Recommendations for Reporting Therapeutic Ultrasound Treatment Parameters

ITRUSST consensus on standardised reporting for transcranial ultrasound stimulation

As transcranial ultrasound stimulation (TUS) advances as a precise, non-invasive neuromodulatory method, there is a need for consistent reporting standards to enable comparison and reproducibility across studies. To this end, the International Transcranial Ultrasonic Stimulation Safety and Standards Consortium (ITRUSST) formed a subcommittee of experts across several domains to review and suggest standardised reporting parameters for low intensity TUS, resulting in the guide presented here. The scope of the guide is limited to reporting the ultrasound aspects of a study. The guide and supplementary material provide a simple checklist covering the reporting of: (1) the transducer and drive system, (2) the drive system settings, (3) the free field acoustic parameters, (4) the pulse timing parameters, (5) in situ estimates of exposure parameters in the brain, and (6) intensity parameters. Detailed explanations for each of the parameters, including discussions on assumptions, measurements, and calculations, are also provided.

Focused Ultrasound-Enhanced Liquid Biopsy: A Promising Diagnostic Tool for Brain Tumor Patients

The performance of minimally invasive molecular diagnostic tools in brain tumors, such as liquid biopsy, has so far been limited by the blood-brain barrier (BBB). The BBB hinders the release of brain tumor biomarkers into the bloodstream. The use of focused ultrasound in conjunction with microbubbles has been shown to temporarily open the BBB (FUS-BBBO). This may enhance blood-based tumor biomarker levels. This systematic review provides an overview of the data regarding FUS-BBBO-enhanced liquid biopsy for primary brain tumors. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed and Embase databases with key terms "brain tumors", "liquid biopsy", "FUS" and their synonyms, in accordance with PRISMA statement guidelines. Five preclinical and two clinical studies were included. Preclinical studies utilized mouse, rat and porcine glioma models. Biomarker levels were found to be higher in sonicated groups compared to control groups. Both stable and inertial microbubble cavitation increased biomarker levels, whereas only inertial cavitation induced microhemorrhages. In clinical studies involving 14 patients with high-grade brain tumors, biomarker levels were increased after FUS-BBBO with stable cavitation. In conclusion, FUS-BBBO-enhanced liquid biopsy using stable cavitation shows diagnostic potential for primary brain tumors. Further research is imperative before integrating FUS-BBBO for liquid biopsy enhancement into clinical practice.

Safety Review of Therapeutic Ultrasound for Spinal Cord Neuromodulation and Blood-Spinal Cord Barrier Opening

New focused ultrasound spinal cord applications have emerged, particularly those improving therapeutic agent delivery to the spinal cord via blood-spinal cord barrier opening and the neuromodulation of spinal cord tracts. One hurdle in the development of these applications is safety. It may be possible to use safety trends from seminal and subsequent works in focused ultrasound to guide the development of safety guidelines for spinal cord applications. We collated data from decades of pre-clinical studies and illustrate a clear relationship between damage, time-averaged spatial peak intensity and exposure duration. This relationship suggests a thermal mechanism underlies ultrasound-induced spinal cord damage. We developed minimum and mean thresholds for damage from these pre-clinical studies. When these thresholds were plotted against the parameters used in recent pre-clinical ultrasonic spinal cord neuromodulation studies, the majority of the neuromodulation studies were near or above the minimum threshold. This suggests that a thermal neuromodulatory effect may exist for ultrasonic spinal cord neuromodulation, and that the thermal dose must be carefully controlled to avoid damage to the spinal cord. By contrast, the intensity-exposure duration threshold had no predictive value when applied to blood-spinal cord barrier opening studies that employed injected contrast agents. Most blood-spinal cord barrier opening studies observed slight to severe damage, except for small animal studies that employed an active feedback control method to limit pressures based on measured bubble oscillation behavior. The development of new focused ultrasound spinal cord applications perhaps reflects the recent success in the development of focused ultrasound brain applications, and recent work has begun on the translation of these technologies from brain to spinal cord. However, a great deal of work remains to be done, particularly with respect to developing and accepting safety standards for these applications.

Guidelines for immunological analyses following focused ultrasound treatment

Focused ultrasound (FUS) is a powerful emerging tool for non-invasive, non-ionizing targeted destruction of tumors. The last two decades have seen a growing body of preclinical and clinical literature supporting the capacity of FUS to increase nascent immune responses to tumors and to potentiate cancer immunotherapies (e.g. checkpoint inhibitors) through a variety of means, including immune modulation and drug delivery. With the rapid acceleration of this field and a multitude of FUS immunotherapy clinical trials having now been deployed worldwide, there is a need to streamline and standardize the methodology for immunological analyses field-wide. Recently, the Focused Ultrasound Foundation and Cancer Research Institute partnered to convene a group of over 85 leaders to discuss the nexus of FUS and immuno-oncology. The guidelines documented herein were assembled in response to recommendations that emerged from this discussion, emphasizing the urgent need for heightened accessibility of immune analysis methods and standardized protocols unique to the field. These guidelines are designated for existing stakeholders in the FUS immuno-oncology domain or those newly entering the field, to provide guidance on collection, storage, and immunological profiling of tissue or blood specimens in the context of FUS immunotherapy studies, and additionally offer templates for standardized deployment of these methods based on collective experience gained within the field to date. These guidelines are tumor-agnostic and provide evidence-based, consensus-based recommendations for both preclinical and clinical immune analysis of tissue and blood specimens.

