Malignancies: pre and post transplantation strategies. Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2014;28:76-83. [PMID: 24439783 DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2013.12.002]

Evaluation of 18-FDG PET diagnostic capabilities for cancer screening in heart transplant patients, a retrospective study

Evaluate 18-FDG positron emission tomography (PET) diagnostic capabilities for cancer screening in heart transplant patients. We conducted an anonymized retrospective observational study of heart transplant patients followed in the University Hospital of Montpellier, France. We analyzed 303 18-FDG PET from 158 patients. We compared demographic and clinical characteristics through uni- and multivariate analysis: in the cancer-free group, comparisons were made between the PET false positive (FP) group versus true negative (TN), and in the cancer group, comparisons were made between the PET false negative (FN) group versus true positive (TP). Out of the 303 exams, we found 245 TN, 26 TP, 26 FP and 6 FN. The sensitivity rate was calculated at 81%, the specificity rate at 90%, the positive predictive value at 50%, and the negative predictive value at 97%. The multivariate analysis showed an association between FP diagnosis and graft-PET delay (P value = .046, OR = 5.14, 95% CI [1.18-32.4]) and creatine reactive protein (CRP) ≥ 10 mg/L (P value = .042, OR = 4.21, 95% CI [1.02-17.2]). The estimated probability of FP by logit regression was 0.48 with 95% CI [0.21-0.77] when graft-PET delay ≥ 6 years and CRP ≥ 10 mg/L. No significative statistical link was found for the demographic or clinical characteristics in the FN group of patients with cancer, except for sex (all FN were men). 18-FDG PET performed very well in the follow-up of heart transplant patients for neoplasia screening, with better specificity than sensitivity. However, the study showed that almost 50% of FP can be predicted by considering only the graft-PET delay and CRP.

A Case of Esophageal Cancer Treated by Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy after Bilateral Cadaveric Lung Transplantation

PURPOSE

With de novo cancer, esophagectomy after lung transplantation (LTx) can be challenging because of intrathoracic adhesions, delayed wound healing, and postoperative pulmonary complications, which might be lethal.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 52-year-old woman with esophageal cancer had undergone bilateral LTx for end-stage diffuse panbronchiolitis at 50 years of age. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy was performed. Bilateral bronchial arteries and subcarinal and bilateral bronchial lymph nodes were preserved to maintain blood supply to the transplanted bronchi. No ischemic changes were observed in either bronchi. The patient's postoperative course was uneventful. Although she underwent chemoradiation therapy for recurrence at the left cervical paraesophageal lymph node, she remains alive with good disease control and well-maintained respiratory function.

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive surgery with careful attention to blood supply to the transplanted bronchi was useful for treating esophageal cancer after LTx.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with a hematologic malignancy and a prior history of breast cancer

PURPOSE

To compare the outcome of allogeneic stem cell transplantation for myeloid malignancies in breast cancer survivors to a contemporaneous control group.

METHODS

Medical records of all patients with a history of breast cancer who received allogeneic stem cell transplants at a single, tertiary referral Comprehensive Cancer Center between 2002 and 2019 were reviewed. Transplant outcomes were compared to 289 control patients without a history of breast cancer from the same time period. Main outcomes included survival, disease-free survival, non-relapse mortality, relapse or progression of hematologic malignancy, and incidence of recurrent breast cancer after hematopoietic cell transplantation. Comparisons between women with a history of breast cancer and controls utilized propensity score weighting to balance patient characteristics.

RESULTS

Forty women, ages 30-74 years, with a history of breast cancer received an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant for a hematologic malignancy between December 2002 and February 2019. Twelve of the 40 patients are alive with a median survival of 7.4 years (range, 1.9-16.8 years). None of the patients had evidence of recurrent breast cancer prior to death or date of last contact. In multivariable Cox models, all transplant outcomes were similar between the patients and the control group with hematopoietic cell transplant comorbidity score as the most important confounding factor for adjustment in these models.

CONCLUSION

A history of treated breast cancer should not exclude patients from consideration for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma complicated with skin Langerhans cell sarcoma: A case report

BACKGROUND

Langerhans cell sarcoma (LCS) is a rare malignancy with poor prognosis. LCS and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) can occur in the same diseased tissues, such as lymph nodes or skin.

