Management of thyroid follicular proliferation: an ultrasound-based malignancy score to opt for surgical or conservative treatment

Role of Ultrasound and Ultrasound-Based Prediction Model in Differentiating Follicular Thyroid Carcinoma From Follicular Thyroid Adenoma

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to identify distinct ultrasound (US) characteristics for distinguishing follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC) from follicular thyroid adenoma (FTA), and construct a user-friendly preoperative risk stratification model for thyroid follicular neoplasms.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, patients diagnosed with pathologically confirmed FTA or FTC and undergoing US examinations between July 2017 and June 2021 were designated as the training cohort, and those from July 2021 to June 2023 were enrolled as the external validation set. We systematically assessed and compared the sonographic and clinical characteristics of FTC and FTA. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to assess the association of US features with FTC in the training set. A prediction nomogram model, incorporating US features independently associated with FTC, was developed and validated externally to assess its performance.

RESULTS

A total of 645 patients (FTA/FTC = 530/115) were included in the training set, while 197 patients (FTA/FTC = 165/32) constituted the validation set. In the training set, solid composition, hypo-echogenicity, irregular margin, calcification, protrusion sign, trabecular formation, absent or thick halo, and mainly central hypervascularity were identified as independent factors associated with FTC. The prediction nomogram model constructed using these variables showed good performance in differentiating FTC from FTA with an area under the curve of 0.948 in the training set and 0.915 in the validation set.

CONCLUSIONS

The preoperative nomogram model constructed based on US features serves as an effective tool for the risk stratification of thyroid follicular neoplasms.

Role of ultrasound in predicting telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutation in follicular thyroid carcinoma

Telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutations are associated with tumor aggressiveness. This study aimed to demonstrate the ultrasonographic (US) features of TERT promoter-mutated follicular thyroid cancer (FTC) and evaluate their predictive performance. A total of 63 patients with surgically confirmed FTC between August 1995 and April 2021 were included. All data were available for analysis of preoperative US findings and TERT promoter mutation results. Genomic DNA was extracted from the archived surgical specimens to identify TERT promoter mutations. Logistic regression analysis was performed to compare US findings between TERT promoter-mutated and wild-type FTCs. Of the 63 patients with FTC, 10 (15.9%) had TERT promoter mutations. TERT promoter-mutated FTCs demonstrated significantly different US suspicion categories compared to wild-type FTCs (Ps = 0.0054 for K-TIRADS and 0.0208 for ACR-TIRADS), with a trend toward an increasing prevalence of the high suspicion category (40.0% for both K-TIRADS and ACR-TIRADS; Ps for trend = 0.0030 for K-TIRADS and 0.0032 for ACR-TIRADS). Microlobulated margins and punctate echogenic foci were independent risk factors associated with TERT promoter mutation in FTC (odds ratio = 9.693, 95% confidence interval = 1.666-56.401, p = 0.0115 for margins; odds ratio = 8.033, 95% confidence interval = 1.424-45.309, p = 0.0182 for punctate echogenic foci). There were no significant differences in the composition and echogenicity of the TERT promoter-mutated and wild-type FTCs. TERT promoter-mutated FTCs were categorized more frequently as high suspicion by the K-TIRADS and ACR-TIRADS. Based on US findings, the independent risk factors for TERT promoter mutations in FTC are microlobulated margins and punctate echogenic foci.

The possibilities of ultrasound imaging in the diagnosis of follicular neoplasia of the thyroid gland

Thyroid cancer is the most common cancer of the endocrine system. The diagnosis of thyroid cancer has taken a step forward due to the introduction of fine-needle biopsy of the thyroid gland with subsequent evaluation of cytological material using the Bethesda system. One category of this classification traditionally remains a gray area of diagnosis. The detection of a follicular tumor in the cytological material (category IV according to Bethesda) does not allow one to reliably classify the neoplasia as benign or malignant and requires surgical intervention. The traditional informative and widely used method for diagnosing thyroid tumors is ultrasound. However, the sensitivity and specificity of the method varies over a wide range. This review analyzes the literature on the possibilities of ultrasound diagnostics in assessing the malignant potential of follicular tumors of the thyroid gland.

