1
|
Luis Alcázar J, Ramón Pérez-Vidal J, Tameish S, Chacón E, Manzour N, Ángel Mínguez J. Ultrasound for assessing tumor spread in ovarian cancer. A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2024; 292:194-200. [PMID: 38042117 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Revised: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/04/2023]
Abstract
In this review, we aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of ultrasound for assessing the tumor spread in the abdomen in women with ovarian cancer. A search for studies evaluating the role of ultrasound for assessing intrabdominal tumor spread in women with ovarian cancer compared to surgery from January 2011 to March 2023 was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 evaluated the quality of the studies (QUADAS-2). All analyses were performed using MIDAS and METANDI commands in STATA 12.0 software. We identified 1552 citations. After exclusions, five studies comprising 822 women were included. Quality of studies were considered as good, except for patient selection as all studies were considered as having high risk of bias. The pooled sensitivity and specificity could be calculated for three anatomical areas (recto-sigma, major omentum and root of mesentery) and the presence of ascites. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for detecting disease in the recto-sigma, major omentum and root of mesentery were 0.83 and 0.95, 0.87 and 0.87, and 0.29 and 0.99, respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for detecting ascites was 0.95 and 0.91, respectively. There is evidence that ultrasound offers good diagnostic performance for evaluating the intra-abdominal extent of disease in women with suspected ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Luis Alcázar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.
| | - Juan Ramón Pérez-Vidal
- Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca, 31120 El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
| | - Sarah Tameish
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Sant Joan, 43204 Reus, Spain
| | - Enrique Chacón
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
| | - Nabil Manzour
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
| | - José Ángel Mínguez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Moruzzi MC, Bolomini G, Esposito R, Mascilini F, Ciccarone F, Quagliozzi L, Giudice MT, Beneduce G, Ficarelli S, Moroni R, Scambia G, Fagotti A, Testa AC, Moro F. Diagnostic performance of ultrasound in assessing the extension of disease in advanced ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022; 227:601.e1-601.e20. [PMID: 35752305 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.05.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical exploration remains the gold standard to evaluate the extension of disease and predict resectability. A laparoscopy-based scoring model was developed by Fagotti and colleagues in 2006 and updated in 2015, based on the intraoperative presence or absence of some specific cancer features. The model proved an overall accuracy rate of 77-100% and is considered the reference test to assess resectability in our Institution. OBJECTIVES The primary aim of the study was to analyze the agreement between preoperative ultrasound examination and laparoscopic findings in assessing the extension of intra-abdominal disease using six parameters described by Fagotti's score. STUDY DESIGN This is a prospective single-center observational study. Between January 2019 and June 2020, consecutive patients with clinical or radiological suspicion of ovarian/peritoneal cancer were assessed with preoperative ultrasound examination and assigned a score based on the six Fagotti's score parameters (great omentum, liver surface, lesser omentum/stomach/spleen, parietal peritoneum, diaphragms, bowel disease). Presence of mesenteral retraction of the small bowel and miliaric carcinomatosis on the serosa were also evaluated. Each parameter was correlated with laparoscopic findings. Concordance was calculated between ultrasound and laparoscopic parameters using Cohen's kappa(κ). RESULTS Cohen's κ ranged from 0.70 to 0.90 for carcinomatosis on the small/large bowel, supracolic omentum, liver surface and diaphragms. Cohen's κ test was lower for carcinomatosis on the parietal peritoneum (k=0.63) and on the lesser omentum/lesser curvature of the stomach/spleen (k=0.54). The agreement between ultrasound and surgical predictive index value (score) was κ=0.74. For the evaluation of mesenteral retraction and miliaric carcinomatosis, the agreement was low (k=0.57 and k=0.36 respectively). CONCLUSIONS The results of ultrasound and laparoscopy in the assessment of intra-abdominal tumor spread were in substantial agreement for almost all the parameters. Ultrasound examination can play a useful role in the preoperative management of patients with ovarian cancer when used in dedicated referral centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Cristina Moruzzi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Bolomini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Rosanna Esposito
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Floriana Mascilini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Ciccarone
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Lorena Quagliozzi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Teresa Giudice
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuliana Beneduce
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Ficarelli