CASE SUMMARY

A 48-year-old female Han Chinese patient was admitted for generalized lymph node enlargement for 6 years and abdominal distension for 1 wk. She was diagnosed with small B-cell lymphoma (stage IV)/CLL (Benet stage B) and received chemotherapy. She started oral ibrutinib in February 2019. She was hospitalized on June 11, 2019, and a 1.5 cm × 1.5 cm dark-red nodule with ulceration scalp lesion was found. Biopsy revealed LCS but without CLL/SLL. She was diagnosed with CLL/SLL (Binet stage C, Rai stage IV) accompanied by secondary histiocytic sarcomas and skin LCS and received cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, dexamethasone, and etoposide but developed severe cytopenia. She ultimately refused treatments and discharged spontaneously. She died on September 12, 2019. The literature review showed that in patients with CLL/SLL, skin lesions of LCS are accompanied by CLL/SLL. This patient was different from the previously reported cases of skin LCS in patients with CLL/SLL.

CONCLUSION

In this patient, the skin lesion of LCS showed no concomitant CLL/SLL.

Evaluation of rejection, infection, and malignancy outcomes in elderly liver transplant recipients receiving a similar level of immunosuppression compared to a younger group

Elderly liver transplant (LTx) recipients at a lower risk of acute rejection compared to younger recipients due to immunosenescence. As such, they may benefit from reduced immunosuppression (IS) to minimize infectious and malignant complications. We aimed to evaluate outcomes in LTx recipients ≥60 years compared to a younger group of LTx recipients aged 18-59 years maintained on a similar level of IS. This was a single-center retrospective evaluation of adult LTx recipients from 2013 to 2018 who received methylprednisolone induction and were maintained on tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and a prednisone taper. A total of 143 LTx recipients were evaluated. Mean age in the older group was 65 ± 3.8 compared to 49 ± 10.4 years in the younger group (p < 0.0001). Mean tacrolimus levels and the duration of MMF and steroids were comparable. Both groups had a similar incidence of first rejection within 1 year (19.2% in the elderly group vs. 23.1% in the younger group, p = 0.57). There were no statistical difference in terms of infection, malignancy, or patient survival. In conclusion, our data suggests that elderly LTx recipients, when treated with a similar level of IS, had similar 1 year incidence of rejection, infection, malignancy, and patient survival as younger LTx recipients.

Immunosenescence as a reason of individualizing immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplantation

Transplantation in elderly patients is obviously more challenging due to existing underlying diseases, changes in pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressive drugs, polypragmasy, and transformation of immunoreactivity (immunosenescence). Our review presents data on modification of adaptive and innate immunity during aging. It also considers the possibility of both reduced and adapted immunosuppressive therapy in elderly renal transplant recipients in achieving an optimal balance between efficacy and complications.

The effect of subsequent immunosuppressant use in organ-transplanted patients on prostate cancer incidence: a retrospective analysis using the Korean National Health Insurance Database

Backgrounds

Prostate cancer (PC) is the most common solid organ cancer. However, there is still no definite consensus before and after organ transplantation (TPL). We aimed to analyze whether PC incidence increased in TPL patients with subsequent use of immunosuppressants using the Korean National Health Insurance Database.

Methods

TPL patients between 2003 and 2015(N = 12,970) were age- and year-matched to non-TPL patients (N = 38,910) in a 1:3 ratio. Multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusted for significant prognostic clinicopathological parameters, including the duration of immunosuppressant agent use (0–300 or > 300 days), and Kaplan–Meier analysis with log-rank test were used to evaluate the association of TPL with PC incidence between the groups.

Results

Median overall survival was 4.86 years; overall mortality rate was 3.4% (n = 1761). Regardless of differences in baseline characteristics between the groups, multivariate analysis for PC incidence showed that age, immunosuppressant use, and TPL organ subtypes were significant factors for the overall population, whereas only age was significant in the TPL group (p < 0.05). After adjusting for age, underlying disease, and prescribed medication (aspirin, statin), multiple subgroup analysis models for PC incidence were evaluated. PC incidence was increased in the TPL group (hazard ratio [HR] 1.965, p < 0.001); however, PC incidence in the TPL group became insignificant after adjusting for immunosuppressant use (p = 0.194). Kaplan–Meier curves also showed that PC incidence was significantly different according to age and TPL with the use of immunosuppressants between the TPL and non-TPL groups.

