Transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis presenting unusually high discordance between genotypic and phenotypic resistance to rifampicin in an endemic tuberculosis setting

A descriptive study on isoniazid resistance-associated mutations, clustering and treatment outcomes of drug-resistant tuberculosis in a high burden country

PURPOSE

To describe katG and inhA mutations, clinical characteristics, treatment outcomes and clustering of drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB) in the State of São Paulo, southeast Brazil.

METHODS

Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from patients diagnosed with drug-resistant TB were screened for mutations in katG and inhA genes by line probe assay and Sanger sequencing, and typed by IS6110-restriction fragment-length polymorphism for clustering assessment. Clinical, epidemiological and demographic data were obtained from surveillance information systems for TB.

RESULTS

Among the 298 isolates studied, 127 (42.6%) were isoniazid-monoresistant, 36 (12.1%) polydrug-resistant, 93 (31.2%) MDR, 16 (5.4%) pre-extensively drug-resistant (pre-XDR), 9 (3%) extensively drug-resistant (XDR) and 17 (5.7%) susceptible after isoniazid retesting. The frequency of katG 315 mutations alone was higher in MDR isolates, while inhA promoter mutations alone were more common in isoniazid-monoresistant isolates. Twenty-six isolates phenotypically resistant to isoniazid had no mutations either in katG or inhA genes. The isolates with inhA mutations were found more frequently in clusters (75%) when compared to the isolates with katG 315 mutations (59.8%, p = 0.04). In our population, being 35-64 years old, presenting MDR-, pre-XDR- or XDR-TB and being a retreatment case were associated with unfavourable TB treatment outcomes.

CONCLUSION

We found that katG and inhA mutations were not equally distributed between isoniazid-monoresistant and MDR isolates. In our population, clustering was higher for isolates with inhA mutations. Finally, unfavourable TB outcomes were associated with specific factors.

Metabolomic analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis reveals metabolic profiles for identification of drug-resistant tuberculosis

The detection of pre-extensively (pre-XDR) and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB) is challenging. Drug-susceptibility tests for some anti-TB drugs, especially ethambutol (ETH) and ethionamide (ETO), are problematic due to overlapping thresholds to differentiate between susceptible and resistant phenotypes. We aimed to identify possible metabolomic markers to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) strains causing pre-XDR and XDR-TB. The metabolic patterns of ETH- and ETO-resistant Mtb isolates were also investigated. Metabolomics of 150 Mtb isolates (54 pre-XDR, 63 XDR-TB and 33 pan-susceptible; pan-S) were investigated. Metabolomics of ETH and ETO phenotypically resistant subgroups were analyzed using UHPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS. Orthogonal partial least-squares discriminant analysis revealed distinct separation in all pairwise comparisons among groups. Two metabolites (meso-hydroxyheme and itaconic anhydride) were able to differentiate the pre-XDR and XDR-TB groups from the pan-S group with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity. In comparisons of the ETH and ETO phenotypically resistant subsets, sets of increased (ETH = 15, ETO = 7) and decreased (ETH = 1, ETO = 6) metabolites specific for the resistance phenotype of each drug were found. We demonstrated the potential for metabolomics of Mtb to differentiate among types of DR-TB as well as between isolates that were phenotypically resistant to ETO and ETH. Thus, metabolomics might be further applied for DR-TB diagnosis and patient management.

Global prevalence of drug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Tuberculosis is a bacterial infectious disease, which affects different parts of a human body, mainly lungs and can lead to the patient's death. The aim of this study is to investigate the global prevalence of drug-resistant tuberculosis using a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

In this study, the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar repositories were systematically searched to find studies reporting the global prevalence of drug-resistant tuberculosis. The search did not entail a lower time limit, and articles published up until August 2022 were considered. Random effects model was used to perform the analysis. The heterogeneity of the studies was examined with the I² test. Data analysis was conducted within the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software.

RESULTS

In the review of 148 studies with a sample size of 318,430 people, the I² index showed high heterogeneity (I² = 99.6), and accordingly random effects method was used to analyze the results. Publication bias was also examined using the Begg and Mazumdar correlation test which indicated the existence of publication bias in the studies (P = 0.008). According to our meta-analysis, the global pooled prevalence of multi-drug resistant TB is 11.6% (95% CI: 9.1-14.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The global prevalence of drug-resistant tuberculosis was found to be very high, thus health authorities should consider ways to control and manage the disease to prevent a wider spread of tuberculosis and potentially subsequent deaths.

Evaluation of xpert Mycobacterium tuberculosis rifampicin for tuberculosis diagnosis in a reference laboratory

Background

The Xpert Mycobacterium tuberculosis Rifampicin (MTB-RIF) is a technological innovation that presents precision and speed in the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB). The study aimed to evaluate the performance of Xpert MTB/RIF in the TB diagnosis and compare its results with those of culture, species identification, Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AST), and rpoB gene sequencing of discordant results in AST, used for the diagnosis of TB in a reference laboratory.

Methods

Cross-sectional descriptive study of pulmonary and extrapulmonary samples requesting Xpert MTB/RIF and culture for TB diagnosis from 2015 to 2019 at Adolfo Lutz Institute-São Paulo/Brazil. The analysis was performed with Epi-Info 7.2.1, presenting the distribution of frequencies and, for comparative analyses, Pearson's Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used, considering P ≤ 0.05 as statistically significant. For variables agreement, the Kappa method was used.

Results

A total of 1575 pulmonary and extrapulmonary samples were analyzed using Xpert MTB/RIF and culture, of which 293 were positive for the MTB Complex in both methodologies with a sensitivity of 94.55%; specificity of 95.97%; accuracy 95.69%; positive predictive value 85.53%; negative predictive value 98.59%, substantial agreement by Kappa 0.87, and detection sensitivity even at lower levels of bacillary load (P < 0.05). The Xpert MTB/RIF and AST showed concordant results (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The study brings forward that the Xpert MTB/RIF shows substantial agreement with the results of culture and AST, contributing to the diagnosis of TB and the rapid detection of resistance. The sequencing of resistant cultures in Xpert MTB/RIF and sensitivity in AST identified the H526N mutation, characterized by a low level of resistance to RIF.

On the Consequences of Poorly Defined Breakpoints for Rifampin Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex

In a recent report of a systematic review of critical concentrations (CCs), the World Health Organization (WHO) lowered the rifampin (RIF) CC for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex using Middlebrook 7H10 medium and the Bactec Mycobacterial Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) 960 system from 1 to 0.5 μg/ml. The previous RIF CC for 7H10 had been in use for over half a century. Because it had served as the de facto reference standard, it contributed to the endorsement of inappropriately high CCs for other AST methods, including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved MGIT system. Moreover, this resulted in confusion about the interpretation of seven borderline resistance mutations in rpoB (i.e., L430P, D435Y, H445L, H445N, H445S, L452P, and I491F). In this issue of the Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Shea et al. (J Clin Microbiol 59:e01885-20, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01885-20) provide evidence that the CC endorsed by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute for the Sensititre MYCOTB system, which is not FDA approved but is CE-IVD marked in the European Union, is likely also too high. These findings underscore the importance of calibrating AST methods against a rigorously defined reference standard, as recently proposed by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, as well as the value of routine next-generation sequencing for investigating discordant AST results.