Quantitative ultrasound at the phalanxes discriminates osteoporotic women with vertebral but not with hip fracture

Quantitative Ultrasound (QUS) in the Management of Osteoporosis and Assessment of Fracture Risk: An Update

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) presents a low cost and readily available alternative to DXA measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) for osteoporotic fracture risk assessment. It is performed in a variety of skeletal sites, among which the most widely investigated and clinically used are first the calcaneus and then the radius. Nevertheless, there is still uncertainty in the incorporation of QUS in the clinical management of osteoporosis as the level of clinical validation differs substantially upon the QUS models available. In fact, results from a given QUS device can unlikely be extrapolated to another one, given the technological differences between QUS devices. The use of QUS in clinical routine to identify individuals at low or high risk of fracture could be considered primarily when central DXA is not easily available. In this later case, it is recommended that QUS bone parameters are used in combination with established clinical risk factors for fracture. Currently, stand-alone QUS is not recommended for treatment initiation decision making or follow-up. As WHO classification of osteoporosis thresholds cannot apply to QUS, thresholds specific for given QUS devices and parameters need to be determined and cross-validated widely to have a well-defined and certain use of QUS in osteoporosis clinical workflow. Despite the acknowledged current clinical limitations for QUS to be used more widely in daily routine, substantial progresses have been made and new results are promising.

Quantitative Ultrasound (QUS) in the Management of Osteoporosis and Assessment of Fracture Risk

The use of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) for a variety of skeletal sites, associated with the absence of technology-specific guidelines, has created uncertainty with respect to the application of QUS results to the management of individual patients in clinical practice. However, when prospectively validated (this is not the case for all QUS devices and skeletal sites), QUS is a proven, low-cost, and readily accessible alternative to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) for the assessment of fracture risk. Indeed, the clinical use of QUS to identify subjects at low or high risk of osteoporotic fracture should be considered when central DXA is unavailable. Furthermore, the use of QUS in conjunction with clinical risk factors (CRF),allows for the identification of subjects who have a low and high probability of osteoporotic fracture. Device- and parameter-specific thresholds should be developed and cross-validated to confirm the concurrent use of QUS and CRF for the institution of pharmacological therapy and monitoring therapy.

Trabecular and cortical bone separately assessed at radius with a new ultrasound device, in a young adult population with various physical activities

The aim was to evaluate a new ultrasound device in a young adult population and to assess its reproducibility via comparison to DXA measurements and geometrical measurements from high-resolution radiographs. Ninety-three subjects aged between 20 and 51 years were recruited and divided into four groups according to their gender and physical activity status: 22 male athletes, 19 male controls, 21 female athletes, and 31 female controls. Ultrasonic measurements were assessed by the prototype LD-100 (Oyo Electric Co., Kyoto, Japan) on the dominant distal radius. Attenuation in the radius (dB), cortical bone thickness (mm), radius thickness (mm), mass density of cancellous bone (mg/cm(3)), and elasticity (GPa) of cancellous bone were obtained. BMD was measured by DXA at the dominant distal radius. Radius images were obtained with a direct high-resolution digital X-ray device (BMA, D(3)A Medical Systems), and radius and cortical thicknesses were estimated using a specific software (ImageJ, Bethesda, USA), in an area site-matched with LD-100. There was a significant positive correlation between site-matched BMD measurement and LD-100 parameters (p<0.004), X-ray radius thickness, and LD-100 parameters except elasticity (p<0.05, r>0.32), X-ray cortical thickness and LD-100 attenuation and cortical thickness (p<0.01). A significantly higher attenuation, cortical and radius thicknesses were found in athletes compared to controls (p<0.05). The radius thickness measured on radiographs was significantly higher in athletes versus controls in both sexes, and cortical thickness was significantly higher in male athletes versus controls. These data suggest a positive influence of physical activity on bone cortical measurements. This study also confirmed the particular interest of bone assessment by ultrasound.

Performance of five phalangeal QUS parameters in the evaluation of gonadal-status, age and vertebral fracture risk compared with DXA

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to study the value of five different quantified ultrasound (QUS) parameters-amplitude-dependent speed of sound (AD-SoS), Ultrasound Bone Profile Index (UBPI), fast-wave amplitude (FWA), bone transmission time (BTT) and signal dynamic (SDY)-measured at the phalanges of the hand in discriminating women with vertebral fracture and their relationship with some determinants of bone mass, in particular age and gonadal status compared with lumbar spine and hip dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). We included 791 women aged 35-84 y, divided into pre-menopause, early menopause and late postmenopause groups on the basis of gonadal status and years since menopause (YSM). The presence of vertebral fracture was evaluated radiographically. All QUS parameters were very sensitive to changes in early postmenopause, with a doubled decrease in early postmenopausal with respect to late postmenopause. In particular AD-SoS and BTT decreases were markedly high in the early postmenopause group. In the late menopause group, similar decreases were observed for AD-SoS, UBPI and hip bone mineral density (BMD). In the multiple logistic model, DXA and QUS significantly discriminate women with and without fractures (p < 0.0001); odds ratio (OR) was higher at lumbar spine BMD (OR 4.01), FWA (OR 3.88), AD-SoS (OR 3.81) and total hip BMD (OR 3.77). Even adjusting the logistic model for age, height, weight, lumbar spine and total hip BMD, all QUS parameters remained significantly predictive of vertebral fracture. AD-SoS showed the best performances both in terms of OR and ROC analysis. QUS parameters show a different behavior in evaluating the effect on bone mass of the time since menopause; AD-SoS and BTT showed a high sensitivity to first changes in bone tissue after menopause. After correction for potential confounders, AD-SoS showed the same ability of lumbar spine BMD in discriminating women with or without vertebral fractures and in the prediction of fracture risk.

