The role of antibodies in transplantation

Recent Advances across the Spectrum of Heart Failure and Heart Transplant

In recent years, remarkable progress has been accomplished in the heart failure (HF) landscape, with novel drugs and groundbreaking device approaches [...].

Modelling acute antibody-mediated rejection of human kidney transplants using ex-vivo warm machine perfusion

BACKGROUND

Transplant rejection is a major cause of graft loss and morbidity. Currently, no human models of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) exist, limiting mechanistic investigation and organ-specific targeted therapy. Here, using 12 human kidneys and ex-vivo normothermic machine perfusion, we demonstrate phenotypes of AMR after addition of antibodies against either human HLA class I or blood group antigens (A, B), thus modelling clinical AMR that can follow HLA incompatible (HLAi) or blood group incompatible (ABOi) transplantation.

METHODS

Discarded human kidneys with wide ranging demographics and cold ischaemia times (11-54 h) were perfused with red blood cells and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) as a source of complement/coagulation factors. For the HLAi model, 600 μg of W6/32 anti-class 1 HLA antibody was added to the circuit (time '0'). For the ABOi model, high titre FFP of the relevant blood group antibody was added. Renal blood flow index (RBFi, mL/min/100 g), C3 desArg, prothrombin fragments 1 + 2 and histology were determined. Our endpoints included haemodynamic changes, thrombosis, and biopsy proven complement deposition.

FINDINGS

Compared to control kidneys perfused without anti-donor antibodies, both models demonstrated haemodynamic collapse after antibody perfusion with only the HLAi model showing glomerular C4d deposition.

INTERPRETATION

We show that a clinically relevant human kidney model of AMR is feasible, and anticipate that these models, with refinements, could provide a basis to test different strategies to prevent AMR.

FUNDING

The Rosetrees and Stonygate Trust, The Royal College of Surgeons of England Fellowship Grant, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre/KCL Early Career Grant, Kidney Research U.K.

Biological evaluation of acellular bovine bone matrix treated with NaOH

We mainly proceed from the view of biological effect to study the acellular bovine bone matrix (ABBM) by the low concentration of hydrogen oxidation. After cleaning the bovine bone routinely, it was cleaned with different concentrations of NaOH and stained with hematoxylin-eosin (HE) to observe the effect of decellulization. The effect of bovine bone matrix treated with NaOH were observed by optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and compared by DNA residue detection. Cell toxicity was also evaluated in MC3T3-E1 cells by CCK-8. For the in vitro osteogenesis detection, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining and alizarin red (AR) staining were performed in MC3T3-E1 cells. And the in vivo experiment, Micro CT, HE and Masson staining were used to observe whether the osteogenic effect of the materials treated with 1% NaOH solution was affected at 6 and 12 weeks. After the bovine bone was decellularized with different concentrations of NaOH solution, HE staining showed that ultrasonic cleaning with 1% NaOH solution for 30 min had the best effect of decellularization. The SEM showed that ABBM treated with 1% NaOH solution had few residual cells on the surface of the three-dimensional porous compared to ABBM treated with conventional chemical reagents. DNA residues and cytotoxicity of ABBM treated with 1% NaOH were both reduced. The results of ALP staining and AR staining showed that ABBM treated with 1% NaOH solution had no effect on the osteogenesis effect. The results of micro-CT, HE staining and Masson staining in animal experiments also showed that ABBM treated with 1% NaOH solution had no effect on the osteogenesis ability. The decellularization treatment of ABBM with the low concentration of NaOH can be more cost-effective, effectively remove the residual cellular components, without affecting the osteogenic ability. Our work may provide a novelty thought and a modified method to applicate the acellular bovine bone matrix clinically better. Graphical abstract.

