1
|
Systematic assessment of information about surgical urinary stone treatment on YouTube. World J Urol 2020; 39:935-942. [PMID: 32468108 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03236-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To systematically assess the quality of videos on the surgical treatment of urinary stones available on YouTube using validated instruments. METHODS A systematic search for videos on YouTube addressing treatment options of urinary stones was performed in October 2019. Assessed parameters included basic data (e.g. number of views), the grade of misinformation reporting of conflicts of interest. Quality of content was analyzed using the validated DISCERN questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS A total of 100 videos with a median of 26,234 views (1020-1,720,521) were included in the analysis. Of these, only 26 videos were rated to contain no misinformation and only nine disclosed potential conflicts of interest. Overall, the median quality of the videos was low (2 out of 5 points for DISCERN question 16). Videos uploaded by healthcare professionals and medical societies/organizations offered significantly higher levels of quality. In particular, the videos provided by the EAU achieved the highest rating with a median score of 3.0. CONCLUSIONS The majority of videos concerning the surgical treatment of urinary stones have a low quality of content, are potentially subject to commercial bias and do not report on conflicts of interest. Videos provided by medical societies, such as the EAU, provide a higher level of quality. This highlights the importance of active recommendation of evidence-based patient education materials.
Collapse
|
2
|
Esposito C, Autorino G, Masieri L, Castagnetti M, Del Conte F, Coppola V, Cerulo M, Crocetto F, Escolino M. Minimally Invasive Management of Bladder Stones in Children. Front Pediatr 2020; 8:618756. [PMID: 33575232 PMCID: PMC7870782 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2020.618756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Bladder stones (BS) are rare in children. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) seems to be nowadays the procedure of choice to treat pediatric patients with BS. This study aimed to analyze retrospectively our experience with percutaneous cystolithotomy, endourological treatment with Holmium laser and robotic cystolithotomy in children with BS. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 13 children (eight boys and five girls) with BS who were treated at our centers between July 2013 and July 2020. The patients received three different MIS procedures for stones removal: five underwent robotic cystolithotomy, five underwent endourological treatment and three received percutaneous cystolithotomy (PCCL). We preferentially adopted endourological approach for stones <10 mm, percutaneous approach between 2014 and 2016 and robotic approach since 2016 for larger stones. Results: Mean patients' age at the time of diagnosis was 13 years (range 5-18). Ten/13 patients (76.9%) had primary BS and 3/13 patients (23.1%) had secondary BS. Mean stone size was 18.8 mm (range 7-50). In all cases the stones were removed successfully. One Clavien II post-operative complication occurred following PCCL (33.3%). All the procedures were completed without conversions. Operative time ranged between 40 and 90 min (mean 66) with no significant difference between the three methods (p = 0.8). Indwelling bladder catheter duration was significantly longer after PCCL (mean 72 h) compared with robotic and endourological approaches (mean 15.6 h) (p = 0.001). Hospitalization was significantly longer after PCCL (mean 7.6 days) compared with the other two approaches (mean 4.7 days) (p = 0.001). The endourological approach was the most cost-effective method compared with the other two approaches (p = 0.001). Conclusions: Minimally invasive management of bladder stones in children was safe and effective. Endourological management was the most cost-effective method, allowing a shorter hospital stay compared with the other procedures but it was mainly indicated for smaller stones with a diameter < 10 mm. Based upon our preliminary results, robotic surgery seemed to be a feasible treatment option for BS larger than 15-20 mm. It allowed to remove the big stones without crushing them with a safe and easy closure of the bladder wall thanks to the easy suturing provided by the Robot technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ciro Esposito
- Pediatric Surgery Unit, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Autorino
- Pediatric Surgery Unit, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Masieri
- Pediatric Urology Unit, Meyer Children Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Fulvia Del Conte
- Pediatric Surgery Unit, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Coppola
- Pediatric Surgery Unit, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Mariapina Cerulo
- Pediatric Surgery Unit, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Felice Crocetto
- Urology Unit, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Maria Escolino
- Pediatric Surgery Unit, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ballesteros N, Snow ZA, Moscardi PRM, Ransford GA, Gomez P, Castellan M. Robotic Management of Urolithiasis in the Pediatric Population. Front Pediatr 2019; 7:351. [PMID: 31508400 PMCID: PMC6714108 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2019.00351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2019] [Accepted: 08/06/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
A variety of surgical techniques exist for the management of urolithiasis. Minimally invasive techniques have replaced open surgery in the last few decades. For complex stone management, robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) has emerged as a safe and feasible alternative in adults. The literature for RALS for urolithiasis (RALS-UL) in the pediatric population is scarce. Herein, we present a review of the literature in both adult and pediatric patients as well as our experience using RALS-UL at our institutions. Special attention is given to the synchronous management of urolithiasis when surgery is performed for other conditions such as ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO), and a supplemental video is provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Ballesteros
- Division of Pediatric Urology, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Zachary A Snow
- Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, United States
| | - Paulo R M Moscardi
- Division of Pediatric Urology, Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL, United States
| | - George A Ransford
- Division of Pediatric Urology, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Pablo Gomez
- Division of Pediatric Urology, Florida Hospital for Children, Orlando, FL, United States
