1
|
Meraouna Y, Blanchard P, Losa S, Labib A, Krhili S, Pommier P, Crehange G, Flam T, Cosset JM, Kissel M. Salvage low-dose-rate brachytherapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after definitive irradiation. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 48:100809. [PMID: 39027689 PMCID: PMC11254530 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Revised: 06/14/2024] [Accepted: 06/15/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose The optimal management of locally recurrent prostate cancer after definitive irradiation is still unclear but local salvage treatments are gaining interest. A retrospective, single-institution analysis of clinical outcomes and treatment-related toxicity after salvage I-125 low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy (BT) for locally-recurrent prostate cancer was conducted in a Comprehensive Cancer Center. Patients and methods A total of 94 patients treated with salvage LDR-BT between 2006 and 2021 were included. The target volume was either the whole-gland +/- a boost on the GTV, the hemigland, or only the GTV. The prescribed dose ranged from 90 to 145 Gy. Toxicity was graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. Results Median follow-up was 34 months. Initial radiotherapy was external beam radiotherapy in 73 patients (78 %) with a median dose of 76 Gy and I-125 BT in 21 patients (22 %) with a prescribed dose of 145 Gy. Median PSA at salvage was 3.75 ng/ml with a median interval between first and salvage irradiation of 9.4 years. Salvage brachytherapy was associated with androgen deprivation therapy for 32 % of the patients. Only 4 % of the patients were castrate-resistant. Failure free survival was 82 % at 2 years and 66 % at 3 years. The only factors associated with failure-free survival on multivariate analysis were hormonosensitivity at relapse and European Association of Urology (EAU) prognostic group. Late grade 3 urinary and rectal toxicities occurred in 12 % and 1 % of the patients respectively.No significant difference in toxicity or efficacy was observed between the three implant volume groups. Conclusion The efficacy and toxicity results are consistent with those in the LDR group of the MASTER meta-analysis. Salvage BT confirms to be an effective and safe option for locally recurrent prostate cancer. A focal approach could be interesting to reduce late severe toxicities, especially urinary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y. Meraouna
- Radiotherapy Department, Institut Curie, 26 rue d’Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
- Faculté de médecine Sorbonne Université, 91-105 Boulevard de l’Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - P. Blanchard
- Radiotherapy Department, Gustave Roussy, 114 Boulevard Edouard Vaillant, 94220 Villejuif, France
| | - S. Losa
- Physics Department, Institut Curie, 26 rue d’Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - A. Labib
- Radiotherapy Department, Institut Curie, 26 rue d’Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - S. Krhili
- Radiotherapy Department, Institut Curie, 26 rue d’Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - P. Pommier
- Radiotherapy Department, Institut Curie, 26 rue d’Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - G. Crehange
- Radiotherapy Department, Institut Curie, 26 rue d’Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - T. Flam
- Radiotherapy Department, Institut Curie, 26 rue d’Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
- Urology Department, Clinique Saint Jean de Dieu, 2 rue Rousselet, 75007 Paris, France
| | - J-M. Cosset
- Radiotherapy Department, Centre Charlebourg – La Défense – Amethyst Radiothérapie, 65 Avenue Foch, 92250 La Garenne-Colombes, France
| | - M. Kissel
- Radiotherapy Department, Institut Curie, 26 rue d’Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Clark A, Villarreal MR, Huang SB, Jayamohan S, Rivas P, Hussain SS, Ybarra M, Osmulski P, Gaczynska ME, Shim EY, Smith T, Gupta YK, Yang X, Delma CR, Natarajan M, Lai Z, Wang LJ, Michalek JE, Higginson DS, Ikeno Y, Ha CS, Chen Y, Ghosh R, Kumar AP. Targeting S6K/NFκB/SQSTM1/Polθ signaling to suppress radiation resistance in prostate cancer. Cancer Lett 2024; 597:217063. [PMID: 38925361 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2024.217063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Revised: 05/29/2024] [Accepted: 06/08/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
In this study we have identified POLθ-S6K-p62 as a novel druggable regulator of radiation response in prostate cancer. Despite significant advances in delivery, radiotherapy continues to negatively affect treatment outcomes and quality of life due to resistance and late toxic effects to the surrounding normal tissues such as bladder and rectum. It is essential to develop new and effective strategies to achieve better control of tumor. We found that ribosomal protein S6K (RPS6KB1) is elevated in human prostate tumors, and contributes to resistance to radiation. As a downstream effector of mTOR signaling, S6K is known to be involved in growth regulation. However, the impact of S6K signaling on radiation response has not been fully explored. Here we show that loss of S6K led to formation of smaller tumors with less metastatic ability in mice. Mechanistically we found that S6K depletion reduced NFκB and SQSTM1 (p62) reporter activity and DNA polymerase θ (POLθ) that is involved in alternate end-joining repair. We further show that the natural compound berberine interacts with S6K in a in a hitherto unreported novel mode and that pharmacological inhibition of S6K with berberine reduces Polθ and downregulates p62 transcriptional activity via NFκB. Loss of S6K or pre-treatment with berberine improved response to radiation in prostate cancer cells and prevented radiation-mediated resurgence of PSA in animals implanted with prostate cancer cells. Notably, silencing POLQ in S6K overexpressing cells enhanced response to radiation suggesting S6K sensitizes prostate cancer cells to radiation via POLQ. Additionally, inhibition of autophagy with CQ potentiated growth inhibition induced by berberine plus radiation. These observations suggest that pharmacological inhibition of S6K with berberine not only downregulates NFκB/p62 signaling to disrupt autophagic flux but also decreases Polθ. Therefore, combination treatment with radiation and berberine inhibits autophagy and alternate end-joining DNA repair, two processes associated with radioresistance leading to increased radiation sensitivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Clark
- Departments of Molecular Medicine, Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA
| | - Michelle R Villarreal
- Departments of Molecular Medicine, Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA
| | - Shih-Bo Huang
- Departments of Molecular Medicine, Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA
| | - Sridharan Jayamohan
- Departments of Molecular Medicine, Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA
| | - Paul Rivas
- Departments of Molecular Medicine, Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA
| | - Suleman S Hussain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Meagan Ybarra
- Departments of Molecular Medicine, Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA
| | - Pawel Osmulski
- Departments of Molecular Medicine, Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA
| | - Maria E Gaczynska
- Departments of Molecular Medicine, Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA
| | - Eun Yong Shim
- Departments of Molecular Medicine, Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA
| | - Tyler Smith
- Departments of Molecular Medicine, Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA
| | - Yogesh K Gupta
- Departments of Greehey Children's Cancer Institute, Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA; Department of Biochemistry and Structural Biology, Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA
| | - Xiaoyu Yang
- Departments of Molecular Medicine, Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA
| | - Caroline R Delma
- Departments of Pathology, Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA
| | - Mohan Natarajan
- Departments of Pathology, Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA
| | - Zhao Lai
- Departments of Molecular Medicine, Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA; Departments of Greehey Children's Cancer Institute, Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA; Departments of Mays Cancer Center, Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA
| | - Li-Ju Wang
- Departments of Greehey Children's Cancer Institute, Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA
| | - Joel E Michalek
- Departments of Mays Cancer Center, Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA; Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA
| | - Daniel S Higginson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yuji Ikeno
- Departments of Pathology, Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA; Barshop Institute for Longevity and Aging Studies, Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA; Audie L. Murphy VA Hospital (STVHCS), Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA
| | - Chul Soo Ha
- Departments of Mays Cancer Center, Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA
| | - Yidong Chen
- Departments of Greehey Children's Cancer Institute, Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA; Departments of Mays Cancer Center, Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA
| | - Rita Ghosh
- Departments of Molecular Medicine, Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA; Departments of Urology, Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA; Departments of Pharmacology, Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
| | - Addanki P Kumar
- Departments of Molecular Medicine, Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA; Departments of Urology, Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA; Departments of Pharmacology, Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA; Departments of Mays Cancer Center, Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA; Audie L. Murphy VA Hospital (STVHCS), Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hiremath A, Corredor G, Li L, Leo P, Magi-Galluzzi C, Elliott R, Purysko A, Shiradkar R, Madabhushi A. An integrated radiology-pathology machine learning classifier for outcome prediction following radical prostatectomy: Preliminary findings. Heliyon 2024; 10:e29602. [PMID: 38665576 PMCID: PMC11044050 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives To evaluate the added benefit of integrating features from pre-treatment MRI (radiomics) and digitized post-surgical pathology slides (pathomics) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients for prognosticating outcomes post radical-prostatectomy (RP) including a) rising prostate specific antigen (PSA), and b) extraprostatic-extension (EPE). Methods Multi-institutional data (N = 58) of PCa patients who underwent pre-treatment 3-T MRI prior to RP were included in this retrospective study. Radiomic and pathomic features were extracted from PCa regions on MRI and RP specimens delineated by expert clinicians. On training set (D1, N = 44), Cox Proportional-Hazards models MR, MP and MRaP were trained using radiomics, pathomics, and their combination, respectively, to prognosticate rising PSA (PSA > 0.03 ng/mL). Top features from MRaP were used to train a model to predict EPE on D1 and test on external dataset (D2, N = 14). C-index, Kalplan-Meier curves were used for survival analysis, and area under ROC (AUC) was used for EPE. MRaP was compared with the existing post-treatment risk-calculator, CAPRA (MC). Results Patients had median follow-up of 34 months. MRaP (c-index = 0.685 ± 0.05) significantly outperformed MR (c-index = 0.646 ± 0.05), MP (c-index = 0.631 ± 0.06) and MC (c-index = 0.601 ± 0.071) (p < 0.0001). Cross-validated Kaplan-Meier curves showed significant separation among risk groups for rising PSA for MRaP (p < 0.005, Hazard Ratio (HR) = 11.36) as compared to MR (p = 0.64, HR = 1.33), MP (p = 0.19, HR = 2.82) and MC (p = 0.10, HR = 3.05). Integrated radio-pathomic model MRaP (AUC = 0.80) outperformed MR (AUC = 0.57) and MP (AUC = 0.76) in predicting EPE on external-data (D2). Conclusions Results from this preliminary study suggest that a combination of radiomic and pathomic features can better predict post-surgical outcomes (rising PSA and EPE) compared to either of them individually as well as extant prognostic nomogram (CAPRA).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Germán Corredor
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Lin Li
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Patrick Leo
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Robin Elliott
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Andrei Purysko
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Rakesh Shiradkar
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Anant Madabhushi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Atlanta Veterans Administration Medical Center, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lee KH, Mena E, Shih J, Lindenberg L, Wood BJ, Pinto PA, Patel KR, Citrin DE, Choyke PL, Turkbey B. Predicting 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT Scan Positivity in Prostate Cancer Patients with Biochemical Recurrence. Acad Radiol 2024; 31:1419-1428. [PMID: 37775447 PMCID: PMC10965502 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES To analyze variables that can predict the positivity of 18F-DCFPyL- positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and extent of disease in patients with biochemically recurrent (BCR) prostate cancer after primary local therapy with either radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a retrospective analysis of a prospective single institutional review board-approved study. We included 199 patients with biochemical recurrence and negative conventional imaging after primary local therapies (radical prostatectomy n = 127, radiation therapy n = 72). All patients underwent 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine predictors of a positive scan for both cohort of patients. Regression-based coefficients were used to develop nomograms predicting scan positivity and extra-pelvic disease. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was implemented to quantify nomogram's clinical benefit. RESULTS Of the 127 (63%) post-radical prostatectomy patients, 91 patients had positive scans - 61 of those with intrapelvic lesions and 30 with extra-pelvic lesions (i.e., retroperitoneal or distant nodes and/or bone/organ lesions). Of the 72 post-radiation therapy patients, 65 patients had positive scans - 39 of them had intrapelvic lesions and 26 extra-pelvic lesions. In the radical prostatectomy cohort, multivariate regression analysis revealed original International Society of Urological Pathology category, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostate-specific antigen doubling time (PSAdt), and time from BCR (mo) to scan were predictors for scan positivity and presence of extra-pelvic disease, with an area under the curve of 80% and 78%, respectively. Positive versus negative tumor margin after radical prostatectomy was not related to scan positivity or to the presence of positive extra-pelvic foci. In the radiation therapy cohort, multivariate regression analysis revealed that PSA, PSAdt, and time to BCR (mo) were predictors of extra-pelvic disease, with area under the curve of 82%. Because only seven patients in the radiation therapy cohort had negative scans, a prediction model for scan positivity could not be analyzed and only the presence of extra-pelvic disease was evaluated. CONCLUSION PSA and PSAdt are consistently significant predictors of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT positivity and extra-pelvic disease in BCR prostate cancer patients. Stratifying the patient population into primary local treatment group enables the use of other variables as predictors, such as time since BCR. This nomogram may guide selection of the most suitable candidates for 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katerina H Lee
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (K.H.L., E.M., L.L., P.L.C., B.T.); Center of Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (K.H.L., B.J.W.)
| | - Esther Mena
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (K.H.L., E.M., L.L., P.L.C., B.T.).
| | - Joanna Shih
- Division Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis: Biometric Research Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (J.S.)
| | - Liza Lindenberg
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (K.H.L., E.M., L.L., P.L.C., B.T.)
| | - Bradford J Wood
- Center of Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (K.H.L., B.J.W.)
| | - Peter A Pinto
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (P.A.P.)
| | - Krishnan R Patel
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (K.R.P., D.E.C.)
| | - Deborah E Citrin
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (K.R.P., D.E.C.)
| | - Peter L Choyke
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (K.H.L., E.M., L.L., P.L.C., B.T.)
