Effects of long-term finasteride treatment on prostate cancer morphology and clinical outcome

Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Morphologic Features and Predictive Parameters of Therapy Response

The primary goals of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) in prostate cancer (PCa) are to reduce the size of the tumor, lower positive surgical margin rate, attempt to reach pathologic remission, and improve survival. Although NHT has not been recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network as a primary treatment option for patients with localized PCa, NHT is increasingly used in clinical trials for locally advanced PCa. More importantly, with the development of novel androgen signaling inhibitors, such as abiraterone and enzalutamide, there has been renewed interests in revisiting the role of such treatment in the neoadjuvant setting. Following NHT, the PCa tissues shows characteristic morphologic alterations. Of note, the collapse of malignant glands most likely leads to an artificial increase of Gleason score in the residual disease. Communicating these changes to the clinician in a way that can help assess the tumor's response poses a challenge for pathologists. In addition, little is known of morphologic features and predictive makers both in pretreated and posttreated specimens that can be of value in predicting tumor response to NHT. In the current review, we summarize the morphologic changes associated with neoadjuvant-treated PCa, focusing on the predictive value of pathologic parameters to therapy response. We also describe the evaluation system in the stratification of pathologic response to NHT in PCa management.

Iatrogenic Disease of the Genitourinary Tract

Iatrogenic disease is defined as illness caused by diagnostic procedures or treatment given by health care professionals. More recently described treatment complications involving the genitourinary tract include newly recognized variants of renal carcinoma in the setting of dialysis/end-stage renal disease, treatment effect in genitourinary carcinomas, and medical renal disease caused by drug therapies, including immunotherapy. The objective of this review is to cover iatrogenic inflammatory diseases, pseudotumors and tumors of the kidney, bladder, prostate, testis and paratestis of most interest to surgical pathologists. For this reason, disease caused by the following will not be covered: iatrogenic glomerulonephritis, self-inflicted injury including the introduction of foreign bodies, surgical error, drugs of abuse and herbal medications, and iatrogenic disease in the transplant setting including ischemia/reperfusion injury. Emphasis is placed upon commonly encountered diseases in order to ensure that the review is of utility to practicing pathologists. The clinical context, pathophysiology and histopathology of each disease entity are covered.

A Novel System for Estimating Residual Disease and Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Treatment of Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND

Pathologic variables that characterize response of prostate carcinoma to current neoadjuvant therapy have not been characterized in detail. This study reports (i) the histological features of prostate cancer treated with abiraterone and enzalutamide and inter-pathologist variance in identifying these features, and (ii) the effect of the novel androgen deprivation agents on residual cancer volume.

METHODS

We reviewed sections of prostatectomies from 37 patients treated with neoadjuvant agents and 22 untreated patients, tabulated the frequency of nine features of cancer (intact cancer glands, isolated cancer cells, poorly formed glands, cribriform architecture, clear spaces, intraductal carcinoma, solid sheets of cancer cells, prominent nucleoli, and previously described ABC grouping) and two features of benign glands (prominent basal cells and coalescent corpora amylacea). We used several methods, including a novel metric (visual grid system), to estimate residual tumor volume.

RESULTS

The most highly reproducible features were ABC grouping (κ = 0.56-0.7), presence of intraductal carcinoma (κ = 0.34-0.72), cribriform architecture (κ = 0.42-0.68), solid sheets of tumor cells (κ = 0.44-0.56), and coalescent corpora amylacea (κ = 0.4-0.54). Among poorly reproducible features were prominent nucleoli (κ = 0.03-0.11), clear spaces (κ = 0.05-0.07), and poorly formed cancer glands (κ = 0.02-0.1). Determination of tumor mass was excellent regardless of the method used-maximum tumor size (κ = 0.9-0.94), tumor area (κ = 0.94-0.96), and grid-based tumor cellularity (κ = 0.9).

