Right posterior segment graft for living donor liver transplantation: A systematic review

Right Posterior Segment Graft in Adult Living-Donor Liver Transplantation: A Report of 17 Years of Experience at a Single Institution

OBJECTIVES

The right posterior segment graft can be selected in cases where neither the right nor left lobe graft satisfies the selection criteria for adult living donor liver transplant. However, vascular and biliary anatomy may cause technical difficulties in procurement of posterior segments in donors of living donor liver transplant and may require specific attention in vascular and biliary reconstruction in the recipient. In this study, we examined the feasibility of right posterior segment grafts in adult living donor liver transplants through donor safety and recipient outcomes and clarified the anatomic points of the surgical technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 296 cases of adult living donor liver transplants treated at Kumamoto University between August 2000 and March 2017.

RESULTS

Among 296 cases, graft types were right lobe (n = 162), left lobe (n = 119), and right posterior segments (n = 9). Among donors, no significant differences were shown in operative time, blood loss, or incidence of postoperative complications between early and late phases among the 3 groups. Four cases ofright posterior segment had >2 biliary duct stumps, and 2 cases had 2 portal vein stumps. Among recipients, median actual graft-to-recipient weight ratio was 0.82% (range, 0.52%-1.22%), with no factors, including graft type, significantly associated with graft survival. Hepatic artery thrombosis and rupture of hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm occurred in 1 case as an early complication, and biliary anastomotic stricture occurred in 4 cases as a late complication.

CONCLUSIONS

The right posterior segment graft may be an effective alternative in living donor liver transplant when no eligible candidates for conventional grafts are available among families and relatives. Careful preoperative anatomic evaluations and simulations are important.

Unusual grafts for living-donor liver transplantation

PURPOSE

Unusual grafts, including extended left liver plus caudate lobe, right anterior section, and right posterior section grafts, are alternatives to left and right lobe grafts for living-donor liver transplantation. This study aimed to investigate unusual grafts from the perspectives of recipients and donors.

METHODS

From 2016 to 2021, 497 patients received living-donor liver transplantation at Severance Hospital. Among them, 10 patients received unusual grafts. Three patients received extended left liver plus caudate lobe grafts, two patients received right anterior section grafts, and five patients received right posterior section grafts. Liver volumetrics and anatomy were analyzed for all recipients and donors. We collected data on laboratory examinations (alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, international normalized ratio), imaging studies, graft survival, and complications. A 1:2 ratio propensity-score matching method was used to reduce selection bias and balance variables between the unusual and conventional graft groups.

RESULTS

The median of Model for End-stage Liver Disease score of unusual graft recipients was 13.5 (interquartile range 11.5-19.3) and that of graft-recipient weight ratio was 0.767 (0.7-0.9). ABO incompatibility was observed in four cases. The alanine aminotransferase level, total bilirubin level, and international normalized ratio decreased in both recipients and donors. Unusual and conventional grafts had similar survival rates (p = 0.492). The right and left subgroups did not differ from each counter-conventional subgroup (p = 0.339 and p = 0.695, respectively). The incidence of major complications was not significantly different between unusual and conventional graft recipients (p = 0.513). Wound seromas were reported by unusual graft donors; the complication ratio was similar to that in conventional graft donors (p = 0.169).

CONCLUSION

Although unusual grafts require a complex indication, they may show feasible surgical outcomes for recipients with an acceptable donor complication.

A rare hepatic artery variant reporting and a new classification

Variations of the hepatic artery are very common, but they greatly increase the difficulty of surgery and the risk of complications in perihepatic surgeries such as liver transplantation, liver segmentectomy, and gastroduodenal surgery. Thus, it is important to precisely define the type of hepatic artery variant before surgery. However, there are often rare variants that cannot be defined with existing classifications. For example, the type of hepatic artery variant in the current case could not be classified with conventional classifications, and no such variation has been reported to date, involving two accessory left hepatic arteries from the common hepatic and left inferior phrenic arteries, respectively. Based on the existing 3DCT technology and the CRL classification method, which is applicable to the most common hepatic artery variants, we reviewed many rare variant types and proposed a new classification method (ex-CRL classification) for hepatic artery variations that do not fit the classic scope. The ex-CRL classification can accurately classify the vast majority of rare cases in the literature, greatly compensates for the limitations of current hepatic artery classifications, improves the generalization and understanding of rare cases, and reduces surgical complications.

Biliary complications in recipients of living donor liver transplantation: A single-centre study

BACKGROUND

Biliary complications (BCs) after liver transplantation (LT) remain a considerable cause of morbidity, mortality, increased cost, and graft loss.

AIM

To investigate the impact of BCs on chronic graft rejection, graft failure and mortality.

METHODS

From 2011 to 2016, 215 adult recipients underwent right-lobe living-donor liver transplantation (RT-LDLT) at our centre. We excluded 46 recipients who met the exclusion criteria, and 169 recipients were included in the final analysis. Donors’ and recipients’ demographic data, clinical data, operative details and postoperative course information were collected. We also reviewed the management and outcomes of BCs. Recipients were followed for at least 12 mo post-LT until December 2017 or graft or patient loss.