| | - Baris Turkbey
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (K.H.L., E.M., L.L., P.L.C., B.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Al Saffar H, Thomson A, Tan JS, Wang Q, Birch E, Koschel S, Medhurst E, Jobson D, Ong S, Moon DA, Murphy D, Lawrentschuk N. Patient-centred pathology reporting improves patient experience and understanding of disease in prostate cancer care. BJUI COMPASS 2024; 5:497-505. [PMID: 38633832 PMCID: PMC11019249 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Revised: 12/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/23/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction and Objectives Patient-centred (PC) and holistic care improves patient satisfaction and health outcomes. We sought to investigate the benefit of utilising a PC pathology report in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PCa). Our study aimed to evaluate and compare patient understanding of their PCa diagnosis after RP, upon receiving either a standard histopathology report or a personalised and PC report (PCR). Moreover, we evaluated knowledge retention at 4 weeks after the initial consultation. Methods We invited patients undergoing RP at three metropolitan Urology clinics to participate in our randomised controlled study. Patients were randomised to receive either a PCR or standard pathology report. Patient satisfaction questionnaires (Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions [PEPPI], Consultation and Relational Empathy [CARE] and Communication Assessment Tool [CAT]) and a knowledge test were conducted within 72 h of the initial appointment and again at 4 weeks. Accurate recollection of Gleason grade group (GGG) and extracapsular extension (ECE) were classified as 'correct'. Baseline demographic data included age, education, marital and employment status, pre-op prostate specific antigen (PSA) and clinical stage. Baseline data were tested for differences between groups using the Student's t test, chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test depending on whether data were continuous, categorical or sparse. Comparison of correctly answered 'knowledge' questions was analysed using chi-squared test. A significance level of p ≤ 0.05 was used. Results Data from 62 patients were analysed (30 standard vs. 32 PCR). No significant differences in baseline demographics were found between groups. Both groups reported high levels of satisfaction with their healthcare experiences in all domains of patient-physician rapport, empathy and communication. There were no significant differences between groups in PEPPI (p = 0.68), CAT (p = 0.39) and CARE (p = 0.66) scores, at baseline and 4 weeks. Ninety-three per cent of patients who received the PCR understood the report while 90% felt the report added to their understanding of their PCa. Regarding patient knowledge, the PCR group had significantly more correct answers on GGG and ECE as compared with the standard report group at baseline and 4 weeks (p < 0.001 and 0.001, respectively). Conclusions Our findings demonstrate that PC pathology reports improve patient knowledge and understanding of their PCa that is retained for at least 4 weeks after initial receipt of results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haidar Al Saffar
- Department of Genitourinary Cancer SurgeryPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Alice Thomson
- Department of Genitourinary Cancer SurgeryPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Jo‐Lynn S. Tan
- Department of Genitourinary Cancer SurgeryPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- St Vincent's Hospital, MelbourneFitzroyVictoriaAustralia
| | - Qiwei Wang
- St Vincent's Hospital, MelbourneFitzroyVictoriaAustralia
- Melbourne Medical School, St Vincent's Hospital, MelbourneUniversity of MelbourneFitzroyVictoriaAustralia
| | - Emma Birch
- Department of Genitourinary Cancer SurgeryPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Samantha Koschel
- Department of Genitourinary Cancer SurgeryPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Elizabeth Medhurst
- Department of Genitourinary Cancer SurgeryPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Dale Jobson
- St Vincent's Hospital, MelbourneFitzroyVictoriaAustralia
- School of Public Health and Preventative MedicineMonash UniversityMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Sean Ong
- Department of Genitourinary Cancer SurgeryPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- EJ Whitten Prostate Cancer Research CentreEpworth HospitalRichmondVictoriaAustralia
| | - Daniel A. Moon
- Department of Genitourinary Cancer SurgeryPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Department of Surgery (Urology)Epworth Hospital RichmondRichmondVictoriaAustralia
| | - Declan Murphy
- Department of Genitourinary Cancer SurgeryPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Department of Surgery (Urology)Epworth Hospital RichmondRichmondVictoriaAustralia
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- Department of Genitourinary Cancer SurgeryPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- EJ Whitten Prostate Cancer Research CentreEpworth HospitalRichmondVictoriaAustralia
- Department of Surgery (Urology)Epworth Hospital RichmondRichmondVictoriaAustralia
- Department of Surgery (Urology)Royal Melbourne HospitalMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mehralivand S, Thomas C, Puhr M, Claessens F, van de Merbel AF, Dubrovska A, Jenster G, Bernemann C, Sommer U, Erb HHH. New advances of the androgen receptor in prostate cancer: report from the 1st International Androgen Receptor Symposium. J Transl Med 2024; 22:71. [PMID: 38238739 PMCID: PMC10795409 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-024-04878-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
The androgen receptor (AR) is a crucial player in various aspects of male reproduction and has been associated with the development and progression of prostate cancer (PCa). Therefore, the protein is the linchpin of current PCa therapies. Despite great research efforts, the AR signaling pathway has still not been deciphered, and the emergence of resistance is still the biggest problem in PCa treatment. To discuss the latest developments in AR research, the "1st International Androgen Receptor Symposium" offered a forum for the exchange of clinical and scientific innovations around the role of the AR in prostate cancer (PCa) and to stimulate new collaborative interactions among leading scientists from basic, translational, and clinical research. The symposium included three sessions covering preclinical studies, prognostic and diagnostic biomarkers, and ongoing prostate cancer clinical trials. In addition, a panel discussion about the future direction of androgen deprivation therapy and anti-AR therapy in PCa was conducted. Therefore, the newest insights and developments in therapeutic strategies and biomarkers are discussed in this report.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sherif Mehralivand
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Christian Thomas
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Martin Puhr
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Frank Claessens
- Molecular Endocrinology Laboratory, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Anna Dubrovska
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Guido Jenster
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ulrich Sommer
- Institut für Pathologie, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Holger H H Erb
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wu Z, Wu Z, Zeng J, Liu Y, Wang Y, Li H, Xia T, Liu W, Lin Z, Xu W. An endoplasmic reticulum stress-related signature featuring ASNS for predicting prognosis and immune landscape in prostate cancer. Aging (Albany NY) 2024; 16:43-65. [PMID: 38206293 PMCID: PMC10817364 DOI: 10.18632/aging.205280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PRAD) is one of the common malignant tumors of the urinary system. In order to predict the treatment results for PRAD patients, this study proposes to develop a risk profile based on endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS). Based on the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) cohort and the Gene Expression Omnibus database (GSE70769), we verified the predictive signature. Using a random survival forest analysis, prognostically significant ERS-related genes were found. An ERS-related risk score (ERscore) was created using multivariable Cox analysis. In addition, the biological functions, genetic mutations and immune landscape related to ERscore are also studied to reveal the underlying mechanisms related to ERS in PRAD. We further explored the ERscore-related mechanisms by profiling a single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) dataset (GSE137829) and explored the oncogenic role of ASNS in PRAD through in vitro experiments. The risk signature composed of eight ERS-related genes constructed in this study is an independent prognostic factor and validated in the MSKCC and GSE70769 data sets. The scRNA-seq data additionally revealed that several carcinogenic pathways were noticeably overactivated in the group with high ERS scores. As one of the prognostic genes, ASNS will significantly inhibit the proliferation, migration and invasion abilities of PRAD cells after its expression is interfered with. In conclusion, this study developed a novel risk-specific ERS-based clinical treatment strategy for patients with PRAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenyu Wu
- Department of Urology, The First People’s Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, P.R. China
| | - Zhenquan Wu
- Department of Urology, The First People’s Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, P.R. China
| | - Jie Zeng
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Guangzhou First People’s Hospital, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Yaxuan Liu
- Department of Blood Transfusion, Shenzhen Hospital Affiliated to Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, P.R. China
| | - Yue Wang
- The First Clinical Medical College, Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, P.R. China
| | - Huixin Li
- Department of Urology, The First People’s Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, P.R. China
| | - Taolin Xia
- Department of Urology, The First People’s Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, P.R. China
| | - Weitao Liu
- Department of Urology, The First People’s Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, P.R. China
| | - Zhe Lin
- Department of Urology, The First People’s Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, P.R. China
| | - Wenfeng Xu
- Department of Urology, The First People’s Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Efstathiou JA, Morgans AK, Bland CS, Shore ND. Novel hormone therapy and coordination of care in high-risk biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 2024; 122:102630. [PMID: 38035646 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
Biochemical recurrence (BCR) occurs in 20-50% of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) undergoing primary definitive treatment. Patients with high-risk BCR have an increased risk of metastatic progression and subsequent PCa-specific mortality, and thus could benefit from treatment intensification. Given the increasing complexity of diagnostic and therapeutic modalities, multidisciplinary care (MDC) can play a crucial role in the individualized management of this patient population. This review explores the role for MDC when evaluating the clinical evidence for the evolving definition of high-risk BCR and the emerging therapeutic strategies, especially with novel hormone therapies (NHTs), for patients with either high-risk BCR or oligometastatic PCa. Clinical studies have used different characteristics to define high-risk BCR and there is no consensus regarding the definition of high-risk BCR nor for management strategies. Next-generation imaging and multigene panels offer potential enhanced patient identification and precision-based decision-making, respectively. Treatment intensification with NHTs, either alone or combined with radiotherapy or metastasis-directed therapy, has been promising in clinical trials in patients with high-risk BCR or oligometastases. As novel risk-stratification and treatment options as well as evidence-based literature evolve, it is important to involve a multidisciplinary team to identify patients with high-risk features at an earlier stage, and make informed decisions on the treatments that could optimize their care and long-term outcomes. Nevertheless, MDC data are scarce in the BCR or oligometastatic setting. Efforts to integrate MDC into the standard management of this patient population are needed, and will likely improve outcomes across this heterogeneous PCa patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason A Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| | - Alicia K Morgans
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 850 Brookline Ave, Dana 09-930, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
| | - Christopher S Bland
- US Oncology Medical Affairs, Pfizer Inc., 66 Hudson Boulevard, Hudson Yards, Manhattan, New York, NY 10001, USA.
| | - Neal D Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center, GenesisCare US, 823 82nd Pkwy, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Houshmand S, Lawhn-Heath C, Behr S. PSMA PET imaging in the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2023; 48:3610-3623. [PMID: 37493837 PMCID: PMC10682054 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-04002-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in men in the United States. Imaging techniques such as CT, MRI, and bone scans have traditionally been used for diagnosis and staging. Molecular imaging modalities targeting the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) have recently gained attention due to their high affinity and accuracy. PSMA PET has been combined with other modalities such as multiparametric MRI for better diagnostic and prognostic performance. PSMA imaging has been studied at different clinical settings with a wide range of disease aggressiveness. In this review we will explore the role of PSMA PET in high-risk prostate cancer staging, biochemical recurrence, and castration-resistant prostate cancer. The primary focus of this review article is to examine the latest developments in the use of PSMA imaging and emphasize the clinical situations where its effectiveness has been demonstrated to significantly impact the treatment of prostate cancer. In addition, we will touch upon the potential future advancements of PSMA PET imaging and its evolving significance in the management of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sina Houshmand
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
| | - Courtney Lawhn-Heath
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Spencer Behr
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Freedland SJ, de Almeida Luz M, De Giorgi U, Gleave M, Gotto GT, Pieczonka CM, Haas GP, Kim CS, Ramirez-Backhaus M, Rannikko A, Tarazi J, Sridharan S, Sugg J, Tang Y, Tutrone RF, Venugopal B, Villers A, Woo HH, Zohren F, Shore ND. Improved Outcomes with Enzalutamide in Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med 2023; 389:1453-1465. [PMID: 37851874 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2303974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with prostate cancer who have high-risk biochemical recurrence have an increased risk of progression. The efficacy and safety of enzalutamide plus androgen-deprivation therapy and enzalutamide monotherapy, as compared with androgen-deprivation therapy alone, are unknown. METHODS In this phase 3 trial, we enrolled patients with prostate cancer who had high-risk biochemical recurrence with a prostate-specific antigen doubling time of 9 months or less. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 1:1:1 ratio, to receive enzalutamide (160 mg) daily plus leuprolide every 12 weeks (combination group), placebo plus leuprolide (leuprolide-alone group), or enzalutamide monotherapy (monotherapy group). The primary end point was metastasis-free survival, as assessed by blinded independent central review, in the combination group as compared with the leuprolide-alone group. A key secondary end point was metastasis-free survival in the monotherapy group as compared with the leuprolide-alone group. Other secondary end points were patient-reported outcomes and safety. RESULTS A total of 1068 patients underwent randomization: 355 were assigned to the combination group, 358 to the leuprolide-alone group, and 355 to the monotherapy group. The patients were followed for a median of 60.7 months. At 5 years, metastasis-free survival was 87.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 83.0 to 90.6) in the combination group, 71.4% (95% CI, 65.7 to 76.3) in the leuprolide-alone group, and 80.0% (95% CI, 75.0 to 84.1) in the monotherapy group. With respect to metastasis-free survival, enzalutamide plus leuprolide was superior to leuprolide alone (hazard ratio for metastasis or death, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.61; P<0.001); enzalutamide monotherapy was also superior to leuprolide alone (hazard ratio for metastasis or death, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.87; P = 0.005). No new safety signals were observed, with no substantial between-group differences in quality-of-life measures. CONCLUSIONS In patients with prostate cancer with high-risk biochemical recurrence, enzalutamide plus leuprolide was superior to leuprolide alone with respect to metastasis-free survival; enzalutamide monotherapy was also superior to leuprolide alone. The safety profile of enzalutamide was consistent with that shown in previous clinical studies, with no apparent detrimental effect on quality of life. (Funded by Pfizer and Astellas Pharma; EMBARK ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02319837.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen J Freedland
- From the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (S.J.F.); the Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC (S.J.F.); the Division of Urologic Oncology, Erasto Gaertner Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (M.A.L.); IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy (U.D.G.); the Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (M.G.), and the Southern Alberta Institute of Urology, University of Calgary, Calgary (G.T.G.) - both in Canada; U.S. Urology Partners and Associated Medical Professionals of New York, Syracuse (C.M.P.); Global Development (G.P.H.) and Biostatistics (J.S.), Astellas Pharma, Northbrook, IL; Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, South Korea (C.-S.K.); Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain (M.R.-B.); the Department of Urology and Research Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki, and Helsinki University Hospital - both in Helsinki, Finland (A.R.); Global Product Development, Pfizer, Collegeville, PA (J.T.); the Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, NSW (S.S.), the Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW (H.H.W.), and the College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT (H.H.W.) - all in Australia; Global Product Development, Pfizer, San Francisco (Y.T.); Chesapeake Urology Research Associates, Towson, MD (R.F.T.); the Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom (B.V.); the Department of Urology, University of Lille, Claude Huriez Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Lille, France (A.V.); Global Product Development, Pfizer, Cambridge, MA (F.Z.); and the Carolina Urologic Research Center and GenesisCare US, Myrtle Beach, SC (N.D.S.)
| | - Murilo de Almeida Luz
- From the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (S.J.F.); the Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC (S.J.F.); the Division of Urologic Oncology, Erasto Gaertner Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (M.A.L.); IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy (U.D.G.); the Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (M.G.), and the Southern Alberta Institute of Urology, University of Calgary, Calgary (G.T.G.) - both in Canada; U.S. Urology Partners and Associated Medical Professionals of New York, Syracuse (C.M.P.); Global Development (G.P.H.) and Biostatistics (J.S.), Astellas Pharma, Northbrook, IL; Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, South Korea (C.-S.K.); Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain (M.R.-B.); the Department of Urology and Research Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki, and Helsinki University Hospital - both in Helsinki, Finland (A.R.); Global Product Development, Pfizer, Collegeville, PA (J.T.); the Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, NSW (S.S.), the Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW (H.H.W.), and the College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT (H.H.W.) - all in Australia; Global Product Development, Pfizer, San Francisco (Y.T.); Chesapeake Urology Research Associates, Towson, MD (R.F.T.); the Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom (B.V.); the Department of Urology, University of Lille, Claude Huriez Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Lille, France (A.V.); Global Product Development, Pfizer, Cambridge, MA (F.Z.); and the Carolina Urologic Research Center and GenesisCare US, Myrtle Beach, SC (N.D.S.)