| | - Miguel Castellan
- Division of Pediatric Urology, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, FL, United States.,Division of Pediatric Urology, Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL, United States.,Division of Pediatric Urology, Joe DiMaggio Children's Hospital, Hollywood, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Landa-Juárez S, Rivera-Pereira BM, Castillo-Fernández AM. Management of Pediatric Urolithiasis Using a Combination of Laparoscopic Lithotomy and Pyeloscopy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2018; 28:766-769. [PMID: 29406799 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2016.0652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive procedures have become the standard option for treatment of urinary stones; the use of more invasive techniques is not a common practice currently. This emergent technology is not always available and laparoscopy is the alternative option. There are few reports of laparoscopic management for urinary lithiasis in pediatric patients. This study is about the use of laparoscopic surgery combined with pyeloscopy as a feasible first-line treatment for pediatric urolithiasis in renal and proximal ureteral locations. PATIENTS AND METHODS We reviewed the records of 14 patients with renal and proximal ureteral stones who underwent laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and pyeloscopy in a period from January 2011 to July 2016. The outcome measures were needed for auxiliary procedures, treatment success, and complication rates. RESULTS A total of 16 procedures were carried out in 14 patients, 15 transperitoneal and 1 retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomies were done. It was necessary to perform upper ureterolithotomies to remove ureteral stones in 2 cases. The holmium laser and/or pneumatic lithotripter were used to fragment staghorn calculi. Some of the complications were blood transfusion in 12.5% and self-limited urinary leak in 18.7% of the patients. The success rate after undergoing one procedure was 92.8%. CONCLUSIONS Transperitoneal or retroperitoneal laparoscopic lithotomy is a safe and feasible procedure for the treatment of pediatric urolithiasis. It can be an alternative to shock-wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy when these are not feasible or possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergio Landa-Juárez
- 1 Department of Pediatric Urology, Pediatric Hospital CMN SXXI , IMSS, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Bárbara M Rivera-Pereira
- 2 Department of Pediatric Surgery, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social , Mexico City, Mexico .,3 Department of Pediatric Urology, Hospital de Pediatria , Centro Médico Nacional SXXI, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Ana M Castillo-Fernández
- 3 Department of Pediatric Urology, Hospital de Pediatria , Centro Médico Nacional SXXI, Mexico City, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schoenthaler M, Hein S, Seitz C, Türk C, Danuser H, Vach W, Miernik A. The stone surgeon in the mirror: how are German-speaking urologists treating large renal stones today? World J Urol 2017; 36:467-473. [PMID: 29218404 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-017-2148-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2017] [Accepted: 12/01/2017] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To elucidate the current treatment strategies of LRS in German-speaking Europe. Little is known about the treatment of large renal stones (LRS > 3 cm) in daily urological practice. LRS therapy can be, however, challenging and hazardous. MATERIALS AND METHODS A 39 item web-based survey was performed among urologists listed by the German, Austrian and Swiss Associations of Urology, addressing professionals treating LRS "on their own" and working in a German-speaking country. Uniparametric descriptions indicated as absolute numbers and percentages without p values, simple linear associations and bubble plots without arithmetic means or bar charts with standard deviation between targeted parameters and percentages were used. RESULTS 266 of the 6586 responding urologists claimed to treat urinary stones on a regular basis. The majority of them were male (90.2%) and over 50 years old (42.9%). Most stones are treated in non-university hospitals (69.5%). 81.9% of all the institutions treat more than 150 cases/y. Open surgery is still performed in 45.5% of the centres, laparoscopy in 32%. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is the primary treatment option. Antimicrobial strategies vary considerably. Serious complications seem to be rare. However, quite a few responders reported treatment-related deaths. The main limitation is the absolute number of urologists performing LRS treatment, which is unknown. CONCLUSIONS The German-speaking urologist treating LRS is a male and over 50. Although he performs PNL primarily, he is not averse to open surgery and SWL. He applies guidelines and employs modern equipment. Only antimicrobial strategies are out of line with the international standards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Schoenthaler
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Centre-University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Simon Hein
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Centre-University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christian Seitz
- Department of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christian Türk
- Department of Urology/Stone Centre, Hospital Rudolfstiftung, Ziehrerplatz 7/7, 1030, Vienna, Austria
| | - Hansjörg Danuser
- Department of Urology, Kantonsspital, 6000, Lucerne 16, Switzerland
| | - Werner Vach
- Centre for Medical Biometry and Medical Informatics, University of Freiburg, Stefan-Meier Str. 26, 79104, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Arkadiusz Miernik
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Centre-University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Laparoscopic and robotic surgery for stone disease. Urolithiasis 2017; 46:125-127. [PMID: 29170855 DOI: 10.1007/s00240-017-1014-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2017] [Accepted: 11/10/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Treatment for stone disease has evolved drastically during the past 3-4 decades. Ureteroscopy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy along with SWL, provides the means to treat practically all urinary tract stones with minimal invasion to the patients. However, for complex stone case scenarios where open surgery is being considered, a less invasive and better tolerated option such as laparoscopy (robot assisted or not) can be performed. The present manuscript reviews role of laparoscopic and robotic surgery in treating urinary tract stones.