Conclusions

PC incidence was higher in the TPL group using immunosuppressants than in the non-TPL group.

Trial registration: The study was retrospectively registered.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12894-021-00883-8.

Prostate Cancer Outcomes Following Solid-Organ Transplantation: A SEER-Medicare Analysis

BACKGROUND

Immunosuppressive regimens associated with organ transplantation increase the risk of developing cancer. Transplant candidates and recipients with prostate cancer are often treated, even if low-risk features would ordinarily justify active surveillance.

METHODS

Using SEER-Medicare, we identified 163 676 men aged 66 years and older diagnosed with nonmetastatic prostate cancer. History of solid organ transplant was identified using diagnosis or procedure codes. A propensity score-matched cohort was identified by matching transplanted men to nontransplanted controls by age, race, region, year, T-stage, grade, comorbidity, and cancer therapy. Fine-Gray competing risk models assessed associations between transplant status and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) and overall mortality (OM).

RESULTS

We identified 620 men (0.4%) with transplant up to 10 years before (n = 320) or 5 years after (n = 300) prostate cancer diagnosis and matched them to 3100 men. At 10 years, OM was 55.7% and PCSM was 6.0% in the transplant cohort compared with 42.4% (P < .001) and 7.6% (P = .70) in the nontransplant cohort, respectively. Adjusted models showed no difference in PCSM for transplanted men (hazard ratio = 0.88, 95% confidence interval = 0.61 to 1.27, P = .70) or differences by prostate cancer therapy. Among 334 transplanted men with T1-2N0, well or moderately differentiated "low-risk" prostate cancer, PCSM was similar for treated and untreated men (hazard ratio = 0.92, 95% confidence interval = 0.47 to 1.81).

CONCLUSIONS

Among men aged 66 years and older with prostate cancer, an organ transplant is associated with higher OM but no observable difference in PCSM. These findings suggest men with prostate cancer and previous or future organ transplantation should be managed per usual standards of care, including consideration of active surveillance for low-risk cancer characteristics.

Incidence of malignancy and related mortality after kidney transplantation: a nationwide, population-based cohort study in Korea

Post-transplant malignancy (PTM) is a leading cause of premature mortality among kidney transplantation recipients. However, population-based cohort studies that cover incidence, mortality, and risk factors for PTM are rarely reported, especially in East Asia. We designed a retrospective cohort study using a national population-based database. A total of 9915 kidney recipients between 2003 and 2016 were included. During this period, 598 cases (6.0%) of de novo PTM occurred. The most common PTM was thyroid cancer (14.2%), followed by colorectal (11.2%), kidney (10.7%), and stomach cancers (8.9%). The standardised incidence ratio for all-site cancer was 3.9. The risks of Kaposi sarcoma (192.9) and kidney cancer (21.1) were more than 10 times those of the general population. Cancer-related deaths were 89 (14.9%) with liver cancer being the highest (14.6%), followed by lung cancer (13.5%), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) (12.4%), stomach cancer (9.0%), and colorectal cancer (7.9%). The standardised mortality ratio (SMR) was slightly elevated (1.4). A notable increase in SMR was observed for lymphoma (9.3 for Hodgkin lymphoma and 5.5 for NHL). Older age and graft failure were significantly related to PTM. These findings reflecting geographical variation have implications for the development of strategies for fatal cancers to prevent premature deaths from PTM.

De-novo malignancies after kidney transplantation: A long-term observational study

Background

De-novo malignancies after kidney transplantation represent one major cause for mortality after transplantation. However, most of the studies are limited due to small sample size, short follow-up or lack of information about cancer specific mortality.

Methods

This long-term retrospective analysis included all adult patients with complete follow-up that underwent kidney transplantation between 1995 and 2016 at our centre. All patients with diagnosis of malignancy excluding non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) were identified and a matched control group was assigned to the kidney transplant recipients with post-transplant malignancies.