| | - Ugo De Giorgi
- From the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (S.J.F.); the Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC (S.J.F.); the Division of Urologic Oncology, Erasto Gaertner Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (M.A.L.); IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy (U.D.G.); the Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (M.G.), and the Southern Alberta Institute of Urology, University of Calgary, Calgary (G.T.G.) - both in Canada; U.S. Urology Partners and Associated Medical Professionals of New York, Syracuse (C.M.P.); Global Development (G.P.H.) and Biostatistics (J.S.), Astellas Pharma, Northbrook, IL; Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, South Korea (C.-S.K.); Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain (M.R.-B.); the Department of Urology and Research Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki, and Helsinki University Hospital - both in Helsinki, Finland (A.R.); Global Product Development, Pfizer, Collegeville, PA (J.T.); the Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, NSW (S.S.), the Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW (H.H.W.), and the College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT (H.H.W.) - all in Australia; Global Product Development, Pfizer, San Francisco (Y.T.); Chesapeake Urology Research Associates, Towson, MD (R.F.T.); the Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom (B.V.); the Department of Urology, University of Lille, Claude Huriez Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Lille, France (A.V.); Global Product Development, Pfizer, Cambridge, MA (F.Z.); and the Carolina Urologic Research Center and GenesisCare US, Myrtle Beach, SC (N.D.S.)
| | - Martin Gleave
- From the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (S.J.F.); the Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC (S.J.F.); the Division of Urologic Oncology, Erasto Gaertner Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (M.A.L.); IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy (U.D.G.); the Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (M.G.), and the Southern Alberta Institute of Urology, University of Calgary, Calgary (G.T.G.) - both in Canada; U.S. Urology Partners and Associated Medical Professionals of New York, Syracuse (C.M.P.); Global Development (G.P.H.) and Biostatistics (J.S.), Astellas Pharma, Northbrook, IL; Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, South Korea (C.-S.K.); Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain (M.R.-B.); the Department of Urology and Research Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki, and Helsinki University Hospital - both in Helsinki, Finland (A.R.); Global Product Development, Pfizer, Collegeville, PA (J.T.); the Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, NSW (S.S.), the Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW (H.H.W.), and the College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT (H.H.W.) - all in Australia; Global Product Development, Pfizer, San Francisco (Y.T.); Chesapeake Urology Research Associates, Towson, MD (R.F.T.); the Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom (B.V.); the Department of Urology, University of Lille, Claude Huriez Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Lille, France (A.V.); Global Product Development, Pfizer, Cambridge, MA (F.Z.); and the Carolina Urologic Research Center and GenesisCare US, Myrtle Beach, SC (N.D.S.)
| | - Geoffrey T Gotto
- From the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (S.J.F.); the Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC (S.J.F.); the Division of Urologic Oncology, Erasto Gaertner Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (M.A.L.); IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy (U.D.G.); the Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (M.G.), and the Southern Alberta Institute of Urology, University of Calgary, Calgary (G.T.G.) - both in Canada; U.S. Urology Partners and Associated Medical Professionals of New York, Syracuse (C.M.P.); Global Development (G.P.H.) and Biostatistics (J.S.), Astellas Pharma, Northbrook, IL; Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, South Korea (C.-S.K.); Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain (M.R.-B.); the Department of Urology and Research Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki, and Helsinki University Hospital - both in Helsinki, Finland (A.R.); Global Product Development, Pfizer, Collegeville, PA (J.T.); the Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, NSW (S.S.), the Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW (H.H.W.), and the College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT (H.H.W.) - all in Australia; Global Product Development, Pfizer, San Francisco (Y.T.); Chesapeake Urology Research Associates, Towson, MD (R.F.T.); the Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom (B.V.); the Department of Urology, University of Lille, Claude Huriez Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Lille, France (A.V.); Global Product Development, Pfizer, Cambridge, MA (F.Z.); and the Carolina Urologic Research Center and GenesisCare US, Myrtle Beach, SC (N.D.S.)
| | - Christopher M Pieczonka
- From the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (S.J.F.); the Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC (S.J.F.); the Division of Urologic Oncology, Erasto Gaertner Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (M.A.L.); IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy (U.D.G.); the Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (M.G.), and the Southern Alberta Institute of Urology, University of Calgary, Calgary (G.T.G.) - both in Canada; U.S. Urology Partners and Associated Medical Professionals of New York, Syracuse (C.M.P.); Global Development (G.P.H.) and Biostatistics (J.S.), Astellas Pharma, Northbrook, IL; Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, South Korea (C.-S.K.); Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain (M.R.-B.); the Department of Urology and Research Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki, and Helsinki University Hospital - both in Helsinki, Finland (A.R.); Global Product Development, Pfizer, Collegeville, PA (J.T.); the Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, NSW (S.S.), the Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW (H.H.W.), and the College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT (H.H.W.) - all in Australia; Global Product Development, Pfizer, San Francisco (Y.T.); Chesapeake Urology Research Associates, Towson, MD (R.F.T.); the Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom (B.V.); the Department of Urology, University of Lille, Claude Huriez Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Lille, France (A.V.); Global Product Development, Pfizer, Cambridge, MA (F.Z.); and the Carolina Urologic Research Center and GenesisCare US, Myrtle Beach, SC (N.D.S.)
| | - Gabriel P Haas
- From the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (S.J.F.); the Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC (S.J.F.); the Division of Urologic Oncology, Erasto Gaertner Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (M.A.L.); IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy (U.D.G.); the Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (M.G.), and the Southern Alberta Institute of Urology, University of Calgary, Calgary (G.T.G.) - both in Canada; U.S. Urology Partners and Associated Medical Professionals of New York, Syracuse (C.M.P.); Global Development (G.P.H.) and Biostatistics (J.S.), Astellas Pharma, Northbrook, IL; Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, South Korea (C.-S.K.); Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain (M.R.-B.); the Department of Urology and Research Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki, and Helsinki University Hospital - both in Helsinki, Finland (A.R.); Global Product Development, Pfizer, Collegeville, PA (J.T.); the Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, NSW (S.S.), the Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW (H.H.W.), and the College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT (H.H.W.) - all in Australia; Global Product Development, Pfizer, San Francisco (Y.T.); Chesapeake Urology Research Associates, Towson, MD (R.F.T.); the Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom (B.V.); the Department of Urology, University of Lille, Claude Huriez Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Lille, France (A.V.); Global Product Development, Pfizer, Cambridge, MA (F.Z.); and the Carolina Urologic Research Center and GenesisCare US, Myrtle Beach, SC (N.D.S.)
| | - Choung-Soo Kim
- From the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (S.J.F.); the Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC (S.J.F.); the Division of Urologic Oncology, Erasto Gaertner Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (M.A.L.); IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy (U.D.G.); the Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (M.G.), and the Southern Alberta Institute of Urology, University of Calgary, Calgary (G.T.G.) - both in Canada; U.S. Urology Partners and Associated Medical Professionals of New York, Syracuse (C.M.P.); Global Development (G.P.H.) and Biostatistics (J.S.), Astellas Pharma, Northbrook, IL; Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, South Korea (C.-S.K.); Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain (M.R.-B.); the Department of Urology and Research Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki, and Helsinki University Hospital - both in Helsinki, Finland (A.R.); Global Product Development, Pfizer, Collegeville, PA (J.T.); the Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, NSW (S.S.), the Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW (H.H.W.), and the College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT (H.H.W.) - all in Australia; Global Product Development, Pfizer, San Francisco (Y.T.); Chesapeake Urology Research Associates, Towson, MD (R.F.T.); the Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom (B.V.); the Department of Urology, University of Lille, Claude Huriez Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Lille, France (A.V.); Global Product Development, Pfizer, Cambridge, MA (F.Z.); and the Carolina Urologic Research Center and GenesisCare US, Myrtle Beach, SC (N.D.S.)
| | - Miguel Ramirez-Backhaus
- From the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (S.J.F.); the Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC (S.J.F.); the Division of Urologic Oncology, Erasto Gaertner Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (M.A.L.); IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy (U.D.G.); the Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (M.G.), and the Southern Alberta Institute of Urology, University of Calgary, Calgary (G.T.G.) - both in Canada; U.S. Urology Partners and Associated Medical Professionals of New York, Syracuse (C.M.P.); Global Development (G.P.H.) and Biostatistics (J.S.), Astellas Pharma, Northbrook, IL; Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, South Korea (C.-S.K.); Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain (M.R.-B.); the Department of Urology and Research Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki, and Helsinki University Hospital - both in Helsinki, Finland (A.R.); Global Product Development, Pfizer, Collegeville, PA (J.T.); the Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, NSW (S.S.), the Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW (H.H.W.), and the College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT (H.H.W.) - all in Australia; Global Product Development, Pfizer, San Francisco (Y.T.); Chesapeake Urology Research Associates, Towson, MD (R.F.T.); the Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom (B.V.); the Department of Urology, University of Lille, Claude Huriez Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Lille, France (A.V.); Global Product Development, Pfizer, Cambridge, MA (F.Z.); and the Carolina Urologic Research Center and GenesisCare US, Myrtle Beach, SC (N.D.S.)
| | - Antti Rannikko
- From the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (S.J.F.); the Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC (S.J.F.); the Division of Urologic Oncology, Erasto Gaertner Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (M.A.L.); IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy (U.D.G.); the Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (M.G.), and the Southern Alberta Institute of Urology, University of Calgary, Calgary (G.T.G.) - both in Canada; U.S. Urology Partners and Associated Medical Professionals of New York, Syracuse (C.M.P.); Global Development (G.P.H.) and Biostatistics (J.S.), Astellas Pharma, Northbrook, IL; Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, South Korea (C.-S.K.); Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain (M.R.-B.); the Department of Urology and Research Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki, and Helsinki University Hospital - both in Helsinki, Finland (A.R.); Global Product Development, Pfizer, Collegeville, PA (J.T.); the Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, NSW (S.S.), the Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW (H.H.W.), and the College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT (H.H.W.) - all in Australia; Global Product Development, Pfizer, San Francisco (Y.T.); Chesapeake Urology Research Associates, Towson, MD (R.F.T.); the Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom (B.V.); the Department of Urology, University of Lille, Claude Huriez Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Lille, France (A.V.); Global Product Development, Pfizer, Cambridge, MA (F.Z.); and the Carolina Urologic Research Center and GenesisCare US, Myrtle Beach, SC (N.D.S.)
| | - Jamal Tarazi
- From the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (S.J.F.); the Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC (S.J.F.); the Division of Urologic Oncology, Erasto Gaertner Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (M.A.L.); IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy (U.D.G.); the Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (M.G.), and the Southern Alberta Institute of Urology, University of Calgary, Calgary (G.T.G.) - both in Canada; U.S. Urology Partners and Associated Medical Professionals of New York, Syracuse (C.M.P.); Global Development (G.P.H.) and Biostatistics (J.S.), Astellas Pharma, Northbrook, IL; Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, South Korea (C.-S.K.); Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain (M.R.-B.); the Department of Urology and Research Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki, and Helsinki University Hospital - both in Helsinki, Finland (A.R.); Global Product Development, Pfizer, Collegeville, PA (J.T.); the Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, NSW (S.S.), the Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW (H.H.W.), and the College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT (H.H.W.) - all in Australia; Global Product Development, Pfizer, San Francisco (Y.T.); Chesapeake Urology Research Associates, Towson, MD (R.F.T.); the Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom (B.V.); the Department of Urology, University of Lille, Claude Huriez Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Lille, France (A.V.); Global Product Development, Pfizer, Cambridge, MA (F.Z.); and the Carolina Urologic Research Center and GenesisCare US, Myrtle Beach, SC (N.D.S.)
| | - Swetha Sridharan
- From the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (S.J.F.); the Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC (S.J.F.); the Division of Urologic Oncology, Erasto Gaertner Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (M.A.L.); IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy (U.D.G.); the Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (M.G.), and the Southern Alberta Institute of Urology, University of Calgary, Calgary (G.T.G.) - both in Canada; U.S. Urology Partners and Associated Medical Professionals of New York, Syracuse (C.M.P.); Global Development (G.P.H.) and Biostatistics (J.S.), Astellas Pharma, Northbrook, IL; Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, South Korea (C.-S.K.); Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain (M.R.-B.); the Department of Urology and Research Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki, and Helsinki University Hospital - both in Helsinki, Finland (A.R.); Global Product Development, Pfizer, Collegeville, PA (J.T.); the Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, NSW (S.S.), the Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW (H.H.W.), and the College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT (H.H.W.) - all in Australia; Global Product Development, Pfizer, San Francisco (Y.T.); Chesapeake Urology Research Associates, Towson, MD (R.F.T.); the Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom (B.V.); the Department of Urology, University of Lille, Claude Huriez Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Lille, France (A.V.); Global Product Development, Pfizer, Cambridge, MA (F.Z.); and the Carolina Urologic Research Center and GenesisCare US, Myrtle Beach, SC (N.D.S.)
| | - Jennifer Sugg
- From the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (S.J.F.); the Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC (S.J.F.); the Division of Urologic Oncology, Erasto Gaertner Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (M.A.L.); IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy (U.D.G.); the Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (M.G.), and the Southern Alberta Institute of Urology, University of Calgary, Calgary (G.T.G.) - both in Canada; U.S. Urology Partners and Associated Medical Professionals of New York, Syracuse (C.M.P.); Global Development (G.P.H.) and Biostatistics (J.S.), Astellas Pharma, Northbrook, IL; Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, South Korea (C.-S.K.); Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain (M.R.-B.); the Department of Urology and Research Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki, and Helsinki University Hospital - both in Helsinki, Finland (A.R.); Global Product Development, Pfizer, Collegeville, PA (J.T.); the Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, NSW (S.S.), the Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW (H.H.W.), and the College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT (H.H.W.) - all in Australia; Global Product Development, Pfizer, San Francisco (Y.T.); Chesapeake Urology Research Associates, Towson, MD (R.F.T.); the Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom (B.V.); the Department of Urology, University of Lille, Claude Huriez Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Lille, France (A.V.); Global Product Development, Pfizer, Cambridge, MA (F.Z.); and the Carolina Urologic Research Center and GenesisCare US, Myrtle Beach, SC (N.D.S.)
