Hypertension in the kidney transplant recipient

Changes in Cardiac Structure and Function of Recipients after Kidney Transplantation

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) elevates the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality. Uremic cardiomyopathy, frequently observed in CKD and end-stage renal disease (ESRD), involves alterations in cardiac structure and function, which may reverse post-kidney transplantation, although data remain controversial. This study examines the relationship between graft function and changes in cardiac parameters pre- and post-transplantation in kidney transplant recipients. Methods: A total of 145 pediatric and adult recipients of living or deceased donor kidney transplants were enrolled at Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital. This cohort study utilized transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) imaging pre-transplant and at least two years post-transplant. Echocardiographic parameters were analyzed using standard techniques. Results: The mean age of the participants was 35 years, with 60% male. The average dialysis duration prior to transplantation was 27 months. Most recipients (83.4%) received kidneys from living donors. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction increased significantly post-transplant (p < 0.05), while other cardiac dimensions and functions, such as ejection fraction and pulmonary artery pressure, showed no significant change (p > 0.05). Notably, diastolic dysfunction worsened in patients with dysfunctional grafts (GFR < 45), correlating with increased pulmonary artery pressure post-transplant. The rate of antihypertensive drug use and the prevalence of diabetes mellitus increased significantly post-transplant (p < 0.05). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that left ventricular diastolic dysfunction present before kidney transplantation continues to persist post-transplantation in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing chronic kidney disease treatment. Furthermore, it shows an increased rate of pulmonary artery pressure and pericardial effusion in patients with dysfunctional grafts after transplantation. Further research is required to explore strategies to reverse uremic cardiomyopathy and reduce cardiovascular risk in these patients.

Incidence and Factors Associated with Uncontrolled Hypertension at 12 months after Kidney Transplantation in Saudi Arabia

INTRODUCTION

Uncontrolled blood pressure (uBP) after kidney transplantation (KTx) is very common and is associated with significant morbidity. However, studies that assess its incidence and risk factors are limited and outdated in the Middle East.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective study of KTx recipients (KTRs) in our center between January 2017 and May 2020 with a 12-month follow-up period. The target of hypertension treatment during the time of this study was <140/90 mm Hg, according to the published guidelines. We divided patients according to their blood pressure (BP) control at 1 year into two groups: controlled BP (cBP) (<140/90) and uBP (≥140/90). We studied the association between uBP and patients' demographics, baseline cardiovascular risk factors, and changes in their metabolic and cardiovascular profile during the first 12 months post-KTx.

RESULTS

A total of 254 KTRs were included. 79.2% developed post-KTx hypertension, 74% were ≥30 years, 58% were men, and 80% were living donor KTRs. The renal replacement modality among our patients pre-KTx was hemodialysis in 78.4%, peritoneal dialysis in 11.5%, and 10.1% underwent preemptive transplantation. At 1 year, 76 (29.9%) KTRs did not attain the target BP goal. Systolic BP (SBP) decreased from baseline to 12 months by 13 ± 24 mm Hg in the cBP group and increased by 8.7 ± 21 mm Hg in the uBP group (p < 0.001). Additionally, diastolic BP (DBP) decreased by 8.5 ± 16.9 mm Hg in the cBP group and increased by 2.3 ± 18.8 mm Hg in the uBP group (p < 0.001). Factors associated with uBP included age (47 vs. 41 years, p = 0.008) and diabetes mellitus (p = 0.012). Contrarily, gender, dialysis vintage, preemptive transplantation, type of dialysis (hemodialysis vs. peritoneal dialysis), type of transplant (living donor KTx vs. deceased donor KTx), and smoking were not different among the two groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups in regard to changes in creatinine, weight, A1c, low-density lipoprotein, and parathyroid hormone levels. Additionally, rate of rejection, new onset diabetes post-transplant, and persistent hyperthyroidism were not different between the groups. However, higher body mass index at 12 months was associated with a higher incidence of uBP (27.2 ± 5.9 vs. 29.2 ± 5.4, p = 0.013). Using multivariate analysis, we found that serum creatinine at 12 months was the only predictor of uBP (OR = 1.005 [1-1.011], p = 0.036).

CONCLUSION

At 1-year post-renal transplantation, about one-third of KTRs had uBP despite multiple antihypertensive medications. SBP and DBP significantly trended upward after transplantation in uBP patients, whereas SBP and DBP significantly trended downward after transplantation in cBP patients. Serum creatinine at 12 months was the only factor independently associated with uBP.

Longitudinal Changes in Cardiac Structure and Function in Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease results in increased morbidity and mortality in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. Longitudinal changes in cardiac structure and function and the association with blood pressure control over time in pediatric kidney transplant recipients are unknown.

METHODS

To determine the influence of blood pressure control on cardiac changes following pediatric kidney transplant, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of children who received their first kidney transplant at the Hospital for Sick Children from 2004 to 2015. Children were followed until transfer to adult care or censoring in July 2018. Cardiac structure and function parameters were collected from clinical echocardiograms and assessed using standardized scores. Blood pressure control was determined by systolic blood pressure Z scores (above or below the 90th percentile) in combination with antihypertensive medications. A segmented mixed-effects model assessed Z scores of interventricular septum thickness, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension, and left ventricular posterior wall dimension.