CONCLUSIONS

We propose using a set of parameters including maximum tumor size, tumor area/volume, cellularity, volume, and ABC grouping for evaluating radical prostatectomies post-neoadjuvant therapy. Prostate 76:1285-1292, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[Drug treatment of alopecia]

BACKGROUND

Alopecia is the term used to describe hairless areas of the scalp. They can follow a specific pattern, be diffuse or circumscript. Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) follows a pattern: in men thinning of temples and vertex up to total baldness; in women thinning of the midline or parietal area.

CAUSES

Lack of iron or cytostatic drugs cause diffuse alopecia, while in autoimmune diseases such as alopecia areata or lichen planus bizarre shapes of hairless areas are observed.

TREATMENT

For therapy, the following medications are used: topical minoxidil solution for AGA of men and women; systemic finasteride 1 mg for men with AGA; topical diphencyprone immunotherapy for alopecia areata; systemic antimycotic agents for tinea capitis; antibiotics such as clindamycin and rifampicin for folliculitis decalvans; systemic corticosteroids and isotretinoin for folliculitis et perifolliculitis capitis abscedens et suffodiens; topical corticosteroids for lichen planus and Kossard's frontal fibrosing alopecia.

Prostate changes related to therapy: with special reference to hormone therapy

Hormone and radiation therapy have traditionally been used in prostate cancer (PCa). Morphological effects are often identified in needle biopsies and surgical specimens. A range of histological changes are seen in the non-neoplastic prostate and in the pre-neoplastic and neoplastic areas. Other ablative therapies, including cryotherapy, and emerging focal therapies, such as high-intensity focused ultrasound, photodynamic therapy and interstitial laser thermotherapy, may induce changes on the prostate. As new compounds are developed for prostate cancer treatment, it is important to document their effects on benign and neoplastic prostate tissue.

Treatment effects in prostate cancer following traditional and emerging therapies

Treatment options for prostate cancer consist of radical prostatectomy, hormonal therapy and radiation therapy. Hormonal and radiation therapy have well-known, often profound, effects on the histological appearance of benign and malignant prostate tissue. Novel therapies including focal ablative treatments, chemotherapies and targeted molecular therapies are beginning to emerge and pathologists will play a central role in documenting the effects of these treatments at the tissue level. As such, knowledge of treatment-related changes and access to clinical information are essential to ensure accurate interpretation and reporting of post-treatment prostate specimens by pathologists.

Prostate cancer originating in basal cells progresses to adenocarcinoma propagated by luminal-like cells

The relationship between the cells that initiate cancer and the cancer stem-like cells that propagate tumors has been poorly defined. In a human prostate tissue transformation model, basal cells expressing the oncogenes Myc and myristoylated AKT can initiate heterogeneous tumors. Tumors contain features of acinar-type adenocarcinoma with elevated eIF4E-driven protein translation and squamous cell carcinoma marked by activated beta-catenin. Lentiviral integration site analysis revealed that alternative histological phenotypes can be clonally derived from a common cell of origin. In advanced disease, adenocarcinoma can be propagated by self-renewing tumor cells with an androgen receptor-low immature luminal phenotype in the absence of basal-like cells. These data indicate that advanced prostate adenocarcinoma initiated in basal cells can be maintained by luminal-like tumor-propagating cells. Determining the cells that maintain human prostate adenocarcinoma and the signaling pathways characterizing these tumor-propagating cells is critical for developing effective therapeutic strategies against this population.

Androgen deprivation therapy in combination with radiotherapy for high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has remained the main therapeutic option for patients with advanced prostate cancer (PCa) for about 70 years. Several reports and our findings revealed that aggressive PCa can occur under a low dihydrotestosterone (DHT) level environment where the PCa of a low malignancy with high DHT dependency cannot easily occur. Low DHT levels in the prostate with aggressive PCa are probably sufficient to propagate the growth of the tumor, and the prostate with aggressive PCa can produce androgens from the adrenal precursors more autonomously than that with non-aggressive PCa does under the low testosterone environment with testicular suppression. In patients treated with ADT the pituitary-adrenal axis mediated by adrenocorticotropic hormone has a central role in the regulation of androgen synthesis. Several experimental studies have confirmed the potential benefits from the combination of ADT with radiotherapy (RT). A combination of external RT with short-term ADT is recommended based on the results of phase III randomized trials. In contrast, the combination of RT plus 6 months of ADT provides inferior survival as compared with RT plus 3 years of ADT in the treatment of locally advanced PCa. Notably, randomized trials included patients with diverse risk groups treated with older RT modalities, a variety of ADT scheduling and duration and, importantly, suboptimal RT doses. The use of ADT with higher doses of RT or newer RT modalities has to be properly assessed.

