Seo H, Han M, Choi JR, Kim S, Park J, Lee EH. Numerical Investigation of Layered Homogeneous Skull Model for Simulations of Transcranial Focused Ultrasound.
Neuromodulation 2024:S1094-7159(24)00072-2. [PMID:
38691075 DOI:
10.1016/j.neurom.2024.04.001]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Revised: 03/24/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
The influence of the intracranial pressure field must be discussed with the development of a single-element transducer for low-intensity transcranial focused ultrasound because the skull plays a significant role in blocking and dispersing ultrasound wave propagation. Ultrasound propagation is mainly affected by the structure and acoustic properties of the skull; thus, we aimed to investigate the impact of simplifying the acoustic properties of the skull on the simulation of the transcranial pressure field to present guidance for efficient skull modeling in full-wave simulations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We constructed a three-dimensional computational model for ultrasound transmission with the same structure but varying acoustic properties of the skull. The structural information and heterogeneous acoustic properties of the skull were acquired from computed tomography images, and we segmented the skull into three layers (3 L), including spongy and compact bones. We then assigned homogeneous acoustic properties to a single layer (1 L) or 3 L of the skull. In addition, we investigated the influence of different types of transducers and different ultrasound frequencies (1.1 MHz, 0.5 MHz, and 0.25 MHz) on the intracranial pressure field to provide a comparison of the heterogenous and homogeneous models.
RESULTS
We indicated the importance of numerical simulations in estimating the intracranial pressure field of the skull owing to beam distortions. When we simplified the skull model, both the 1 L and 3 L models showed contours of the acoustic focus comparable to those of the heterogeneous model. When we evaluated the peak pressure and volume of the acoustic focus, the 1 L model produced a better estimation of peak pressure with a difference <10%, and the 3 L model is suitable to obtain smaller errors in the volume of the acoustic focus.
CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, we examined the possibility of simplification of skull models using 1 L and 3 L homogeneous properties in the numerical simulation for focused ultrasound. The results show that the layered homogeneous model can provide characteristics comparable to those of the acoustic focus in heterogeneous models.
Collapse