Ultrasonographic and cytologic assessments of follicular neoplasms of the thyroid: Predictive features differentiating follicular carcinoma from follicular adenoma

Background

The preoperative diagnosis of follicular neoplasm of the thyroid is challenging due to difficulties in the assessment of capsular invasion. This study aimed to identify ultrasonographic (US) and cytopathologic features that are characteristic of follicular adenoma and carcinoma to aid in their differential diagnosis.

Methods

A total of 98 surgically resected nodules diagnosed as follicular neoplasms between 2011 and 2012 were analyzed. US findings were reviewed according to the Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (K-TIRADS). Six cytologic features (high cellularity, abundant microfollicles, cell crowding/nuclear overlapping, isolated cells, homogeneous nuclei, abundant colloid) were reviewed quantitatively. The radiologic findings and quantification of cytologic features were correlated with final diagnoses.

Results

In total, 70 (71.4%) and 28 (28.6%) of the nodules were follicular adenomas and follicular carcinomas, respectively. US findings of a heterogeneous echogenicity, speculated/ill-defined margin, and presence of calcifications were significantly associated with follicular carcinoma (p<0.05). Calcifications had a predilection for pericapsular areas than for stromal areas in follicular carcinomas, whereas their location was more varied in follicular adenomas. No cytologic feature was significantly different between follicular adenomas and carcinomas.

Conclusion

Distinct from follicular adenomas, follicular carcinomas are characterized by heterogeneous echogenicity, speculated/ill-defined margin, and presence of calcifications on US. Thus, US findings can be helpful to differentiate between these two follicular neoplasms.

The Value of Sonography in Distinguishing Follicular Thyroid Carcinoma from Adenoma

Purpose

Differentiation between follicular thyroid carcinomas (FTCs) and follicular thyroid adenomas (FTAs) is difficult and the sonographic features of FTC are not yet fully established. The purpose of this study is to explore the sonographic features of FTC and the value of sonography in differentiating FTCs from FTAs.

Patients and Methods

A total of 28 pathologically proven FTCs and 53 FTAs in 78 patients who were performed thyroid surgery were included in this retrospective study. The sonographic features of each tumor including an interrupted halo, satellite nodule(s) with or without halo ring, local irregularity of margin and cluster of grapes sign were evaluated. A mode image of FTC halo was built up in our study. The frequencies of the sonographic features were compared by chi-square test or Fisher exact test between FTCs and FTAs. The relative risk of malignancy was assessed by logistic regression analysis.

Results

Logistic regression analysis showed that a thick, irregular and/or interrupted halo with or without satellite nodule(s), hypoechoic or marked hypoechoic echogenicity, a predominantly solid pattern, cluster of grapes sign, micro-or macro-calcifications, rim calcifications correlated with significant increases in relative risk for FTCs (odds ratio 11.48 (1.37-96.56), 6.74 (1.05-43.30), 17.51 (1.78-172.53), 9.55 (1.44-63.46), 9.36 (1.25-70.15) and 17.45 (1.04-292.65), respectively, p<0.05). Two new sonographic features, an interrupted halo and satellite nodule(s) with or without halo ring, can only be found in FTCs.

Conclusion

An interrupted halo and satellite nodule(s) with or without halo ring are specific sonographic features for FTCs. Sonography could play a role in differentiating follicular thyroid carcinoma from adenoma.

Sonographic Features Differentiating Follicular Thyroid Cancer from Follicular Adenoma-A Meta-Analysis

Simple Summary

The risk of thyroid malignancy assessment may include certain ultrasound features. The analysis is lacking for the differentiation of follicular thyroid adenomas and cancers (FTAs and FTCs). Our meta-analysis aimed to identify sonographic features suggesting malignancy in the case of follicular lesions, potentially differentiating FTA and FTC. Based on twenty studies describing sonographic features of 10,215 nodules, we found that the most crucial feature associated with an increased risk of FTC were tumor protrusion (odds ratios—OR = 10.19), microcalcifications or mixed type of calcifications: 6.09, irregular margins: 5.11, marked hypoechogenicity: 4.59, and irregular shape: 3.6.