RESULTS

Of 142 children included, 58% were men, mean age at transplant was 11 (±4.5) years, and average follow-up time was 4 (±3) years. All cardiac structural Z scores improved during follow-up. Interventricular septum thickness normalized at 4.0 years post-transplant. Left ventricular end-diastolic dimension normalized at 1.5 years post-transplant. Left ventricular posterior wall dimension normalized at 6.3 years post-transplant. Left ventricular mass index showed sustained improvement up to 12 years post-transplant. Individuals with uncontrolled blood pressure had increased left ventricular mass (β=2.97 [95% CI, 0.77-5.16]).

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac structural abnormalities improve following kidney transplantation and normalize within 7 years, especially with controlled blood pressure. Strict blood pressure control is critical after pediatric kidney transplantation.

Clinicopathologic Features and Risk Factors of Proteinuria in Transplant Glomerulopathy

Background: Transplant glomerulopathy (TG) is one of the main causes of post-transplant proteinuria (PU). The features and possible risk factors for proteinuria in TG patients are uncertain.

Methods: We investigated all patients who had biopsy-proven TG from 2000 to 2018 in our center. The clinical and histological data were compared between two groups with or without PU (cut-off = 0.3 g/day). Spearman correlation analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between PU and pathological changes. The risk factors for PU in TG patients were determined by multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Results: One hundred and twenty-five (75.76%) of all enrolled 165 TG patients had proteinuria ≥0.3 g/day at the time of biopsy. TG patients' PU level was significantly correlated with Banff lesion score cg (ρ = 0.247, P = 0.003), and mm (ρ = 0.257, P = 0.012). Systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg (OR 2.72, 95% CI 1.04–7.10, P = 0.041), diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg (OR 4.84, 95% CI 1.39–16.82, P = 0.013), peak PRA ≥5% (OR 6.47, 95% CI 1.67–25.01, P = 0.007), positive C4d staining (OR 4.55, 95% CI 1.29–16.11, 0.019), tacrolimus-based regimen (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.28–9.54, P = 0.014), and calcium channel blocker usage (OR 4.38, 95% CI 1.59–12.09, P = 0.004) were independent risk factors for PU.

Conclusions: Proteinuria is common in TG patients. systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg, peak PRA ≥5%, positive C4d staining, tacrolimus-based regimen, and calcium channel blocker usage are associated with proteinuria in TG patients.

Hypertension in kidney transplantation: a consensus statement of the 'hypertension and the kidney' working group of the European Society of Hypertension

Hypertension is common in kidney transplantation recipients and may be difficult to treat. Factors present before kidney transplantation, related to the transplantation procedure itself and factors developing after transplantation may contribute to blood pressure (BP) elevation in kidney transplant recipients. The present consensus is based on the results of three recent systematic reviews, the latest guidelines and the current literature. The current transplant guidelines, which recommend only office BP assessments for risk stratification in kidney transplant patients should be reconsidered, given the presence of white-coat hypertension and masked hypertension in this population and the better prediction of adverse outcomes by 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring as indicated in recent systematic reviews. Hypertension is associated with adverse kidney and cardiovascular outcomes and decreased survival in kidney transplant recipients. Current evidence suggests calcium channel blockers could be the preferred first-step antihypertensive agents in kidney transplant patients, as they improve graft function and reduce graft loss, whereas no clear benefit is documented for renin-angiotensin system inhibitor use over conventional treatment in the current literature. Randomized control trials demonstrating the clinical benefits of BP lowering on kidney and major cardiovascular events and recording patient-related outcomes are still needed. These trials should define optimal BP targets for kidney transplant recipients. In the absence of kidney transplant-specific evidence, BP targets in kidney transplant recipients should be similar to those in the wider chronic kidney disease population.

Changes in Office Blood Pressure Control, Augmentation Index, and Liver Steatosis in Kidney Transplant Patients after Successful Hepatitis C Infection Treatment with Direct Antiviral Agents

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) can be successfully treated with direct antiviral agents (DAA). The aim of our study was to analyze different measures of vascular function during and after the DAA treatment. As we have observed the improvement of blood pressure (BP) control in some individuals, we have conducted an analysis of potential explanatory mechanisms behind this finding. Twenty-eight adult KTRs were prospectively evaluated before and 15 months after start of DAA therapy. Attended office BP (OBP), augmentation index (AIx), pulse wave velocity (PWV), flow-mediated dilation (FMD), liver stiffness measurement (LSM), and liver steatosis assessment (controlled attenuation parameter (CAP)) were measured. In half of the patients, improvement of OBP control (decline of systolic BP by at least 20 mmHg or reduction of the number of antihypertensive drugs used) and parallel central aortic pressure parameters, including AIx, was observed. There was a significant decrease in CAP mean values (241 ± 54 vs. 209 ± 30 dB/m, p < 0.05) only in patients with OBP control improvement. Half of our KTRs cohort after successful HCV eradication noted clinically important improvement of both OBP control and central aortic pressure parameters, including AIx. The concomitant decrease of liver steatosis was observed only in the subgroup of patients with improvement of blood pressure control.