Quick preparation of ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation for acute liver failure

Acute liver failure is life-threatening and has to be treated by liver transplantation urgently. When deceased donors or ABO-compatible living donors are not available, ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) becomes the only choice. How to prepare ABO-I LDLT urgently is an unsolved issue. A quick preparation regimen was designed, which was consisted of bortezomib (3.5mg) injection to deplete plasma cells and plasma exchange to achieve isoagglutinin titer ≤ 1: 64 just prior to liver transplantation and followed by rituximab (375mg/m² ) on post-operative day one to deplete B-cells. Eight patients received this quick preparation regimen to undergo ABO-I LDLT for acute liver failure from 2012 to 2019. They aged between 50 and 60 years. The median MELD score was 39 with a range from 35 to 48. It took 4.75 ± 1.58 days to prepare such an urgent ABO-I LDLT. All the patients had successful liver transplantations, but one patient died of antibody-mediated rejection at post-operative month 6. The 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year graft/patient survival were 100%, 87.5%, and 75%, respectively. In conclusion, this quick preparation regimen can reduce isoagglutinin titers quickly and make timely ABO-I LDLT feasible for acute liver failure. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Characteristics of Immunoglobulin M Type Antibodies of Different Origins from the Immunologic and Clinical Viewpoints and Their Application in Controlling Antibody-Mediated Allograft Rejection

Antibody-mediated allograft rejection (AMR) hinders patient prognosis after organ transplantation. Current studies concerning AMR have mainly focused on the diagnostic value of immunoglobulin G (IgG)-type donor-specific antihuman leukocyte antigen antibodies (DSAs), primarily because of their antigen specificity, whereas the clinical significance of immunoglobulin M (IgM)-type DSAs has not been thoroughly investigated in the context of organ transplantation because of their nonspecificity against antigens. Although consensus regarding the clinical significance and role of IgM antibodies is not clear, as discussed in this review, recent findings strongly suggest that they also have a huge potential in novel diagnostic as well as therapeutic application for the prevention of AMR. Most serum IgM antibodies are known to comprise natural antibodies with low affinity toward antigens, and this is derived from B-1 cells (innate B cells). However, some of the serum IgM-type antibodies reportedly also produced by B-2 cells (conventional B cells). The latter are known to have a high affinity for donor-specific antigens. In this review, we initially discuss how IgM-type antibodies of different origins participate in the pathology of various diseases, directly or through cell surface receptors, complement activation, or cytokine production. Then, we discuss the clinical applicability of B-1 and B-2 cell-derived IgM-type antibodies for controlling AMR with reference to the involvement of IgM antibodies in various pathological conditions.

Immunogenicity analysis of decellularized cardiac scaffolds after transplantation into rats

Aim: Cardiac extracellular matrix (cECM) scaffolds are promising biomaterials for clinical applications. Our aim is to determine the immunogenicity of decellularized scaffolds from different sources for use as artificial organs during organ transplantation. Materials & methods: We transplanted Lewis rats with syngeneic (Lewis rat cECM), allogeneic (BN rat cECM) or xenogeneic (hamster cECM) decellularized cardiac scaffolds. Acute vascular and cellular rejection was quantified by immunohistochemistry and immune cell infiltration. Results: BN rat and hamster hearts were rejected following transplantation. BN and hamster cECMs had similarly low immunogenicity compared with Lewis rat cECMs and did not lead to increased rejection. Conclusion: We found that scaffolds from all sources did not induce vascular or cellular rejection and exhibited low immunogenicity.

Sensitization in Heart Transplantation: Emerging Knowledge: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Sensitization, defined as the presence of circulating antibodies, presents challenges for heart transplant recipients and physicians. When present, sensitization can limit a transplantation candidate’s access to organs, prolong wait time, and, in some cases, exclude the candidate from heart transplantation altogether. The management of sensitization is not yet standardized, and current therapies have not yielded consistent results. Although current strategies involve antibody suppression and removal with intravenous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis, and antibody therapy, newer strategies with more specific targets are being investigated.