ERG cooperates with androgen receptor in regulating trefoil factor 3 in prostate cancer disease progression

To elucidate the role of ETS gene fusions in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), we characterized the transcriptome of 54 CRPC tumor samples from men with locally advanced or metastatic disease. Trefoil factor 3 (TFF3) emerged as the most highly differentially regulated gene with respect to ERG rearrangement status and resistance to hormone ablation therapy. Conventional chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-polymerase chain reaction and ChIP followed by DNA sequencing (ChIP-seq) revealed direct binding of ERG to ETS binding sites in the TFF3 promoter in ERG-rearranged prostate cancer cell lines. These results were confirmed in ERG-rearranged hormone-naive prostate cancer (HNPC) and CRPC tissue samples. Functional studies demonstrated that ERG has an inhibitory effect on TFF3 expression in hormone-naive cancer but not in the castration-resistant state. In addition, we provide evidence suggesting an effect of androgen receptor signaling on ERG-regulated TFF3 expression. Furthermore, TFF3 overexpression enhances ERG-mediated cell invasion in CRPC prostate cancer cells. Taken together, our findings reveal a novel mechanism for enhanced tumor cell aggressiveness resulting from ERG rearrangement in the castration-resistant setting through TFF3 gene expression.

Association between serum sex hormone levels and prostate cancer: effect of prostate cancer on serum testosterone levels

Androgens are essential for prostatic growth and development, but also play a significant role in the pathogenesis of prostate disease. The traditional view that higher testosterone levels represent a risk factor for prostate cancer (PCa) appears to have little evidentiary support. Some studies have described a relationship between lower testosterone levels and more advanced disease. Serum androgen levels, within a broad range, are thus suggested to show no association with PCa risk, whereas low rather than high serum testosterone levels have been found to be associated with advanced or high-grade disease at the time of PCa diagnosis. Dihydrotestosterone, the principal prostatic androgen, is transformed from testosterone by type 1 and type 2 5alpha-reductase, and therapeutic benefits may thus be potentially achieved through the inhibition of 5alpha-reductase.

[Histological modifications observed in prostate after preserving treatments for prostate cancer and their impact on Gleason score interpretation]

Total prostatectomy remains the main treatment for intermediate risk prostate cancer with a life expectancy greater than 10 years. In other cases non-surgical treatments can be proposed: external radiotherapy (exclusive or combined anti-androgen therapy), brachytherapy with permanent implants, high frequency ultrasounds (HIFU, Ablatherm), cryotherapy or exclusive hormonal treatment. For such patients in case of biological recurrence, prostate biopsies are usually performed in order to affirm the local recurrence. The histological confirmation of persistent tumor is usually required before any treatment: salvage surgery, cryotherapy, and brachytherapy or high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). Pathologists must be aware of the histological modifications induced by these different treatments in order to ensure an optimal interpretation of the biopsies. In this review, we describe the modifications observed in the normal prostate and in cancers after these various therapeutic methods, and also after alpha reductase inhibitors proposed as treatment of benign prostate hypertrophy and prostate cancer chemoprevention.