Ambulatory monitoring unmasks hypertension among kidney transplant patients: single center experience and review of the literature

Background

Disagreements between clinic and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) measurements are well-described in the general population. Though hypertension is frequent in renal transplant recipients, only a few studies address the clinic-ambulatory discordance in this population. We aimed to describe the difference between clinic and ambulatory BP in kidney transplant patients at our institution.

Methods

We compared the clinic and ambulatory BP of 76 adult recipients of a kidney allograft followed at our transplant center and investigated the difference between these methods, considering confounding by demographic and clinical variables.

Results

Clinic systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) were 128 ± 13/79 ± 9 mmHg. Awake SBP and DBP were 147 ± 18/85 ± 10 mmHg. The clinic-minus-awake SBP and DBP differences were − 18 and − 6 mmHg, respectively. The negative clinic-awake ΔSBP was more pronounced at age > 60 years (p = 0.026) and with tacrolimus use compared to cyclosporine (p = 0.046). Sleep SBP and DBP were 139 ± 21/78 ± 11 mmHg. A non-dipping sleep BP pattern was noted in 73% of patients and was associated with tacrolimus use (p = 0.020).

Conclusions

Our findings suggest pervasive underestimation of BP when measured in the kidney transplant clinic, emphasizes the high frequency of a non-dipping pattern in this population and calls for liberal use of ambulatory BP monitoring to detect and manage hypertension.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12882-019-1442-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Cardiovascular Disease After Kidney Transplant

Renal transplantation is the preferred treatment for patients with end-stage kidney disease. However, despite successful kidney transplantation, cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains one of the major causes of patient death and hence graft loss. The antecedents of this increased risk reside within the development of end-stage kidney disease and dialysis. Risk factors for the development of CVD include diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. Other transplant-specific factors include the presence of a patent arteriovenous fistula and immunosuppressive therapy. Efforts to modify these factors should be strongly encouraged to improve long-term outcomes of transplant patients and reduce death from CVD in this at-risk patient population.

Being Overweight Is Related to Faster Decline in Annual Glomerular Filtration Rate in Kidney Transplant

Few studies have examined the relationship between non-immunological factors and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decline in kidney transplant. Correcting these factors in native kidneys slows the progression of chronic kidney disease. The aim of this study was to analyze the association between the control of non-immunological factors and the annual decline of GFR.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective study was performed. We included 128 patients who received kidney transplants between 2000 and 2015, with at least 1-year post-transplant follow-up. Clinical records were reviewed. GFR was estimated by CKD-EPI. Three groups were defined according to the annual change in eGFR (ΔGFR 2016-1015): non-progressors (> -1 mL/min/1.73 m²), slow progressors (> -1 and < -5 mL/min/1.73 m²), and fast progressors (< -5 mL/min/1.73 m²). Percentage of achievement of KDIGO target was also analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean GFR was 62.5 mL/min/1.73 m². Glomerulonephritis was the most common cause of kidney failure (36%). When the fast progressor group was compared with the non-progressor group, they differed significantly in age-patients were younger (40 ± 12.3 vs 45 ± 13.1 years)-post-transplant body mass index (27.4 ± 5.6 vs 25.2 x ± 5.9 kg/m²), and serum uric acid, which was significantly higher (6.4 ± 1.7 vs 5.5 ± 1.58 mg/dL). There were no differences between the groups with regard to blood pressure, dyslipidemia, proteinuria, or venous bicarbonate. Target systolic blood pressure was achieved by 45% of patients. Biopsy-proven acute rejection was higher in the fast progression group, although this was not statistically significant (13 [24.5%] vs 8 [13.1%]).

CONCLUSIONS

High body mass index was associated with a faster decline in glomerular filtration rate in this study. Target blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg was achieved in less than 50% of cases.

Arterial stiffness but not endothelial dysfunction is associated with multidrug antihypertensive therapy and nondipper blood pressure pattern in kidney transplant recipients

Vascular injury related to chronic kidney disease results in increased arterial stiffness and endothelial dysfunction which may affect arterial blood pressure (BP) and influence patient and graft survival in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs).This cross-sectional study aims to elucidate the relationship between the above-mentioned measures of vascular damage and effectiveness of antihypertensive treatment in KTR.One hundred forty-five KTRs 7.6 ± 2.7 years after transplantation were enrolled in our study. Pulse wave velocity (PWV), flow-mediated dilation (FMD), and nitroglycerin-mediated dilation (NMD) were measured, and 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring was performed.Overall, there were 62 patients with well-controlled or borderline BP and 83 subjects who did not achieve target BP despite antihypertensive treatment. Patients with suboptimal BP control were characterized by greater PWV (median 9.6/interquartile range: 3.9 vs 8.0/3.3 m/s, P = .002), but borderline lower FMD (8.4% ± 5.0% vs 9.9% ± 5.7%; P = .09) as compared with the group with better BP control. When patients were allocated to subgroups based on the number of current antihypertensive medications, no differences in FMD and NMD were found. However, a significant trend was observed for higher PWV values and decreased proportion of dippers along with the increasing number of drugs. PWV, diabetes, and total cholesterol level, but not FMD or NMD, were explanatory variables for systolic BP in multivariate analysis.Arterial stiffness but not endothelial dysfunction is associated with suboptimal BP control in stable KTRs. Less efficient antihypertensive treatment appears to be caused by inadequate control of nocturnal BP.