The use of histotripsy as intratumoral immunotherapy beyond tissue ablation-the rationale for exploring the immune effects of histotripsy

Mechanical high-intensity focused ultrasound (M-HIFU), which includes histotripsy, is a non-ionizing, non-thermal ablation technology that can be delivered by noninvasive methods. Because acoustic cavitation is the primary mechanism of tissue disruption, histotripsy is distinct from the conventional HIFU techniques resulting in hyperthermia and thermal injury. Phase I human trials have shown the initial safety and efficacy of histotripsy in treating patients with malignant liver tumors. In addition to tissue ablation, a promising benefit of M-HIFU has been stimulating a local and systemic antitumor immune response in preclinical models and potentially in the Phase I trial. Preclinical studies combining systemic immune therapies appear promising, but clinical studies of combinations have been complicated by systemic toxicities. Consequently, combining M-HIFU with systemic immunotherapy has been demonstrated in preclinical models and may be testing in future clinical studies. An additional alternative is to combine intratumoral M-HIFU and immunotherapy using microcatheter-placed devices to deliver both M-HIFU and immunotherapy intratumorally. The promise of M-HIFU as a component of anti-cancer therapy is promising, but as forms of HIFU are tested in preclinical and clinical studies, investigators should report not only the parameters of the energy delivered but also details of the preclinical models to enable analysis of the immune responses. Ultimately, as clinical trials continue, clinical responses and immune analysis of patients undergoing M-HIFU including forms of histotripsy will provide opportunities to optimize clinical responses and to optimize application and scheduling of M-HIFU in the context of the multi-modality care of the cancer patient.

Ultrasound as a versatile tool for short- and long-term improvement and monitoring of brain function

Treating the brain with focused ultrasound (FUS) at low intensities elicits diverse responses in neurons, astroglia, and the extracellular matrix. In combination with intravenously injected microbubbles, FUS also opens the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and facilitates focal drug delivery. However, an incompletely understood cellular specificity and a wide parameter space currently limit the optimal application of FUS in preclinical and human studies. In this perspective, we discuss how different FUS modalities can be utilized to achieve short- and long-term improvements, thereby potentially treating brain disorders. We review the ongoing efforts to determine which parameters induce neuronal inhibition versus activation and how mechanoreceptors and signaling cascades are activated to induce long-term changes, including memory improvements. We suggest that optimal FUS treatments may require different FUS modalities and devices, depending on the targeted brain area or local pathology, and will be greatly enhanced by new techniques for monitoring FUS efficacy.

Barrier-breaking effects of ultrasonic cavitation for drug delivery and biomarker release

Recently, emerging evidence has demonstrated that cavitation actually creates important bidirectional channels on biological barriers for both intratumoral drug delivery and extratumoral biomarker release. To promote the barrier-breaking effects of cavitation for both therapy and diagnosis, we first reviewed recent technical advances of ultrasound and its contrast agents (microbubbles, nanodroplets, and gas-stabilizing nanoparticles) and then reported the newly-revealed cavitation physical details. In particular, we summarized five types of cellular responses of cavitation in breaking the plasma membrane (membrane retraction, sonoporation, endocytosis/exocytosis, blebbing and apoptosis) and compared the vascular cavitation effects of three different types of ultrasound contrast agents in breaking the blood-tumor barrier and tumor microenvironment. Moreover, we highlighted the current achievements of the barrier-breaking effects of cavitation in mediating drug delivery and biomarker release. We emphasized that the precise induction of a specific cavitation effect for barrier-breaking was still challenged by the complex combination of multiple acoustic and non-acoustic cavitation parameters. Therefore, we provided the cutting-edge in-situ cavitation imaging and feedback control methods and suggested the development of an international cavitation quantification standard for the clinical guidance of cavitation-mediated barrier-breaking effects.

Hydrophone Measurements for Biomedical Ultrasound Applications: A Review

This article presents basic principles of hydrophone measurements, including mechanisms of action for various hydrophone designs, sensitivity and directivity calibration procedures, practical considerations for performing measurements, signal processing methods to correct for both frequency-dependent sensitivity and spatial averaging across the hydrophone sensitive element, uncertainty in hydrophone measurements, special considerations for high-intensity therapeutic ultrasound, and advice for choosing an appropriate hydrophone for a particular measurement task. Recommendations are made for information to be included in hydrophone measurement reporting.

Ultrasound-Mediated Bioeffects in Senescent Mice and Alzheimer's Mouse Models

Ultrasound is routinely used for a wide range of diagnostic imaging applications. However, given that ultrasound can operate over a wide range of parameters that can all be modulated, its applicability extends far beyond the bioimaging field. In fact, the modality has emerged as a hybrid technology that effectively assists drug delivery by transiently opening the blood–brain barrier (BBB) when combined with intravenously injected microbubbles, and facilitates neuromodulation. Studies in aged mice contributed to an insight into how low-intensity ultrasound brings about its neuromodulatory effects, including increased synaptic plasticity and improved cognitive functions, with a potential role for neurogenesis and the modulation of NMDA receptor-mediated neuronal signalling. This work is complemented by studies in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), a form of pathological ageing. Here, ultrasound was mainly employed as a BBB-opening tool that clears protein aggregates via microglial activation and neuronal autophagy, thereby restoring cognition. We discuss the currently available ultrasound approaches and how studies in senescent mice are relevant for AD and can accelerate the application of low-intensity ultrasound in the clinic.