| | - Yiyun Tang
- From the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (S.J.F.); the Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC (S.J.F.); the Division of Urologic Oncology, Erasto Gaertner Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (M.A.L.); IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy (U.D.G.); the Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (M.G.), and the Southern Alberta Institute of Urology, University of Calgary, Calgary (G.T.G.) - both in Canada; U.S. Urology Partners and Associated Medical Professionals of New York, Syracuse (C.M.P.); Global Development (G.P.H.) and Biostatistics (J.S.), Astellas Pharma, Northbrook, IL; Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, South Korea (C.-S.K.); Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain (M.R.-B.); the Department of Urology and Research Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki, and Helsinki University Hospital - both in Helsinki, Finland (A.R.); Global Product Development, Pfizer, Collegeville, PA (J.T.); the Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, NSW (S.S.), the Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW (H.H.W.), and the College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT (H.H.W.) - all in Australia; Global Product Development, Pfizer, San Francisco (Y.T.); Chesapeake Urology Research Associates, Towson, MD (R.F.T.); the Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom (B.V.); the Department of Urology, University of Lille, Claude Huriez Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Lille, France (A.V.); Global Product Development, Pfizer, Cambridge, MA (F.Z.); and the Carolina Urologic Research Center and GenesisCare US, Myrtle Beach, SC (N.D.S.)
| | - Ronald F Tutrone
- From the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (S.J.F.); the Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC (S.J.F.); the Division of Urologic Oncology, Erasto Gaertner Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (M.A.L.); IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy (U.D.G.); the Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (M.G.), and the Southern Alberta Institute of Urology, University of Calgary, Calgary (G.T.G.) - both in Canada; U.S. Urology Partners and Associated Medical Professionals of New York, Syracuse (C.M.P.); Global Development (G.P.H.) and Biostatistics (J.S.), Astellas Pharma, Northbrook, IL; Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, South Korea (C.-S.K.); Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain (M.R.-B.); the Department of Urology and Research Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki, and Helsinki University Hospital - both in Helsinki, Finland (A.R.); Global Product Development, Pfizer, Collegeville, PA (J.T.); the Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, NSW (S.S.), the Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW (H.H.W.), and the College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT (H.H.W.) - all in Australia; Global Product Development, Pfizer, San Francisco (Y.T.); Chesapeake Urology Research Associates, Towson, MD (R.F.T.); the Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom (B.V.); the Department of Urology, University of Lille, Claude Huriez Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Lille, France (A.V.); Global Product Development, Pfizer, Cambridge, MA (F.Z.); and the Carolina Urologic Research Center and GenesisCare US, Myrtle Beach, SC (N.D.S.)
| | - Balaji Venugopal
- From the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (S.J.F.); the Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC (S.J.F.); the Division of Urologic Oncology, Erasto Gaertner Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (M.A.L.); IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy (U.D.G.); the Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (M.G.), and the Southern Alberta Institute of Urology, University of Calgary, Calgary (G.T.G.) - both in Canada; U.S. Urology Partners and Associated Medical Professionals of New York, Syracuse (C.M.P.); Global Development (G.P.H.) and Biostatistics (J.S.), Astellas Pharma, Northbrook, IL; Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, South Korea (C.-S.K.); Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain (M.R.-B.); the Department of Urology and Research Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki, and Helsinki University Hospital - both in Helsinki, Finland (A.R.); Global Product Development, Pfizer, Collegeville, PA (J.T.); the Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, NSW (S.S.), the Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW (H.H.W.), and the College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT (H.H.W.) - all in Australia; Global Product Development, Pfizer, San Francisco (Y.T.); Chesapeake Urology Research Associates, Towson, MD (R.F.T.); the Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom (B.V.); the Department of Urology, University of Lille, Claude Huriez Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Lille, France (A.V.); Global Product Development, Pfizer, Cambridge, MA (F.Z.); and the Carolina Urologic Research Center and GenesisCare US, Myrtle Beach, SC (N.D.S.)
| | - Arnauld Villers
- From the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (S.J.F.); the Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC (S.J.F.); the Division of Urologic Oncology, Erasto Gaertner Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (M.A.L.); IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy (U.D.G.); the Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (M.G.), and the Southern Alberta Institute of Urology, University of Calgary, Calgary (G.T.G.) - both in Canada; U.S. Urology Partners and Associated Medical Professionals of New York, Syracuse (C.M.P.); Global Development (G.P.H.) and Biostatistics (J.S.), Astellas Pharma, Northbrook, IL; Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, South Korea (C.-S.K.); Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain (M.R.-B.); the Department of Urology and Research Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki, and Helsinki University Hospital - both in Helsinki, Finland (A.R.); Global Product Development, Pfizer, Collegeville, PA (J.T.); the Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, NSW (S.S.), the Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW (H.H.W.), and the College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT (H.H.W.) - all in Australia; Global Product Development, Pfizer, San Francisco (Y.T.); Chesapeake Urology Research Associates, Towson, MD (R.F.T.); the Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom (B.V.); the Department of Urology, University of Lille, Claude Huriez Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Lille, France (A.V.); Global Product Development, Pfizer, Cambridge, MA (F.Z.); and the Carolina Urologic Research Center and GenesisCare US, Myrtle Beach, SC (N.D.S.)
| | - Henry H Woo
- From the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (S.J.F.); the Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC (S.J.F.); the Division of Urologic Oncology, Erasto Gaertner Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (M.A.L.); IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy (U.D.G.); the Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (M.G.), and the Southern Alberta Institute of Urology, University of Calgary, Calgary (G.T.G.) - both in Canada; U.S. Urology Partners and Associated Medical Professionals of New York, Syracuse (C.M.P.); Global Development (G.P.H.) and Biostatistics (J.S.), Astellas Pharma, Northbrook, IL; Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, South Korea (C.-S.K.); Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain (M.R.-B.); the Department of Urology and Research Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki, and Helsinki University Hospital - both in Helsinki, Finland (A.R.); Global Product Development, Pfizer, Collegeville, PA (J.T.); the Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, NSW (S.S.), the Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW (H.H.W.), and the College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT (H.H.W.) - all in Australia; Global Product Development, Pfizer, San Francisco (Y.T.); Chesapeake Urology Research Associates, Towson, MD (R.F.T.); the Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom (B.V.); the Department of Urology, University of Lille, Claude Huriez Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Lille, France (A.V.); Global Product Development, Pfizer, Cambridge, MA (F.Z.); and the Carolina Urologic Research Center and GenesisCare US, Myrtle Beach, SC (N.D.S.)
| | - Fabian Zohren
- From the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (S.J.F.); the Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC (S.J.F.); the Division of Urologic Oncology, Erasto Gaertner Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (M.A.L.); IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy (U.D.G.); the Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (M.G.), and the Southern Alberta Institute of Urology, University of Calgary, Calgary (G.T.G.) - both in Canada; U.S. Urology Partners and Associated Medical Professionals of New York, Syracuse (C.M.P.); Global Development (G.P.H.) and Biostatistics (J.S.), Astellas Pharma, Northbrook, IL; Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, South Korea (C.-S.K.); Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain (M.R.-B.); the Department of Urology and Research Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki, and Helsinki University Hospital - both in Helsinki, Finland (A.R.); Global Product Development, Pfizer, Collegeville, PA (J.T.); the Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, NSW (S.S.), the Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW (H.H.W.), and the College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT (H.H.W.) - all in Australia; Global Product Development, Pfizer, San Francisco (Y.T.); Chesapeake Urology Research Associates, Towson, MD (R.F.T.); the Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom (B.V.); the Department of Urology, University of Lille, Claude Huriez Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Lille, France (A.V.); Global Product Development, Pfizer, Cambridge, MA (F.Z.); and the Carolina Urologic Research Center and GenesisCare US, Myrtle Beach, SC (N.D.S.)
| | - Neal D Shore
- From the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (S.J.F.); the Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC (S.J.F.); the Division of Urologic Oncology, Erasto Gaertner Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil (M.A.L.); IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy (U.D.G.); the Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (M.G.), and the Southern Alberta Institute of Urology, University of Calgary, Calgary (G.T.G.) - both in Canada; U.S. Urology Partners and Associated Medical Professionals of New York, Syracuse (C.M.P.); Global Development (G.P.H.) and Biostatistics (J.S.), Astellas Pharma, Northbrook, IL; Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, South Korea (C.-S.K.); Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain (M.R.-B.); the Department of Urology and Research Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki, and Helsinki University Hospital - both in Helsinki, Finland (A.R.); Global Product Development, Pfizer, Collegeville, PA (J.T.); the Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, NSW (S.S.), the Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW (H.H.W.), and the College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT (H.H.W.) - all in Australia; Global Product Development, Pfizer, San Francisco (Y.T.); Chesapeake Urology Research Associates, Towson, MD (R.F.T.); the Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom (B.V.); the Department of Urology, University of Lille, Claude Huriez Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Lille, France (A.V.); Global Product Development, Pfizer, Cambridge, MA (F.Z.); and the Carolina Urologic Research Center and GenesisCare US, Myrtle Beach, SC (N.D.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Freedland SJ, Davis MR, Epstein AJ, Arondekar B, Ivanova JI. Healthcare Costs in Men with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: An Analysis of US Medicare Fee-For-Service Claims. Adv Ther 2023; 40:4480-4492. [PMID: 37531024 PMCID: PMC10500004 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-023-02572-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To analyze healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and healthcare costs in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the US Medicare population. METHODS A published claims-based algorithm was used to identify men with mCRPC in the fee-for-service Medicare population between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2019. Unadjusted all-cause HRU (days) and healthcare costs paid by Medicare (medical and pharmacy) per patient per year (PPPY) are described for the periods before mCRPC diagnosis, after diagnosis, and from the start of first-line (1L), second-line (2L), and third-line (3L) therapy with mCRPC life-prolonging treatments to the start of subsequent therapy or end of follow-up/death. RESULTS A total of 14,780 men with mCRPC were identified. After mCRPC diagnosis, 11,528 men initiated 1L mCRPC therapy, 6275 initiated 2L, and 2945 initiated 3L. All-cause medical HRU (days PPPY) increased after mCRPC diagnosis and from 1L through 3L treatment, particularly for outpatient care (pre-diagnosis, 10.4; 1L, 16.2; 2L, 18.9; 3L, 22.0) and physician/other visits (pre-diagnosis, 30.1; 1L, 46.5; 2L, 50.2; 3L, 56.9). Similarly, mean all-cause healthcare costs PPPY were $27,468 in the year before mCRPC diagnosis and increased over four fold to $124,379 after mCRPC diagnosis and continued to rise from start of 1L ($148,325) to 2L ($160,118) to 3L ($165,186) therapy. CONCLUSION HRU and healthcare costs increased substantially following mCRPC diagnosis, and continued to increase even further through progression from 1L through 3L mCRPC therapy. These findings help to quantify the economic burden of mCRPC and to contextualize the economic value of treatments that delay disease progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen J Freedland
- Department of Urology, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8635 West 3rd Street, 1070W, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
- Durham VA Medical Center, Urology Section, Durham, NC, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Marturano F, Guglielmo P, Bettinelli A, Zattoni F, Novara G, Zorz A, Sepulcri M, Gregianin M, Paiusco M, Evangelista L. Role of radiomic analysis of [ 18F]fluoromethylcholine PET/CT in predicting biochemical recurrence in a cohort of intermediate and high risk prostate cancer patients at initial staging. Eur Radiol 2023; 33:7199-7208. [PMID: 37079030 PMCID: PMC10511374 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09642-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Revised: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/21/2023]
Abstract
AIM To study the feasibility of radiomic analysis of baseline [18F]fluoromethylcholine positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the prediction of biochemical recurrence (BCR) in a cohort of intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS Seventy-four patients were prospectively collected. We analyzed three prostate gland (PG) segmentations (i.e., PGwhole: whole PG; PG41%: prostate having standardized uptake value - SUV > 0.41*SUVmax; PG2.5: prostate having SUV > 2.5) together with three SUV discretization steps (i.e., 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6). For each segmentation/discretization step, we trained a logistic regression model to predict BCR using radiomic and/or clinical features. RESULTS The median baseline prostate-specific antigen was 11 ng/mL, the Gleason score was > 7 for 54% of patients, and the clinical stage was T1/T2 for 89% and T3 for 9% of patients. The baseline clinical model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.73. Performances improved when clinical data were combined with radiomic features, in particular for PG2.5 and 0.4 discretization, for which the median test AUC was 0.78. CONCLUSION Radiomics reinforces clinical parameters in predicting BCR in intermediate and high-risk PCa patients. These first data strongly encourage further investigations on the use of radiomic analysis to identify patients at risk of BCR. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT The application of AI combined with radiomic analysis of [18F]fluoromethylcholine PET/CT images has proven to be a promising tool to stratify patients with intermediate or high-risk PCa in order to predict biochemical recurrence and tailor the best treatment options. KEY POINTS • Stratification of patients with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer at risk of biochemical recurrence before initial treatment would help determine the optimal curative strategy. • Artificial intelligence combined with radiomic analysis of [18F]fluorocholine PET/CT images allows prediction of biochemical recurrence, especially when radiomic features are complemented with patients' clinical information (highest median AUC of 0.78). • Radiomics reinforces the information of conventional clinical parameters (i.e., Gleason score and initial prostate-specific antigen level) in predicting biochemical recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Marturano
- Department of Medical Physics, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Priscilla Guglielmo
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Andrea Bettinelli
- Department of Medical Physics, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
- Department of Information Engineering, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
| | - Fabio Zattoni
- Department of Surgical Oncological & Gastroenterological Sciences (DiSCOG), University of Padua, Padua, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Giacomo Novara
- Department of Surgical Oncological & Gastroenterological Sciences (DiSCOG), University of Padua, Padua, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Alessandra Zorz
- Department of Medical Physics, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Matteo Sepulcri
- Radiotherapy Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Michele Gregianin
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Marta Paiusco
- Department of Medical Physics, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Laura Evangelista
