A new submerged split-thickness skin graft technique to rebuild peri-implant keratinized soft tissue in composite flap reconstructed mandible or maxilla

Removal of patient-specific reconstruction plates after mandible reconstruction with a fibula free flap: is the plate the problem?

Computer-aided microvascular mandible reconstruction is an increasingly common procedure in oral and maxillofacial surgery. The aim of this retrospective single-centre study was to evaluate the rate and specifics of hardware removal after fibula free flap (FFF) fixation with a patient-specific reconstruction plate. The study included patients who underwent hardware removal between April 2017 and October 2019. Statistical analyses were performed regarding the different indications for plate removal (dental implantation versus complication) and the surgical approach (intraoral versus extraoral). Plate removal was performed in 29 of 98 patients (29.6%) after FFF fixation with a patient-specific reconstruction plate. Plate removal was done prior to dental implantation in 58.6% of cases and due to complications in 41.4%. Complications seen between reconstructive surgery and plate removal were less frequent in the dental rehabilitation group (8/17 vs 12/12; P=0.002). Within this group, 35.3% of plates were removed intraorally, and the majority of partial plate removals were performed in the patients with plate removal for dental rehabilitation (72.7% vs 27.3%). Hospitalization was shorter with an intraoral approach (1.7 days vs 4.0 days, P=0.052). The removal of patient-specific reconstruction plates prior to dental implantation is often partial and can be performed intraorally. The use of patient-specific miniplates for fixation of FFF might facilitate later dental rehabilitation.

The Sydney Modified Alberta Reconstruction Technique (SM-ART) for dental rehabilitation following mandibulectomy or maxillectomy

The Sydney Modification of the Alberta Mandibular Reconstruction technique (SM-ART) is a hybrid of the Rohner method and the Alberta Reconstructive Technique (ART). SM-ART differs from ART in three ways, notably the use of custom plates, intraoral placement of implants via three-dimensionally printed guides and a skin graft buried deep into the skin paddle of the fibula flap in the first stage of the reconstruction.

Dental Rehabilitation for Free Fibula Flap-Reconstructed Mandible with Scar Contracture: A Technical Note

Dental rehabilitation with osseointegrated implants in reconstructed mandibles is a common procedure, but the technique still requires improvement, especially in its reliability and technical simplification. We herein report dental rehabilitation of a free fibula-reconstructed mandible with scar contracture. A vestibuloplasty technique with application of a polyglycolic acid (PGA) sheet is described. The implants were inserted into a viable fibula flap with severe scar contracture of the overlying epithelium resulting from vascular instability in skin paddle. Only the fibula periosteum was sutured after implant insertion; exposed surfaces were covered with a combination of PGA sheet and fibrin sealant. The area with PGA sheet coverage gradually healed with moderate contracture. The epithelium around the almost implants became immobilized. The implant-supported removable partial denture with custom titanium bar was acceptable. Dental rehabilitation is possible for reconstructed mandibles with severe scar contracture. Application of a PGA sheet may be useful for vestibuloplasty in patients with reconstructed mandibles.

Sub-Periosteal Dissection with Denture-Guided Epithelial Regeneration: A Novel Method for Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Management in Reconstructed Mandibles

BACKGROUND

In patients with reconstructed mandibles using free fibula flaps, management of soft tissues around implants supporting dental rehabilitation, is often a clinical problem.

AIM

The aim of this paper is to describe a new technique, namely "Sub-periosteal dissection and denture-guided epithelial regeneration (SD-DGER)", as a method of peri-implant soft tissue management in these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The technique consists of performing a subperiosteal dissection with creation of buccal and lingual flaps. These flaps form the buccal and lingual vestibule. Implants are placed and an interim denture is immediately loaded onto the implants to guide the regenerated epithelium. A keratinized mucosal layer is formed on the bare fibula bone in six months time.

RESULTS

This technique was successful in producing fixed keratinized epithelial tissue around implants in patients with mandibles reconstructed using the free fibula flap in patients who did not undergo radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

The sub-periosteal dissection with denture guided epithelial regeneration is a predictable form of peri-implant soft tissue management in selected patients with reconstructed jaws.