Results

1417 patients matched the inclusion criteria. 179 malignancies posttransplant were diagnosed in 154 patients (n = 21 with two, n = 2 patients with three different malignancies). Mean age at cancer diagnosis was 60.3±13.3 years. Overall incidence of de-novo malignancies except NMSC was 1% per year posttransplant. Renal cell carcinoma was the most common entity (n = 49, incidence 4.20 per 1000 patient years; cancer specific mortality 12%), followed by cancer of the gastro-intestinal tract (n = 30, 2.57; 50%), urinary system (n = 24, 2.06; 13%), respiratory system (n = 18, 1.54; 89%), female reproductive system (n = 15, 1.29; 13%), posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders and haematological tumours (n = 14, 1.20; 21%), cancers of unknown primary (n = 7, 0.60 100%) and others (n = 22, 1.89; 27%). Male sex, re-transplantation and time on dialysis were associated with de-novo malignancies after transplantation.

Conclusion

De-novo malignancies continue to be a serious problem after kidney transplantation. To improve long-term outcome after Kidney transplantation, prevention and cancer screening should be more tailored and intensified.

A single-center experience of post-transplant lymphomas involving the central nervous system with a review of current literature

Background

Central Nervous System (CNS) lymphoma is a rare presentation of post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD).

Methods

This single center retrospective study reviewed presentations, management and outcomes of CNS lymphomas in kidney transplant patients transplanted 1968 to 2015, and reviews relevant current literature.

Results

We identified 5773 adult kidney transplant recipients of who 90 had a PTLD diagnosis confirmed. CNS disease was diagnosed in 6/90 (7%). Median age at presentation was 60 years and time from transplant 4.5 years. Immunosuppression at diagnosis included mycophenolate mofetil and prednisolone without calcineurin inhibitor in 5/6 patients. Histological analysis diagnosed monomorphic disease in 5/6, and one polymorphic case with tissue positive for Epstein-barr virus (EBV) in 5/6 cases. Despite this 2/4 EBV positive cases had no detectable EBV in peripheral blood or CSF at diagnosis. Treatment strategies included reduction in immunosuppression in all, chemotherapy (n=5), radiotherapy (n=3), Cytotoxic T-Lymphocytes and Craniotomy (n=2). Patient survival was 40% at 1 year with CTL treated patients surviving beyond three years from diagnosis.

Conclusion

This study supports observational data suggesting MMF treated patients without CNI may have increased risk of disease. Peripheral blood screening for EBV DNAemia does not seem helpful in early identification of those at risk.

Solid Organ Cancer and Melanoma in Kidney Transplant Recipients: TumorTx Base Preliminary Results

BACKGROUND

Incidence of malignancy in transplant recipients is higher than in the general population. Malignancy is a major cause of mortality following solid organ transplantation and a major barrier to long-term survival for the kidney. The aim of this study was to estimate the incidence of solid organ malignancy (SOM) and melanoma in renal transplant recipients (RTR) transplanted at 2 representative transplant centers in Poland based on data from the Polish Tumor Registry.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analyzed the medical data of 3069 patients who underwent kidney transplantation (KTx) between 1995 and 2015.

RESULTS

In our study 112 SOM (3.6%) were diagnosed. The majority of patients were male (n = 71; 63.4%; P < .01). The mean age at KTx was 48.0 ± 13.1 years and the mean age at the time of cancer diagnosis was 55.9 ± 12.7 years. The average time of malignancy occurrence was 5.9 ± 5.0 years after KTx. SOM was the cause of death in 60 patients (53%). The most common were malignancies of gastrointestinal tract (25%), urinary tract tumors (23.2%), lung cancer (n = 18; 16%), and lymphoma (13.4%). We found an increase in the percentage of chronic glomerular nephropathy in the group of SOM (n = 56; 50%) compared with renal insufficiency of other etiologies.

CONCLUSIONS

RTR in Poland are at a significant risk of malignancy development in a variety of organs, primarily urinary tract tumors and lymphoma. Cancers most frequently occurring in the general population such as lung and colorectal cancer are common in our RTR. On this basis an appropriate tumor screening schedule can be developed in individual countries.

Advanced native-kidney carcinoma in a heart- and kidney-transplanted patient: a case report

Malignancies are one of the leading causes of death in long-term surviving transplant recipients. Dose and prolonged durations of immunosuppressive regimens are considered the main cause, through a direct oncogenic effect and a renowned interaction on physiological anti-viral and anti-oncogenic immune response. Specific neoplasms are known to occur with different frequencies according to the transplanted organ. As a consequence, imaging screenings have been implemented in many graft surveillance programs, although a wide consensus on the timing and modality has not been concurred. There are little data available in the literature regarding incidence of de-novo malignancies in multi-organ recipients. We report the case of a 66-year-old man who developed a renal mass 10 years after a combined heart-kidney transplant.