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine DIMED, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zhao X, Wang Z, Tang Z, Hu J, Zhou Y, Ge J, Dong J, Xu S. An anoikis-related gene signature for prediction of the prognosis in prostate cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1169425. [PMID: 37664042 PMCID: PMC10469923 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1169425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study presents a novel approach to predict postoperative biochemical recurrence (BCR) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients which involves constructing a signature based on anoikis-related genes (ARGs). Methods In this study, we utilised data from TCGA-PARD and GEO databases to identify specific ARGs in prostate cancer. We established a signature of these ARGs using Cox regression analysis and evaluated their clinical predictive efficacy and immune-related status through various methods such as Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, subject work characteristics analysis, and CIBERSORT method. Our findings suggest that these ARGs may have potential as biomarkers for prostate cancer prognosis and treatment. To investigate the biological pathways of genes associated with anoikis, we utilised GSVA, GO, and KEGG. The expression of ARGs was confirmed by the HPA database. Furthermore, we conducted PPI analysis to identify the core network of ARGs in PCa. Results Based on analysis of the TCGA database, a set of eight ARGs were identified as prognostic signature genes for prostate cancer. The reliability and validity of this signature were well verified in both the TCGA and GEO codifications. Using this signature, patients were classified into two groups based on their risk for developing BCR. There was a significant difference in BCR-free time between the high and low risk groups (P < 0.05).This signature serves as a dependable and unbiased prognostic factor for predicting biochemical recurrence (BCR) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. It outperforms clinicopathological characteristics in terms of accuracy and reliability. PLK1 may play a potential regulatory role as a core gene in the development of prostate cancer. Conclusion This signature suggests the potential role of ARGs in the development and progression of PCa and can effectively predict the risk of BCR in PCa patients after surgery. It also provides a basis for further research into the mechanism of ARGs in PCa and for the clinical management of patients with PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaodong Zhao
- Jinling School of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Urology, Eastern Theater General Hospital of Medical School Of Nan Jing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Zuheng Wang
- Jinling School of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Urology, Eastern Theater General Hospital of Medical School Of Nan Jing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Zilu Tang
- Jinling School of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Urology, Eastern Theater General Hospital of Medical School Of Nan Jing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jun Hu
- Jinling School of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Urology, Eastern Theater General Hospital of Medical School Of Nan Jing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yulin Zhou
- Department of Urology, Eastern Theater General Hospital of Medical School Of Nan Jing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jingping Ge
- Department of Urology, Eastern Theater General Hospital of Medical School Of Nan Jing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jie Dong
- Department of Urology, Eastern Theater General Hospital of Medical School Of Nan Jing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Song Xu
- Jinling School of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Urology, Eastern Theater General Hospital of Medical School Of Nan Jing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Chow KM, So WZ, Lee HJ, Lee A, Yap DWT, Takwoingi Y, Tay KJ, Tuan J, Thang SP, Lam W, Yuen J, Lawrentschuk N, Hofman MS, Murphy DG, Chen K. Head-to-head Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography and Conventional Imaging Modalities for Initial Staging of Intermediate- to High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol 2023; 84:36-48. [PMID: 37032189 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Revised: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Whether prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) should replace conventional imaging modalities (CIM) for initial staging of intermediate-high risk prostate cancer (PCa) requires definitive evidence on their relative diagnostic abilities. OBJECTIVE To perform head-to-head comparisons of PSMA-PET and CIM including multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), computed tomography (CT) and bone scan (BS) for upfront staging of tumour, nodal, and bone metastasis. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A search of the PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Scopus databases was conducted from inception to December 2021. Only studies in which patients underwent both PSMA-PET and CIM and imaging was referenced against histopathology or composite reference standards were included. Quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) checklist and its extension for comparative reviews (QUADAS-C). Pairwise comparisons of the sensitivity and specificity of PSMA-PET versus CIM were performed by adding imaging modality as a covariate to bivariate mixed-effects meta-regression models. The likelihood ratio test was applied to determine whether statistically significant differences existed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS A total of 31 studies (2431 patients) were included. PSMA-PET/MRI was more sensitive than mpMRI for detection of extra-prostatic extension (78.7% versus 52.9%) and seminal vesicle invasion (66.7% versus 51.0%). For nodal staging, PSMA-PET was more sensitive and specific than mpMRI (73.7% versus 38.9%, 97.5% versus 82.6%) and CT (73.2% versus 38.5%, 97.8% versus 83.6%). For bone metastasis staging, PSMA-PET was more sensitive and specific than BS with or without single-photon emission computerised tomography (98.0% versus 73.0%, 96.2% versus 79.1%). A time interval between imaging modalities >1 month was identified as a source of heterogeneity across all nodal staging analyses. CONCLUSIONS Direct comparisons revealed that PSMA-PET significantly outperforms CIM, which suggests that PSMA-PET should be used as a first-line approach for the initial staging of PCa. PATIENT SUMMARY We reviewed direct comparisons of the ability of a scan method called PSMA-PET (prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography) and current imaging methods to detect the spread of prostate cancer outside the prostate gland. We found that PSMA-PET is more accurate for detection of the spread of prostate cancer to adjacent tissue, nearby lymph nodes, and bones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kit Mun Chow
- YLL School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Wei Zheng So
- YLL School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Han Jie Lee
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Alvin Lee
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | | | - Yemisi Takwoingi
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Kae Jack Tay
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Jeffrey Tuan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sue Ping Thang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Winnie Lam
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - John Yuen
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- Department of Urology and Department of Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; EJ Whitten Prostate Cancer Research Centre at Epworth, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Department of Urology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kenneth Chen
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ferrari M, Wang L, Hoeppner L, Hahm E, Yu J, Kuzel T, Mansini A. Myeloid differentiation factor-2/LY96, a new predictive biomarker of metastasis in prostate cancer: Clinical implications as a potential therapeutic target. RESEARCH SQUARE 2023:rs.3.rs-2968406. [PMID: 37333086 PMCID: PMC10275058 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2968406/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/20/2023]
Abstract
Relapsed prostate cancer (CaP), usually treated with androgen deprivation therapy, acquires resistance to develop into lethal metastatic castration-resistant CaP. The cause of resistance remains elusive, and the lack of biomarkers predictive of castration-resistance emergence is a stumbling block in managing the disease. We provide strong evidence that Myeloid differentiation factor-2 (MD2) plays a critical role in metastasis and CaP progression. Analysis of tumor genomic data and IHC of tumors showed a high frequency of MD2 amplification and association with poor overall survival in patients. The Decipher-genomic test validated the potential of MD2 in predicting metastasis. In vitro studies demonstrated that MD2 confers invasiveness by activating MAPK and NF-kB signaling pathways. Furthermore, we show that metastatic cells release MD2 (sMD2). We measured serum-sMD2 in patients and found that the level is correlated to disease extent. We determined the significance of MD2 as a therapeutic target and found that targeting MD2 significantly inhibited metastasis in a murine model. We conclude that MD2 predicts metastatic behavior and serum-MD2 is a non-invasive biomarker for tumor burden, whereas MD2 presence on prostate biopsy predicts adverse disease outcome. We suggest MD2-targeted therapies could be developed as potential treatments for aggressive metastatic disease.
Collapse
|
16
|
Subramanian K, Martinez J, Castellanos SH, Ivanidze J, Nagar H, Nicholson S, Youn T, Nauseef JT, Tagawa S, Osborne JR. Complex implementation factors demonstrated when evaluating cost-effectiveness and monitoring racial disparities associated with [ 18F]DCFPyL PET/CT in prostate cancer men. Sci Rep 2023; 13:8321. [PMID: 37221397 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-35567-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PC) staging with conventional imaging often includes multiparametric magnetic resonance (MR) of the prostate, computed tomography (CT) of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis, and whole-body bone scintigraphy. The recent development of highly sensitive and specific prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) has suggested that prior imaging techniques may be insufficiently sensitive or specific, particularly when evaluating small pathologic lesions. As PSMA PET/CT is considered to be superior for multiple clinical indications, it is being deployed as the new multidisciplinary standard-of-care. Given this, we performed a cost-effectiveness analysis of [18F]DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT imaging in the evaluation of PC relative to conventional imaging and anti-3-[18F]FACBC (18F-Fluciclovine) PET/CT. We also conducted a single institution review of PSMA PET/CT scans performed primarily for research indications from January 2018 to October 2021. Our snapshot of this period of time in our catchment demonstrated that PSMA PET/CT imaging was disproportionately accessed by men of European ancestry (EA) and those residing in zip codes associated with a higher median household income. The cost-effectiveness analysis demonstrated that [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT should be considered as an alternative to anti-3-[18F]FACBC PET/CT and standard of care imaging for prostate cancer staging. [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT is a new imaging modality to evaluate PC patients with higher sensitivity and specificity in detecting disease than other prostate specific imaging studies. Despite this, access may be inequitable. This discrepancy will need to be addressed proactively as the distribution network of the radiotracer includes both academic and non-academic sites nationwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kritika Subramanian
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Juana Martinez
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sandra Huicochea Castellanos
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jana Ivanidze
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Himanshu Nagar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sean Nicholson
- Department of Policy Analysis and Management, Sloan, Cornell Institute for Public Affairs, New York, NY, USA
| | - Trisha Youn
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jones T Nauseef
- Department of Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Scott Tagawa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joseph R Osborne
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cameron S, Deblois G, Hawley JR, Qamra A, Zhou S, Tonekaboni SAM, Murison A, Van Vliet R, Liu J, Locasale JW, Lupien M. Chronic hypoxia favours adoption to a castration-resistant cell state in prostate cancer. Oncogene 2023; 42:1693-1703. [PMID: 37020039 DOI: 10.1038/s41388-023-02680-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Revised: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
Predicting and treating recurrence in intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients remains a challenge despite having identified genomic instability [1] and hypoxia [2, 3] as risk factors. This underlies challenges in assigning the functional impact of these risk factors to mechanisms promoting prostate cancer progression. Here we show chronic hypoxia (CH), as observed in prostate tumours [4], leads to the adoption of an androgen-independent state in prostate cancer cells. Specifically, CH results in prostate cancer cells adopting transcriptional and metabolic alterations typical of castration-resistant prostate cancer cells. These changes include the increased expression of transmembrane transporters for the methionine cycle and related pathways leading to increased abundance of metabolites and expression of enzymes related to glycolysis. Targeting of the Glucose Transporter 1 (GLUT1) identified a dependency on glycolysis in androgen-independent cells. Overall, we identified a therapeutically targetable weakness in chronic hypoxia and androgen-independent prostate cancer. These findings may offer additional strategies for treatment development against hypoxic prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarina Cameron
- Princess Margaret Cancer Research Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Genevieve Deblois
- Princess Margaret Cancer Research Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute for Research in Immunology and Cancer (IRIC), Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Montréal, Montréal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada
| | - James R Hawley
- Princess Margaret Cancer Research Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Aditi Qamra
- Princess Margaret Cancer Research Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Stanley Zhou
- Princess Margaret Cancer Research Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Seyed Ali Madani Tonekaboni
- Princess Margaret Cancer Research Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Romy Van Vliet
- Princess Margaret Cancer Research Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Juan Liu
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Mathieu Lupien
- Princess Margaret Cancer Research Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Severson TM, Zhu Y, Prekovic S, Schuurman K, Nguyen HM, Brown LG, Hakkola S, Kim Y, Kneppers J, Linder S, Stelloo S, Lieftink C, van der Heijden M, Nykter M, van der Noort V, Sanders J, Morris B, Jenster G, van Leenders GJLH, Pomerantz M, Freedman ML, Beijersbergen RL, Urbanucci A, Wessels L, Corey E, Zwart W, Bergman AM. Enhancer profiling identifies epigenetic markers of endocrine resistance and reveals therapeutic options for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.02.24.23286403. [PMID: 36865297 PMCID: PMC9980263 DOI: 10.1101/2023.02.24.23286403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
Androgen Receptor (AR) signaling inhibitors, including enzalutamide, are treatment options for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), but resistance inevitably develops. Using metastatic samples from a prospective phase II clinical trial, we epigenetically profiled enhancer/promoter activities with H3K27ac chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing, before and after AR-targeted therapy. We identified a distinct subset of H3K27ac-differentially marked regions that associated with treatment responsiveness. These data were successfully validated in mCRPC patient-derived xenograft models (PDX). In silico analyses revealed HDAC3 as a critical factor that can drive resistance to hormonal interventions, which we validated in vitro . Using cell lines and mCRPC PDX tumors in vitro , we identified drug-drug synergy between enzalutamide and the pan-HDAC inhibitor vorinostat, providing therapeutic proof-of-concept. These findings demonstrate rationale for new therapeutic strategies using a combination of AR and HDAC inhibitors to improve patient outcome in advanced stages of mCRPC.
Collapse
|
19
|
Bodar YJL, Luining WI, Keizer B, Meijer D, Vellekoop A, Schaaf M, Hendrikse NH, Van Moorselaar RJA, Oprea-Lager DE, Vis AN. A prospective, multicenter head-to-head comparative study in patients with primary high-risk prostate cancer investigating the bone lesion detection of conventional imaging and 18F-PSMA-PET/CT. Urol Oncol 2022; 41:205.e17-205.e24. [PMID: 36588019 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Revised: 12/04/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is an emerging staging tool for patients with primary high-risk prostate cancer (PCa). Patients with primary metastatic disease are staged using PSMA-PET/CT imaging, while previously published randomized clinical trials relied on conventional imaging (i.e., bone scintigraphy (BS) results. The aim of this study was to compare the ability of bone metastatic lesion detection and changes in staging for 18F-PSMA-PET/CT versus BS in high-risk PCa patients. METHODS 79 patients with high-risk PCa were prospectively staged using BS and subsequent 18F-PSMA-PET/CT before initial therapy. Patients who presented with a BS showing no metastases represented Group 1, and patients with a BS showing low-volume disease according to the CHAARTED criteria (<4 bone metastases, no metastases outside vertebral column or pelvis and no visceral metastases) represented Group 2. Metastatic risk group according to CHAARTED and treatment strategies based on both imaging modalities were assessed. RESULTS A change of CHAARTED risk group was observed in 9/70 (12.8%) of patients in Group 1. In Group 2, a change of risk group was found in 66.7% of patients, due to either upstaging (4/9 patients (44.4%)) and downstaging (2/9 patients (22.2%)). Treatment changes due to use of a different imaging modality occurred in almost 20% of patients. CONCLUSION In patients with negative for cancer results on BS, upstaging on 18F-PSMA-PET/CT occurred only infrequently. Moreover, 18F-PSMA-PET/CT resulted in both upstaging and downstaging in a substantial subset of patients with low-volume metastatic disease on BS. Treatment changes occurred in almost 20% of cases depending on imaging results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y J L Bodar
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (VU University), Noord Holland, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (VU University), Noord Holland, The Netherlands; Prostate Cancer Network, Noord Holland, The Netherlands.
