Hormones and thrombosis: risk across the reproductive years and beyond

The genetic effects of hormones modulated by the Pituitary-Thyroid/Adrenal/Gonadal axis on the risk of developing venous thromboembolism: a mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to explore the genetic effects of hormones modulated through the pituitary-thyroid/adrenal/gonadal axis on the risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE) and to investigate the potentially causal relationships between them.

METHODS

A two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) design was used. The single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) used as instrumental variables for various hormones and hormone-mediated diseases were derived from published genome-wide association studies (GWASs). Summary statistics for the risk of developing VTE (including deep venous thrombosis [DVT] and pulmonary embolism [PE]) were obtained from the UK Biobank and the FinnGen consortium. Inverse-variance weighting (IVW) was applied as the primary method to analyse causal associations. Other MR methods were used for supplementary estimates and sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS

A genetic predisposition to greater free thyroxine (FT4) concentrations was associated with a greater risk of developing DVT (OR = 1.0007, 95%CI [1.0001-1.0013], p = 0.0174) and VTE (OR = 1.0008, 95%CI [1.0002-1.0013], p = 0.0123). Genetically predicted hyperthyroidism was significantly associated with an increased risk of developing DVT (OR = 1.0685, 95%CI [1.0139-1.1261], p = 0.0134) and VTE (OR = 1.0740, 95%CI [1.0165-1.1348], p = 0.0110). According to the initial MR analysis, testosterone concentrations were positively associated with the risk of developing VTE (OR = 1.0038, 95%CI [1.004-1.0072], p = 0.0285). After sex stratification, estradiol concentrations were positively associated with the risk of developing DVT (OR = 1.0143, 95%CI [1.0020-1.0267], p = 0.0226) and VTE (OR = 1.0156, 95%CI [1.0029-1.0285], p = 0.0158) in females, while the significant relationship between testosterone and VTE did not persist. SHBG rs858518 was identified as the only SNP that was associated with an increased risk of developing VTE, mediated by estradiol, in females.

CONCLUSIONS

Genetically predicted hyperthyroidism and increased FT4 concentrations were positively associated with the risk of developing VTE. The effects of genetically predicted sex hormones on the risk of developing VTE differed between males and females. Greater genetically predicted estradiol concentrations were associated with an increased risk of developing VTE in females, while the SHBG rs858518 variant may become a potential prevention and treatment target for female VTE.

Thrombosis and cachexia in cancer: two partners in crime?

Among cancer patients, thrombosis and cachexia are major causes of morbidity and mortality. Although the two may occur together, little is known about their possible relationship. Thus, a literature review was conducted by screening the databases PubMed, Scopus, SciELO, Medline and Web of Science. To summarize, cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) and cancer-associated cachexia (CAC) seem to share several patient-, tumour- and treatment-related risk factors. Inflammation alongside metabolic and endocrine derangement is the potential missing link between CAT, CAC and cancer. Many key players, including specific pro-inflammatory cytokines, immune cells and hormones, appear to be implicated in both thrombosis and cachexia, representing attractive predictive markers and potential therapeutic targets. Altogether, the current evidence suggests a link between CAT and CAC, however, epidemiological studies are required to explore this potential relationship. Given the high incidence and negative impact of both diseases, further studies are needed for the better management of cancer patients.

The ART of Thromboprophylaxis in the Prevention of Gestational Venous Thromboembolism

Assisted reproductive techniques (ART) allow infertile couples to conceive. Use of hormones to obtain a controlled ovarian stimulation and an adequate growth of the endometrium preparatory for embryo implantation are not riskless. Among others, thrombotic events can occur during the ovulation induction or pregnancy following ART. As the number of women approaching ART to conceive is steadily increasing, the issue of thrombotic risk in this setting is relevant. Data on the weight of each risk factor and on potential benefit of thromboprophylaxis are largely lacking. In this review, we discuss risk of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy following ART, with a focus on general (i.e.: age, body mass index, thrombophilia, bed rest, transfusions) and ART-specific (i.e., polycystic ovarian syndrome, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome) risk factors. We also attempt to provide some suggestions to guide clinical practice, based on available data and studies performed outside ART.