Quantifying the medication burden of kidney transplant recipients in the first year post-transplantation

Background Kidney transplantation is an effective treatment, but it is not a cure. Since the risk of graft rejection and the presence of comorbid conditions remain for a lifetime, medications are necessary. Objective To examine the prescription medication burden of adult kidney transplant recipients from 3- to 12-months post-transplantation. Setting All five adult kidney transplant units in Victoria, Australia. Method As part of a larger intervention study, we conducted a retrospective review of prescription refill records and medical records containing the history of medication changes of 64 participants who completed the study. The complexity of the medication management was studied, and we looked at the burden of maintaining the medications supply. Outcome measures Pill burden, administration frequency, dose changes frequency, immunosuppressive medication changes, the estimated out-of-pocket costs of medications and frequency of pharmacy visits. Results At 3 months, the average daily pill burden was 22 (SD = 9) whilst at 12 months, it was 23 (SD = 10). Some participants required long-term prophylaxis of fungal infections up to 4 times a day whilst those with diabetes had to manage up to 4 insulin doses a day. The average out-of-pocket cost per person and the frequency of pharmacy visits at 6, 9 and 12 months post-transplantation remained relatively unchanged. Conclusion The medication regimen prescribed for kidney transplant recipients is complex and for most patients, it did not simplify over time post transplantation. Strategies are needed to support patients in managing the complexity of their medication regimen following kidney transplantation.

Sustainability of improvements in medication adherence through a mobile health intervention

Context-Very few patient-centered, theory-guided programs for medication adherence and blood pressure control have been conducted in kidney transplant recipients. Objective-To evaluate preliminary indications of sustainability of improved blood pressure in kidney transplant recipients 12 months after completion of a 3-month randomized controlled trial of a mobile health pilot program to improve blood pressure and medication adherence. Participants and Design-A total of 18 of the 19 trial participants were contacted and all consented to inclusion in the retrospective analysis of their medical records showing their clinic-recorded systolic blood pressures at 3, 6, and 12 months following participation in the 3-month trial of a medical regimen self-management intervention. Results-A significant group difference in systolic blood pressure was observed longitudinally, indicating that the intervention group, as compared with the standard-care group, exhibited lower clinic-measured systolic blood pressures at the 12-month posttrial follow-up visit (P= .01). At 12-month follow-up, success in establishing and sustaining control of systolic blood pressure (<131 mm Hg) was greater in the intervention group (50%) than in the control group (11%). Conclusion-Patients in the intervention group continued to exhibit lower systolic blood pressure than did patients in the control group 12 months after the trial ended, suggesting that the intervention may have a durable impact on blood pressure control that most likely reflects sustained medication adherence. These findings will aid in the development of an adequately powered randomized controlled trial to address the sustainable impact of the intervention program on medication adherence and blood pressure control.

Renal association clinical practice guideline in post-operative care in the kidney transplant recipient

These guidelines cover the care of patients from the period following kidney transplantation until the transplant is no longer working or the patient dies. During the early phase prevention of acute rejection and infection are the priority. After around 3-6 months, the priorities change to preservation of transplant function and avoiding the long-term complications of immunosuppressive medication (the medication used to suppress the immune system to prevent rejection). The topics discussed include organization of outpatient follow up, immunosuppressive medication, treatment of acute and chronic rejection, and prevention of complications. The potential complications discussed include heart disease, infection, cancer, bone disease and blood disorders. There is also a section on contraception and reproductive issues.Immediately after the introduction there is a statement of all the recommendations. These recommendations are written in a language that we think should be understandable by many patients, relatives, carers and other interested people. Consequently we have not reworded or restated them in this lay summary. They are graded 1 or 2 depending on the strength of the recommendation by the authors, and AD depending on the quality of the evidence that the recommendation is based on.

Hypertension in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Hypertension in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) is common and it contributes to the overall morbidity and mortality. Patients may present with hypertensive emergencies or hypertension can manifest itself later in PICU course. Although hypertension can be seen in most patients during hospitalization, patients with some specific diseases and conditions are more prone to hypertension. Hypertension should be recognized promptly and treated accordingly. Different pathophysiologic mechanisms can be responsible for the hypertension and management differs based on the underlying etiology. Any patient with a hypertensive emergency must be admitted to PICU, and treatment and diagnostic workup should be initiated immediately.

Ramipril versus placebo in kidney transplant patients with proteinuria: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have been shown to reduce the risk of end-stage renal disease and death in non-transplant patients with proteinuria. We examined whether ramipril would have a similar beneficial effect on important clinical outcomes in kidney transplant recipients with proteinuria.

METHODS

In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial, conducted at 14 centres in Canada and New Zealand, we enrolled adult renal transplant recipients at least 3-months post-transplant with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 20 mL/min/1·73m(2) or greater and proteinuria 0·2 g per day or greater and randomly assigned them to receive either ramipril (5 mg orally twice daily) or placebo for up to 4 years. Patients completing the final 4-year study visit were invited to participate in a trial extension phase. Treatment was assigned by centrally generated randomisation with permuted variable blocks of 2 and 4, stratified by centre and estimated GFR (above or below 40 mL/min/1·73 m(2)). The primary outcome was a composite consisting of doubling of serum creatinine, end-stage renal disease, or death in the intention-to-treat population. The principal secondary outcome was the change in measured GFR. We ascertained whether any component of the primary outcome had occurred at each study visit (1 month and 6 months post-randomisation, then every 6 months thereafter). This trial is registered with ISRCTN, number 78129473.