Abstract

Certain ultrasound features are associated with an increased risk of thyroid malignancy. However, they were studied mainly in papillary thyroid cancers (PTCs); these results cannot be simply extrapolated for the differentiation of follicular thyroid adenomas and cancers (FTAs and FTCs). The aim of our study was to perform a meta-analysis to identify sonographic features suggesting malignancy in the case of follicular lesions, potentially differentiating FTA and FTC. We searched thirteen databases from January 2006 to December 2020 to find all relevant, full-text journal articles written in English. Analyses assessed the accuracy of malignancy detection in case of follicular lesions, potentially differentiating FTA and FTC included the odds ratio (OR), sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values. A random-effects model was used to summarize collected data. Twenty studies describing sonographic features of 10,215 nodules met the inclusion criteria. The highest overall ORs to increase the risk of malignancy were calculated for tumor protrusion (OR = 10.19; 95% confidence interval: 2.62–39.71), microcalcifications or mixed type of calcifications (coexisting micro and macrocalcifications): 6.09 (3.22–11.50), irregular margins: 5.11 (2.90–8.99), marked hypoechogenicity: 4.59 (3.23–6.54), and irregular shape: 3.6 (1.19–10.92). The most crucial feature associated with an increased risk of FTC is capsule protrusion, followed by the presence of calcifications, irrespectively of their type.

Prediction of follicular thyroid carcinoma associated with distant metastasis in the preoperative and postoperative model

BACKGROUND

Only clinicopathological findings are reported for predicting follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC) associated with distant metastasis, and preoperative ultrasound (US) findings are unknown.

METHODS

Associations between distant metastases of FTC and predicting factors were evaluated by using logistic regression analysis in the preoperative and postoperative models.

RESULTS

Distant metastasis was present in 37 (11.5%) of the 321 patients with FTC. In the preoperative model, independent predictors of distant metastasis were age, marked hypoechogenicity, nodule-in-nodule appearance, and rim calcification on US. Postoperative predictors were marked hypoechogenicity, rim calcification, and widely invasive histology. Sensitivities, specificities, and the area under the curves for predicting distant metastasis were 86.5%, 80.3%, and 0.889 on preoperative status and 86.5%, 78.5%, and 0.908 on postoperative status. Although not statistically significant, all four patients with gross extrathyroidal extension had metastasis.

CONCLUSION

Age, ultrasound features, and widely invasive histology allow preoperative and postoperative prediction of FTC associated with distant metastasis.

THYROID NODULE LOCATION ON ULTRASONOGRAPHY AS A PREDICTOR OF MALIGNANCY

OBJECTIVE

The diagnostic capacity of ultrasonography (US) for differentiating between malignant and benign thyroid nodules is crucial in preventing unnecessary invasive procedures. This is the first study to evaluate whether thyroid nodule location on US has predictive value for malignancy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data from 219 patients with thyroid nodules who underwent fine-needle aspiration biopsy in 1 year. Patients' demographics as well as nodule's laterality, polarity, morphology, and multinodularity were analyzed. All malignant lesions were confirmed by surgical pathology.

RESULTS

The majority of the patients were female (86.2%). Nodules were evenly distributed between the right lobe (46.3%) and left lobe (49.5%). Eight nodules (4.2%) were located in the isthmus. Most nodules (79.3%) were located in the lower pole, while 9.6% were located in the upper pole and 6.9% in the middle pole. Seventy-five patients (39.9%) had multiple nodules. Fourteen nodules were malignant, representing a prevalence of 7.4%. A significantly higher frequency of malignancy was observed in upper pole (22.2%) compared to lower pole (4.7%) and middle pole (15.4%). A multiple logistic regression model confirmed such association after adjusting for age, body mass index, multinodularity, and laterality. The odds of malignancy in the upper pole were 4 times higher than other locations (odds ratio, 4.6; P = .03).

CONCLUSION

Our study is the first showing that thyroid nodules located in the upper pole can be considered as having higher risk for malignancy. It may enhance the predictive value of malignancy if it is included in thyroid nodule ultrasound classification guidelines.

ABBREVIATIONS

AACE = American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists; ATA = American Thyroid Association; BMI = body mass index; FNA = fine-needle aspiration; TMS = total malignancy score; TTW = taller than wide; US = ultrasonography.

