Principal component regression-based contrast-enhanced ultrasound evaluation system for the management of BI-RADS US 4A breast masses: objective assistance for radiologists

Biopsy or Follow-up: AI Improves the Clinical Strategy of US BI-RADS 4A Breast Nodules Using a Convolutional Neural Network

OBJECTIVES

To develop predictive nomograms based on clinical and ultrasound features and to improve the clinical strategy for US BI-RADS 4A lesions.

METHODS

Patients with US BI-RADS 4A lesions from 3 hospitals between January 2016 and June 2020 were retrospectively included. Clinical and ultrasound features were extracted to establish nomograms CE (based on clinical experience) and DL (based on deep-learning algorithm). The performances of nomograms were evaluated by receiver operator characteristic curves, calibration curves and decision curves. Diagnostic performances with DL of radiologists were analyzed.

RESULTS

1616 patients from 2 hospitals were randomly divided into training and internal validation cohorts at a ratio of 7:3. Hundred patients from another hospital made up external validation cohort. DL achieved more optimized AUCs than CE (internal validation: 0.916 vs. 0.863, P < .01; external validation: 0.884 vs. 0.776, P = .05). The sensitivities of DL were higher than CE (internal validation: 81.03% vs. 72.41%, P = .044; external validation: 93.75% vs. 81.25%, P = .4795) without losing specificity (internal validation: 84.91% vs. 86.47%, P = .353; external validation: 69.14% vs. 71.60%, P = .789). Decision curves indicated DL adds more clinical net benefit. With DL's assistance, both radiologists achieved higher AUCs (0.712 vs. 0.801; 0.547 vs. 0.800), improved specificities (70.93% vs. 74.42%, P < .001; 59.3% vs. 81.4%, P = .004), and decreased unnecessary biopsy rates by 6.7% and 24%.

CONCLUSION

DL was developed to discriminate US BI-RADS 4A lesions with a higher diagnostic power and more clinical net benefit than CE. Using DL may guide clinicians to make precise clinical decisions and avoid overtreatment of benign lesions.

Identifying plasma metabolic characteristics of major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia in adolescents

Major depressive disorder (MDD), bipolar disorder (BD), and schizophrenia (SCZ) are classified as major mental disorders and together account for the second-highest global disease burden, and half of these patients experience symptom onset in adolescence. Several studies have reported both similar and unique features regarding the risk factors and clinical symptoms of these three disorders. However, it is still unclear whether these disorders have similar or unique metabolic characteristics in adolescents. We conducted a metabolomics analysis of plasma samples from adolescent healthy controls (HCs) and patients with MDD, BD, and SCZ. We identified differentially expressed metabolites between patients and HCs. Based on the differentially expressed metabolites, correlation analysis, metabolic pathway analysis, and potential diagnostic biomarker identification were conducted for disorders and HCs. Our results showed significant changes in plasma metabolism between patients with these mental disorders and HCs; the most distinct changes were observed in SCZ patients. Moreover, the metabolic differences in BD patients shared features with those in both MDD and SCZ, although the BD metabolic profile was closer to that of MDD than to SCZ. Additionally, we identified the metabolites responsible for the similar and unique metabolic characteristics in multiple metabolic pathways. The similar significant differences among the three disorders were found in fatty acid, steroid-hormone, purine, nicotinate, glutamate, tryptophan, arginine, and proline metabolism. Interestingly, we found unique characteristics of significantly altered glycolysis, glycerophospholipid, and sphingolipid metabolism in SCZ; lysine, cysteine, and methionine metabolism in MDD and BD; and phenylalanine, tyrosine, and aspartate metabolism in SCZ and BD. Finally, we identified five panels of potential diagnostic biomarkers for MDD-HC, BD-HC, SCZ-HC, MDD-SCZ, and BD-SCZ comparisons. Our findings suggest that metabolic characteristics in plasma vary across psychiatric disorders and that critical metabolites provide new clues regarding molecular mechanisms in these three psychiatric disorders.

Catalytically Active Metal-Organic Frameworks Elicit Robust Immune Response to Combination Chemodynamic and Checkpoint Blockade Immunotherapy

Chemodynamic therapy (CDT) strategies rely on the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) to kill tumor cells, with hydroxyl radicals (^•OH) serving as the key mediators of cytotoxicity in this setting. However, the efficacy of CDT approaches is often hampered by the properties of the tumor microenvironment (TME) and associated limitations to the Fenton reaction that constrains ROS generation. As such, there is a pressing need for the design of new nanoplatforms capable of improving CDT outcomes. In this study, an Fc-based metal-organic framework (MOF) vitamin k3 (Vk3)-loaded cascade catalytic nanoplatform (Vk3@Co-Fc) was developed. This platform was capable of undergoing TME-responsive degradation without impacting normal cells. After its release, Vk3 was processed by nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide hydrogen phosphate (NAD(P)H) quinone oxidoreductase-1 (NQO1), which is highly expressed in tumor cells, thereby yielding large quantities of H₂O₂ that in turn interact with Fe ions via the Fenton reaction to facilitate in situ cytotoxic ^•OH production. This process leads to immunogenic cell death (ICD) of the tumor, which then promotes dendritic cell maturation and ultimately increases T cell infiltration into the tumor site. When this nanoplatform was combined with programmed death 1 (PD-1) checkpoint blockade approaches, it was sufficient to enhance tumor-associated immune responses in breast cancer as evidenced by increases in the frequencies of CD45⁺ leukocytes and CD8⁺ cytotoxic T lymphocytes, thereby inhibiting tumor metastasis to the lungs and improving murine survival outcomes. Together, this Vk3@Co-Fc cascading catalytic nanoplatform enables potent cancer immunotherapy for breast cancer regression and metastasis prevention.