FINDINGS

Between Aug 23, 2006, and March 28, 2012, 213 patients were randomised. 109 were allocated to placebo and 104 were allocated to ramipril, of whom 109 patients in the placebo group and 103 patients in the ramipril group were analysed and the trial is now complete. The intention to treat population (placebo n=109, ramipril n=103) was used for the primary analysis and the trial extension phase analysis. The primary outcome occurred in 19 (17%) of 109 patients in the placebo group and 14 (14%) of 103 patients in the ramipril group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·76 [95% CI 0·38-1·51]; absolute risk difference -3·8% [95% CI -13·6 to 6·1]). With extended follow-up (mean 48 months), the primary outcome occurred in 27 patients (25%) in the placebo group and 25 (24%) patients in the ramipril group (HR 0·96 [95% CI 0·55-1·65]); absolute risk difference: -0·5% (95% CI -12·0 to 11·1). There was no significant difference in the rate of measured GFR decline between the two groups (mean difference per 6-month interval: -0·16 mL/min/1·73m(2) (SE 0·24); p=0·49). 14 (14%) of patients died in the ramipril group and 11 (10%) in the placebo group, but the difference between groups was not statistically significant (HR 1·45 [95% CI 0·66 to 3·21]). Adverse events were more common in the ramipril group (39 [38%]) than in the placebo group (24 [22%]; p=0·02).

INTERPRETATION

Treatment with ramipril compared with placebo did not lead to a significant reduction in doubling of serum creatinine, end-stage renal disease, or death in kidney transplant recipients with proteinuria. These results do not support the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors with the goal of improving clinical outcomes in this population.

FUNDING

Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Number of antihypertensive drugs at 1 year after kidney transplantation

High blood pressure (BP) affects up to 90% of kidney transplant recipients and is associated with lower patient and graft survival rates. Kidney Disease/Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines suggest maintaining BP at lower than 130/80 mm Hg. Multidrug therapy is usually required for the control of BP in this population. Our aim was to analyze the number of antihypertensive drugs used in our kidney transplantation population at 1 year after transplantation and their influence on graft and patient outcome. We included 411 deceased-donor kidney transplantation cases; data were obtained from a prospectively maintained institutional database. BP was measured at the outpatient clinic. Approximately 97 patients were not under antihypertensive therapy, whereas 130, 119, 52, and 13 received 1, 2, 3, or 4 antihypertensive drugs, respectively. The number of antihypertensive drugs was significantly related to lower patient survival rates independently of a previous diagnosis of hypertension and diabetes, recipient age and sex and renal function at 1-year. After multivariate linear regression analysis high body mass index, male gender of recipients, donor hypertension, previous acute rejection, and cyclosporine therapy were risk factors independently related to a higher number of antihypertensive drugs. To conclude, the number of antihypertensive drugs is an objective and easy-to-measure marker related to lower patient survival rates. Recipient body mass index, type of calcineurin inhibitor, and acute rejection are modifiable risk factors whose control can help to reduce the number of antihypertensive drugs needed to treat high BP in the kidney transplantation population.

Advanced glycation end products accelerate arteriosclerosis after renal transplantation through the AGE/RAGE/ILK pathway

BACKGROUND

The effects of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) on arteriosclerosis (AS) after kidney transplantation and the molecular mechanisms involved remain unclear.

METHODS

Samples were collected from 30 healthy volunteers and 30 renal transplant recipients (RTRs) to determine the levels of AGEs and to observe both histological changes and α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) and osteopontin (OPN) expression. Furthermore, we analyzed α-SMA, OPN and integrin-linked kinase (ILK) in rat vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) that were treated with AGEs and in ILK plasmid transfected rat VSMCs treated with AGEs. Finally, we measured the expression of ILK and the receptor for advanced glycation end (RAGE) products in rat VSMCs treated with AGEs and an anti-RAGE antibody.

RESULTS

Significant differences in the histological changes, serum AGEs, and expression of α-SMA and OPN in arterial walls were noted between healthy volunteers and RTRs. Significant OPN and ILK overexpression and reduced α-SMA expression were detected in a time-dependent manner in rat VSMCs after treatment with AGEs. Similar outcomes were observed regarding the overexpression of ILK, and these results could be prevented via RAGE inhibition.

CONCLUSIONS

AGEs may play a critical role in the formation and progression of AS after renal transplantation by inducing VSMCs-to-osteoblast trans-differentiation through the AGE/RAGE/ILK pathway.

Myocardial perfusion is impaired in asymptomatic renal and liver transplant recipients: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study

BACKGROUND

Myocardial ischemia is a major cause of death in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, which can be caused by either epicardial or microvascular coronary artery disease (CAD). Although renal transplantation improves survival, cardiovascular disease remains a major cause of mortality in post renal transplant recipients, including those with no significant epicardial CAD pre-transplant. We aim to utilize stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and MR coronary angiography (MRCA) to assess silent myocardial ischemia and epicardial CAD in renal transplant recipients.

