Immunotherapy for prostate cancer: an emerging treatment modality

Clinical implications of PTEN loss in prostate cancer

Genomic aberrations of the PTEN tumour suppressor gene are among the most common in prostate cancer. Inactivation of PTEN by deletion or mutation is identified in ∼20% of primary prostate tumour samples at radical prostatectomy and in as many as 50% of castration-resistant tumours. Loss of phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN) function leads to activation of the PI3K-AKT (phosphoinositide 3-kinase-RAC-alpha serine/threonine-protein kinase) pathway and is strongly associated with adverse oncological outcomes, making PTEN a potentially useful genomic marker to distinguish indolent from aggressive disease in patients with clinically localized tumours. At the other end of the disease spectrum, therapeutic compounds targeting nodes in the PI3K-AKT-mTOR (mechanistic target of rapamycin) signalling pathway are being tested in clinical trials for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Knowledge of PTEN status might be helpful to identify patients who are more likely to benefit from these therapies. To enable the use of PTEN status as a prognostic and predictive biomarker, analytically validated assays have been developed for reliable and reproducible detection of PTEN loss in tumour tissue and in blood liquid biopsies. The use of clinical-grade assays in tumour tissue has shown a robust correlation between loss of PTEN and its protein as well as a strong association between PTEN loss and adverse pathological features and oncological outcomes. In advanced disease, assessing PTEN status in liquid biopsies shows promise in predicting response to targeted therapy. Finally, studies have shown that PTEN might have additional functions that are independent of the PI3K-AKT pathway, including those affecting tumour growth through modulation of the immune response and tumour microenvironment.

Targeting androgen-independent pathways: new chances for patients with prostate cancer?

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the mainstay treatment for advanced prostate cancer (PC). Most patients eventually progress to a condition known as castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), characterized by lack of response to ADT. Although new androgen receptor signaling (ARS) inhibitors and chemotherapeutic agents have been introduced to overcome resistance to ADT, many patients progress because of primary or acquired resistance to these agents. This comprehensive review aims at exploring the mechanisms of resistance and progression of PC, with specific focus on alterations which lead to the activation of androgen receptor (AR)-independent pathways of survival. Our work integrates available clinical and preclinical data on agents which target these pathways, assessing their potential clinical implication in specific settings of patients. Given the rising interest of the scientific community in cancer immunotherapy strategies, further attention is dedicated to the role of immune evasion in PC.

Ipilimumab versus placebo after radiotherapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer that had progressed after docetaxel chemotherapy (CA184-043): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Ipilimumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that binds cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 to enhance antitumour immunity. Our aim was to assess the use of ipilimumab after radiotherapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer that progressed after docetaxel chemotherapy.

METHODS

We did a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial in which men with at least one bone metastasis from castration-resistant prostate cancer that had progressed after docetaxel treatment were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive bone-directed radiotherapy (8 Gy in one fraction) followed by either ipilimumab 10 mg/kg or placebo every 3 weeks for up to four doses. Non-progressing patients could continue to receive ipilimumab at 10 mg/kg or placebo as maintenance therapy every 3 months until disease progression, unacceptable toxic effect, or death. Patients were randomly assigned to either treatment group via a minimisation algorithm, and stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, alkaline phosphatase concentration, haemoglobin concentration, and investigator site. Patients and investigators were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was overall survival, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00861614.

FINDINGS

From May 26, 2009, to Feb 15, 2012, 799 patients were randomly assigned (399 to ipilimumab and 400 to placebo), all of whom were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Median overall survival was 11·2 months (95% CI 9·5-12·7) with ipilimumab and 10·0 months (8·3-11·0) with placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0·85, 0·72-1·00; p=0·053). However, the assessment of the proportional hazards assumption showed that it was violated (p=0·0031). A piecewise hazard model showed that the HR changed over time: the HR for 0-5 months was 1·46 (95% CI 1·10-1·95), for 5-12 months was 0·65 (0·50-0·85), and beyond 12 months was 0·60 (0·43-0·86). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were immune-related, occurring in 101 (26%) patients in the ipilimumab group and 11 (3%) of patients in the placebo group. The most frequent grade 3-4 adverse events included diarrhoea (64 [16%] of 393 patients in the ipilimumab group vs seven [2%] of 396 in the placebo group), fatigue (40 [11%] vs 35 [9%]), anaemia (40 [10%] vs 43 [11%]), and colitis (18 [5%] vs 0). Four (1%) deaths occurred because of toxic effects of the study drug, all in the ipilimumab group.

INTERPRETATION

Although there was no significant difference between the ipilimumab group and the placebo group in terms of overall survival in the primary analysis, there were signs of activity with the drug that warrant further investigation.

FUNDING

Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Feasibility of Applying Helper-Dependent Adenoviral Vectors for Cancer Immunotherapy

Adenoviruses (Ads) infect a broad range of tissue types, and derived vectors have been extensively used for gene therapy. Helper-dependent Ad vectors (HDAds), devoid of viral coding sequences, allow for insertion of large or multiple transgenes in a single vector and have been preclinically used for the study of genetic disorders. However, the clinical application of Ad vectors including HDAds for genetic disorders has been hampered by an acute toxic response. This characteristic, while disadvantageous for gene replacement therapy, could be strategically advantageous for the activation of an immune response if HDAds were used as an adjunct treatment in cancer. Cancer treatments including immunotherapy are frequently limited by the inhibitory environment produced by both tumors and their stroma, each of which express numerous inhibitory molecules. Hence, multiple inhibitory mechanisms must be overcome for development of anti-tumor immunity. The large coding capacity of HDAds can accommodate multiple immune modulating transgenes that could produce a combined effect to overcome tumor-derived inhibition and ensure intratumoral effector T-cell proliferation and function. In this review, we discuss the potential advantages of HDAds to cancer immunotherapy based on potent host immune responses to Ads.