Collapse
|
7
|
Müller PF, Schlager D, Hein S, Bach C, Miernik A, Schoeb DS. Robotic stone surgery - Current state and future prospects: A systematic review. Arab J Urol 2017; 16:357-364. [PMID: 30140470 PMCID: PMC6104666 DOI: 10.1016/j.aju.2017.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2017] [Revised: 09/19/2017] [Accepted: 09/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To provide a comprehensive review of robot-assisted surgery in urolithiasis and to consider the future prospects of robotic approaches in stone surgery. Materials and methods We performed a systematic PubMed© literature search using predefined Medical Subject Headings search terms to identify PubMed-listed clinical research studies on robotic stone surgery. All authors screened the results for eligibility and two independent reviewers performed the data extraction. Results The most common approach in robotic stone surgery is a robot-assisted pyelolithotomy using the da Vinci™ system (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Several studies show this technique to be comparable to classic laparoscopic and open surgical interventions. One study that focused on ureteric stones showed a similar result. In recent years, promising data on robotic intrarenal surgery have been reported (Roboflex Avicenna™; Elmed Medical Systems, Ankara, Turkey). Initial studies have shown its feasibility and high stone-free rates and prove that this novel endoscopic approach is safe for the patient and comfortable for the surgeon. Conclusions The benefits of robotic devices in stone surgery in existing endourological, laparoscopic, and open treatment strategies still need elucidation. Although recent data are promising, more prospective randomised controlled studies are necessary to clarify the impact of this technique on patient safety and stone-free rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe F Müller
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Medical Centre, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Schlager
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Medical Centre, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Simon Hein
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Medical Centre, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christian Bach
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Arkadiusz Miernik
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Medical Centre, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Dominik S Schoeb
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Medical Centre, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nefrolitotomía retrógrada flexible láser en el manejo de la litiasis renal mayor de 2cm como alternativa a la nefrolitotomía percutánea. Rev Urol 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.uroco.2015.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
9
|
Neira Melo IM, Estrada Guerrero A, Celis Reyes E. Retrograde flexible nephrolithotomy in the management of large lithiasic masses as an alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. UROLOGÍA COLOMBIANA 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.uroco.2016.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
10
|
The role of open and laparoscopic stone surgery in the modern era of endourology. Nat Rev Urol 2015; 12:392-400. [DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2015.141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
11
|
Postoperative Complications Leading to Death after Coagulum Pyelolithotomy in a Tetraplegic Patient: Can We Prevent Prolonged Ileus, Recurrent Intestinal Obstruction due to Adhesions Requiring Laparotomies, Chest Infection Warranting Tracheostomy, and Mechanical Ventilation? Case Rep Urol 2013; 2013:682316. [PMID: 23533931 PMCID: PMC3600272 DOI: 10.1155/2013/682316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2013] [Accepted: 02/12/2013] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
A 22-year-old male sustained C-6 tetraplegia in 1992. In 1993, intravenous pyelography revealed normal kidneys. Suprapubic cystostomy was performed. He underwent open cystolithotomy in 2004 and 2008. In 2009, computed tomography revealed bilateral renal calculi. Coagulum pyelolithotomy of left kidney was performed. Pleura and peritoneum were opened. Peritoneum could not be closed. Following surgery, he developed pulmonary atelectasis; he required tracheostomy and mechanical ventilation. He did not tolerate nasogastric feeding. CT of abdomen revealed bilateral renal calculi and features of proximal small bowel obstruction. Laparotomy revealed small bowel obstruction due to dense inflammatory adhesions involving multiple small bowel loops which protruded through the defect in sigmoid mesocolon and fixed posteriorly over the area of previous intervention. All adhesions were divided. The wide defect in mesocolon was not closed. In 2010, this patient again developed vomiting and distension of abdomen. Laparotomy revealed multiple adhesions. He developed chest infection and required ventilatory support again. He developed pressure sores and depression. Later abdominal symptoms recurred. This patient's general condition deteriorated and he expired in 2011.
Conclusion. Risk of postoperative complications could have been reduced if minimally invasive surgery had been performed instead of open surgery to remove stones from left kidney. Suprapubic cystostomy predisposed to repeated occurrence of stones in urinary bladder and kidneys. Spinal cord physicians should try to establish intermittent catheterisation regime in tetraplegic patients.
Collapse
|