Cancer Screening Recommendations for Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines

Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) are at increased risk of developing and dying from cancer. However, controversies exist around cancer screening in this population owing to reduced life expectancy and competing causes of death. This systematic review assesses the availability, quality and consistency of cancer screening recommendations in clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). We systematically searched bibliographic databases and gray literature to identify CPGs and assessed their quality using AGREE II. Recommendations were extracted along with their supporting evidence. Thirteen guidelines were included in the review. CPGs for kidney recipients were the most frequent source of screening recommendations, and recommendations for skin cancer screening were most frequently presented. Some screening recommendations differed from those for the general population, based on literature demonstrating higher cancer incidence among SOTRs versus direct evidence of screening effectiveness. Relevant stakeholders such as oncology specialists, primary care providers and public health experts were not involved in the formulation of the screening recommendations. In conclusion, although several guidelines make recommendations for cancer screening in SOTRs, the availability of cancer screening recommendations varied considerably by transplanted organ. More studies are required to inform cancer screening recommendations in SOTRs, and guideline development should involve transplant patients, oncologists and cancer screening specialists.

Urothelial carcinoma of donor origin in a kidney transplant patient

Background

Malignancy after transplantation is an uncommon multifactorial occurrence. Immunosuppression to prevent graft rejection is described as a major risk factor in malignancy development in the post-transplant state. Donor-derived malignancy is a rare reported complication. Herein, we review our patient history and discuss diagnostic strategies and the implications of immunosuppression for donor-derived malignancy.

Case presentation

This is a 69-year-old man with post-renal-transplant urothelial carcinoma determined to be of donor origin. His course was complicated by BK virus at six years post-transplant; urothelial carcinoma was identified nine years post-transplant. Cystectomy was performed, but because of immunosuppression and underlying chronic kidney disease, the patient was considered ineligible for adjuvant chemotherapy. Two years after resection, screening MRI demonstrated retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy and a right upper pole mass in the transplanted kidney. Urine cytology confirmed the presence of malignant cells; FISH showed 2-8 copies of the X chromosome and no Y chromosome consistent with female origin of the malignant cells. CT-guided renal mass and paraaortic lymph node biopsies demonstrated that about 50 % of cells had an XY complement, while the remainder showed a XX genotype by chromosomal SNP microarray analysis. Immunosuppression was discontinued and the donor kidney removed. X/Y FISH of the urothelial carcinoma identified in the explanted kidney confirmed that the malignant cells were of female donor origin. Follow-up at 3, 6 and 12 months after discontinuation of immunosuppression and surgery demonstrated normalization of the lymphadenopathy and absence of new lesions.

Conclusions

Immunosuppression is a major risk factor for development of malignancy in transplant recipients. Donor-derived malignancy can arise and current molecular studies allow an accurate diagnosis. Withdrawal of immunosuppression and surgical resection of the transplant kidney proved an effective treatment in our case.

Anti-TNFα therapy for chronic inflammatory disease in kidney transplant recipients: Clinical outcomes

Anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα) therapy has improved the prognosis of many chronic inflammatory diseases. It appears to be well-tolerated by liver-transplant patients. However, their use and their safety in kidney-transplant patients have yet to be determined.In this retrospective study, we identified 16 adult kidney-transplant patients aged 46.5 years (34-51.8) who received anti-TNFα therapy from 7 kidney transplantation centers. The indications for this treatment included: chronic inflammatory bowel disease (n = 8), inflammatory arthritis (n = 5), AA amyloidosis (n = 1), psoriasis (n = 1), and microscopic polyangiitis (n = 1).Anti-TNFα therapies resulted in a clinical response in 13/16 patients (81%). Estimated glomerular filtration rates (MDRD-4) were similar on day 0 and at 24 months (M24) after anti-TNFα treatment had been initiated (41 [12-55] and 40 [21-53] mL/min/1.73 m, respectively). Two allograft losses were observed. The 1st case was due to antibody-mediated rejection (M18), while the 2nd was the result of AA amyloidosis recurrence (M20). There were several complications: 8 patients (50%) developed 23 serious infections (18 bacterial, 4 viral, and 1 fungal) and 4 developed cancer. Five patients died (infection n = 2, cardiac AA amyloidosis n = 1, intraalveolar hemorrhage following microscopic polyangiitis n = 1, and acute respiratory distress syndrome n = 1). On univariate analysis, recipient age associated with death (P = 0.009) and infection development (P = 0.06).Using anti-TNFα therapies, remission can be achieved in chronic inflammatory diseases in kidney-transplant patients. However, concommitant anti-TNFα and immunosuppresive therapies must be used with caution due to the high risk of infection, particularly after the age of 50.