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Rossana Moroni
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Direzione Scientifica, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Clinica Ostetrica e Ginecologica, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Clinica Ostetrica e Ginecologica, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonia Carla Testa
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Clinica Ostetrica e Ginecologica, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Moro
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tomasińska A, Stukan M, Badocha M, Myszewska A. Accuracy of Pretreatment Ultrasonography Assessment of Intra-Abdominal Spread in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Prospective Study. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:1600. [PMID: 34573942 PMCID: PMC8519008 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11091600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Revised: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to test the accuracy of ultrasonography performed by gynecological oncologists for the preoperative assessment of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) spread in the pelvis and abdominal cavity. A prospective, observational cohort study was performed at a single tertiary cancer care unit. Patients with suspected EOC were recruited and underwent comprehensive transvaginal and abdominal ultrasonography performed by a gynecological oncologist. Sixteen intra-abdominal localizations and parameters were assessed using ultrasonography and compared with surgical-pathological status (reference standard). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and overall accuracy were calculated. Differences were analyzed using Fisher's exact and chi-square tests. Ultimately, we included 132 patients (median age 62 years), of whom 67% were in stage IIIC-IVB and 72% had serous cancer. Overall prediction accuracies for the involvement of the omentum, small bowel mesentery root, and frozen pelvis, and detecting ascites were >90%. Detecting the involvement of the pelvis peritoneum, liver and spleen hilum, and rectosigmoid colon, and predictions of disease stage and residual disease had overall accuracies of 80-90%. The lowest accuracy was for involvement of the abdominal peritoneum (69%) and diaphragm peritoneum (right 71%; left 75%) and surgical complexity prediction (77%). Stratification of results by presence or absence of ascites revealed significantly higher specificity of ultrasonography (clinically meaningful) for assessments of the abdominal/pelvic peritoneum, spleen hilum, and rectum wall, if there were ascites. A gynecological oncologist, experienced in surgery and sonology, performing comprehensive ultrasonography on patients with EOC can accurately detect intraperitoneal lesions and recognize critical disease manifestations and predict stage, surgical complexity, and residual disease, which allow accurate qualification of patients for primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agnieszka Tomasińska
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Gdynia Oncology Center, Pomeranian Hospitals, 81-519 Gdynia, Poland;
| | - Maciej Stukan
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Gdynia Oncology Center, Pomeranian Hospitals, 81-519 Gdynia, Poland;
| | - Michał Badocha
- Department of Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Gdańsk University of Technology, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland;
| | - Aleksandra Myszewska
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Gdynia Oncology Center, Pomeranian Hospitals, 81-519 Gdynia, Poland;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Moruzzi MC, Bolomini G, Moro F, Mascilini F, Ficarelli S, Beneduce G, Giudice MT, Pasciuto T, Moroni R, Scambia G, Fagotti A, Testa AC. Diagnostic performance of ultrasound in assessing the extension of the disease in patients with suspicion of malignant ovarian tumor: correlation between ultrasound parameters and Fagotti's score. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 31:279-285. [PMID: 32900793 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A radical surgical approach represents the mainstay treatment for gynecological malignancy, and preoperative staging of ovarian cancer is crucial. Ultrasound evaluation is widely recognized as the gold standard technique for the characterization of ovarian masses due to a high sensitivity for malignancy. In addition, its accuracy in defining intra-abdominal ovarian cancer spread has been previously proposed. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE To analyze the agreement between preoperative ultrasound examination and laparoscopic findings in assessing the extension of intra-abdominal disease using six parameters as described by Fagotti's score. STUDY HYPOTHESIS When performed by expert examiners, ultrasound can be an accurate technique to assess tumor spread in ovarian cancer and therefore to predict surgical resectability. TRIAL DESIGN This is a single-center prospective observational study. Patients with clinical and/or radiological suspicion of advanced ovarian or peritoneal cancer will be assessed with preoperative ultrasound and assigned a score based on the six Fagotti's laparoscopic score parameters. Each parameter will then be correlated with laparoscopic findings. MAJOR INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA Eligible patients include women 18-75 years of age with clinical and/or imaging suggestive of advanced ovarian or peritoneal cancer, and an ECOG performance status 0-3. PRIMARY ENDPOINTS Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in detecting carcinomatosis, using the parameters of Fagotti's score as a reference standard. Agreement between preoperative ultrasound examination and laparoscopic findings in assessing the extension of intra-abdominal disease as described in Fagotti's score. SAMPLE SIZE 240 patients. ESTIMATE DATES FOR COMPLETING ACCRUAL AND PRESENTING RESULTS The accrual started in January 2019. Enrollment should be completed approximately by October 2020 and the results will be analyzed by December 2020. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study received the Ethical Committee approval on July 19 2018 (Protocol 28967/18 ID:2172).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Cristina Moruzzi
