R  =  .97) or vertical (R  =  .74) vectors.

CONCLUSIONS

The surgical stent in this study guides mini-implants to the prescribed position as planned in CBCT. Since the statistical difference was not significant, the surgical stent can be considered to be an accurate guide tool for mini-implant placement in clinical use.