[The pathologist's perspective on the PCPT trial]

The PCPT (Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial) trial which compared 5 mg/d of finastéride to placebo in men over 55 years old showed that active treatment reduced the incidence of prostate cancer from 24.4 to 18.4%. Paradoxically, the incidence of high grade cancers (Gleason score > or = 7) was higher in the finasteride group (6.4%) than in the placebo group (5.1%). Histological interpretation of the radical prostatectomy specimens showed an overestimation of Gleason score on biopsy both in the finasteride and placebo group. The high grade cancers on total prostatectomy specimens were not more aggressive in the finasteride arm than in the placebo arm. There is no argument to suggest that long term finasteride may promote the development of highly aggressive cancer. Urologists must clearly be aware that finasteride treatment may result in morphological changes in order to inform the pathologist that this drug is being taken. If a prostate cancer with a Gleason score > or = 7 is diagnosed in a treated patient, the pathologist will perform a double reading of the slides to confirm the score.

Targeted therapy of cancer: new roles for pathologists--prostate cancer

The clinical dilemma today in the management of prostate cancer (PCA) is to distinguish men who need definitive treatment from men who have indolent disease. As demonstrated most recently by the randomized Scandinavian trial evaluating the benefit of prostatectomy over Watchful Waiting, surgery significantly decreased the risk of death from PCA. However, this same study also suggests that 19 men need to be treated to benefit one man. Given the high prevalence of the disease, the aging of the population, and the potential morbidity of treatment, the ability to distinguish aggressive from indolent forms of PCA is critical. Treatment for advanced PCA begins with androgen ablation, but eventually hormone-refractory (HR) PCA emerges. Novel therapies are in various stages of clinical trials, including kinase inhibitors, antisense oligonucleotides, and inhibitors of heat-shock proteins. The discovery of novel therapeutic approaches is an active area of clinical research. Eliminating HR PCA before it advances is a high priority in the biomarker field. Therefore, the development of molecular signatures of lethal PCA are critical. In addition, the recent discovery that a significant percentage of PCAs harbor a TMPRSS2-ETS gene fusion suggests that targeting either the ETS transcription factors or the fusion product may offer a novel approach to therapy. However, in 2007, the mainstay of treatment for advanced PCA remains androgen ablation therapy as originally introduced in the early 1940s.

The role of testosterone in the pathogenesis of prostate cancer

Relationships between androgenic hormones and prostatic tissue growth are complex. It is certainly true that the prostate will not develop without androgens and the gland will atrophy if androgen support is withdrawn. The hormonal hypothesis remains one of the most important hypotheses in the etiology of prostate cancer (PCa), and efforts are continuing to improve the understanding of androgen actions in PCa. Although evidence from epidemiological studies of associations between circulating levels of androgens and PCa risk has been inconsistent, the traditional view that higher testosterone (T) levels represent a risk factor for PCa appears to have little evidentiary support. Reinvestigation of the relationship between T and PCa seems important and necessary if a new, clinically and scientifically rewarding concept is to be constructed. The present review considers the metabolism and intraprostatic action of T, epidemiological evidence, and the association between T and PCa risk.

Intra-prostatic androgen levels during various androgen-blockade regimens

Androgens are heavily involved in the development of prostate cancer. This article reviews the scenario of the androgen environment and androgen metabolism in the prostate during androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with prostate cancer. Ways of altering the intra-prostatic androgen milieu during various androgen-blockade regimens include surgical castration, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogues to block androgen secretion by the testes, anti-androgens, and 5alpha-reductase inhibitors. The levels of androgen precursors in the blood are different under different ADT regimens, and the androgen levels in the prostate also vary according to the ADT used. This may affect the therapeutic effect of ADT. We therefore discuss the subject of prostatic androgen levels during various androgen-blockade regimens, and we describe the prospects for the future of ADT.

