The Evolving Role of Metastasectomy for Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Surgical metastasectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the era of targeted and immune therapy: a narrative review

PURPOSE

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) still harbours a big propensity for future metastasis. Combinations of immune and targeted therapies are currently the cornerstone of management with a less clear role for surgical metastasectomy (SM).

METHODS

We performed a narrative review of literature searching for the available evidence on the yield of surgical metastasectomy in the era of targeted and immune therapies. The review consisted of a PubMed search of relevant articles using the Mesh terms:" renal cell carcinoma", "surgery», «resection", "metastasectomy", "molecular targeted therapies", "immune checkpoint inhibitors" alone or in combination.

RESULTS

In this review, we exposed the place of surgical metastasectomy within a multimodal treatment algorithm for mRCC Also, we detailed the patient selection criteria that yielded the best results when SM was performed. Finally, we discussed the feasibility and advantages of SM per organ site.

CONCLUSION

Our work was able to show that SM could be proposed as a consolidation treatment to excise residual lesions that were deemed unresectable prior to a combination of systemic therapies. Contrastingly, it can be proposed as an upfront treatment, leaving systemic therapies as an alternative in case of future relapse. However, patient selection regarding their performance status, metastatic sites, number of lesions and tumorous characteristics is of paramount importance.

Understanding and integrating cytoreductive nephrectomy with immune checkpoint inhibitors in the management of metastatic RCC

Cytoreductive nephrectomy became accepted as standard of care for selected patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) because of improved survival observed in patients treated with cytoreductive nephrectomy in combination with interferon-α in two randomized clinical trials published in 2001. Over the past two decades, novel systemic therapies have shown higher treatment response rates and improved survival outcomes compared with interferon-α. During this rapid evolution of mRCC treatments, systemic therapies have been the primary focus of clinical trials. Results from multiple retrospective studies continue to suggest an overall survival benefit for selected patients treated with nephrectomy in combination with systemic mRCC treatments, with the notable exception of one debated clinical trial. The optimal timing for surgery is unknown, and proper patient selection remains crucial to improving surgical outcomes. As systemic therapies continue to evolve, clinicians have an increasing need to understand how to incorporate cytoreductive nephrectomy into the management of mRCC.

Solitary versus multiple bone metastases in the appendicular skeleton

Aims

We first sought to compare survival for patients treated surgically for solitary and multiple metastases in the appendicular skeleton, and second, to explore the role of complete and incomplete resection (R0 and R1/R2) in patients with a solitary bony metastasis in the appendicular skeleton.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study on a population-based cohort of all adult patients treated surgically for bony metastases of the appendicular skeleton between January 2014 and December 2019. We excluded patients in whom the status of bone metastases and resection margin was unknown. Patients were followed until the end of the study or to their death. We had no loss to follow-up. We used Kaplan-Meier analysis (with log-rank test) to evaluate patient survival. We identified 506 operations in 459 patients. A total of 120 operations (in 116 patients) were for solitary metastases and 386 (in 345 patients) for multiple metastases. Of the 120 operations, 70 (in 69 patients) had no/an unknown status of visceral metastases (solitary group) and 50 (in 49 patients) had visceral metastases. In the solitary group, 45 operations (in 44 patients) were R0 (resections for cure or complete remission) and 25 (in 25 patients) were R1/R2 (resections leaving microscopic or macroscopic tumour, respectively). The most common types of cancer in the solitary group were kidney (n = 27), lung (n = 25), and breast (n = 20).

Results

The one-year patient survival was 47% (95% confidence interval (CI) 38 to 57) for the solitary bony metastases and 34% (95% CI 29 to 39) for multiple bone metastases (p < 0.001). The one-year patient survival was 64% (95% CI 52 to 75) for solitary bony metastases without/with unknown visceral metastases and 23% (95% CI 11 to 36) for solitary bony metastases with visceral metastases (p < 0.001). The one-year patient survival was 75% (95% CI 62 to 89) for a solitary bony metastasis after R0 surgery and 42% (95% CI 22 to 61) for a solitary bony metastasis with R1/R2 surgery (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Our study suggests that the surgical treatment of patients with a solitary bony metastasis to the appendicular skeleton results in better survival than for patients with multiple bony metastases. Furthermore, aggressive treatment of a solitary bony metastasis with R0 surgery may improve patient survival.

