Radiation Therapy for Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

EMX2 inhibits clear cell renal cell carcinoma progress via modulating Akt/FOXO3a pathway

Empty spiracles homeobox 2 (EMX2) is initially identified as a key transcription factor that plays an essential role in the regulation of neuronal development and some brain disorders. Recently, several studies emphasized that EMX2 could as a tumor suppressor, but its role in human clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) remains unclear. In the present study, we investigated the role and underlying mechanism of EMX2 in the regulation of ccRCC progress. Our results demonstrated that EMX2 expression was markedly decreased in ccRCC tissues and cell lines, and low EMX2 expression predicted the poor prognosis of ccRCC patients. In addition, forced expression of EMX2 significantly inhibited the cell growth, migration, and invasion in vitro, as well as ccRCC tumor growth in nude mice, via, at least in part, regulating Akt/FOXO3a pathway. In detail, EMX2 could attenuate the phosphorylation levels of Akt and FOXO3a, and increase FOXO3a expression without affecting total Akt expression in vivo and in vitro. Meanwhile, shRNA-mediated knockdown of FOXO3a expression could obviously attenuate the effects of EMX2 on cell growth, migration, invasion, and tumor growth. Furthermore, EMX2 could significantly attenuate the interaction between Akt and FOXO3a. Taken together, our results demonstrated that EMX2 could inhibit ccRCC progress through, at least in part, modulating Akt/FOXO3a signaling pathway, thus representing a novel role and underlying mechanism of EMX2 in the regulation of ccRCC progress.

E2F2 serves as an essential prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target for human renal cell carcinoma by presenting "E2F2/miR-16-5p/SPTLC1" schema

BACKGROUND

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a common malignant tumor of the urinary system with high mortality and morbidity. Although E2F2, a classical transcription factor implicated in cell cycle, has been shown to foster tumorigenesis in several human cancers, it could not draw a satisfy answer referring to precise downstream signaling axis in RCC development yet.

METHODS

Based on the publicly available data from TCGA database, expression patterns of E2F2, SPTLC1 and miR-16-5p were identified, either with the ability to predict the prognosis of patients with RCC, which was further validated in 38 paired RCC tissues and matched adjacent tissues by RT-qPCR and Western blot, respectively. Their cellular biofunctions were evaluated using MTT, EdU, Colony formation and transwell assays. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and luciferase reporter assay were employed to certain the exquisite core transcription regulatory circuitry of E2F2/miR-16-5p/SPTLC1 in RCC progression, which was also determined in xenograft tumor model.

RESULTS

Consistent with the public TCGA database, E2F2 was significantly increased in RCC tissues and cells, indicating shorter overall survival. Mechanistically, E2F2 served as a transcriptional activator of miR-16-5p, thus accounting for its negative regulation on SPTLC1 expression. E2F2 knockdown-mediated suppressive biofunctions on RCC cells were rescued by miR-16-5p mimics, while this effect was abolished again by SPTLC1 overexpression. Role of E2F2 on RCC tumorigenesis via the miR-16-5p/SPTLC1 axis was verified both in vitro and in vivo.

CONCLUSION

E2F2 promoted RCC progression via the miR-16-5p/SPTLC1 axis, which may represent a novel prognostic and therapeutic biomarker for RCC.

Prognostic Impact of Baseline Neutrophil-to-Eosinophil Ratio in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Nivolumab Therapy in Second or Later Lines

Background

Inflammation is a crucial component in carcinogenesis. The neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) has been studied as a biomarker of prognosis and predictive of response in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). In the present study, we evaluated the relevance of baseline NER on the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes in real-world patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab in second or subsequent lines. We also assessed the association of baseline NER with objective response, as well as with toxicity and histology.

Methods

In this multicenter retrospective analysis of patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab, the last systemic absolute neutrophil and eosinophil count before treatment with nivolumab was used to calculate the NER. An additive Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify the cut-off point for NER considering PFS and the patients were allocated into low and high NER groups. Median OS and median PFS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator, and survival curves of groups were compared using the log-rank test. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were used to study OS and PFS and Fisher’s exact test was performed to evaluate the association of NER with the response, toxicity, and histology.