Follicular thyroid cancer and Hürthle cell carcinoma: challenges in diagnosis, treatment, and clinical management

Follicular thyroid cancer is the second most common differentiated thyroid cancer histological type and has been overshadowed by its more common counterpart-papillary thyroid cancer-despite its unique biological behaviour and less favourable outcomes. In this Review, we comprehensively review the literature on follicular thyroid cancer to provide an evidence-based guide to the management of these tumours, to highlight the lack of evidence behind guideline recommendations, and to identify changes and challenges over the past decades in diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. We highlight that correct identification of cancer in indeterminate cytological samples is challenging and ultrasonographic features can be misleading. Despite certain unique aspects of follicular thyroid cancer presentation and prognosis, no specific recommendations exist for follicular thyroid cancer and Hürthle cell carcinoma in evidence-based guidelines. Efforts should be made to stimulate additional research in this field.

Diagnostic Utility of Molecular and Imaging Biomarkers in Cytological Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules

Indeterminate thyroid cytology (Bethesda III and IV) corresponds to follicular-patterned benign and malignant lesions, which are particularly difficult to differentiate on cytology alone. As ~25% of these nodules harbor malignancy, diagnostic hemithyroidectomy is still custom. However, advanced preoperative diagnostics are rapidly evolving.This review provides an overview of additional molecular and imaging diagnostics for indeterminate thyroid nodules in a preoperative clinical setting, including considerations regarding cost-effectiveness, availability, and feasibility of combining techniques. Addressed diagnostics include gene mutation analysis, microRNA, immunocytochemistry, ultrasonography, elastosonography, computed tomography, sestamibi scintigraphy, [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.The best rule-out tests for malignancy were the Afirma® gene expression classifier and FDG-PET. The most accurate rule-in test was sole BRAF mutation analysis. No diagnostic had both near-perfect sensitivity and specificity, and estimated cost-effectiveness. Molecular techniques are rapidly advancing. However, given the currently available techniques, a multimodality stepwise approach likely offers the most accurate diagnosis, sequentially applying one sensitive rule-out test and one specific rule-in test. Geographical variations in cytology (e.g., Hürthle cell neoplasms) and tumor genetics strongly influence local test performance and clinical utility. Multidisciplinary collaboration and implementation studies can aid the local decision for one or more eligible diagnostics.

Use of the ultrasound-based total malignancy score in the management of thyroid nodules

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to validate the role of the total malignancy score (TMS) in identifying thyroid nodules suspicious for malignancy through the sum of their ultrasound features.

Methods

The local ethical committee approved this prospective observational study. We examined 231 nodules in 231 consecutive patients (164 females and 67 males; age range, 20 to 87 years; median age, 59 years; interquartile range, 48 to 70 years) who underwent ultrasound followed by fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). The nodules were further classified using the TMS, which considers ultrasound features (number, echogenicity, structure, halo, margins, Doppler signal, calcifications, and growth), and the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC), which considers cytological features. Patients with non-negative nodules (TBSRTC categories III to VI) underwent histological analysis, repeated FNAC, or 2 years of regular ultrasound follow-up. The associations between the final diagnosis, each of the ultrasound features, and the TMS were estimated using the chi-square test, the Mann-Whitney U test, and multivariate logistic regression. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the TMS.

Results

On ultrasound, 47% of the nodules (108 of 231) had a TMS <3, 18% (42 of 231) had a TMS of 3, and 35% (81 of 231) had a TMS >3. The FNAC results of 85% of the nodules (196 of 231) were benign, while 15% (35 of 231) had non-negative results. Hypoechogenicity, solid structure, the presence of microcalcifications, and the number of nodules were independent predictors of the final diagnosis, and the diagnostic accuracy of the TMS was good (area under the ROC curve, 0.82).

Conclusion

The TMS system is simple to use, reliable, easily reproducible, and closely reflects malignancy risk. Based on our results, FNAC could be limited to nodules with a TMS ≥3 without missing any cases of carcinoma.