Systemic hormonal contraception and risk of venous thromboembolism

INTRODUCTION

The increased risk of venous thromboembolism associated with the use of hormonal contraception is well recognized, but evidence regarding hormonal contraception containing natural estradiol is limited. This study aimed to assess the associations between the patterns of use of different systemic hormonal contraceptives and the risk of venous thromboembolism during 2017-2019.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All fertile-aged women (15-49 years) living in Finland in 2017 and using hormonal contraception in 2017 and their 1:1 age- and residence-matched controls not using hormonal contraception in 2017 (altogether 587 559 women) were selected from the Prescription Centre. All incident venous thromboembolism cases during 2018-2019 and their 4:1 age-matched controls were further analyzed in a prospective nested case-control design to assess the associations between the use (starting, stopping, continuous vs no use) of different hormonal contraception types and venous thromboembolism.

RESULTS

Altogether, 1334 venous thromboembolism cases occurred during the follow-up period (incidence rate 1.14 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.20), with an incidence rate ratio of hormonal contraception vs no hormonal contraception use of 1.42 (95% CI 1.27-1.58). Compared with non-use, starting the use of gestodene and ethinylestradiol (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.85; 95% CI 1.62-5.03), drospirenone and ethinylestradiol (aOR 1.55; 95% CI 0.98-2.44), desogestrel and ethinylestradiol (aOR 1.97; 95% CI 0.99-3.92), and transdermal patch releasing norelgestromin and ethinylestradiol (aOR 5.10; 95% CI 1.12-23.16), as well as continuing the use of gestodene and ethinylestradiol (aOR 2.60; 95% CI 1.61-4.21), drospirenone and ethinylestradiol (aOR 1.55; 95% CI 1.02-2.37), cyproterone-acetate and estrogen/ethinylestradiol (aOR 1.66; 95% CI 1.06-2.61), and vaginal ring releasing etonogestrel and ethinylestradiol (aOR 3.27; 95% CI 1.95-5.48) were associated with venous thromboembolism risk. Regarding the type of estrogen, the highest risk was associated with current use (vs non use in the previous 180 days) of ethinylestradiol-containing preparations (aOR 2.20; 95% CI 1.82-2.65), followed by estradiol-containing preparations (aOR 1.39; 95% CI 1.04-1.87) with no risk for progestin-only hormonal contraception. Current use of estradiol-containing preparations was not associated with venous thromboembolism risk after exclusion of cyproterone-acetate and estrogen/ethinylestradiol (aOR 1.05; 95% CI 0.66-1.66).

CONCLUSIONS

An increased risk of venous thromboembolism is associated with ethinylestradiol-containing combined preparations. The use of estradiol-containing combined preparations confers only a slightly increased risk, possibly driven by cyproterone-containing combined oral contraceptives, whereas the use of progestin-only contraception is not associated with venous thromboembolism.

Thromboembolism and Oral Contraceptives During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Disproportionality Analysis Within the Spanish Pharmacovigilance Database

Background

Thromboembolic events (TEs) are known to be a severe complication for COVID-19. They are associated with a systemic inflammatory response syndrome with coagulation cascade activation.

Objective

The aim of this study was to determine a potential association between the COVID-19 pandemic and the increment of the risk of suspected TEs in women on systemic hormonal contraceptives (SHCs).

Patients and Methods

This study utilised a case/non-case approach in the Spanish Pharmacovigilance Database, which includes more than 290,000 cases of suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The reporting odds ratio (ROR) was calculated during an initial pandemic period in 2020 compared with a pre-pandemic period in 2019 and an additional control period in 2018.