| | - W I Luining
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (VU University), Noord Holland, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (VU University), Noord Holland, The Netherlands; Prostate Cancer Network, Noord Holland, The Netherlands
| | - B Keizer
- Department of Urology, Dijklander Hospital, Noord Holland, The Netherlands
| | - D Meijer
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (VU University), Noord Holland, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (VU University), Noord Holland, The Netherlands; Prostate Cancer Network, Noord Holland, The Netherlands
| | - A Vellekoop
- Department of Urology, Amstelland Hospital, Noord Holland, The Netherlands
| | - M Schaaf
- Department of Urology, Bovenij hospital, Noord Holland, The Netherlands
| | - N H Hendrikse
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (VU University), Noord Holland, The Netherlands
| | - R J A Van Moorselaar
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (VU University), Noord Holland, The Netherlands; Prostate Cancer Network, Noord Holland, The Netherlands
| | - D E Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (VU University), Noord Holland, The Netherlands
| | - A N Vis
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (VU University), Noord Holland, The Netherlands; Prostate Cancer Network, Noord Holland, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hutten R, Khouri A, Parsons M, Tward A, Wilson T, Peterson J, Morrell G, Dechet C, O'Neil B, Schmidt B, Kokeny K, Lloyd S, Cannon D, Tward J, Sanchez A, Johnson S. The Clinical Significance of Maximum Tumor Diameter on MRI in Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy or Definitive Radiotherapy for Locoregional Prostate Cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2022; 20:e453-e459. [PMID: 35787979 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Revised: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Maximum tumor diameter (MTD) on pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has the potential to further risk stratify for men with prostate cancer (PCa) prior to definitive local therapy. We aim to evaluate the prognostic impact of radiographic maximum tumor diameter (MTD) in men with localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS From a single-center retrospective cohort of men receiving definitive treatment for PCa (radical prostatectomy [RP] or radiotherapy [RT]) with available pretreatment MRI, we conducted univariable and multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models for progression using clinical variables including age, NCCN risk group, radiographic extracapsular extension (ECE), radiographic seminal vesical invasion (SVI), and MTD. RP and RT cohorts were analyzed separately. Covariates were used in a classification and regression tree (CART) analysis and progression-free survival was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and groups were compared using log-rank tests. RESULTS The cohort included 631 patients (n = 428 RP, n = 203 RT). CART analysis identified 4 prognostic groups for patients treated with RP and 2 prognostic groups in those treated with RT. In the RP cohort, NCCN low/intermediate risk group patients with MTD>=15 mm had significantly worse PFS than those with MTD <= 14 mm, and NCCN high-risk patients with radiographic ECE had significantly worse PFS than those without ECE. In the RT cohort, PFS was significantly worse in the cohort with MTD >= 23 mm than those <= 22 mm. CONCLUSION Radiographic MTD may be a useful prognostic factor for patients with locoregional prostate cancer. This is the first study to illustrate that the importance of pretreatment tumor size may vary based on treatment modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Hutten
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Ashley Khouri
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Matthew Parsons
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Alex Tward
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Trevor Wilson
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - John Peterson
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Glen Morrell
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Services, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Christopher Dechet
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Brock O'Neil
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Bogdana Schmidt
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Kristine Kokeny
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Shane Lloyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Donald Cannon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Jonathan Tward
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Alejandro Sanchez
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Skyler Johnson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lorenzo G, di Muzio N, Deantoni CL, Cozzarini C, Fodor A, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Pérez-García VM, Gomez H, Reali A. Patient-specific forecasting of postradiotherapy prostate-specific antigen kinetics enables early prediction of biochemical relapse. iScience 2022; 25:105430. [DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2022] [Revised: 09/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
|
22
|
Glemser PA, Rotkopf LT, Ziener CH, Beuthien-Baumann B, Weru V, Kopp-Schneider A, Schlemmer HP, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Sachpekidis C. Hybrid imaging with [ 68Ga]PSMA-11 PET-CT and PET-MRI in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. Cancer Imaging 2022; 22:53. [PMID: 36138437 PMCID: PMC9502876 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-022-00489-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To compare [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET-CT, [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET-MRI and MRI in a cohort of prostate cancer (PCa) patients in biochemical recurrence after initial curative therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifty-three patients with biochemically recurrent PCa underwent whole-body [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET-CT 1 hour post-injection (p.i.) followed by [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET-MRI 2.5 hours p.i., including a multiparametric MRI pelvic protocol examination. Imaging data analysis consisted of visual (qualitative) evaluation of the PET-CT, PET-MRI and MRI scans, as well as semi-quantitative and quantitative analyses of the PET and MRI data, including calculation of the parameters standardized uptake value (SUV) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) derived from the PCa lesions. Association analysis was performed between imaging and clinical data, including PSA level and Gleason score. The results were considered significant for p-values less than 0.05 (p < 0.05). RESULTS The hybrid imaging modalities [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET-CT and PET-MRI were positive in more patients than MRI alone. In particular, PET-CT detected lesions suggestive of PCa relapse in 34/53 (64.2%), PET-MRI in 36/53 (67.9%) and MRI in 23/53 patients (43.4%). While no significant differences in lesion detection rate were observed between PET-CT and PET-MRI, the latter was particularly efficient in detection of local recurrences in the prostate bed mainly due to the contribution of the MRI part of the modality. Association analysis revealed a statistically significant increase in the probability of a positive scan with increasing PSA levels for all imaging modalities. Accordingly, there was no significant association between scan positivity rate and Gleason score for any imaging modality. No significant correlation was observed between SUV and ADC values in lymph node metastases. CONCLUSION [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET-CT and PET-MRI provide equally good detection rates for PCa recurrence, both outperforming stand-alone MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P A Glemser
- Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - L T Rotkopf
- Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Medical Faculty, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C H Ziener
- Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - B Beuthien-Baumann
- Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - V Weru
- Department of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - A Kopp-Schneider
- Department of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - H P Schlemmer
- Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - A Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69210, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C Sachpekidis
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69210, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sugimoto M, Kato T, Tohi Y, Shimizu Y, Matsumoto R, Inoue T, Takezawa Y, Masui K, Sasaki H, Hirama H, Saito S, Egawa S, Kamoto T, Teramukai S, Kojima S, Kikuchi T, Kakehi Y. Enzalutamide in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after combined androgen blockade for recurrence following radical treatment in Japan (Japanese research for patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer-enzalutamide: JCASTRE-zero)—a prospective single-arm interventional study. BMC Urol 2022; 22:151. [PMID: 36104667 PMCID: PMC9476281 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-022-01096-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The effect of enzalutamide in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after combined androgen blockade, which represents a patient profile similar to real-world clinical practice in Japan, remains unknown. Therefore, we investigate the efficacy and safety of enzalutamide after combined androgen blockade for recurrence following radical treatment in Japanese patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Methods We analyzed 66 patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after combined androgen blockade for recurrence following radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy who were prospectively enrolled from October 2015 to March 2018. They received enzalutamide 160 mg orally once daily until the protocol treatment discontinuation criteria were met. The primary endpoint was prostate-specific antigen-progression-free survival, defined as the time from enrollment to prostate-specific antigen-based progression or death from any cause. The secondary endpoints included overall survival, progression-free survival, metastasis-free survival, time to prostate-specific antigen progression, prostate-specific antigen response rate, chemotherapy-free survival, and safety assessment. Results The median observation period was 27.3 months. The median prostate-specific antigen-progression-free survival was 35.0 months (95% confidence interval, 17.5 to not reached). The median overall survival, median progression-free survival, median metastasis-free survival, and chemotherapy-free survival were not reached, with the corresponding 2-year rates being 91.6%, 67.1%, 72.4%, and 85.8%, respectively. The 50% prostate-specific antigen response rate was 88.9%, with the median time being 2.8 months. In total, 42.2% of the patients experienced adverse events, with malaise being the most common. Conclusions Enzalutamide effectively manages non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after combined androgen blockade for recurrence following radical treatment. Trialregistration: UMIN000018964, CRB6180007. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12894-022-01096-3.
Collapse
|
24
|
Wang X, Brea L, Lu X, Gritsina G, Park SH, Xie W, Zhao JC, Yu J. FOXA1 inhibits hypoxia programs through transcriptional repression of HIF1A. Oncogene 2022; 41:4259-4270. [PMID: 35931888 PMCID: PMC9464719 DOI: 10.1038/s41388-022-02423-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Revised: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Intratumoral hypoxia is associated with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), a lethal disease. FOXA1 is an epithelial transcription factor that is down-regulated in CRPC. We have previously reported that FOXA1 loss induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and cell motility through elevated TGFβ signaling. However, whether FOXA1 directly regulates hypoxia pathways of CRPC tumors has not been previously studied. Here we report that FOXA1 down-regulation induces hypoxia transcriptional programs, and FOXA1 level is negatively correlated with hypoxia markers in clinical prostate cancer (PCa) samples. Mechanistically, FOXA1 directly binds to an intragenic enhancer of HIF1A to inhibit its expression, and HIF1A, in turn, is critical in mediating FOXA1 loss-induced hypoxia gene expression. Further, we identify CCL2, a chemokine ligand that modulates tumor microenvironment and promotes cancer progression, as a crucial target of the FOXA1-HIF1A axis. We found that FOXA1 loss leads to immunosuppressive macrophage infiltration and increased cell invasion, dependent on HIF1A expression. Critically, therapeutic targeting of HIF1A-CCL2 using pharmacological inhibitors abolishes FOXA1 loss-induced macrophage infiltration and PCa cell invasion. In summary, our study reveals an essential role of FOXA1 in controlling the hypoxic tumor microenvironment and establishes the HIF1A-CCL2 axis as one mechanism of FOXA1 loss-induced CRPC progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaohai Wang
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA,Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Lourdes Brea
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Xiaodong Lu
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Galina Gritsina
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Su H. Park
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Wanqing Xie
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jonathan C. Zhao
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jindan Yu
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. .,Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. .,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Chatterjee A, Turchan WT, Fan X, Griffin A, Yousuf A, Karczmar GS, Liauw SL, Oto A. Can Pre-treatment Quantitative Multi-parametric MRI Predict the Outcome of Radiotherapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer? Acad Radiol 2022; 29:977-985. [PMID: 34645572 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2021.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Revised: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES To investigate whether pre-treatment quantitative multiparametric MRI can predict biochemical outcome of prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with primary radiotherapy (RT). MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifty-one patients with biopsy confirmed PCa underwent prostate multiparametric MRI on 3T MR scanner prior to RT. Thirty-seven men (73%) were treated with external beam RT alone, 12 men (24%) were treated with brachytherapy monotherapy, and two men (4%) were treated with external beam RT with brachytherapy boost. The index lesion was outlined by a radiologist and quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), T2 and DCE parameters were measured. Biochemical failure was defined using the Phoenix criteria. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 65 months, seven patients had biochemical failure. ADC had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.71 for predicting RT outcome with significantly lower ADC (0.78 ± 0.17 vs 0.96 ± 0.26 µm2/ms, p = 0.04) of the index lesion in men with biochemical failure. Ideal ADC cutoff point (Youdens index) was 0.96 µm2/ms which had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 48% for predicting biochemical failure. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that lower ADC values were associated with significantly lower freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF, p = 0.03, no failures out of 20 men if ADC ≥ 0.96 µm2/ms; seven of 31 with failures if ADC < 0.96 µm2/ms). On multivariable analysis, ADC was associated with FFBF (HR 0.96 per increase in ADC of 0.01 um2/ms [95% CI, 0.92-1.00]; p = 0.042) after accounting for National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk category (p = 0.064) and receipt of androgen deprivation therapy (p = 0.141). Quantitative T2 and DCE parameters were not associated with biochemical outcome. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that quantitative ADC values of the index lesion may predict biochemical failure following primary radiotherapy in patients with PCa. Lower ADC values were associated with inferior biochemical control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aritrick Chatterjee
- Department of Radiology (A.C., X.F., A.G., A.Y., G.S.K., A.O.), University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637; Sanford J. Grossman Center of Excellence in Prostate Imaging and Image Guided Therapy (A.C., A.Y., G.S.K., A.O.), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology (W.T.T., S.L.L.), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - William Tyler Turchan
- Department of Radiology (A.C., X.F., A.G., A.Y., G.S.K., A.O.), University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637; Sanford J. Grossman Center of Excellence in Prostate Imaging and Image Guided Therapy (A.C., A.Y., G.S.K., A.O.), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology (W.T.T., S.L.L.), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Xiaobing Fan
- Department of Radiology (A.C., X.F., A.G., A.Y., G.S.K., A.O.), University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637; Sanford J. Grossman Center of Excellence in Prostate Imaging and Image Guided Therapy (A.C., A.Y., G.S.K., A.O.), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology (W.T.T., S.L.L.), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Alexander Griffin
- Department of Radiology (A.C., X.F., A.G., A.Y., G.S.K., A.O.), University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637; Sanford J. Grossman Center of Excellence in Prostate Imaging and Image Guided Therapy (A.C., A.Y., G.S.K., A.O.), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology (W.T.T., S.L.L.), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ambereen Yousuf
- Department of Radiology (A.C., X.F., A.G., A.Y., G.S.K., A.O.), University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637; Sanford J. Grossman Center of Excellence in Prostate Imaging and Image Guided Therapy (A.C., A.Y., G.S.K., A.O.), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology (W.T.T., S.L.L.), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Gregory S Karczmar
- Department of Radiology (A.C., X.F., A.G., A.Y., G.S.K., A.O.), University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637; Sanford J. Grossman Center of Excellence in Prostate Imaging and Image Guided Therapy (A.C., A.Y., G.S.K., A.O.), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology (W.T.T., S.L.L.), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Stanley L Liauw
- Department of Radiology (A.C., X.F., A.G., A.Y., G.S.K., A.O.), University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637; Sanford J. Grossman Center of Excellence in Prostate Imaging and Image Guided Therapy (A.C., A.Y., G.S.K., A.O.), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology (W.T.T., S.L.L.), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Aytekin Oto
- Department of Radiology (A.C., X.F., A.G., A.Y., G.S.K., A.O.), University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637; Sanford J. Grossman Center of Excellence in Prostate Imaging and Image Guided Therapy (A.C., A.Y., G.S.K., A.O.), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology (W.T.T., S.L.L.), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Sun JX, Liu CQ, Zhong XY, Xu JZ, An Y, Xu MY, Hu J, Zhang ZB, Xia QD, Wang SG. Statin Use and the Risk of Prostate Cancer Biochemical Recurrence Following Definitive Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies. Front Oncol 2022; 12:887854. [PMID: 35615153 PMCID: PMC9124863 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.887854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Numerous studies have reported the role of statins on biochemical recurrence (BCR) among patients with prostate cancer (PCa) after definite treatment. However, the conclusions of these studies are contradictory. We aimed to determine the effect of statins on BCR of PCa using a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods We searched PubMed (Medline) and other databases for cohort studies evaluating the effect of statins on the BCR of patients with PCa between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2021. The random effects (RE) model and quality effects (QE) model were used to calculate the pooled hazard ratio (pHR) and pooled risk ratio (pRR) and their 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Results A total of 33 cohort studies were finally selected and included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Statin use was significantly associated with a 14% reduction in the HR of BCR (pHR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.78 to 0.95, I2 = 64%, random effects model, 31 studies) and a 26% reduction in the RR of BCR (pRR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.57 to 0.94, 24,591 patients, I2 = 88%, random effects model, 15 studies) among patients with PCa. The subgroup analyses showed that statins could result in 22% reduction in the HR of BCR (pHR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.61 to 0.98, I2 = 57%, random effects model) among patients accepting radiotherapy (RT). Conclusions Our study suggests that statins have a unique role in the reduction of BCR in patients with PCa after definite treatment, especially RT. In the future, more clinical trials and in vitro and animal experiments are needed to further verify the effects of statins in PCa and the potential mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Zong-Biao Zhang