METHODS

Forty-five subjects: twenty renal transplant (RT) with no known CAD, fifteen liver transplant (LT) controls without prior CKD and no known CAD, and ten hypertensive (HT) controls underwent stress perfusion CMR and MRCA.

RESULTS

A total of 1308 myocardial segments (576 of RT, 468 of LT, and 264 of HT) were compared using mixed linear modeling. Left ventricular mass index, septal diameter and presence of diabetes mellitus were similar between the groups. The mean transmural MPRI was significantly lower in the RT and LT groups compared to HT controls (1.19 ± 0.50 in RT versus 1.23 ± 0.36 in LT versus 2.04 ± 0.32 in HT controls, p < 0.0001), in the subepicardium (1.33 ± 0.57 in RT versus 1.30 ± 0.33 in LT versus 2.01 ± 0.30 in HT controls, p < 0.001), and in the subendocardium (1.19 ± 0.54 in RT versus 1.11 ± 0.31 in LT versus 1.85 ± 0.34 in HT controls, p < 0.0001). Seven (35%) RT and five (33%) LT had significant epicardial CAD compared to none in HT controls, p = 0.12. One RT and one LT had LGE suggesting sub-endocardial infarction.

CONCLUSIONS

RT recipients have impaired myocardial perfusion independent of LVH or diabetes mellitus. The impaired myocardial perfusion in RT is similar to LT without prior renal disease, thus unlikely related to previous CKD. It is not fully explained by the presence of significant epicardial CAD, and therefore most likely represents microvascular CAD.

Assessment and management of hypertension in transplant patients

Hypertension in renal transplant recipients is common and ranges from 50% to 80% in adult recipients and from 47% to 82% in pediatric recipients. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality and shortened allograft survival are important consequences of inadequate control of hypertension. In this review, we examine the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management considerations of post-transplant hypertension. Donor and recipient factors, acute and chronic allograft injury, and immunosuppressive medications may each explain some of the pathophysiology of post-transplant hypertension. As observed in other patient cohorts, renal artery stenosis and adrenal causes of hypertension may be important contributing factors. Notably, BP treatment goals for renal transplant recipients remain an enigma because there are no adequate randomized controlled trials to support a benefit from targeting lower BP levels on graft and patient survival. The potential for drug-drug interactions and altered pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the different antihypertensive medications need to be carefully considered. To date, no specific antihypertensive medications have been shown to be more effective than others at improving either patient or graft survival. Identifying the underlying pathophysiology and subsequent individualization of treatment goals are important for improving long-term patient and graft outcomes in these patients.

Ambulatory vs office blood pressure monitoring in renal transplant recipients

Hypertension is common following renal transplantation and has adverse effects on cardiovascular and graft health. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is better at overall blood pressure (BP) assessment and is necessary to diagnose nocturnal hypertension, which is also implicated in poor outcomes. The authors performed a retrospective analysis of 98 renal transplant recipients (RTRs) and compared office BP and ambulatory BP recordings. ABPM revealed discordance between office BP and ambulatory BP in 61% of patients, with 3% caused by white-coat and 58% caused by masked hypertension (of which 33% were caused by isolated nocturnal hypertension). Overall, mean systolic BP was 3.6 mm Hg (0.5-6.5) and diastolic BP was 7.5 mm Hg (5.7-9.3) higher via ambulatory BP than office BP. This was independent of estimated glomerular filtration rate, proteinuria, transplant time/type, and comorbidities. A total of 42% of patients had their management changed after results from ABPM. ABPM should be routinely offered as part of hypertension management in RTRs.

Renal sodium transporters are increased in urinary exosomes of cyclosporine-treated kidney transplant patients

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Cyclosporine (CsA) is a calcineurin inhibitor widely used as an immunosuppressant in organ transplantation. Previous studies demonstrated the relationship between CsA and renal sodium transporters such as the Na-K-2Cl cotransporter in the loop of Henle (NKCC2). Experimental models of CsA-induced hypertension have shown an increase in renal NKCC2.

METHODS

Using immunoblotting of urinary exosomes, we investigated in CsA-treated kidney transplant patients (n = 39) the excretion of NKCC2 and Na-Cl cotransporter (NCC) and its association with blood pressure (BP) level. We included 8 non-CsA-treated kidney transplant patients as a control group. Clinical data, immunosuppression and hypertension treatments, blood and 24-hour urine tests, and 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring were recorded.

RESULTS

CsA-treated patients tended to excrete a higher amount of NKCC2 than non-CsA-treated patients (mean ± SD, 175 ± 98 DU and 90 ± 70.3 DU, respectively; p = 0.05) and showed higher BP values (24-hour systolic BP 138 ± 17 mm Hg and 112 ± 12 mm Hg, p = 0.003; 24-hour diastolic BP, 83.8 ± 9.8 mm Hg and 72.4 ± 5.2 mm Hg, p = 0.015, respectively). Within the CsA-treated group, there was no correlation between either NKCC2 or NCC excretion and BP levels. This was confirmed by a further analysis including potential confounding factors. On the other hand, a significant positive correlation was observed between CsA blood levels and the excretion of NKCC2 and NCC.