Immunosuppression following organ transplantation. Part 1: mechanisms and immunosuppressive agents

Solid organ transplantation has revolutionised medical care by providing a definitive cure for a wide spectrum of end-stage medical conditions. This treatment, however, does not come without complications and poses the risks of rejection, life-threatening infection, malignancies and recurrent organ failure, with significant impacts on patient outcomes. One of the major challenges involved in optimising post-transplant outcomes is managing the immune system's response to the transplanted graft and preventing organ rejection. This is mainly accomplished through the use of immunosuppressant agents, which have become a mainstay of treatment for a majority of post-transplant patients. This article, the first of two parts, discusses the concept of immunosuppression and its importance in the care of patients who have received an organ transplant. It focuses on the pathophysiologic mechanisms involved in transplant rejection and discusses the pharmacologic aspects of immunosuppression and its implications for patient care.

B cells with regulatory properties in transplantation tolerance

Induction of tolerance remains a major goal in transplantation. Indeed, despite potent immunosuppression, chronic rejection is still a real problem in transplantation. The humoral response is an important mediator of chronic rejection, and numerous strategies have been developed to target either B cells or plasma cells. However, the use of anti-CD20 therapy has highlighted the beneficial role of subpopulation of B cells, termed regulatory B cells. These cells have been characterized mainly in mice models of auto-immune diseases but emerging literature suggests their role in graft tolerance in transplantation. Regulatory B cells seem to be induced following inflammation to restrain excessive response. Different phenotypes of regulatory B cells have been described and are functional at various differentiation steps from immature to plasma cells. These cells act by multiple mechanisms such as secretion of immuno-suppressive cytokines interleukin-10 (IL-10) or IL-35, cytotoxicity, expression of inhibitory receptors or by secretion of non-inflammatory antibodies. Better characterization of the development, phenotype and mode of action of these cells seems urgent to develop novel approaches to manipulate the different B cell subsets and the response to the graft in a clinical setting.

ABO-compatible liver allograft antibody-mediated rejection: an update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Liver allograft antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) studies have lagged behind parallel efforts in kidney and heart because of a comparative inherent hepatic resistance to AMR. Three developments, however, have increased interest: first, solid phase antibody testing enabled more precise antibody characterization; second, increased expectations for long-term, morbidity-free survival; and third, immunosuppression minimization trials.

RECENT FINDINGS

Two overlapping liver allograft AMR phenotypic expressions are beginning to emerge: acute and chronic AMR. Acute AMR usually occurs within the several weeks after transplantation and characterized clinically by donor-specific antibodies (DSA) persistence, allograft dysfunction, thrombocytopenia, and hypocomplementemia. Acute AMR appears histopathologically similar to acute AMR in other organs: diffuse microvascular endothelial cell hypertrophy, C4d deposits, neutrophilic, eosinophilic, and macrophag-mediated microvasculitis/capillaritis, along with liver-specific ductular reaction, centrilobular hepatocyte swelling, and hepatocanalicular cholestasis often combined with T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR). Chronic AMR is less well defined, but strongly linked to serum class II DSA and associated with late-onset acute TCMR, fibrosis, chronic rejection, and decreased survival. Unlike acute AMR, chronic AMR is a slowly evolving insult with a number of potential manifestations, but most commonly appears as low-grade lymphoplasmacytic portal and perivenular inflammation accompanied by unusual fibrosis patterns and variable microvascular C4d deposition; capillaritis can be more difficult to identify than in acute AMR.

SUMMARY

More precise DSA characterization, increasing expectations for long-term survival, and immunosuppression weaning precipitated a re-emergence of liver allograft AMR interest. Pathophysiological similarities exist between heart, kidney, and liver allografts, but liver-specific considerations may prove critical to our ultimate understanding of all solid organ AMR.

Oral manifestations in transplant patients

Organ transplantation is a widely undertaken procedure and has become an important alternative for the treatment of different end-stage organ diseases that previously had a poor prognosis. The field of organ transplant and hematopoietic stem cell transplant is developing rapidly. The increase in the number of transplant recipients also has an impact on oral and dental services. Most of the oral problems develop as a direct consequence of drug-induced immunosuppression or the procedure itself. These patients may present with oral complaints due to infections or mucosal lesions. Such lesions should be identified, diagnosed, and treated. New treatment strategies permit continuous adaptation of oral care regimens to the changing scope of oral complications. The aim of this review is to analyze those oral manifestations and to discuss the related literature.