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Bolomini
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Moro
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Floriana Mascilini
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Ficarelli
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuliana Beneduce
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cure, Istituto di Clinica Ostetrica e Ginecologica, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Teresa Giudice
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cure, Istituto di Clinica Ostetrica e Ginecologica, Rome, Italy
| | - Tina Pasciuto
- STAR Center (Statistics Technology Archiving Research), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Rossana Moroni
- Direzione Scientifica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Università Cattolica del Sacro Cure, Istituto di Clinica Ostetrica e Ginecologica, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Università Cattolica del Sacro Cure, Istituto di Clinica Ostetrica e Ginecologica, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonia Carla Testa
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Università Cattolica del Sacro Cure, Istituto di Clinica Ostetrica e Ginecologica, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
De Blasis I, Moruzzi MC, Moro F, Mascilini F, Cianci S, Gueli Alletti S, Turco LC, Garganese G, Scambia G, Testa AC. Role of ultrasound in advanced peritoneal malignancies. Minerva Med 2019; 110:292-300. [DOI: 10.23736/s0026-4806.19.06103-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
6
|
Stukan M, Badocha M, Ratajczak K. Development and validation of a model that includes two ultrasound parameters and the plasma D-dimer level for predicting malignancy in adnexal masses: an observational study. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:564. [PMID: 31185938 PMCID: PMC6558858 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5629-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2018] [Accepted: 04/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Pre-operative discrimination of malignant from benign adnexal masses is crucial for planning additional imaging, preparation, surgery and postoperative care. This study aimed to define key ultrasound and clinical variables and develop a predictive model for calculating preoperative ovarian tumor malignancy risk in a gynecologic oncology referral center. We compared our model to a subjective ultrasound assessment (SUA) method and previously described models. Methods This prospective, single-center observational study included consecutive patients. We collected systematic ultrasound and clinical data, including cancer antigen 125, D-dimer (DD) levels and platelet count. Histological examinations served as the reference standard. We performed univariate and multivariate regressions, and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) to assess the optimal model. Data were split into 2 subsets: training, for model development (190 observations) and testing, for model validation (n = 100). Results Among 290 patients, 52% had malignant disease, including epithelial ovarian cancer (72.8%), metastatic disease (14.5%), borderline tumors (6.6%), and non-epithelial malignancies (4.6%). Significant variables were included into a multivariate analysis. The optimal model, included three independent factors: solid areas, the color score, and the DD level. Malignant and benign lesions had mean DD values of 2.837 and 0.354 μg/ml, respectively. We transformed established formulae into a web-based calculator (http://gin-onc-calculators.com/gynonc.php) for calculating the adnexal mass malignancy risk. The areas under the curve (AUCs) for models compared in the testing set were: our model (0.977), Simple Rules risk calculation (0.976), Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) (0.972), Logistic Regression 2 (LR2) (0.969), Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI) 4 (0.932), SUA (0.930), and RMI3 (0.912). Conclusions Two simple ultrasound predictors and the DD level (also included in a mathematical model), when used by gynecologist oncologist, discriminated malignant from benign ovarian lesions as well or better than other more complex models and the SUA method. These parameters (and the model) may be clinically useful for planning adequate management in the cancer center. The model needs substantial validation. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-019-5629-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maciej Stukan
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Gdynia Oncology Center, Pomeranian Hospitals, Gdynia, Poland, Postal address: ul. Powstania Styczniowego 1, 81-519, Gdynia, Poland.