CONCLUSION

Overall, these results support the hypothesis that CsA induces an increase in NKCC2 and NCC in urinary exosomes of renal transplant patients. The fact that the increase in sodium transporters in urine did not correlate with the BP level suggests that in kidney transplant patients, other mechanisms could be implicated in CsA-induced hypertension.

Hypertension after kidney transplantation: a pathophysiologic approach

Post-transplant hypertension is associated with decreased graft and patient survival and cardiovascular morbidity. Unfortunately, post-transplant hypertension is often poorly controlled. Important risk factors include immunosuppressive medications, complications of the transplant surgery, delayed graft function, rejection, and donor and recipient risk factors. The effects of immunosuppressive medications are multifactorial including increased vascular and sympathetic tone and salt and fluid retention. The immunosuppressive agents most commonly associated with hypertension are glucocorticoids and calcineurin inhibitors. Drug therapy for hypertension should be based on the comorbidities and pathophysiology. Evidence-based approaches to defining and treating hypertension in renal transplant recipients are predominantly extrapolated from large-scale studies performed in the general population. Thus, there continues to be a need for larger studies examining the pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of hypertension in renal transplant recipients.

Acute effects of fructose consumption on uric acid and plasma lipids in patients with impaired renal function

OBJECTIVE

Metabolic disturbances are common in patients with renal function impairment and are related to high rates of cardiovascular incidents and mortality. Kidney transplantation leads to improved survival but may lead to additional metabolic alterations caused by immunosuppressive drugs and improved nutrition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The short-term effect of oral fructose load on serum uric acid (UA), plasma lipids, and blood pressure (BP) was studied in 85 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and impairment of renal function (glomerular filtration rate 50-65 ml/min per 1.73 m(2)), comprising 55 renal transplant recipients (RTR) treated with standard triple immunosuppressive therapy including a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) cyclosporine A (CsA) or tacrolimus (Tac) and 30 non-transplanted patients with CKD. Both non-transplanted CKD patients and RTR had stable renal function and a comparable degree of kidney dysfunction. All subjects received orally 70 g of fructose dissolved in 200 ml of water. Serum UA, lipids, and blood pressure were measured at baseline and 60, 120, 180, and 240 minutes after fructose administration.

RESULTS

There was a significant increase of serum UA concentration (p<0.001) in both CKD patients and RTR--CsA- or Tac-treated patients comparable in the latter. Total cholesterol (TC), LDL, and HDL cholesterol significantly decreased and serum triglycerides (TG) markedly increased in RTR, whereas in CKD patients all serum lipid fractions increased. Blood pressure was unaffected by fructose intake.

CONCLUSION

Both non-transplanted and transplanted patients with mild renal function impairment show similar acute purine metabolic disturbances following oral administration of fructose but in the latter dietary fructose may induce a smaller hyperlipidemic response.

Mobile Health Medication Adherence and Blood Pressure Control in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Proof-of-Concept Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

Mobile phone based programs for kidney transplant recipients are promising tools for improving long-term graft outcomes and better managing comorbidities (eg, hypertension, diabetes). These tools provide an easy to use self-management framework allowing optimal medication adherence that is guided by the patients’ physiological data. This technology is also relatively inexpensive, has an intuitive interface, and provides the capability for real-time personalized feedback to help motivate patient self-efficacy. Automated summary reports of patients’ adherence and blood pressure can easily be uploaded to providers’ networks helping reduce clinical inertia by reducing regimen alteration time.

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary outcomes of a prototype mobile health (mHealth) medication and blood pressure (BP) self-management system for kidney transplant patients with uncontrolled hypertension.

Methods

A smartphone enabled medication adherence and BP self-management system was developed using a patient and provider centered design. The development framework utilized self-determination theory with iterative stages that were guided and refined based on patient/provider feedback. A 3-month proof-of-concept randomized controlled trial was conducted in 20 hypertensive kidney transplant patients identified as non-adherent to their current medication regimen based on a month long screening using an electronic medication tray. Participants randomized to the mHealth intervention had the reminder functions of their electronic medication tray enabled and received a bluetooth capable BP monitor and a smartphone that received and transmitted encrypted physiological data and delivered reminders to measure BP using text messaging. Controls received standard of care and their adherence continued to be monitored with the medication tray reminders turned off. Providers received weekly summary reports of patient medication adherence and BP readings.

Results

Participation and retention rates were 41/55 (75%) and 31/34 (91%), respectively. The prototype system appears to be safe, highly acceptable, and useful to patients and providers. Compared to the standard care control group (SC), the mHealth intervention group exhibited significant improvements in medication adherence and significant reductions in clinic-measured systolic blood pressures across the monthly evaluations. Physicians made more anti-hypertensive medication adjustments in the mHealth group versus the standard care group (7 adjustments in 5 patients versus 3 adjustments in 3 patients) during the 3-month trial based on the information provided in the weekly reports.

Conclusions

These data support the acceptability and feasibility of the prototype mHealth system. Further trials with larger sample sizes and additional biomarkers (eg, whole blood medication levels) are needed to examine efficacy and effectiveness of the system for improving medication adherence and blood pressure control after kidney transplantation over longer time periods.

Trial Registration

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01859273; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01859273 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6IqfCa3A3).