Image-Guided Ablations in Patients with Recurrent Renal Cell Carcinoma

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is one of the most frequently diagnosed tumors and a leading cause of death. The high risk of local recurrence and distant metastases represent a significant clinical issue. Different image-guided ablation techniques can be applied for their treatment as an alternative to surgery, radiotherapy or systemic treatments. A retrospective analysis was conducted at our institution, including a total number of 34 RCC patients and 44 recurrent RCC tumors in different locations (kidney, lung, adrenal gland, liver, pancreas, pararenal and other) using microwave ablation, radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation and laser ablation. The estimated time to local and distant tumor progression after treatment were 22.53 ± 5.61 months and 24.23 ± 4.47 months, respectively. Systemic treatment was initiated in 10/34 (29%) treated patients with a mean time-to-systemic-therapy of 40.92 ± 23.98 months. Primary technical success was achieved in all cases and patients while the primary efficacy rate was achieved in 43/44 (98%) cases and 33/34 (97%) patients, respectively, with a secondary technical success and efficacy rate of 100%. At a mean follow-up of 57.52 months ± 27.86 months, local tumor progression occurred in 3/44 (7%) cases and distant progression in 25/34 (74%) patients. No significant complications occurred. Image-guided ablations can play a role in helping to better control recurrent disease, avoiding or delaying the administration of systemic therapies and their significant adverse effects.

Current status and novel insights into the role of metastasectomy in the era of immunotherapy

INTRODUCTION

New perspectives on the role of metastasectomy have emerged along with the advances in cancer immunotherapy. Despite accumulating evidence that encourages the use of immunotherapy in the metastatic setting, current data regarding its combination with surgical resection of secondary lesions, as well as the best timeline and sequence of such a therapeutic approach is limited.

AREAS COVERED

We review the currently available literature on the role of metastasectomy in the era of novel immunotherapeutic agents and provide comprehensive evidence from ongoing trials about the available treatment strategies. In metastatic melanoma, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) play a key role both in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting to achieve long-term disease control. In metastatic renal cell carcinoma, investigation is ongoing regarding the emerging role of ICIs before metastasectomy. ICIs have improved outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal and head and neck cancer.

EXPERT OPINION

In the neoadjuvant setting, the high response rates and the durability of responses to immunotherapy may enable the resectability of metastatic lesions. In the adjuvant setting post metastasectomy, immunotherapy constitutes a safe and efficacious approach to support immune tumor surveillance and delay or even prevent disease relapse. Patient participation in relevant clinical trials should be encouraged.

Partially Reduced MIL-100(Fe) as a CO Carrier for Sustained CO Release and Regulation of Macrophage Phenotypic Polarization

Carbon monoxide (CO) is a bioactive molecule with high potential as it shows promising efficacy for regulating inflammation. Materials capable of storing and delivering CO are of great potential therapeutic value. Although CO-releasing molecules (CORMs) have been developed to deliver CO, the short CO duration of minutes to 2 h confines their practical use. In this study, partially reduced MIL-100(Fe) as a new CO-releasing nanoMOF was developed and used for sustained CO release and macrophage (MA) phenotypic polarization regulation. MIL-100(Fe) was synthesized and mildly annealed in vacuum for partial reduction. When the annealing temperature was lower than 250 °C, less Fe(II) present in MIL-100(Fe) and the subsequent CO adsorption and desorption profiles displayed typical features of physisorption. While it was annealed at 250 °C, it showed about 20% of Fe(III) was reduced, which resulted in chemisorption of CO due to the high coordination affinity of Fe(II) to CO. The loading amount of CO was increased, and the CO release was prolonged for about 24 h. Furthermore, the CO release from this nanoMOF could alter the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced macrophage from M1 to the alternative M2 phenotype and promoted the growth of endothelial cells (ECs) by paracrine regulation of MA. It can be envisioned as a promising CO-releasing solid for biomedical application.

Oncological outcomes of surgery for isolated retroperitoneal recurrence in renal cancer patients after radical nephrectomy

AIMS

Isolated retroperitoneal recurrence (IRR) in renal cancer patients after radical nephrectomy (RN) is a rare event and poses a therapeutic dilemma. We evaluated oncologic outcomes in surgically treated patients with IRR and established prognostic factors associated with survival. The benefit of metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) in those with clinical progression after extirpation of IRR was assessed.