Perspectives on immunotherapy in prostate cancer and solid tumors: where is the future?

The goals of any cancer therapy are to improve disease control, palliate pain and improve overall survival. We are fortunate to have in our cancer armamentarium two new immune-directed therapies which not only impact on disease control but also on overall survival. The first, sipuleucel-T, a cellular-based vaccine, was approved for prostate cancer and was shown to be safe with minimal toxicity. The second, ipilimumab, a monoclonal antibody directed to an immunologic checkpoint molecule, showed a survival benefit in patients with advanced melanoma. Benefit appeared to correlate in some cases with the development of autoimmune events, signaling that the immune system is in overdrive against the cancer. Where we are and where we will likely go are the topics to be discussed in this review.

Dual antigen target-based immunotherapy for prostate cancer eliminates the growth of established tumors in mice

AIMS

We have previously shown that immunization with an adenovirus vector carrying an individual antigen induces antigen-specific CD8 T cells actively engaged in the destruction of tumor cells expressing the cognate antigen. In order to expand the range of antitumor responses beyond an individual antigen, we designed a recombinant adenovirus type 5 (rAd5) carrying a fusion construct of two full-length antigens. We used this adenovirus vector to test the concept that multiantigenic effector T cells could be generated simultaneously following a single immunization.

METHOD

To perform the rAd5 constructs, we selected a combination of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA) genes based on their restricted distribution within the prostate tissue and their association with the development and progression of prostate cancer.

RESULTS

Immunization of mice with rAd5 vector carrying a fusion construct of PSA and PSCA (Ad5-PSA/PSCA) simultaneously induced the expansion of anti-PSA and anti-PSCA CD8 T cells, as measured by intracellular cytokine staining for IFN-γ. The antigen-specific T-cell responses that developed were efficient in eliminating the target cells expressing cognate antigens measured by an in vivo cytotoxic T-cell assay. The in vivo tumor growth study showed that immunization of mice with Ad5-PSA/PSCA vaccine induced strong antitumor immunity when challenged with mouse prostate tumor cell lines (RM11) expressing human PSA (RM11/PSA). To further analyze the impact on therapeutic efficacy of Ad5-PSA/PSCA vaccine against the tumor cells expressing PSA and PSCA (RM11-PSA/PSCA) antigens, we injected mice with Ad5-PSA/PSCA vaccine. The vaccine inhibited the growth of established tumors with 80% of the mice becoming tumor free. These data provide useful information that antigen-specific effector T cells can be generated simultaneously and that their additive antitumor effect has the potential to eliminate the growth of established tumors. Therefore, the immunotherapy approach of using the simultaneous targeting of dual antigens associated with prostate cancer may have important implications for human clinical trials.

Development of an MHC class I L(d)-restricted PSA peptide-loaded tetramer for detection of PSA-specific CD8+ T cells in the mouse

Objectives

We set out to develop a prostate specific antigen (PSA) peptide-loaded tetramer for enumeration of PSA-specific CD8⁺ T cells in the Balb/c mouse model.

Methods

A candidate MHC class I PSA peptide (HPQKVTKFML_188–197) was selected based on its ability to restimulate PSA-specific CD8⁺ T cells to secrete IFN-γ in our assays. Next, H-2L^d-restricted peptide-loaded and fluorescently labeled tetramers were produced in conjunction with the NIH Tetramer Core Facility. This tetramer was then tested for staining specificity and optimized for detection of PSA-specific CD8⁺ T cells induced by our PSA-encoding adenovirus tumor vaccine.

Results

The MHC class I PSA peptide demonstrated successful restimulation of CD8⁺ T cells isolated from mice previously vaccinated with a PSA-encoding adenovirus tumor vaccine, with no restimulation observed in control vaccinated mice. The peptide-loaded H-2L^d tetramer exhibited the desired binding specificity and allowed for detection and frequency determination of PSA-specific CD8⁺ T cells by flow cytometry.

Conclusions

We have successfully designed and validated a PSA peptide tetramer for use in the Balb/c mouse model that can be used to test PSA-based prostate cancer vaccines. Until now, PSA-specific CD8⁺ T cells in the mouse have only been detectable via cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) assays or intracellular cytokine staining, which primarily assess Ag-specific functional activity, not their absolute number. This research tool provides laboratories the ability to directly quantitate CD8⁺ T cells elicited by PSA-specific immunotherapies and cancer vaccines that are tested in mouse models.

Novel targeted agents on the horizon for castration-resistant prostate cancer

Androgen deprivation treatment in prostate cancer patients is well established; however, resistance to such treatment manifests itself by progression to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Despite significant advances in treatment options for patients with CRPC, their prognosis remains poor. Resistance results from multiple processes that facilitate cancer cell growth and survival. Mechanisms underlying the shift to castrate resistance have been attributed to a complex interplay of clonal selection, reactivation of the androgen receptor axis despite castrate levels of serum testosterone, stress-induced prosurvival genes and cytoprotective chaperone networks and alternative mitogenic growth factor pathways. This article discusses several pathways involved in the development of CRPC, with a particular focus on those mechanisms that have led to the development of new targeted therapies.