Using individual DSA titers to assess for accommodation after late humoral rejection

Management of late humoral rejection remains challenging, and DSA may persist. A case report illustrates how individual DSA titers using solid-phase-based assays may help to assess for accommodation. A male cystinosis patient received a cadaveric renal transplant at the age of 12 yr with a daclizumab, tacrolimus, MMF, and steroids-based immunosuppression. After three acute rejection episodes over the first eight months, interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA) was diagnosed on biopsy, while the immunosuppression was left unchanged with a high target exposure for both tacrolimus and MPA. One yr later, AMR type III (C4d and DSA positive) was treated with daily plasmapheresis, IVIG 100 mg/kg and pulse steroids 5 mg/kg. DSA (DR 53, DQ4, and DQ 2) were not responding until the plasma volume was increased to 2.5 plasma volumes. A second rise of creatinine confirmed worse humoral rejection; daily plasma exchange was resumed, and two doses of rituximab (375 mg/m(2)) were given. Subsequently, all DSA dropped, but only DR53 DSA remained unchanged, whereas the DQ antibodies rebounded to very strong titers. With a follow-up of over 120 days after recovery of the CD19 count, off all additional treatment and on identical immunosuppression with tacrolimus and MMF and prednisone, the patient's creatinine remained stable between 45 and 50 um while DQ DSA remain strong to very strong. We conclude that the patient is in a state of accommodation. DSA titers should be monitored when managing late humoral rejection.

Mannose-binding lectin-2 and ficolin-2 gene polymorphisms and clinical risk factors for acute rejection in kidney transplantation

INTRODUCTION

There is growing evidence that the lectin pathway is significantly associated with acute rejection. Rare studies associated both gene polymorphisms of MBL2 and FCN2 with acute rejection after kidney transplantation. The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of the lectin gene profile and clinical risk factors such as PRA level on acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

We prospectively analyzed 157 kidney transplant recipients with and without acute rejection. A total of 6 well-known functional single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the MBL2 gene and 5 in the FCN2 gene of the recipients were determined by gene sequencing. MBL2 and FCN2 genotypic variants were analyzed for association with the incidence of acute rejection within the first year after kidney transplantation.

RESULTS

After adjusting for variables of P<0.2, we found the differences in the incidence of acute rejection were only according to panel-reactive antibodies (odds ratios (OR) = 6.468, 95% confidence intervals (CI)= 2.017-20.740, P = 0.002) and the HH genotypes of MBL2 promoter -550 (OR = 2.448, 95%CI = 1.026-5.839, P = 0.044).

CONCLUSION

Panel-reactive antibodies and the HH genotypes of MBL2 promoter -550 have significant impacts on the risk of developing acute rejection after kidney transplantation.

An evaluation of sirolimus in renal transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Sirolimus is a powerful antiproliferative immunosuppressive drug approved for the prevention of kidney allograft rejection. By its unique mechanism of action, sirolimus provides a multitude of clinical potential and has been used effectively in different drug combinations. Extensive experience has been gained regarding the best timing of its application, side effect profile and potential benefits and limitations compared with other immunosuppressive drugs.

AREAS COVERED

The authors evaluate the recent experience with sirolimus in kidney transplantation. Pivotal randomized controlled trials were used to provide an overview with special attention to pharmacokinetic and dynamic aspects of sirolimus, its current clinical use as well as perspectives for its future role.

EXPERT OPINION

Sirolimus enriches the possibilities of immunosuppressive therapies after renal transplantation. Beneficial effects toward kidney function by allowing CNI sparing, lower incidence of malignancies and less viral infections have been suggested. Sirolimus should be used cautiously in de novo patients for reasons of wound healing. An early conversion to a sirolimus-based CNI-free regimen has shown promising results, whereas late conversion is more challenging. Finally, sirolimus-associated side effects are causing tolerability concerns and frequent discontinuations. Future research should aim to better define the therapeutic window and those patients most likely to benefit.