Prostate cancer prevention: past, present, and future

Prostate cancer is the most common male malignancy and the second or third leading cause of cancer death among men in the West. The descriptive epidemiology of prostate cancer suggests that it is a preventable disease. Prevention has the theoretical advantage of not only saving lives, but also reduce the morbidity of radical prostate cancer therapy. This article reviews the past, present, and future of prostate cancer prevention. In particular, the evidence and scientific data of a variety of prevention strategies are reviewed. Strategies reviewed include dietary fat reduction and supplementation with vitamins D and E, and selenium. Dietary intake of soy, green tea, and tomato-rich products (lycopene) are also reviewed. Data regarding pharmacological intervention with cyclo-oxygenease inhibitors, antiestrogens, and in particular 5-alpha reductase inhibitors are reviewed. The results of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial including the controversy surrounding higher-grade cancers among men randomized to finasteride are also summarized. Finally, a variety of trial designs as well as a roster of current phase 2 trials are presented. Probably no cancer is being investigated more thoroughly in the context of prevention as prostate cancer in 2007. Definitive answers to pivotal phase 3 trials will be available in the coming 2 to 7 years.

Detection bias due to the effect of finasteride on prostate volume: a modeling approach for analysis of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial

BACKGROUND

The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) demonstrated a 24.8% reduction in the 7-year prevalence of prostate cancer among patients treated with finasteride (5 mg daily) compared with that among patients treated with placebo; however, a 25.5% increase in the prevalence of high-Gleason grade tumors was observed, the clinical significance of which is unknown. One hypothesized explanation for this increase is that finasteride reduced prostate volume, leading to detection of more high-grade tumors due to increased sampling density. This possibility was investigated in an observational reanalysis of the PCPT data, with adjustment for sampling density.

METHODS

A logistic model for the association of high-grade (Gleason score 7-10) prostate cancer with baseline covariates and/or baseline covariates plus prostate volume and number of cores obtained at biopsy was developed using the placebo group (n = 4775) of the PCPT. This model was then applied to the finasteride group (n = 5123) to compare the predicted and observed numbers of high-grade tumors in that group. In a second approach, odds ratios (ORs) for prostate cancer in the finasteride versus placebo groups calculated from binary and polytomous logistic regression models that contained or excluded covariates for gland volume and number of needle cores were compared.

RESULTS

Median prostate volume was 25% lower in the finasteride group (median = 25.1 cm3) than in the placebo group (median = 33.5 cm3). The logistic model developed in the placebo group showed that the likelihood of detection of high-grade prostate cancer decreased as volume increased (for each 10 cm3 increase in prostate volume, OR = 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.74 to 0.90). Based on this model, 239 high-grade prostate cancers were predicted in the finasteride group, whereas 243 were observed, a non-statistically significant difference. Among all participants, the odds ratios for high-grade cancer in the finasteride versus placebo groups decreased from 1.27 (95% CI = 1.05 to 1.54) with adjustment for baseline covariates to 1.03 (95% CI = 0.84 to 1.26) following additional adjustment for gland volume and number of biopsy cores in binary outcome models and from 1.14 (95% CI = 0.94 to 1.38) to 0.88 (95% CI = 0.72 to 1.09) following these adjustments in the polytomous models.

CONCLUSIONS

Although analyses using postrandomization data require cautious interpretation, these results suggest that sampling density bias alone could explain the excess of high-grade cancers among the finasteride-assigned participants in the PCPT.

Cellular Changes in Prostate Cancer Cells Induced by Intermittent Androgen Suppression

OBJECTIVES

This study used tumour specimens from a clinical trial on intermittent androgen suppression (IAS) to study the effects of castration on tissue morphology, cell proliferation, apoptosis, and the expression of androgen receptor (AR).

METHODS

A total of 113 representative needle biopsy specimens were available from 29 patients for evaluation of the Gleason score as well as Ki-67, cleaved caspase-3, and AR immunostaining.

RESULTS

At 6 mo from the beginning of the first androgen withdrawal, cell proliferation activity was significantly (p = 0.002) reduced, whereas no effect on apoptosis was found. A nonsignificant trend to an increase in Gleason score after castration was found. Subsequent cycles of withdrawals had no significant effect on any of the measured parameters. The Gleason score, proliferation activity, and apoptosis rate showed only heterogeneous, nonsignificant changes after the first progression. Strong nuclear AR staining was evident in all cancer specimens.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that the long-term (months) effect of androgen withdrawal on tumour growth is due to the inhibition of proliferation. Because the tumours seem to become resistant to castration at the first cycle of treatment withheld, it is possible that IAS does not postpone the emergence of ablation-resistant tumours. There was no consistent sign of increased proliferation or Gleason score during the treatment, suggesting that the biologic aggressiveness of a particular tumour is defined already at an early stage of disease. The constant nuclear expression of AR in cancer cells indicates that the AR signalling remains active despite of the androgen withdrawal.