Results

The 49 analyzed patients had a median follow-up of nine months. The NER cut-off was established at 48, locating 29 patients in the low NER group (NER < 48) and 20 in the high NER group (NER ≥ 48). Median PFS and median OS were significantly shorter in patients with high NER versus low NER (3 vs. 30 months (p < 0.001) and 6 vs. 24 months (p = 0.002), respectively). Multivariable analyses showed that NER (HR 3.92 (95% CI: 1.66-9.23), p = 0.002) was an independent factor for PFS and that NER (HR 3.85 (95% CI: 1.33-11.17), p = 0.013) and progressive disease (HR 5.62 (95% CI: 1.88-16.83), p = 0.002) were independent factors for OS. NER was significantly associated with objective response rate (ORR) (NER ≥ 48-12.5% vs. NER < 48-87.5%, p = 0.003), immune-related adverse events (irAEs) (NER ≥ 48-10.0% vs. NER < 48-42.9%, p = 0.014), and tumor’s histology as patients of high NER group had more non-clear cell carcinoma than low NER group (35.0% vs. 7.4%, p = 0.017).

Conclusion

Our real-world data analysis of NER in patients with mRCC confirmed the prognostic value of this biomarker, supporting clinical utility in predicting survival. Results also suggested an association between lower NER and better ORR, and that irAEs occur more frequently in patients with a lower NER. However, further large-scale prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and to validate this biomarker.

Autophagy Induced by Micheliolide Alleviates Acute Irradiation-Induced Intestinal Injury via Inhibition of the NLRP3 Inflammasome

Radiation-induced enteropathy (RIE) is one of the most common and fatal complications of abdominal radiotherapy, with no effective interventions available. Pyroptosis, a form of proinflammatory regulated cell death, was recently found to play a vital role in radiation-induced inflammation and may represent a novel therapeutic target for RIE. To investigate this, we found that micheliolide (MCL) exerted anti-radiation effects in vitro. Therefore, we investigated both the therapeutic effects of MCL in RIE and the possible mechanisms by which it may be therapeutic. We developed a mouse model of RIE by exposing C57BL/6J mice to abdominal irradiation. MCL treatment significantly ameliorated radiation-induced intestinal tissue damage, inflammatory cell infiltration, and proinflammatory cytokine release. In agreement with these observations, the beneficial effects of MCL treatment in RIE were abolished in Becn1^+/− mice. Furthermore, super-resolution microscopy revealed a close association between NLR pyrin domain three and lysosome-associated membrane protein/light chain 3-positive vesicles following MCL treatment, suggesting that MCL facilitates phagocytosis of the NLR pyrin domain three inflammasome. In summary, MCL-mediated induction of autophagy can ameliorate RIE by NLR pyrin domain three inflammasome degradation and identify MCL as a novel therapy for RIE.

Renal cell carcinoma, part 3

ABSTRACT

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for most renal malignancies. This article, the last in a three-part series, presents treatment options for RCC using the American Joint Committee on Cancer Tumor, Node, and Metastasis staging system as a framework, as well as nursing-care options for patients undergoing partial or radical nephrectomy.

Eosinophil counts as a relevant prognostic marker for response to nivolumab in the management of renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective study

Background

Despite improvements in the management of renal cell carcinomas (RCC) with the advent of immunotherapy, only a few patients respond to these treatments. Predictors of response to nivolumab are currently being investigated but are still lacking.

Aim of the study

To evaluate eosinophil levels and their variations during treatment as an accurate biomarker for outcome in metastatic RCC treated with nivolumab.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was carried out for patients with metastatic RCC treated with nivolumab. Absolute eosinophil counts, their variation, and relative change were evaluated at six weeks. Relative eosinophil change was categorized in three groups (≥10%‐decrease, no change, ≥10%‐increase). Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to determine whether eosinophils and their variations were prognostic markers for response at the first scan evaluation, progression‐free survival, and overall survival.

Results

Sixty‐five patients aged on average 66 years, 68% men, and 77% with good or intermediate International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk group were included. The median follow‐up was 16.6 months. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached for good prognosis and was 22.5 and 6.5 months for intermediate and poor prognosis, respectively. An increase in eosinophils and relative eosinophil change at six weeks of nivolumab was associated with a good response to immunotherapy (p = 0.012 and p = 0.024 respectively). In the group of patients with a 10%‐decrease in relative change, PFS reduced significantly compared to the other groups (p = 0.0044 with the 10%‐increase group and p = 0.03 with the no‐change group). This relative increase was independent of IMDC risks factors for better OS (HR = 3.3 [1.45–7.4]; p = 0.004). The eosinophil baseline level was not associated with response to treatment.

Conclusion

Eosinophil levels and relative eosinophil change at 6 weeks might be good prognostic markers for response to nivolumab for metastatic RCC, and were associated with better PFS and OS.