Results

While there was a decreased number of ADR notifications for any medications and for any type of ADR in patients on SHCs during the pandemic period, the TE ROR for all SHCs was higher in the 2020 pandemic period [ROR = 11.8 (5.6–24.7)] relative to the pre-pandemic period in 2019 [ROR = 6.3 (3.2–12.5)] and the additional control period in 2018 [ROR = 4.6. (2.1–9.9)]. In contrast, ROR for progestogen-only contraceptives was lower during the pandemic as compared with the two control periods.

Conclusion

The reported disproportionality of TEs in women on SHCs rose during the pandemic period. This suggests a potential interaction of the drug (SHC) with COVID-19, which led to an increased risk of TEs in women exposed to both factors. This should be taken into consideration in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Optimal Endometrial Preparation Protocols for Frozen-thawed Embryo Transfer Cycles by Maternal Age

This retrospective cohort study aimed to explore the optimal endometrial preparation protocols among different maternal age groups. A total of 16,867 frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles were categorized into three groups based on endometrial preparation protocols: Natural cycle (NC n = 3893), artificial cycles (AC, n = 11456) and AC with GnRH-a pretreatment (AC+GnRH-a, n = 1518). To account for repeat cycles, a generalized estimating equation (GEE) method was applied to examine the associations between cycle regimens and pregnancy outcomes. Subgroup analyses were conducted to evaluate the best preparation methods for different maternal age groups. Primary outcomes were live birth and early miscarriage rates. After completing GEE, in overall population, the live birth rate [(NC as reference; AC: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.837, 95% confidential interval (CI) 0.771-0.908; AC+GnRHa: aOR = 0.906, 95%CI 0.795-1.031)] in NC was significantly higher than that in AC, while comparable that in AC+GnRH-a. The early miscarriage rate (AC: aOR = 1.420, 95%CI 1.225-1.646; AC+GnRHa: aOR = 1.545, 95%CI 1.236-1.931) was significantly lower in NC compared to either AC group. Subgroup analysis showed that in younger women, the incidences of live birth (AC: aOR = 0.900, 95%CI 0.804-1.007; AC+GnRHa: aOR = 1.091, 95%CI 0.904-1.317) were equivalent between groups, with a slightly higher in AC+GnRH-a. Early miscarriage rate (AC: aOR = 1.462, 95%CI 1.165-1.835; AC+GnRHa: aOR = 1.137, 95%CI 0.948-1886) was only significantly lower in NC compared to that in AC. In older women, the live birth rate (AC: aOR = 0.815, 95%CI 0.722-0.920; AC+GnRHa: aOR = 0.759, 95%CI 0.627-0.919) was significantly higher, and early miscarriage rate (AC: aOR = 1.353, 95%CI 1.118-1.638; AC+GnRHa: aOR = 1.704, 95%CI 1.273-2.280) was significantly lower in NC compared to either AC group. Our study demonstrated that NC is associated with lower early miscarriage late in overall IVF population. There is a mild favor of AC+GnRH-a in younger women, while the priority of NC is remarkable in older women. Maternal age should be a considerable factor when determining endometrial preparation method for FET.

Which Hormones and Contraception for Women with APS? Exogenous Hormone Use in Women with APS

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Use of exogenous estrogen carries significant risk for patients with prothrombotic disorders including those with antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). This review summarizes current knowledge of contraceptive and other hormone therapies for aPL-positive and APS women and highlights knowledge gaps to guide future research.

RECENT FINDINGS

Studies support very low risk for most progestin-only contraceptives in patients with increased thrombotic risk, but suggest increased VTE risk with depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate. Highest efficacy contraceptives are intrauterine devices and subdermal implants, and these are recommended for women with aPL/APS. Progestin-only pills are effective and low risk. Perimenopausal symptoms may be treated with nonhormone therapies in aPL/APS patients: vasomotor symptoms can improve with nonhormonal medications and cognitive behavioral therapy, and genitourinary symptoms often improve with intravaginal estrogen that has limited systemic absorption.