Hormonal implications in the development and treatment of prostate cancer

In this article, the conflicting data concerning the androgen axis and prostate cancer development are reviewed in addition to how this pathway may be exploited to prevent the development of prostate cancer. The expanding role of hormone ablative therapy alone or in conjunction with standard therapies, the controversies of timing of therapy, and the completeness of ablation and its use on an intermittent basis are reviewed.

Looking Back at PCPT: Looking Forward to New Paradigms in Prostate Cancer Screening and Prevention

OBJECTIVES

Provide a critical summary of the latest interpretation of findings from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT).

METHODS

Findings from PCPT and recently published post-hoc analyses are reviewed.

RESULTS

PCPT demonstrated that finasteride can reduce the prevalence of prostate cancer, permitted the first large-scale assessment of the performance characteristics of prostate-specific antigen for prostate cancer screening, and identified new-onset erectile dysfunction as an early predictor of cardiovascular events.

CONCLUSIONS

PCPT has and will continue to yield valuable information regarding future strategies for prostate cancer prevention and detection, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and other matters of public health importance.

Finasteride as a chemopreventive agent in prostate cancer: impact of the PCPT on urologic practice

Prostate cancer chemoprevention involves the use of natural and/or synthetic agents that inhibit or reverse the development of precancerous lesions or delay progression of these lesions to invasive disease. The recent completion of the first Phase III trial for prostate cancer prevention, the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) using the drug finasteride, has provided the urologic community with the first evidence that a chemopreventive agent can reduce the risk of developing prostate cancer. The enthusiasm for the clear relative risk reduction in the finasteride arm of the trial has been tempered by the observation that the incidence of high-grade tumors was higher in men receiving finasteride compared to those on placebo. A question remains about whether the observed higher incidence in high-grade tumors is real or whether it is related to a pathologic or sampling artifact. The PCPT has instigated a great deal of debate, resulting in the larger urologic community being reluctant to recommend the widespread use of finasteride as a chemopreventive agent. This review summarizes the PCPT, analyzes its controversial results, and describes future prostate cancer chemoprevention studies.

What's new in prostate cancer disease assessment in 2006?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Issues relating to the disease are critical in the diagnosis, management, and prognostication of prostate cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

New data have emerged regarding the disease of prostate cancer and its precursors. The diagnosis of prostate cancer on needle biopsy has been refined because of the recent discovery of alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase, which preferentially labels adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Modifications and additions to the Gleason grading system were published based on a consensus conference of urological pathologists. Various models have been proposed using Gleason score, clinical findings, as well as measurements of tumor volume on needle biopsy to enhance the prediction in men undergoing radical prostatectomy and to predict "insignificance". Several studies have confirmed that certain findings in radical prostatectomy are adverse, yet conflicting studies were published as to the independent prognosis of tumor volume. The risk of cancer following a diagnosis of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on needle biopsy has decreased to the point at which this author does not recommend a routine repeat needle biopsy within the first year following the diagnosis of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

SUMMARY

This review summarizes developments over the last year in the disease of prostate cancer and its precursors.

Association between the dihydrotestosterone level in the prostate and prostate cancer aggressiveness using the Gleason score

PURPOSE

To our knowledge the association between dihydrotestosterone in the prostate and prostate cancer aggressiveness has not yet been elucidated. We analyzed dihydrotestosterone levels in the prostate and Gleason score in patients diagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 81 patients with suspected prostate cancer underwent prostate biopsy. Serum samples were collected before biopsy. Dihydrotestosterone levels in prostatic tissue and serum were analyzed using liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry after polar derivatization.