A Rationale for Age-Adapted Immunosuppression in Organ Transplantation

Demographic changes are associated with a steady increase of older patients with end-stage organ failure in need for transplantation. As a result, the majority of transplant recipients are currently older than 50 years, and organs from elderly donors are more frequently used. Nevertheless, the benefit of transplantation in older patients is well recognized, whereas the most frequent causes of death among older recipients are potentially linked to side effects of their immunosuppressants.Immunosenescence is a physiological part of aging linked to higher rates of diabetes, bacterial infections, and malignancies representing the major causes of death in older patients. These age-related changes impact older transplant candidates and may have significant implications for an age-adapted immunosuppression. For instance, immunosenescence is linked to lower rates of acute rejections in older recipients, whereas the engraftment of older organs has been associated with higher rejection rates. Moreover, new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation is more frequent in the elderly, potentially related to corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitors.This review presents current knowledge for an age-adapted immunosuppression based on both, experimental and clinical studies in and beyond transplantation. Recommendations of maintenance and induction therapy may help to improve graft function and to design future clinical trials in the elderly.

Langerhans cell sarcoma: a systematic review

Langerhans cell sarcoma (LCS) is a rare malignant tumour of Langerhans cells with a poor outcome. Given its rarity, there is a lack of evidence regarding the most appropriate treatment for this condition. Therefore the aim of this work was to review, compile, analyse and present clinical details and to determine the optimal treatment regimen. A search of PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane, CENTRAL, clinicaltrials.gov and Google Scholar was supplemented by hand searching. Data extracted included demographics, treatment, type of LCS and clinical outcome. Of 510 citations identified by a systematic literature search, 46 case series including 66 subjects with LCS met criteria for analysis. The most common treatment modality was chemotherapy, used alone or in combination in 47 cases (71%) followed by surgery in 31 cases (47%). Overall mean (S.E.) disease specific survival and disease free survival were 27.2 (3.9) and 18.3 (3.8) months respectively. There was a significant difference in both disease specific and disease free survival between the local, loco-regional and disseminated disease cohorts (DSS p=0.014; DFS p<0.001). More localised disease confers a survival advantage. Multi-modality therapy appears to be most effective, with the addition of radiotherapy to chemotherapy appearing beneficial. Complete surgical excision with clear margins being most effective for local disease control. Any adjuvant therapy should not be delayed. Bone marrow transplant appears to be the most reliable treatment in terms of outcome especially in disseminated disease however has well known patient selection and toxicity/tolerance issues. The role of cell surface markers for prognostication remains unclear.

Contribution of TLR signaling to the pathogenesis of colitis-associated cancer in inflammatory bowel disease

In the intestine a balance between proinflammatory and repair signals of the immune system is essential for the maintenance of intestinal homeostasis. The innate immunity ensures a primary host response to microbial invasion, which induces an inflammatory process to localize the infection and prevent systemic dissemination of pathogens. The key elements of this process are the germline encoded pattern recognition receptors including Toll-like receptors (TLRs). If pathogens cannot be eliminated, they may elicit chronic inflammation, which may be partly mediated via TLRs. Additionally, chronic inflammation has long been suggested to trigger tissue tumorous transformation. Inflammation, the seventh hallmark of cancer, may affect all phases of tumor development, and evade the immune system. Inflammation acts as a cellular stressor and may trigger DNA damage or genetic instability. Furthermore, chronic inflammation can provoke genetic mutations and epigenetic mechanisms that promote malignant cell transformation. Colorectal cancers in inflammatory bowel disease patients are considered typical examples of inflammation-related cancers. Although data regarding the role of TLRs in the pathomechanism of cancer-associated colitis are rather conflicting, functionally these molecules can be classified as ”largely antitumorigenic” and ”largely pro-tumorigenic” with the caveat that the underlying signaling pathways are mainly context (i.e., organ-, tissue-, cell-) and ligand-dependent.