- *Correspondence: Zong-Biao Zhang, ; Qi-Dong Xia, ; Shao-Gang Wang,
| | - Qi-Dong Xia
- *Correspondence: Zong-Biao Zhang, ; Qi-Dong Xia, ; Shao-Gang Wang,
| | - Shao-Gang Wang
- *Correspondence: Zong-Biao Zhang, ; Qi-Dong Xia, ; Shao-Gang Wang,
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Clark R, Klotz L. Focal therapy: definition and rationale. Curr Opin Urol 2022; 32:218-223. [PMID: 35220365 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The role of focal therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer is expanding in clinical practice. The aim of this review is to introduce readers to controversies in the use of focal therapy and its rationale. RECENT FINDINGS There is a growing body of literature regarding the short-term and medium-term cancer control parameters and quality of life outcomes. These are mostly observational studies without a comparative arm. There is a need for high-quality randomize control trials comparing these treatments to definitive standard of care interventions (e.g. surgery or radiotherapy) in appropriate patient populations. SUMMARY Focal therapy for prostate cancer has become an established therapeutic strategy. Evidence continues to accrue regarding its effectiveness. It is a useful treatment option for the appropriately selected patient, with the appeal of improved quality of life compared with standard therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Laurence Klotz
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ryg U, Seierstad T, Nilsen LB, Hellebust TP, Djupvik LH, Gustafson H, Hydal J, Kishan AU, Hole KH, Lilleby W. A Prospective Study of High Dose-Rate Brachytherapy or Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of Intra-Prostatic Recurrence: Toxicity and Long Term Clinical Outcome. Front Oncol 2022; 12:861127. [PMID: 35463376 PMCID: PMC9022104 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.861127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Up to half of patients with localized prostate cancer experience biochemical relapse within 10 years after definitive radiotherapy. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the toxicity, dose to the organs at risk (OARs), and efficacy of dose-intensified focal salvage radiotherapy. Methods and Material Thirty-three patients (median age 68.8 years) with histologically confirmed relapse after primary definitive radiotherapy were enrolled between 2012 and 2019. No patients had metastases at imaging or in bone marrow aspiration. Twenty-three patients were treated with high dose-rate brachytherapy to the recurrent tumor, defined at multiparametric MRI, with 3 fractions of 10 Gy with two weeks interval, and 10 patients by stereotactic body radiotherapy with 35 Gy to the local recurrence and 25 Gy to the whole prostate in 5 fractions. We used the RTOG-scoring system to grade genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal toxicity (GI) at three months (acute), and at 12, 24, and 36 months (late). Dose-volume histogram parameters to the local recurrence and the OARs were obtained and 2 Gy equivalent (EQD2) total dose was calculated using the linear-quadratic model with α/β = 3 Gy. Efficacy was assessed by the progression-free interval and overall survival. Results Median follow-up time was 81 months (range 21–115). The cumulative moderate to severe GI and GU toxicities were 3.0% (1/33) and 15.2% (5/33). Six patients had grade 1 acute GI toxicity, none had grade 2 or 3. One patient had grade 3 acute GU toxicity, two had grade 2, and fourteen had grade 1. One patient had late GI toxicity grade 2 and eight had grade 1. Four patients had late GU toxicity grade 2 and eight had grade 1. No patients had grade 3 late toxicity. The mean total D90 to the recurrent tumor was 77.7 ± 17.0 Gy. The mean total rectum D2cc was 17.0 ± 7.9 Gy and the mean total urethra D0.1cc was 29.1 ± 8.2 Gy. Twenty-eight patients had re-irradiation without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Nine of these are still relapse-free and 10 had a recurrence-free interval longer than 2 years. Conclusion The toxicity of salvage radiotherapy was mild to moderate. One-third of the patients achieved long-term stable disease without ADT and one-third had a recurrence-free interval longer than 2 years. Some patients progressed rapidly and probably did not benefit from re-irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Una Ryg
- Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Therese Seierstad
- Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Taran Paulsen Hellebust
- Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Hilde Gustafson
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jørgen Hydal
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.,Department of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Knut Håkon Hole
- Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Saxby H, Boussios S, Mikropoulos C. Androgen Receptor Gene Pathway Upregulation and Radiation Resistance in Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23094786. [PMID: 35563176 PMCID: PMC9105839 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23094786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 04/09/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is currently used as a salvage intervention for men with oligometastatic prostate cancer (PC), and increasingly so since the results of the Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for the Comprehensive Treatment of Oligometastatic Cancers (SABR-COMET) trial reported a significant improvement in overall survival with SABR. The addition of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to localised prostate radiotherapy improves survival as it sensitises PC to radiotherapy-induced cell death. The importance of the androgen receptor (AR) gene pathway in the development of resistance to radiotherapy is well established. In this review paper, we will examine the data to determine how we can overcome the upregulation of the AR pathway and suggest a strategy for improving outcomes in men with oligometastatic hormone-sensitive PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Saxby
- Torbay & South Devon NHS Healthcare Foundation Trust, Lowes Bridge, Torquay TQ2 7AA, UK;
| | - Stergios Boussios
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Windmill Road, Gillingham Kent ME7 5NY, UK
- Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 9RT, UK
- AELIA Organization, 9th Km Thessaloniki–Thermi, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece
- Correspondence: , or
| | - Christos Mikropoulos
- St Lukes Cancer Centre, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Egerton Rd, Guildford GU2 7XX, UK;
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Zhao Y, Tao Z, Li L, Zheng J, Chen X. Predicting biochemical-recurrence-free survival using a three-metabolic-gene risk score model in prostate cancer patients. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:239. [PMID: 35246070 PMCID: PMC8896158 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09331-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biochemical recurrence (BCR) after initial treatment, such as radical prostatectomy, is the most frequently adopted prognostic factor for patients who suffer from prostate cancer (PCa). In this study, we aimed to construct a prognostic model consisting of gene expression profiles to predict BCR-free survival. METHODS We analyzed 70 metabolic pathways in 152 normal prostate samples and 494 PCa samples from the UCSC Xena dataset (training set) via gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) to select BCR-related genes and constructed a BCR-related gene risk score (RS) model. We tested the power of our model using Kaplan-Meier (K-M) plots and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses of RS using other clinicopathological features and established a nomogram model, which has stronger prediction ability. We used GSE70770 and DFKZ 2018 datasets to validate the results. Finally, we performed differential expression and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analyses of the UCSC data for further verification of the findings. RESULTS A total of 194 core enriched genes were obtained through GSEA, among which 16 BCR-related genes were selected and a three-gene RS model based on the expression levels of CA14, LRAT, and MGAT5B was constructed. The outcomes of the K-M plots and ROC curves verified the accuracy of the RS model. We identified the Gleason score, pathologic T stage, and RS model as independent predictors through univariate and multivariate Cox analyses and constructed a nomogram model that presented better predictability than the RS model. The outcomes of the validation set were consistent with those of the training set. Finally, the results of differential expression analyses support the effectiveness of our model. CONCLUSION We constructed an RS model based on metabolic genes that could predict the prognosis of PCa patients. The model can be easily used in clinical applications and provide important insights into future research on the underlying mechanism of PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiqiao Zhao
- Department of Urology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110004, People's Republic of China
| | - Zijia Tao
- Department of Urology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110004, People's Republic of China
| | - Lei Li
- Department of Urology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110004, People's Republic of China
| | - Jianyi Zheng
- Department of Urology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110004, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaonan Chen
- Department of Urology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110004, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Clark R, Herrera-Caceres J, Kenk M, Fleshner N. Clinical Management of Prostate Cancer in High-Risk Genetic Mutation Carriers. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14041004. [PMID: 35205755 PMCID: PMC8870148 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14041004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Revised: 02/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Men with certain genetic differences are at much higher risks of developing metastatic and lethal prostate cancer. With the recent introduction of a new class of medications specifically targeted to these gene repair pathways (PARP inhibitors), it is critical to review the state of the literature surrounding the management of men with prostate cancer who have these genetic differences. We review the existing literature to address common clinical questions pertaining to this population. There is an urgent need for further research regarding clinical management in these scenarios as patients are increasingly seeking out genetic testing and consulting healthcare professionals for guidance. Abstract Background: Prostate cancer is a leading cause of death. Approximately one in eight men who are diagnosed with prostate cancer will die of it. Since there is a large difference in mortality between low- and high-risk prostate cancers, it is critical to identify individuals who are at high-risk for disease progression and death. Germline genetic differences are increasingly recognized as contributing to risk of lethal prostate cancer. The objective of this paper is to review prostate cancer management options for men with high-risk germline mutations. Methods: We performed a review of the literature to identify articles regarding management of prostate cancer in individuals with high-risk germline genetic mutations. Results: We identified numerous publications regarding the management of prostate cancer among high-risk germline carriers, but the overall quality of the evidence is low. Conclusions: We performed a review of the literature and compiled clinical considerations for the management of individuals with high-risk germline mutations when they develop prostate cancer. The quality of the evidence is low, and there is an immediate need for further research and the development of consensus guidelines to guide clinical practice for these individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roderick Clark
- Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1X6, Canada; (M.K.); (N.F.)
- Correspondence:
| | | | - Miran Kenk
- Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1X6, Canada; (M.K.); (N.F.)
| | - Neil Fleshner
- Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1X6, Canada; (M.K.); (N.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Bodar YJL, Veerman H, Meijer D, de Bie K, van Leeuwen PJ, Donswijk ML, van Moorselaar RJ, Hendrikse NH, Boellaard R, Oprea-Lager DE, Vis AN. Standardised Uptake Values as Determined on PSMA PET/CT is associated with Oncological Outcomes in Prostate Cancer Patients. BJU Int 2022; 129:768-776. [PMID: 35166426 PMCID: PMC9315142 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Revised: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To investigate the association between intraprostatic, intratumoral maximum standardised uptake values (SUVmax) on prostate‐specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) prior to robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and pathology outcomes, including pathological International Society of Urological Pathology score (pISUP) and lymph node (LN) status (pN0/pN1). Patients and Methods A bi‐centric, secondary analysis of two previous, prospective cohort studies was performed in 318 patients with biopsy confirmed PCa and who were scheduled for RARP. Before surgery, patients received a PSMA PET/CT with either 68Ga‐PSMA‐11 (59% of the patients) or 18F‐PSMA (DCFPyL; 41%) as radiotracer. PET/CT images were analysed both visually and semi‐quantitatively by measuring the SUVmax of the most intense suspect lesion in the prostate. The association between the SUVmax of the primary tumour and pre‐ and postoperative variables was analysed. Results The SUVmax was associated with clinical and biopsy preoperative variables, as well as with pISUP score and pathological tumour stage. Patients with a pISUP of ≤2 showed significantly lower SUVmax compared to patients with a pISUP of >2 for both tracers (SUVmax18F‐PSMA: median 5.1 vs 9.6, P = 0.002; SUVmax68Ga‐PSMA‐11: 6.6 vs 8.6, P = 0.003). Moreover, patients with pN1 had significantly higher median SUVmax than those with pN0/pNx for both tracers (SUVmax18F‐PSMA: 7.9 vs 12.3, P = 0.04; SUVmax68Ga‐PSMA‐11: 7.6 vs 12.0, P < 0.001). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, the intraprostatic SUVmax was an independent predictor of pN1 for both 68Ga‐PSMA‐11 (per doubling: odds ratio [OR] 1.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27–3.01)) and 18F‐PSMA (per doubling: OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.06–3.03). Conclusion Intraprostatic, intratumoral PSMA intensity on PET/CT, as semi‐quantitatively expressed by SUVmax, may be a valuable innovative biomarker in patients with localised PCa, as it is highly associated with known conventional prognostic factors, such as pISUP and LN status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yves J L Bodar
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Department of Urology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Prostate Cancer Network The Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hans Veerman
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Department of Urology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Prostate Cancer Network The Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Network The Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dennie Meijer
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Department of Urology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Prostate Cancer Network The Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Katelijne de Bie
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Department of Urology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim J van Leeuwen
- Prostate Cancer Network The Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Network The Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten L Donswijk
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Network The Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - N Harry Hendrikse
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniela E Oprea-Lager
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - André N Vis
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Department of Urology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Prostate Cancer Network The Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Orme JJ, Pagliaro LC, Quevedo JF, Park SS, Costello BA. Rational Second-Generation Antiandrogen Use in Prostate Cancer. Oncologist 2022; 27:110-124. [PMID: 35641216 PMCID: PMC8895732 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyab045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
The second-generation antiandrogens have achieved an ever-growing list of approvals and indications in subsets of prostate cancer. Here, we provide an overview of second-generation antiandrogen trials and FDA approvals and outline a rational sequencing approach for the use of these agents as they relate to chemotherapy and other available treatment modalities in advanced prostate cancer. All published phase II-III randomized controlled trials reporting outcomes with the use of second-generation antiandrogens in prostate cancer are included as well as all published trials and retrospective studies of second-generation antiandrogen sequencing and/or combinations. Complete tabular and graphical representation of all available evidence is provided regarding the use and sequencing of second-generation antiandrogens in prostate cancer. In metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, evidence suggests prioritization of abiraterone before chemotherapy, chemotherapy after second-generation antiandrogen failure, and postchemotherapy enzalutamide in select patients to maximize agent efficacy and tolerability. We conclude that a rational, optimized sequencing of second-generation antiandrogens with other treatment options is feasible with present data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob J Orme
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | - Sean S Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Circular RNAs and Drug Resistance in Genitourinary Cancers: A Literature Review. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14040866. [PMID: 35205613 PMCID: PMC8869870 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14040866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2021] [Revised: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Drug resistance to systematic treatment in genitourinary tumors severely aggravated the burden on patients and society. Multiple mechanisms were involved in drug resistance. As typical non-coding RNAs, circRNAs play a critical role in the onset and development of cancers and several studies implied their function in the regulation of drug resistance. Here, we reviewed the investigations of circRNAs’ behavior in drug resistance of genitourinary cancers and summarized the underlying mechanisms. This review emphasized the essential role of circRNAs in drug resistance development and also pointed out the potential topics that need further investigations in the future. Abstract In recent years, systematic treatment has made great progress in genitourinary tumors. However, some patients develop resistance to the treatments, resulting in an increase in mortality. Circular RNAs (circRNAs) form a class of non-coding RNAs with high stability and significant clinical relevance. Accumulating evidence indicates that circRNAs play a vital role in cancer development and tumor chemotherapy resistance. This review summarizes the molecular and cellular mechanisms of drug resistance mediated by circRNAs to common drugs used in the treatment of genitourinary tumors. Several circRNAs were identified to regulate the responsiveness to systemic treatments in genitourinary tumors, including chemotherapies such as cisplatin and targeted therapies such as enzalutamide. Canonically, cicrRNAs participate in the competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network, or in some cases directly interact with proteins, regulate downstream pathways, and even some circRNAs have the potential to produce proteins or polypeptides. Several cellular mechanisms were involved in circRNA-dependent drug resistance, including autophagy, cancer stem cells, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and exosomes. The potential clinical prospect of circRNAs in regulating tumor drug resistance was also discussed.