RESULTS

A total of 47 patients were diagnosed with stages T1 to T3N0M0 prostate cancer and 34 were diagnosed with no malignancy. Of the 47 patients 32 had a Gleason score of 6 or less and 15 had a score of 7 to 10. Dihydrotestosterone in prostatic tissue in patients with Gleason score 7 to 10 disease was significantly lower than in those with Gleason score 6 or less disease (p = 0.025). Gleason score correlated with the testosterone-to-serum dihydrotestosterone ratio (rs = 0.329, p = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with Gleason score 7 to 10 prostate cancer have low dihydrotestosterone in the prostate, although there were no significant differences between patients with Gleason score 7 to 10 vs 6 or less prostate cancer with respect to serum androgens. Low dihydrotestosterone in cases of aggressive prostate cancer is probably sufficient to activate androgen receptor expression and propagate tumor growth.

Should finasteride be used to prevent prostate cancer?

Prostate cancer is an important public health problem. Chemoprevention offers an attractive solution because it may lead to decreased disease-specific mortality. Furthermore, because many men are treated radically for prostate cancers that pose little or no threat to life, chemoprevention may also provide an excellent strategy for diminishing treatment-related costs and adverse effects such as erectile and urinary dysfunction. The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial was a 7-year randomized study of finasteride versus placebo among men aged older than 55 years. All men were intended to have a prostate biopsy at study conclusion. At trial's end, there was a 25% reduction in period prevalence in all prostate cancers (24.4% for placebo vs 18.4% for finasteride). This represents a 6% absolute risk reduction. A larger number of higher-grade cancers were noted among men randomized to finasteride, which post hoc analyses and studies suggest are almost certainly related to previously unrecognized biases in trial design. There continues to be great debate as to the clinical significance of the cancers prevented. It is our opinion that among men who warrant 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5ARIs) as part of their benign prostatic hyperplasia regimen, cancer prevention should be recognized as an additional benefit of treatment. Furthermore, men with high risk of clinically significant prostate cancer, such as significant family history, abnormal prostate biopsy histologies, and African descent, should be made aware of these findings. Men with significant anxiety or concern about prostate cancer should also be made aware of the risks and benefits of this therapy. Additional trials of antiestrogens, micronutrients, and other 5ARIs, which will mature over the next 2 to 5 years, will better define the role of 5ARIs in prostate cancer chemoprevention.

Pathological changes of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and prostate cancer after monotherapy with bicalutamide 150 mg

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the morphological changes induced by a 3-month course of neoadjuvant bicalutamide 150 mg/day before radical prostatectomy (RP) on prostatic adenocarcinoma and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In all, 90 patients with cT1-T2 prostate cancer and HGPIN on prostatic biopsy were randomized to receive bicalutamide (150 mg/day for 3 months) before RP, or to have immediate surgery. Surgical specimens were assessed for the histopathological features of cancer, HGPIN and benign epithelium in a blinded manner. The volumes of prostate cancer and HGPIN were evaluated using a stereological (i.e. grid) method.

RESULTS

Compared with the bicalutamide-treated group, the ratio of stroma to epithelium, evaluated by visual microscopic assessment in the normal epithelium of the three prostate zones, was significantly lower in the control group, at 2.27 (sd 1.13), than in the treated group, at 1.87 (sd 0.72) (P = 0.048). The mean (sd) tumour volume was significantly lower in the bicalutamide-treated than in the control group, at 0.914 (0.13) vs 1.47 (0.24) mL (P = 0.044). Similarly, the mean (sd) volume of HGPIN was significantly lower in the bicalutamide-treated than in the control group, at 0.34 (0.06) vs 0.62 (0.07) mL (P = 0.003). At RP, specimen Gleason scores in the bicalutamide-treated group were similar to those in the control group, and were no different from the biopsy Gleason scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Involution and epithelial shrinkage of prostate cancer and HGPIN were evident after neoadjuvant treatment with bicalutamide 150 mg. There was no evidence of the emergence of higher-grade cancer after treatment.