Blood pressure control according to the prevalence of diabetes in renal transplant recipients

Hypertension is one of the most frequent complications of renal transplantation. About 70% to 90% of this population display either high blood pressure (BP) or require antihypertensive therapy. Diabetes mellitus is also a common finding among kidney transplant recipients. The aim of the study was to assess the BP control among kidney transplant recipients according to the prevalence of diabetes. This retrospective analysis included 172 renal transplant recipients of overall mean age 50 years and 51% males. Hypertension was present in 79% of patients. About one-third of the studied population showed abnormal blood pressures based on office measurements. The cohort was divided into two groups according to the presence of diabetes: group 1, diabetic patients (n = 14) versus group 2, nondiabetics (n = 158). Nondiabetic patients were significantly older than diabetic ones (61.5 versus 49 years; P < .05) and their time after renal transplantation was longer (98.83 versus 67.33 months, P < .05). There was no difference in regard to hypertension prevalence, mean BP value, percentage of abnormal (≥ 140/90 mm Hg) BP values or glomerular filtration rate. Diabetic patients were prescribed less steroid. The main hypotensive drug used in whole cohort and in no-diabetic patients was a beta-blocker (n = 64, 37%; n = 4, 28%), patients with diabetes used beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors at the same frequency (n = 60, 37%). The main causative factor for hypertension appeared to be the calcineurin inhibitor. More aggressive antihypertensive treatment using combined drugs, including RAS blockers, might provide adequate BP control among renal transplant subjects with high cardiovascular risk.

Prevention of cardiovascular disease after renal transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

After renal transplantation, cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death with a functioning graft. Guidelines for prevention of CVD are mainly based on data from the general population. The purpose of this review is to give a practical approach on prevention of CVD in renal transplant recipients.

RECENT FINDINGS

New epidemiological data have shown that in addition to traditional risk factors for CVD, other risk factors may influence cardiovascular risk in renal transplant recipients. Recently, a specific risk calculator for CVD in renal transplant recipients has been developed. Prevention of CVD in renal transplant recipients should include lifestyle modifications, such as prevention of overweight, smoking cessation and physical exercise. Optimal treatment of hypertension, lipid disturbances and posttransplant diabetes should be encouraged. Accumulating evidence indicates that declining graft function and graft loss are potentially modifiable risk factors in this population, which make strategies for preserving graft function important. This situation may include individual tailoring of immunosuppression and use of new immunosuppressive medications with a more favorable effect on cardiovascular risk factors and graft function.

SUMMARY

To prevent CVD in renal transplant recipients, cardiovascular risk assessment should be performed regularly. Prevention should include both lifestyle modifications, optimal treatment of cardiovascular risk factors and strategies to preserve graft function.

Management of hypertension and factors affecting its control in Jordanian renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Hypertension affects 70-90 % of all kidney transplant recipients. It is associated with poor graft survival and is a contributing factor to the increased cardiovascular mortality. The reasons for the insufficient blood pressure control in transplanted patients have not been thoroughly investigated.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the extent of blood pressure control in Jordanian hypertensive renal transplant recipients and to assess factors associated with such control.

SETTING

Three outpatient renal transplant clinics in Amman.

METHOD

A cross-sectional observational study including 181 patients. We have considered blood pressure <130/80 mm Hg as controlled hypertension. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine clinical factors associated with achievement of blood pressure control.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Proportion of patients who achieved hypertension control and clinical factors associated with good blood pressure control.

RESULTS

Mean systolic blood pressure was 128.6 ± 16.3 mm Hg and mean diastolic blood pressure was 82.8 ± 11.5 mm Hg. Blood pressure control was achieved only in 58 % of patients. The most commonly prescribed antihypertensives were calcium channel blockers (58 %) followed by beta-blockers (44 %). In bivariate analysis, female gender (p = 0.017) and creatinine clearance (p = 0.002) were positively associated, while number of antihypertensive medications was inversely associated (p = 0.04) with achievement of blood pressure control. After including these factors in multivariate logistic regression analysis, only creatinine clearance remained independently associated with hypertension control (odds ratio, OR 1.04; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.06; p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Blood pressure control among renal transplant recipients in Jordan was found to be inadequate. The only factor found to be independently associated with adequate blood pressure control was creatinine clearance.

Hypertension in kidney transplant recipients

Arterial hypertension is frequently observed in renal transplant recipients. Its pathogenesis is multifactorial in most cases. Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) can increase peripheral vascular resistance by inducing arteriolar vasoconstriction and can cause extracellular fluid expansion by reducing the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), activating the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), and by inactivating the atrial natriuretic peptide. Glucocorticoids can impair urinary water and salt excretion. Poor graft function can lead to increased extracellular volume and inappropriate production of renin. Native kidneys, older age of the donor and transplant renal artery stenosis (TRAS) may also contribute to the development of hypertension. Arterial hypertension not only can increases the risk for cardiovascular events but can also deteriorate renal allograft function. A number of studies have shown that the higher the levels of blood pressure are, the higher is the risk of graft failure. On the other hand, a good control of blood pressure may prevent many cardiovascular and renal complications. Appropriate lifestyle modification is the first step for treating hypertension. Calcium channel blockers (CCB) and renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors are the most frequently used antihypertensive agents, but in many cases, a combination of these and other drugs is required to obtain good control of hypertension.