Finite element analysis of cancellous bone failure in the vertebral body of healthy and osteoporotic subjects

The aim of this work is to assess the fracture risk prediction of the cancellous bone in the body of a lumbar vertebra when the mechanical parameters of the bone, i.e. stiffness, porosity, and strength anisotropy, of elderly and osteoporotic subjects are considered. For this purpose, a non-linear three-dimensional continuum-based finite element model of the lumbar functional spinal unit L4—L5 was created and strength analyses of the spongy tissue of the vertebral body were carried out. A fabric-dependent strength criterion, which accounts for the micro-architecture of the cancellous bone, based on histomorphometric analyses was used. The strength analyses have shown that the cancellous bone of none of the subject types undergoes failure under loading applied during normal daily life like axial compression; however, bone failure occurs for the osteoporotic segment, subjected to a combination of the compression preloading and moments in the sagittal or in the frontal plane, which are conditions that may not be considered to occur ‘daily’. In particular, critical stress conditions are met because of the high porosity values in the horizontal direction within the cancellous bone. The computational approach presented in the paper can potentially predict the material fracture risk of the cancellous bone in the vertebral body and it may be usefully employed to draw failure maps representing, for a given micro-architecture of the spongy tissue, the critical loading conditions (forces and moments) that may lead to such a risk. This approach could be further developed in order to assess the effectiveness of biomedical devices within an engineering approach to the clinical problem of the spinal diseases.

Quantitative ultrasound in the management of osteoporosis: the 2007 ISCD Official Positions

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is commonly used in the care of patients for diagnostic classification of osteoporosis, low bone mass (osteopenia), or normal bone density; assessment of fracture risk; and monitoring changes in bone density over time. The development of other technologies for the evaluation of skeletal health has been associated with uncertainties regarding their applications in clinical practice. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS), a technology for measuring properties of bone at peripheral skeletal sites, is more portable and less expensive than DXA, without the use of ionizing radiation. The proliferation of QUS devices that are technologically diverse, measuring and reporting variable bone parameters in different ways, examining different skeletal sites, and having differing levels of validating data for association with DXA-measured bone density and fracture risk, has created many challenges in applying QUS for use in clinical practice. The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) 2007 Position Development Conference (PDC) addressed clinical applications of QUS for fracture risk assessment, diagnosis of osteoporosis, treatment initiation, monitoring of treatment, and quality assurance/quality control. The ISCD Official Positions on QUS resulting from this PDC, the rationale for their establishment, and recommendations for further study are presented here.

Quantitative bone ultrasound at phalanges and calcaneus in osteoporotic postmenopausal women: influence of age and measurement site

Phalangeal and calcaneal quantitative ultrasound (QUS) measurements were tested in a postmenopausal osteoporotic population of a wide age range to assess their ability to identify subjects with vertebral fractures in a population of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. A group of 127 osteoporotic women aged from 50 to 85 y, who had been postmenopausal for at least 5 y, were enrolled. All subjects underwent phalangeal and calcaneal QUS measurements, femoral neck and lumbar spine dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements and lateral thoracic and lumbar spine radiography. Osteoporosis was defined on the basis of femoral neck or lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) T-score lower than -2.5 SD or of the presence of one or more vertebral atraumatic fractures, independently of BMD values. Fifty-two women had one or more vertebral fractures, while the remaining 75 had no evidence of previous fracture. Both QUS techniques were able to discriminate between fractured and nonfractured subjects in the whole group (p < 0.05). When patients aged <70 y (n = 43) and patients aged > or = 70 y (n = 84) were considered separately, phalangeal QUS and lumbar spine BMD were able to discriminate vertebral fractures in the younger group (p < 0.05), whereas calcaneal QUS was able to discriminate vertebral fractures in the older one (p < 0.05). The results of this study raise an issue of the optimal use of different QUS techniques and different skeletal sites in the management of osteoporosis in early or late postmenopausal life.

Bone ultrasonometric features and growth hormone secretion in asthmatic patients during chronic inhaled corticosteroid therapy

BACKGROUND

Quantitative ultrasound bone densitometry (QUBD) is a new method to assess bone mineral density and bone microarchitecture. Corticosteroid (CS) therapy may diminish bone mass, alter bone quality and may influence growth hormone (GH) secretion and bone metabolism markers. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of long-term therapy with inhaled CSs (ICSs) on structural bone characteristics and their correlations with GH secretion and bone markers in asthmatic patients.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional study, we enrolled 60 adult patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma: 22 on chronic (>1 year) ICS therapy, 10 naive to ICSs treatment and 28 healthy control subjects. The groups were matched for age and BMI. Each subject underwent to QUBD at the phalanxes to assess bone microarchitecture by ultrasound bone profile index (UBPI), bone density by amplitude-dependent speed of sound (AdSos); test with GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) injection with calculation of peak GH and the Delta GH (peak GH-basal GH); and hormonal and bone markers measurements.

RESULTS

Asthmatics treated with long-term ICS therapy showed a lower UBPI (P < 0.01) compared to controls (49.8 +/- 19.3 vs. 77.0 +/- 10.1, respectively) and to asthmatics never taking ICSs (73.2 +/- 9.6). In ICS-treated asthmatics, DeltaGH and GH-peak showed a significant correlation with UBPI. A significant difference was observed comparing asthmatics treated with ICSs to controls and asthmatics naive to ICSs in GH response to GHRH iv bolus. Serum osteocalcin was significantly reduced in asthmatic patients treated with ICSs.

CONCLUSIONS

In asthmatic patients, long-term ICSs treatment produces negative effects on bone quality assessed by QUBD, and such effects are associated to an impaired GH secretion.