Quantitative analysis of echogenicity for patients with thyroid nodules

Hypoechogenicity has been described qualitatively and is potentially subject to intra- and inter-observer variability. The aim of this study was to clarify whether quantitative echoic indexes (EIs) are useful for the detection of malignant thyroid nodules. Overall, 333 participants with 411 nodules were included in the final analysis. Quantification of echogenicity was performed using commercial software (AmCAD-UT; AmCad BioMed, Taiwan). The coordinates of three defined regions, the nodule, thyroid parenchyma, and strap muscle regions, were recorded in the database separately for subsequent analysis. And the results showed that ultrasound echogenicity (US-E), as assessed by clinicians, defined hypoechogenicity as an independent factor for malignancy. The EI, adjusted EI (EI_N-T; EI_N-M) and automatic EI_(N-R)/R values between benign and malignant nodules were all significantly different, with lower values for malignant nodules. All of the EIs showed similar percentages of sensitivity and specificity and had better accuracies than US-E. In conclusion, the proposed quantitative EI seems more promising to constitute an important advancement than the conventional qualitative US-E in allowing for a more reliable distinction between benign and malignant thyroid nodules.

Novel and Practical Scoring Systems for the Diagnosis of Thyroid Nodules

Objective

The clinical management of patients with thyroid nodules that are biopsied by fine-needle aspiration cytology and yield indeterminate results remains unsettled. The BRAF V600E mutation has dubious diagnostic value due to its low sensitivity. Novel strategies are urgently needed to distinguish thyroid malignancies from thyroid nodules.

Design

This prospective study included 504 thyroid nodules diagnosed by ultrasonography from 468 patients, and fine-needle aspiration cytology was performed under ultrasound guidance. Cytology and molecular analysis, including BRAF V600E, RET/PTC1 and RET/PTC3, were conducted simultaneously. The cytology, ultrasonography results, and mutational status were gathered and analyzed together. Predictive scoring systems were designed using a combination of diagnostic parameters for ultrasonography, cytology and genetic analysis. The utility of the scoring systems was analyzed and compared to detection using the individual methods alone or combined.

Result

The sensitivity of scoring system^a (ultrasonography, cytology, BRAF V600E, RET/PTC) was nearly identical to that of scoring system^b (ultrasonography, cytology, BRAF V600E); these were 91.0% and 90.2%, respectively. These sensitivities were significantly higher than those obtained using FNAC, genetic analysis and US alone or combined; their sensitivities were 63.9%, 70.7% and 87.2%, respectively. Scoring system^c (ultrasonography, cytology) was slightly inferior to the former two scoring systems but still had relatively high sensitivity and specificity (80.5% and 95.1%, respectively), which were significantly superior to those of single cytology, ultrasonography or genetic analysis. In nodules with uncertainty cytology, scoring system^a, scoring system^b and scoring system^c could elevate the malignancy detection rates to 69.7%, 69.7% and 63.6%, respectively.

Conclusion

These three scoring systems were quick for clinicians to master and could provide quantified information to predict the probability of malignant nodules. Scoring system^b is recommended for improving the detection rate among nodules of uncertain cytology.

Computerized quantification of ultrasonic heterogeneity in thyroid nodules

To test whether computerized quantification of ultrasonic heterogeneity can be of help in the diagnosis of thyroid malignancy, we evaluated ultrasonic heterogeneity with an objective and quantitative computerized method in a prospective setting. A total of 400 nodules including 271 benign thyroid nodules and 129 malignant thyroid nodules were evaluated. Patient clinical data were collected, and the grading of heterogeneity on conventional gray-scale ultrasound images was retrospectively reviewed by a thyroid specialist. Quantification of ultrasonic heterogeneity (heterogeneity index, HI) was performed by a proprietary program implemented with methods proposed in this article. HI values differed significantly between benign and malignant nodules, diagnosed by a combination of fine-needle aspiration and surgical pathology results (p < 0.001, area under the curve = 0.714). The ultrasonic heterogeneity of these samples, as assessed by an experienced clinician, could not significantly differentiate between benign and malignant thyroid nodules. However, nodules with marked ultrasonic heterogeneity had higher HI values than nodules with homogeneous nodules. These results indicate that the new computer-aided diagnosis method for evaluation of the ultrasonic heterogeneity of thyroid nodules is an objective and quantitative method that is correlated with conventional ultrasonic heterogeneity assessment, but can better aid in the diagnosis of thyroid malignancy.