METHODS

This was a retrospective single-institutional study in which 60 renal cancer patients after previous RN underwent surgery for suspicion of IRR within the period of 2004-2019; in 55 of them, RCC recurrence was histologically confirmed. No patient had distant metastatic disease at the time of IRR diagnosis. In cases of clinical progression after IRR surgery, MDT (metastasectomy, stereotactic radiotherapy) was selectively used. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate survival outcomes. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to evaluate associations between clinicopathological parameters and cancer-specific survival.

RESULTS

Median age at IRR diagnosis was 64 years (range 23-81). IRR was diagnosed at a median of 42 months (IQR 19-99) after RN. Surgical complications of grade 3-5 after IRR extirpation were rare (7%). Median follow-up time was 50 months (IQR 19-80). Five-year recurrence-free survival and cancer-specific survival rates were 32% and 66%, respectively. Radiographic progression was observed in 34 (62%) patients at a median of 11 months after IRR surgery, out of which 22 patients (40%) underwent MDT. When compared with 12 patients without MDT, the MDT patients had a prolonged median time to systemic treatment of 58 (vs. 16 months), and median cancer-specific survival of 88 (vs. 46 months). Upon multivariable analysis, the interval from nephrectomy ≤12 months (HR 7.77), tumour grade 3-4 (HR 13.24) and female sex (HR 7.42) were determined to be independent prognostic factors of cancer-related mortality.

CONCLUSION

Aggressive surgical therapy of IRR is feasible with relatively low morbidity. More than half of the patients experience long-term survival. The interval from nephrectomy to IRR less than 12 months, tumour grade 3-4 and female sex were negative prognostic predictors. In the case of progression, metastasis-directed therapy may prolong the interval to initiation of systemic treatment.

[Synchronous oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma-what is the role of surgery?]

BACKGROUND

Long-term remission can be achieved by surgery in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), without chronic toxicity due to systemic treatment. Data on metastasectomy are mostly based on observations of metachronous metastasis. However, it is unclear whether patients with synchronous oligometastasis may also benefit from surgery alone as an alternative to highly effective systemic treatment combined with resection of the primary tumor.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors performed an unstructured literature search in PubMed including systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Results are discussed in regard of the current data and clinical practice.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Although there is no uniform definition for oligometastasis in mRCC, cytoreductive nephrectomy in selected patients seems to be mandatory before metastasectomy is performed in primary oligometastatic RCC. In particular, in those patients with oligometastasis of the lung, bone, central nervous system, liver, adrenal gland, and thyroid, metastasectomy appears to be an important therapeutic option. Ultimately, among the therapeutic options, surgery is also an important therapeutic approach in primary oligometastatic mRCC. A balanced consideration between surgery, other local therapies, and modern systemic treatment demands interdisciplinary decision-making that takes into account the patients' preference.

Renal cell carcinoma, part 3

ABSTRACT

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for most renal malignancies. This article, the last in a three-part series, presents treatment options for RCC using the American Joint Committee on Cancer Tumor, Node, and Metastasis staging system as a framework, as well as nursing-care options for patients undergoing partial or radical nephrectomy.

Management of local recurrence after radical nephrectomy: surgical removal with or without systemic treatment is still the gold standard. Results from a multicenter international cohort

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the survival outcomes of patients with local recurrence after radical nephrectomy (RN) and to test the effect of surgery, as monotherapy or in combination with systemic treatment, on cancer-specific mortality (CSM).

METHODS

Patients with local recurrence after RN were abstracted from an international dataset. The primary outcome was CSM. Cox's proportional hazard models tested the main predictors of CSM. Kaplan-Meier method estimates the 3-year survival rates.

RESULTS

Overall, 96 patients were included. Of these, 44 (45.8%) were metastatic at the time of recurrence. The median time to recurrence after RN was 14.5 months. The 3-year cancer-specific survival rates after local recurrence were 92.3% (± 7.4%) for those who were treated with surgery and systemic therapy, 63.2% (± 13.2%) for those who only underwent surgery, 22.7% (± 0.9%) for those who only received systemic therapy and 20.5% (± 10.4%) for those who received no treatment (p < 0.001). Receiving only medical treatment (HR: 5.40, 95% CI 2.06-14.15, p = 0.001) or no treatment (HR: 5.63, 95% CI 2.21-14.92, p = 0.001) were both independently associated with higher CSM rates, even after multivariable adjustment. Following surgical treatment of local recurrence 8 (16.0%) patients reported complications, and 2/8 were graded as Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical treatment of local recurrence after RN, when feasible, should be offered to patients. Moreover, its association with a systemic treatment seems to warrantee adjunctive advantages in terms of survival, even in the presence of metastases.