Effective therapy for acute antibody-mediated rejection with mild chronic changes: case report and review of the literature

To reduce the long-term toxicities of immunosuppressant drugs, corticosteroid-sparing and calcineurin-inhibitor-sparing immunosuppression protocols have become increasingly popular in managing kidney transplant recipients. The most vexing clinical condition caused by antibodies in organ transplants is antibody-mediated rejection. Limitations of the current antibody-mediated rejection therapies include (1) antibody-mediated rejection reversal tends to be gradual rather than prompt, (2) expense, (3) rejection reversal rates below 80%, (4) common appearance of chronic rejection after antibody-mediated rejection treatment, and (5) long-term persistence of donor specific antibodies after therapy. Because these limitations may be due to a lack of effects on mature plasma cells, the effects of bortezomib on mature plasma cells may represent a quantum advance in antihumoral therapy. Our experiences represent the first clinical use of bortezomib as an antihumoral agent in renal allograft recipients in Kuwait. We present 2 cases with resistant-acute antibody-mediated rejection to the standard therapies that were managed successfully with bortezomib.

Comparative study on signal transduction in endothelial cells after anti-a/b and human leukocyte antigen antibody reaction: implication of accommodation

BACKGROUND

Recent development of immunosuppressive therapy has provided a platform for clinical human leukocyte antigen (HLA)- and ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation. However, the prognosis seems to be different between the two. Accommodation, the condition of no injury even in the presence of antidonor antibody, is one of the key factors for successful transplantation with antidonor antibody. The purpose of this study was to compare signal transduction between anti-A/B and anti-HLA antibody reaction and to elucidate the mechanisms underlying accommodation.

METHODS

Blood type A- or B-transferase gene was transfected into human EA.hy926 endothelial cells. After cell sorting, A- or B-expressing cells at high levels were obtained. The effects of anti-HLA and anti-A/B antibody binding on complement-mediated cytotoxicity and signal transduction were examined.

RESULTS

Preincubation with anti-HLA antibodies only at low levels (<10% of saturation level) or anti-A/B antibodies at high levels (even at near saturation levels) for 24 hr resulted in resistance to complement-mediated cytotoxicity. Anti-A/B antibody ligation inactivated ERK1/2 pathway and increased complement regulatory proteins such as CD55 and CD59, whereas anti-HLA ligation activated PI3K/AKT pathway and increased cytoprotective genes such as hemeoxygenase-1 and ferritin H.

CONCLUSION

Complement inhibition by upregulation of CD55 and CD59 through ERK1/2 inactivation might play a substantial role in accommodation after ABO-incompatible transplantation, which could also explain the intriguing finding of C4d deposition in the graft without rejection.

ABO Incompatible Kidney Transplantation-Current Status and Uncertainties

In the past, ABO blood group incompatibility was considered an absolute contraindication for kidney transplantation. Progress in defined desensitization practice and immunologic understanding has allowed increasingly successful ABO incompatible transplantation during recent years. This paper focused on the history, disserted outcomes, desensitization modalities and protocols, posttransplant immunologic surveillance, and antibody-mediated rejection in transplantation with an ABO incompatible kidney allograft. The mechanism underlying accommodation and antibody-mediated injury was also described.

Long-term allograft tolerance is characterized by the accumulation of B cells exhibiting an inhibited profile

Numerous reports have highlighted the central role of regulatory T cells in long-term allograft tolerance, but few studies have investigated the B-cell aspect. We analyzed the B-cell response in a rat model of long-term cardiac allograft tolerance induced by a short-term immunosuppression. We observed that tolerated allografts are infiltrated by numerous B cells organized in germinal centers that are strongly regulated in their IgG alloantibody response. Moreover, alloantibodies from tolerant recipients exhibit a deviation toward a Th2 isotype and do not activate in vitro donor-type endothelial cells in a pro-inflammatory way but maintained expression of cytoprotective molecules. Interestingly, this inhibition of the B-cell response is characterized by the progressive accumulation in the graft and in the blood of B cells blocked at the IgM to IgG switch recombination process and overexpressing BANK-1 and the inhibitory receptor Fcgr2b. Importantly, B cells from tolerant recipients are able to transfer allograft tolerance. Taken together, these results demonstrate a strong regulation of the alloantibody response in tolerant recipients and the accumulation of B cells exhibiting an inhibited and regulatory profile. These mechanisms of regulation of the B-cell response could be instrumental to develop new strategies to promote tolerance.