A nomogram based on combining clinical features and contrast enhanced ultrasound is not able to identify Her-2 over-expressing cancer from other breast cancers

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a predictive model based on a contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)-based nomogram and clinical features (Clin) could differentiate Her-2-overexpressing breast cancers from other breast cancers.

Methods

A total of 152 pathology-proven breast cancers including 55 Her-2-overexpressing cancers and 97 other cancers from two units that underwent preoperative CEUS examination, were included and divided into training (n = 102) and validation cohorts (n = 50). Multivariate regression analysis was utilized to identify independent indicators for developing predictive nomogram models. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve was also calculated to establish the diagnostic performance of different predictive models. The corresponding sensitivities and specificities of different models at the cutoff nomogram value were compared.

Results

In the training cohort, 7 clinical features (menstruation, larger tumor size, higher CA153 level, BMI, diastolic pressure, heart rate and outer upper quarter (OUQ)) + enlargement in CEUS with P < 0.2 according to the univariate analysis were submitted to the multivariate analysis. By incorporating clinical information and enlargement on the CEUS pattern, independently significant indicators for Her-2-overexpression were used for further predictive modeling as follows: Model I, nomogram model based on clinical features (Clin); Model II, nomogram model combining enlargement (Clin + Enlargement); Model III, nomogram model based on typical clinical features combining enlargement (MC + BMI + diastolic pressure (DP) + outer upper quarter (OUQ) + Enlargement). Model II achieved an AUC value of 0.776 at nomogram cutoff score value of 190, which was higher than that of the other models in the training cohort without significant differences (all P>0.05). In the test cohort, the diagnostic efficiency of predictive model was poor (all AUC<0.6). In addition, the sensitivity and specificity were not significantly different between Models I and II (all P>0.05), in either the training or the test cohort. In addition, Clin exhibited an AUC similar to that of model III (P=0.12). Moreover, model III exhibited a higher sensitivity (70.0%) than the other models with similar AUC and specificity, only in the test cohort.

Conclusion

The main finding of the study was that the predictive model based on a CEUS-based nomogram and clinical features could not differentiate Her-2-overexpressing breast cancers from other breast cancers.

Evaluation of diagnostic efficacy of multimode ultrasound in BI-RADS 4 breast neoplasms and establishment of a predictive model

Objectives

To explore the diagnostic efficacy of ultrasound (US), two-dimensional and three-dimensional shear-wave elastography (2D-SWE and 3D-SWE), and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in breast neoplasms in category 4 based on the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) from the American College of Radiology (ACR) and to develop a risk-prediction nomogram based on the optimal combination to provide a reference for the clinical management of BI-RADS 4 breast neoplasms.

Methods

From September 2021 to April 2022, a total of 104 breast neoplasms categorized as BI-RADS 4 by US were included in this prospective study. There were 78 breast neoplasms randomly assigned to the training cohort; the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC), 95% confidence interval (95% CI), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 2D-SWE, 3D-SWE, CEUS, and their combination were analyzed and compared. The optimal combination was selected to develop a risk-prediction nomogram. The performance of the nomogram was assessed by a validation cohort of 26 neoplasms.

Results

Of the 78 neoplasms in the training cohort, 16 were malignant and 62 were benign. Among the 26 neoplasms in the validation cohort, 6 were malignant and 20 were benign. The AUC values of 2D-SWE, 3D-SWE, and CEUS were not significantly different. After a comparison of the different combinations, 2D-SWE+CEUS showed the optimal performance. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was used to filter the variables in this combination, and the variables included Emax, Eratio, enhancement mode, perfusion defect, and area ratio. Then, a risk-prediction nomogram with BI-RADS was built. The performance of the nomogram was better than that of the radiologists in the training cohort (AUC: 0.974 vs. 0.863). In the validation cohort, there was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy between the nomogram and the experienced radiologists (AUC: 0.946 vs. 0.842).

Conclusions

US, 2D-SWE, 3D-SWE, CEUS, and their combination could improve the diagnostic efficiency of BI-RADS 4 breast neoplasms. The diagnostic efficacy of US+3D-SWE was not better than US+2D-SWE. US+2D-SWE+CEUS showed the optimal diagnostic performance. The nomogram based on US+2D-SWE+CEUS performs well.

Multi-parameter ultrasonography-based predictive model for breast cancer diagnosis

OBJECTIVES

To develop, validate, and evaluate a predictive model for breast cancer diagnosis using conventional ultrasonography (US), shear wave elastography (SWE), and contrast-enhanced US (CEUS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 674 patients with 674 breast lesions. The data, a main and an independent datasets, were divided into three cohorts. Cohort 1 (80% of the main dataset; n = 448) was analyzed by logistic regression analysis to identify risk factors and establish the predictive model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was analyzed in Cohort 2 (20% of the main dataset; n = 119) to validate and in Cohort 3 (the independent dataset; n = 107) to evaluate the predictive model.

RESULTS

Multivariable regression analysis revealed nine independent breast cancer risk factors, including age > 40 years; ill-defined margin, heterogeneity, rich blood flow, and abnormal axillary lymph nodes on US; enhanced area enlargement, contrast agent retention, and irregular shape on CEUS; mean SWE higher than the cutoff value (P < 0.05 for all). The diagnostic performance of the model was good, with AUC values of 0.847, 0.857, and 0.774 for Cohorts 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The model increased the diagnostic specificity (from 31% to 81.3% and 7.3% to 73.1% in cohorts 2 and 3, respectively) without a significant loss in sensitivity (from 100.0% to 90.1% and 100.0% to 81.8% in cohorts 2 and 3, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The multi-parameter US-based model showed good performance in breast cancer diagnosis, improving specificity without a significant loss in sensitivity. Using the model could reduce unnecessary biopsies and guide clinical diagnosis and treatment.