Sandoval-Salinas C, Saffon JP, Corredor HA. Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction: A Systematic Review.
J Sex Med 2020;
17:678-687. [PMID:
32001203 DOI:
10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.12.023]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2019] [Revised: 12/14/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) guide the diagnosis and treatment of erectile dysfunction using different methodologies. Nonetheless, the quality of published CPGs is unknown.
AIM
To evaluate the quality of CPGs for diagnosis and treatment of patients with erectile dysfunction.
METHODS
The Medline, Embase, and LILACS databases were searched using structured strategies. The evidence was complemented by searches on websites of scientific societies and guideline developers. The CPG quality was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE
The outcome measure included the quality of CPGs in accordance with the AGREE II instrument score.
RESULTS
17 guidelines met the selection criteria. 15 had recommendations for diagnosis, 16, had recommendations for treatment, and 1 included a follow-up. Most of the guidelines were developed in Europe (35.3%) and North America (29.4%), 2 were prepared by specialized groups (11.7%), and 1 was funded by public resources. The most common development method was the panel of experts (9 guides, 52.9%). 5 guidelines were of high quality as per the methodological rigor, as follows: Cancer Care Ontario 2016 (76.5%), European Urology Association 2018 (65.6%), American Urological Association 2018 (62.5%), American College of Physicians (62.5%), and Japanese Society for Sexual Medicine (60.4%). There was a significant relationship (P = .043) between the methodological quality of the guidelines and the funding source.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
By knowing the quality of the clinical practice guidelines, users can make more objective decisions about their use, which has an impact on patient care.
STRENGTH & LIMITATIONS
High-quality CPGs frequently used in health-care practice were identified. Solely CPGs in Spanish, English, and Portuguese were included, which generates selection bias in the results.
CONCLUSIONS
The number of CPGs for erectile dysfunction developed using international standards that meet the AGREE II quality criteria is low. Scientific societies have a strong interest in developing guidelines on this topic, whereas the participation of governmental organizations is limited. Sandoval-Salinas C, Saffon JP, Corredor HA. Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction: A Systematic Review. J Sex Med 2020;17:678-687.
Collapse