Pre- and posttransplantation allosensitization in heart allograft recipients: major impact of de novo alloantibody production on allograft survival

The involvement of humoral response in allograft rejection has been suggested by both immunologic and histochemistry studies. In the present study, we explored the role of alloantibodies in a large cohort of heart allograft recipients followed for 15 years. Sequential samples of sera were obtained from 950 recipients of heart allografts before and after transplantation at the time when protocol endomyocardial biopsies were performed. The presence of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies was investigated using complement mediated cytotoxicity and solid phase assay (SPA). Our data reveal an inverse correlation between the development of alloantibodies after transplantation and heart allograft survival. The 15-year graft survival was highest in patients who never developed alloantibodies (70%) or who displayed them only before transplantation (71%); graft survival in recipients who showed antibodies both before and after transplantation (56%), or only after transplantation (47%), was lower. The deleterious effect of antibodies on graft survival started 8 years after transplantation, suggesting that the production of de novo antibodies may have been triggered by some later event. We found that patients with de novo antibodies appearing more than 1 year after transplantation had the poorest survival. Furthermore, the development of de novo antibodies was preceded in 76% of these patients by cellular rejection grade 3 or higher, according to the International Society for Heart Transplantation (ISHT) grading criteria. Development of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) had a significant negative impact on graft survival (16% in AMR(+) vs 63% in AMR(-) patients, p = 0.0008). Of the 23 patients with AMR, 21 displayed cytotoxic donor-specific antibodies (DSA) at the time of diagnosis, and in 18 of these cases SPA showed that they were directed against the donors' HLA. The data demonstrate that the detection of alloantibodies permits a better definition of AMR in heart allograft recipients. Identification of patients at risk for developing AMR is of great importance for early treatment of rejection episodes.

KDOQI US commentary on the 2009 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients

In response to recently published KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) guidelines for the care of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), the National Kidney Foundation's Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) organized a working group of transplant nephrologists and surgeons to review these guidelines and comment on their relevance and applicability for US KTRs. The following commentaries on the KDIGO guidelines represent the consensus of our work group. The KDIGO transplant guidelines concentrated on aspects of transplant care most important to this population in the posttransplant period, such as immunosuppression, infection, malignancy, and cardiovascular care. Our KDOQI work group concurred with many of the KDIGO recommendations except in some important areas related to immunosuppression, in which decisions in the United States are largely made by transplant centers and are dependent in part on the specific patient population served. Most, but not all, KDIGO guidelines are relevant to US patients. However, implementation of many may remain a major challenge because of issues of limitation in resources needed to assist in the tasks of educating, counseling, and implementing and maintaining lifestyle changes. Although very few of the guidelines are based on evidence that is strong enough to justify their being used as the basis of policy or performance measures, they offer an excellent road map to navigate the complex care of KTRs.

Role of T cells in graft rejection and transplantation tolerance

Transplantation is the most effective treatment for end-stage organ failure, but organ survival is limited by immune rejection and the side effects of immunosuppressive regimens. T cells are central to the process of transplant rejection through allorecognition of foreign antigens leading to their activation, and the orchestration of an effector response that results in organ damage. Long-term transplant acceptance in the absence of immunosuppressive therapy remains the ultimate goal in the field of transplantation and many studies are exploring potential therapies. One promising cellular therapy is the use of regulatory T cells to induce a state of donor-specific tolerance to the transplant. This article first discusses the role of T cells in transplant rejection, with a focus on the mechanisms of allorecognition and the alloresponse. This is followed by a detailed review of the current progress in the field of regulatory T-cell therapy in transplantation and the translation of this therapy to the clinical setting.