| | - Michał Badocha
- Department of Physical Chemistry, Gdańsk University of Technology, Gdańsk, Poland, Postal address: ul. Gabriela Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Karol Ratajczak
- Karol Ratajczak Consulting, ul. Damroki 1A, 80-175, Gdańsk, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Thomassin-Naggara I, Daraï E, Lécuru F, Fournier L. [Diagnostic value of imaging (ultrasonography, doppler, CT, MR, PET-CT) for the diagnosis of a suspicious ovarian mass and staging of ovarian, tubal or primary peritoneal cancer: Article drafted from the French Guidelines in oncology entitled "Initial management of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer" developed by FRANCOGYN, CNGOF, SFOG, GINECO-ARCAGY under the aegis of CNGOF and endorsed by INCa]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 47:123-133. [PMID: 30686729 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Transvaginal ultrasound is the first-line examination allowing characterizing 80 to 90% of adnexal masses (LP1). If performed by an expert, a subjective analysis is optimal. If performed by a non-expert, combining the use of Simple Rules with subjective analysis can achieve the diagnostic performance of an expert (LP1). Whichever the chosen model (subjective analysis by an expert or combination of the Simple Rules with a subjective analysis by a non-expert), a second-line examination will have to be proposed in the complex or indeterminate cases (about 20% of the masses) (grade A). The best-performing second-line test for characterization is pelvic MRI (LP1). If read by an expert, a pathological hypothesis can or should be suggested (grade D). In case of non-expert reading, the use of the ADNEXMR score allows a reliable assessment of the positive predictive value of malignancy to guide the patient towards the best management (gradeC). For preoperative assessment and evaluation of resectability of ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer, it is recommended to perform a chest abdomen and pelvis CT with contrast agent injection (LP2, grade B). In the event of a contraindication to the injection of iodinated contrast agent (severe renal insufficiency, GFR <30mL/min), an abdomen and pelvis MRI completed with a non-injected chest CT may be proposed (LP3, grade C). By analogy, the same examinations are recommended to evaluate the disease after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (LP3, Recommendation grade C). Further studies will be required to determine whether PET-CT provides better lymph node assessment before retroperitoneal and pelvic lymphadenectomy. PET-CT may be used to eliminate lymph node involvement in the absence of suspicious lymph nodes on morphological examination (LP3, grade C). The report should specify the localizations leading to a risk of incomplete cytoreductive surgery and lesions outside the field explored during surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Thomassin-Naggara
- Service de radiologie, hôpital Tenon, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France; Équipe medecine- Jussieu, institut des sciences du calcul et de données (ISCD), Sorbonne université 4, place Jussieu, 75006 Paris, France.
| | - E Daraï
- Service de gynécologie et obstétrique, hôpital Tenon, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France
| | - F Lécuru
- Service de chirurgie cancérologique gynécologique et du sein, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - L Fournier
- Service de radiologie, université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris Cité, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France; Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris Cité, Inserm UMR-S970, Cardiovascular Research Center - PARCC, 56, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Alcázar JL, Caparros M, Arraiza M, Mínguez JÁ, Guerriero S, Chiva L, Jurado M. Pre-operative assessment of intra-abdominal disease spread in epithelial ovarian cancer: a comparative study between ultrasound and computed tomography. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2019; 29:227-233. [DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2018-000066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2018] [Revised: 11/01/2018] [Accepted: 11/02/2018] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
ObjectiveTo compare the diagnostic performance of ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) for detecting pelvic and abdominal tumor spread in women with epithelial ovarian cancer.MethodsAn observational cohort study of 93 patients (mean age 57.6 years) with an ultrasound diagnosis of adnexal mass suspected of malignancy and confirmed histologically as epithelial ovarian cancer was undertaken. In all cases, transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasound as well as CT scans were performed to assess the extent of the disease within the pelvis and abdomen prior to surgery. The exploration was systematic, analyzing 12 anatomical areas. All patients underwent surgical staging and/or cytoreductive surgery with an initial laparoscopy for assessing resectability. The surgical and pathological findings were considered as the 'reference standard'. Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound and CT scanning were calculated for the different anatomical areas and compared using the McNemar test. Agreement between ultrasound and CT staging and the surgical stage was estimated using the weighted kappa index.ResultsThe tumorous stage was International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I in 26 cases, stage II in 11 cases, stage III in 47 cases, and stage IV in nine cases. Excluding stages I and IIA cases (n=30), R0 (no macroscopic residual disease) was achieved in 36 women (62.2%), R1 (macroscopic residual disease <1 cm) was achieved in 13 women (25.0%), and R2 (macroscopic residual disease >1 cm) debulking surgery occurred in three women (5.8%). Eleven patients (11.8%) were considered not suitable for optimal debulking surgery during laparoscopic assessment. Overall sensitivity of ultrasound and CT for detecting disease was 70.3% and 60.1%, respectively, and specificity was 97.8% and 93.7%, respectively. The agreement between radiological stage and surgical stage for ultrasound (kappa index 0.69) and CT (kappa index 0.70) was good for both techniques. Overall accuracy to determine tumor stage was 71% for ultrasound and 75% for CT.ConclusionDetailed ultrasound examination renders a similar diagnostic performance to CT for assessing pelvic/abdominal tumor spread in women with epithelial ovarian cancer.
Collapse
|