RESULTS

The overall incidence rate of BCs including biliary leakage, biliary infection and biliary stricture was 57.4%. Twenty-seven (16%) patients experienced chronic graft rejection. Graft failure developed in 20 (11.8%) patients. A total of 28 (16.6%) deaths occurred during follow-up. BCs were a risk factor for the occurrence of chronic graft rejection and failure; however, mortality was determined by recurrent hepatitis C virus infection.

CONCLUSION

Biliary complications after RT-LDLT represent an independent risk factor for chronic graft rejection and graft failure; nonetheless, effective management of these complications can improve patient and graft survival.

Percutaneous Balloon Dilatation for Hepaticojejunostomy Stricture Following Paediatric Liver Transplantation: Long-Term Results of an Institutional "Three-Session" Protocol

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to report the long-term results of an institutional protocol of percutaneous biliary balloon dilatation (PBBD) on paediatric patients with benign anastomotic stricture after liver transplantation. As a secondary objective, we evaluated risk factors associated with post-treatment re-stricture.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fourteen paediatric, post-liver transplant patients with benign anastomotic stricture of Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy were included. All patients underwent the same treatment protocol of three PBBD procedures with 15-day intervals. Clinical outcome was analysed using the Terblanche classification. Primary patency rate was assessed with the Kaplan-Meier test.

RESULTS

All patients had an initial successful result (Terblanche grade, excellent/good) after PBBD. At the end of the follow-up time of 35.7 ± 21.1 months (CI95%, 23.5-47.9), 10 patients persisted with excellent/good grading, while the remaining 4 had re-stricture, all of the latter occurring within the first 19 months. Patency rate after percutaneous treatment at 1, 3, and 5 years were 85.7%, 70%, and 70%, respectively. History of major complication after liver transplantation was associated with 5 times higher risk of re-stricture, HR 5.48 [95% CI, 2.18-8.78], p = 0.018.

CONCLUSION

In paediatric patients with benign anastomotic stricture of hepaticojejunostomy after liver transplantation, the "Three-session" percutaneous biliary balloon dilatation protocol is associated with a high rate of long-term success. In this limited series, the history of post-liver transplant major complication, defined as complications requiring a reintervention under general anaesthesia or advanced life support, seems to be an independent risk factor for stricture recurrence.

Living donor liver transplantation for Budd‒Chiari syndrome with right posterior segment graft and patch plasty using the superficial femoral vein: a case report

Background

In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for patients with Budd‒Chiari syndrome (BCS), there are several concerns about reconstruction of the inferior vena cava (IVC) and hepatic veins. Herein, we report the case of a patient with BCS who underwent LDLT with right posterior segment graft (RPSG) and patch plasty for reconstruction of the hepatic venous outflow, using the patient’s own superficial femoral vein (SFV).

Case presentation

A 19-year-old man, who was diagnosed with primary BCS, underwent LDLT. His main hepatic veins were totally obstructed, and membranous stenosis was seen in the IVC. The LDLT donor was his mother; however, liver volumetric analysis showed that only her RPSG was appropriate. In the recipient surgery, 16 cm of the left SFV was harvested and was cut longitudinally and opened. The right hepatic vein (RHV) of the RPSG was anastomosed to the sidewall of the SFV graft. After explantation of native diseased liver was completed, the stenotic and thickened wall of the IVC was widely resected, and a large anastomotic orifice was created. Patch cavoplasty was performed with the RHV‒SFV graft patch. After portal reperfusion started, hepatic venous outflow was satisfactory, and there was no venous graft congestion. Both his postoperative course and his long-term course after discharge were uneventful.

Conclusions

In LDLT for BCS patients, ingenuity is required for the reconstruction of venous outflow. The SFV patch can be safely harvested from liver transplant recipients and is suitable for venous reconstruction. In addition, RPSG is an alternative type of liver graft for LDLT if a conventional right- or left-lobe graft cannot be used.

Short-term and long-term outcomes in living donors for liver transplantation: Cohort study

BACKGROUND

Although perioperative outcomes following donor hepatectomy (DH) have been reported, little is known about the long-term outcomes in living donors of liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to investigate the short-term and long-term outcomes following DH.

METHODS

A total of 408 living donors who underwent DH between 1996 and 2019 were analyzed in this retrospective study, focusing on short-term outcomes with respect to the operation period (era) and the graft type, as well as long-term outcomes.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of postoperative complications was 40.4%. These included minor (30.4%), major (10.0%), and biliary (14.0%) complications. Short-term outcomes after DH slightly improved over time, and outcomes did not differ significantly between the graft types. With regards to long-term outcomes, the incidence of surgery-related complications such as keloids, incisional hernias, and mechanical bowel obstructions was 6.6% over a median follow-up of 7.2 years. In addition, some donors developed comorbidities such as lifestyle diseases and cancers during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirmed an improvement of perioperative outcomes in living donors. There was no significant association between the graft type and postoperative outcomes. Donors could develop various morbidities during long-term follow-up. Therefore, a careful perioperative management and long-term follow-up should be provided to living donors.