Toward a Standardization of Ultrasound Scanners for Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography: Methodology and Phantoms

New calibration setup for quantitative DCE-US imaging protocol: Toward standardization

BACKGROUND

The DCE-US (Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography) imaging protocol predicts the vascular modifications compared with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) based mainly on morphological changes. A quantitative biomarker has been validated through the DCE-US multi-centric study for early monitoring of the efficiency of anti-angiogenic cancer treatments. In this context, the question of transposing the use of this biomarker to other types of ultrasound scanners, probes and settings has arisen to maintain the follow-up of patients under anti-angiogenic treatments. As a consequence, radiologists encounter standardization issues between the different generations of ultrasound scanners to perform quantitative imaging protocols.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to develop a new calibration setup to transpose the DCE-US imaging protocol to the new generation of ultrasound scanners using both abdominal and linear probes.

METHODS

This calibration method has been designed to be easily reproducible and optimized, reducing the time required and cost incurred. It is based on an original set-up that includes using a concentration splitter to measure the variation of the harmonic signal intensity, obtained from the Area Under the time-intensity Curve (AUC) as a function of various contrast-agent concentrations. The splitter provided four different concentrations simultaneously ranging from 12.5% to 100% of the initial concentration of the SonoVue contrast agent (Bracco Imaging S.p.A., Milan, Italy), therefore, measuring four AUCs in a single injection. The plot of the AUC as a function of the four contrast agent concentrations represents the intensity variation of the harmonic signal: the slope being the calibration parameter. The standardization through this method implied that both generations of ultrasound scanners had to have the same slopes to be considered as calibrated. This method was tested on two ultrasound scanners from the same manufacturer (Aplio500, Aplioi900, Canon Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan). The Aplio500 used the settings defined by the initial multicenter DCE-US study. The Mechanical Index (MI) and the Color Gain (CG) of the Aplioi900 have been adjusted to match those of the Aplio500. The reliability of the new setup was evaluated in terms of measurement repeatability, and reproducibility with the agreement between the measurements obtained once the two ultrasound scanners were calibrated.

RESULTS

The new setup provided excellent repeatability measurements with a value of 96.8%. Once the two ultrasound scanners have been calibrated for both types of probes, the reproducibility was excellent with the agreement between their respective quantitative measurement was at the lowest 95.4% and at the best 98.8%. The settings of the Aplioi900 (Canon Medical Systems) were adjusted to match those of the Aplio500 (Canon Medical Systems) and these validated settings were for the abdominal probe: MI = 0.13 and CG = 34 dB; and for the linear probe: MI = 0.10 and CG = 38 dB.

CONCLUSION

This new calibration setup provided reliable measurements and enabled the rapid transfer and the use of the DCE-US imaging protocol on new ultrasound scanners, thus permitting a continuation of the therapeutic evaluation of patients through quantitative imaging.

Factors influencing the time-intensity curve analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in kidney transplanted patients: Toward a standardized contrast-enhanced ultrasound examination

Background

Time-intensity curve analysis (TIC analysis) based on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) provides quantifiable information about the microcirculation of different tissues. TIC analysis of kidney transplantations is still a field of research, and standardized study protocols are missing though being mandatory for the interpretation of TIC parameters in the clinical context. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of different sizes and forms of regions of interest (ROIs) on the variance of different TIC parameters and the level of interoperator variance between the different ROI methods in kidney transplantations.

Methods

In 25 renal transplanted patients, 33 CEUS of the transplanted kidney were performed, and TIC analysis with ROIs sized 5 mm2 (ROI5), 10 mm2 (ROI10), and ROIs circumscribing the outlines of anatomical regions (ROI Anat ) were analyzed based on CEUS examination. The TIC analysis was repeated by a second independent operator for ROI5 and ROI Anat .

Results

Statistical analysis revealed significant differences between TIC parameters of different ROI methods, and overall, the interoperator variance was low. But a greater ROI surface (ROI10) led to higher values of the intensity parameters A and AUC compared with ROI5 (p < 0.05). The difference in the ROI form led to high variation of certain TIC parameters between ROI5 and ROI Anat in the myelon [intraclass correlation coefficient (A, ICC = 0.578 (0.139-0.793); TIC parameter (TTP); and ICC = 0.679 (0.344-0.842) (p < 0.05)]. A mean variation of 1 cm of the depth of ROI5 in the cortex did not show significant differences in the TIC parameters, though there was an impact of depth of ROI Anat on the values of TIC parameters. The interoperator variance in the cortex was low and equal for ROI5 and ROI Anat , but increased in the myelon, especially for ROI Anat . Furthermore, the analysis revealed a strong correlation between the parameter AUC and the time interval applied for the TIC analysis in the cortex and myelon (r = 0.710, 0.674, p < 0.000).

Conclusion

Our findings suggest the application of multiple ROIs of 5 mm2 in the cortex and medulla to perform TIC analysis of kidney transplants. For clinical interpretation of AUC, a standardized time interval for TIC analysis should be developed. After the standardization of the TIC analysis, the clinical predictive value could be investigated in further studies.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the pediatric brain

Brain contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is an emerging application that can complement gray-scale US and yield additional insights into cerebral flow dynamics. CEUS uses intravenous injection of ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) to highlight tissue perfusion and thus more clearly delineate cerebral pathologies including stroke, hypoxic-ischemic injury and focal lesions such as tumors and vascular malformations. It can be applied not only in infants with open fontanelles but also in older children and adults via a transtemporal window or surgically created acoustic window. Advancements in CEUS technology and post-processing methods for quantitative analysis of UCA kinetics further elucidate cerebral microcirculation. In this review article we discuss the CEUS examination protocol for brain imaging in children, current clinical applications and future directions for research and clinical uses of brain CEUS.

Optimisation of ultrasound liver perfusion through a digital reference object and analysis tool

Background

Conventional ultrasound (US) provides important qualitative information, although there is a need to evaluate the influence of the input parameters on the output signal and standardise the acquisition for an adequate quantitative perfusion assessment. The present study analyses how the variation in the input parameters influences the measurement of the perfusion parameters.

Methods

A software tool with simulator of the conventional US signal was created, and the influence of the different input variables on the derived biomarkers was analysed by varying the image acquisition configuration. The input parameters considered were the dynamic range, gain, and frequency of the transducer. Their influence on mean transit time (MTT), the area under the curve (AUC), maximum intensity (MI), and time to peak (TTP) parameters as outputs of the quantitative perfusion analysis was evaluated. A group of 13 patients with hepatocarcinoma was analysed with both a commercial tool and an in-house developed software.

Results

The optimal calculated inputs which minimise errors while preserving images’ readability consisted of gain of 15 dB, dynamic range of 60 dB, and frequency of 1.5 MHz. The comparison between the in-house developed software and the commercial software provided different values for MTT and AUC, while MI and TTP were highly similar.

Conclusion

Input parameter selection introduces variability and errors in US perfusion parameter estimation. Our results may add relevant insight into the current knowledge of conventional US perfusion and its use in lesions characterisation, playing in favour of optimised standardised parameter configuration to minimise variability.