Reported accuracy of cranial closing wedge ostectomy variants for management of canine cranial cruciate ligament insufficiency: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective and owner-reported outcomes after modified cranial closing wedge ostectomy: a case series

Immediate and longer-term outcomes of a cranial closing wedge ostectomy variant for management of canine cranial cruciate ligament disease were assessed in this single-center retrospective consecutive study. Records and radiographs were retrieved and assessed by three independent observers to evaluate tibial plateau angle, anatomical-mechanical axis angle, tibial tuberosity distalization, and mechanical axis length before and after surgery. Kinetic gait analysis and owner questionnaires were used to assess clinical outcomes. Seventeen stifles from fifteen dogs were evaluated radiographically. Mean error from target tibial plateau angle was 0.4 degrees. Anatomical-mechanical axis angles reduced from mean 2.9 degrees preoperatively to mean - 0.9 degrees postoperatively. Tibial tuberosity distalization was mean 5.0% of mechanical axis length, and mean reduction in mechanical axis length was 0.1%. Increased tibial plateau angles were noted in 8/17 stifles, with a mean of 9.6 degrees at short-term follow-up. Major complications were observed in 9/17 stifles. Long term follow-up (mean 832 days) was obtained with gait analysis in 8/15 dogs and with questionnaire in 11/15. Most dogs (9/11) were weakly to moderately affected by osteoarthritis symptoms. All values for peak vertical force and vertical impulse normalized to body weight exceeded local lower reference limits for normal dogs, indicating acceptable limb use. Satisfactory immediate and long-term clinical outcomes appear to be possible with this technique, but the high incidence of shorter-term complications may caution against the technique or the fixation and management described here.

Cranial closing wedge ostectomies for management of canine cranial cruciate ligament insufficiency: Comparison and geometric modelling of errors

Variants of the cranial closing wedge ostectomy (CCWO) may be used to manage cranial cruciate ligament deficient stifles by reduction of the tibial plateau angle (TPA). Concerns have been raised about predictability of achieving target TPA, limb shortening, axis shift, and distalization of the tibial tuberosity. Landmarks derived from tibial radiographs (n = 50) by 5 observers, along with outlines of the cranial and caudal proximal tibial cortices, were used to simulate six CCWO variants. Tested variants were Slocum-type (n = 2), modified (n = 2), isosceles, and anatomical-mechanical axis (AMA)-based CCWO. Observer specific landmarks were used to model pre- and postoperative errors in TPA measurement. Mean landmarks were used to compare key outcome variables between the variants, as well as modelling errors in positioning the wedge apex. Variants differed markedly in TPA, axis shift, mechanical axis length changes, and tibial tuberosity distalization, with more proximally positioned wedges performing better than distally positioned wedges. Errors in TPA identification appeared partially self-correcting due to altered axis shifts. Craniocaudal shifts in wedge apex position had the most severe effects on outcome variables, especially in shorter tibiae with greater initial TPA values. Recent CCWO variants are likely to achieve a satisfactory postoperative TPA with limited axis shift. The AMA-based CCWO technique appears to influence MA length and tibial tuberosity position the least, and apart from the effect on TPA where no advantage could be discerned, it appeared more robust in the face of wedge apex positioning errors than the other techniques.