Collapse
|
35
|
Value of Targeted Biopsies and Combined PSMA PET/CT and mp-MRI Imaging in Locally Recurrent Prostate Cancer after Primary Radiotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14030781. [PMID: 35159048 PMCID: PMC8834189 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Revised: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary After primary radiotherapy for prostate cancer, patients may develop an isolated local recurrence. The diagnostic workup of these recurrences guides decision making for potential focal salvage treatments. The aim of this study was to determine the positive predictive value (PPV) of combined multiparametric (mp) MRI and prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT imaging in this setting, with histological conformation using MR-guided targeted biopsies. In 41 patients counseled for focal salvage high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy, a PPV of 97.6% was found for combined mp-MRI and PSMA PET/CT. Therefore, biopsies can safely be omitted in these patients. Abstract Radiorecurrent prostate cancer is conventionally confirmed using systematic and/or targeted biopsies. The availability of multiparametric (mp) MRI and prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT has increased diagnostic accuracy. The objective was to determine the positive predictive value (PPV) of combined mp-MRI and PSMA PET/CT and whether pathology verification with MR-targeted biopsies remains necessary for patients with radiorecurrent prostate cancer. Patients with locally recurrent prostate cancer who were referred for 19 Gy single-dose MRI-guided focal salvage high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy between 2015 and 2018 were included in the current analysis. Patients were selected if they underwent pre-biopsy mp-MRI and PSMA PET/CT. Based on these images, lesions suspect for isolated tumor recurrence were transperineally biopsied using transrectal ultrasound fused with MRI. A total of 41 patients were identified from the database who underwent cognitive targeted (n = 7) or MRI/PSMA-transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fused targeted (n = 34) biopsies. A total of 40 (97.6%) patients had positive biopsies for recurrent cancer. Five patients initially had negative biopsies (all MRI/PSMA-TRUS fusion targeted), four of whom recurrence was confirmed after a re-biopsy. One (2.4%) patient refused re-biopsy, leading to a positive predictive value (PPV) for combined imaging of 97.6%. Biopsies can therefore safely be withheld when the results of the combined mp-MRI and PSMA PET/CT are conclusive, avoiding an unnecessary invasive and burdensome procedure.
Collapse
|
36
|
Metser U, Zukotynski K, Mak V, Langer D, MacCrostie P, Finelli A, Kapoor A, Chin J, Lavallée L, Klotz LH, Hagerty M, Hildebrand C, Bauman G. Effect of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT on the Management of Patients with Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Results of a Prospective Multicenter Registry Trial. Radiology 2022; 303:414-422. [PMID: 35076300 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.211824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Background The high positivity rate of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET in the setting of biochemical failure (BCF), even when conventional imaging is negative, is promising. Purpose To assess the disease detection rate of PSMA-based PET/CT with fluorine 18-DCFPyL as a radiotracer and the PET-directed management change in men with suspected limited recurrent prostate cancer. Materials and Methods This prospective multicenter registry (Ontario PSMA-PET Registry for Recurrent Prostate Cancer, or PREP) enrolled men with BCF after primary therapy (radical prostatectomy plus or minus salvage radiation therapy or primary radiation therapy) and zero to four disease sites at conventional imaging (CT and bone scintigraphy). The positivity rate of PSMA PET according to serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level; frequency of local-egional, oligometastatic, and extensive metastatic recurrence; and rate of change in management after PET findings were recorded. The nonparametric Mood median test was used to assess the association between serum PSA level and change in management. Results A total of 1289 men (median age, 71 years [interquartile range, 65-75 years]) were evaluated. PSMA PET helped detect disease in 841 of 1289 men (65%) and in 615 of 999 men (62%) with negative conventional imaging. The recurrence detection rates according to serum PSA level at enrollment were 38% (160 of 424 men), 63% (107 of 171 men), and 83% (573 of 692 men) for PSA under 0.5 ng/mL, 0.5-1.0 ng/mL, and above 1.0 ng/mL, respectively. At PSMA PET, 399 of 1289 men (31%) had local-regional recurrence, 314 (24%) had oligometastatic disease, and 128 (10%) had extensive metastases. Following PET examination, a change in planned management was recorded in 748 of 1289 men (58%), and in 371 of 1250 men (30%), there was a change in management intent, more commonly from palliative to potentially curative intent (255 of 1289 men [20%]). Conclusion Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET helped detect additional sites of disease compared with conventional imaging in approximately 60% of men with biochemical failure and suspected low-volume metastatic disease, resulting in frequent change in management, including a change from palliative to curative or radical intent therapy in 20% of men. Long-term follow-up is needed to determine whether this impacts disease control. Clinical trial registration no. NCT03718260 © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Civelek in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ur Metser
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, 610 University Ave, Ste 3-920, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9 (U.M.); Departments of Radiology and Medicine (K.Z.) and Division of Urology, Department of Surgery (A.K.), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Cancer Imaging Program, Ontario Health-Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada (V.M., D.L., P.M.); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada (A.F., L.H.K.); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery (J.C.) and Department of Oncology (C.H., G.B.), Western University, London, ON, Canada; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada (L.L.); and Department of Radiation Oncology, Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada (M.H.)
| | - Katherine Zukotynski
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, 610 University Ave, Ste 3-920, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9 (U.M.); Departments of Radiology and Medicine (K.Z.) and Division of Urology, Department of Surgery (A.K.), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Cancer Imaging Program, Ontario Health-Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada (V.M., D.L., P.M.); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada (A.F., L.H.K.); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery (J.C.) and Department of Oncology (C.H., G.B.), Western University, London, ON, Canada; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada (L.L.); and Department of Radiation Oncology, Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada (M.H.)
| | - Victor Mak
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, 610 University Ave, Ste 3-920, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9 (U.M.); Departments of Radiology and Medicine (K.Z.) and Division of Urology, Department of Surgery (A.K.), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Cancer Imaging Program, Ontario Health-Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada (V.M., D.L., P.M.); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada (A.F., L.H.K.); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery (J.C.) and Department of Oncology (C.H., G.B.), Western University, London, ON, Canada; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada (L.L.); and Department of Radiation Oncology, Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada (M.H.)
| | - Deanna Langer
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, 610 University Ave, Ste 3-920, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9 (U.M.); Departments of Radiology and Medicine (K.Z.) and Division of Urology, Department of Surgery (A.K.), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Cancer Imaging Program, Ontario Health-Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada (V.M., D.L., P.M.); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada (A.F., L.H.K.); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery (J.C.) and Department of Oncology (C.H., G.B.), Western University, London, ON, Canada; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada (L.L.); and Department of Radiation Oncology, Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada (M.H.)
| | - Pamela MacCrostie
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, 610 University Ave, Ste 3-920, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9 (U.M.); Departments of Radiology and Medicine (K.Z.) and Division of Urology, Department of Surgery (A.K.), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Cancer Imaging Program, Ontario Health-Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada (V.M., D.L., P.M.); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada (A.F., L.H.K.); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery (J.C.) and Department of Oncology (C.H., G.B.), Western University, London, ON, Canada; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada (L.L.); and Department of Radiation Oncology, Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada (M.H.)
| | - Antonio Finelli
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, 610 University Ave, Ste 3-920, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9 (U.M.); Departments of Radiology and Medicine (K.Z.) and Division of Urology, Department of Surgery (A.K.), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Cancer Imaging Program, Ontario Health-Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada (V.M., D.L., P.M.); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada (A.F., L.H.K.); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery (J.C.) and Department of Oncology (C.H., G.B.), Western University, London, ON, Canada; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada (L.L.); and Department of Radiation Oncology, Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada (M.H.)
| | - Anil Kapoor
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, 610 University Ave, Ste 3-920, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9 (U.M.); Departments of Radiology and Medicine (K.Z.) and Division of Urology, Department of Surgery (A.K.), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Cancer Imaging Program, Ontario Health-Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada (V.M., D.L., P.M.); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada (A.F., L.H.K.); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery (J.C.) and Department of Oncology (C.H., G.B.), Western University, London, ON, Canada; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada (L.L.); and Department of Radiation Oncology, Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada (M.H.)
| | - Joseph Chin
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, 610 University Ave, Ste 3-920, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9 (U.M.); Departments of Radiology and Medicine (K.Z.) and Division of Urology, Department of Surgery (A.K.), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Cancer Imaging Program, Ontario Health-Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada (V.M., D.L., P.M.); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada (A.F., L.H.K.); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery (J.C.) and Department of Oncology (C.H., G.B.), Western University, London, ON, Canada; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada (L.L.); and Department of Radiation Oncology, Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada (M.H.)
| | - Luke Lavallée
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, 610 University Ave, Ste 3-920, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9 (U.M.); Departments of Radiology and Medicine (K.Z.) and Division of Urology, Department of Surgery (A.K.), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Cancer Imaging Program, Ontario Health-Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada (V.M., D.L., P.M.); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada (A.F., L.H.K.); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery (J.C.) and Department of Oncology (C.H., G.B.), Western University, London, ON, Canada; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada (L.L.); and Department of Radiation Oncology, Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada (M.H.)
| | - Laurence H Klotz
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, 610 University Ave, Ste 3-920, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9 (U.M.); Departments of Radiology and Medicine (K.Z.) and Division of Urology, Department of Surgery (A.K.), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Cancer Imaging Program, Ontario Health-Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada (V.M., D.L., P.M.); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada (A.F., L.H.K.); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery (J.C.) and Department of Oncology (C.H., G.B.), Western University, London, ON, Canada; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada (L.L.); and Department of Radiation Oncology, Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada (M.H.)
| | - Marlon Hagerty
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, 610 University Ave, Ste 3-920, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9 (U.M.); Departments of Radiology and Medicine (K.Z.) and Division of Urology, Department of Surgery (A.K.), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Cancer Imaging Program, Ontario Health-Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada (V.M., D.L., P.M.); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada (A.F., L.H.K.); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery (J.C.) and Department of Oncology (C.H., G.B.), Western University, London, ON, Canada; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada (L.L.); and Department of Radiation Oncology, Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada (M.H.)
| | - Catherine Hildebrand
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, 610 University Ave, Ste 3-920, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9 (U.M.); Departments of Radiology and Medicine (K.Z.) and Division of Urology, Department of Surgery (A.K.), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Cancer Imaging Program, Ontario Health-Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada (V.M., D.L., P.M.); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada (A.F., L.H.K.); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery (J.C.) and Department of Oncology (C.H., G.B.), Western University, London, ON, Canada; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada (L.L.); and Department of Radiation Oncology, Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada (M.H.)
| | - Glenn Bauman
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, 610 University Ave, Ste 3-920, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9 (U.M.); Departments of Radiology and Medicine (K.Z.) and Division of Urology, Department of Surgery (A.K.), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Cancer Imaging Program, Ontario Health-Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada (V.M., D.L., P.M.); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada (A.F., L.H.K.); Division of Urology, Department of Surgery (J.C.) and Department of Oncology (C.H., G.B.), Western University, London, ON, Canada; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada (L.L.); and Department of Radiation Oncology, Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada (M.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Razmaria AA, Schoder H, Morris MJ. Advances in Prostate Cancer Imaging. Urol Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-89891-5_8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
38
|
Targeting the Intrinsic Apoptosis Pathway: A Window of Opportunity for Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 14:cancers14010051. [PMID: 35008216 PMCID: PMC8750516 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Revised: 12/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Prostate cancer treatment has improved over the last 20 years; despite this, approximately 33,000 men died from the disease in the United States in 2020. In view of this, new treatment options are urgently needed for advanced prostate cancer. Eradicating cancer cells by triggering apoptosis (a form of cell death) is an attractive strategy, and a novel class of drugs, called BH3 mimetics, have been designed to do this. They have been shown to work for blood cancers and may also have a role in solid cancers. Herein, we discuss cell death, focusing on the intrinsic apoptosis pathway, and consider how BH3 mimetics may be used to help treat prostate cancer. Abstract Despite major improvements in the management of advanced prostate cancer over the last 20 years, the disease remains invariably fatal, and new effective therapies are required. The development of novel hormonal agents and taxane chemotherapy has improved outcomes, although primary and acquired resistance remains problematic. Inducing cancer cell death via apoptosis has long been an attractive goal in the treatment of cancer. Apoptosis, a form of regulated cell death, is a highly controlled process, split into two main pathways (intrinsic and extrinsic), and is stimulated by a multitude of factors, including cellular and genotoxic stress. Numerous therapeutic strategies targeting the intrinsic apoptosis pathway are in clinical development, and BH3 mimetics have shown promising efficacy for hematological malignancies. Utilizing these agents for solid malignancies has proved more challenging, though efforts are ongoing. Molecular characterization and the development of predictive biomarkers is likely to be critical for patient selection, by identifying tumors with a vulnerability in the intrinsic apoptosis pathway. This review provides an up-to-date overview of cell death and apoptosis, specifically focusing on the intrinsic pathway. It summarizes the latest approaches for targeting the intrinsic apoptosis pathway with BH3 mimetics and discusses how these strategies may be leveraged to treat prostate cancer.
Collapse
|
39
|
Gühne F, Radke S, Winkens T, Kühnel C, Greiser J, Seifert P, Drescher R, Freesmeyer M. Differences in Distribution and Detection Rate of the [ 68Ga]Ga-PSMA Ligands PSMA-617, -I&T and -11-Inter-Individual Comparison in Patients with Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Cancer. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2021; 15:ph15010009. [PMID: 35056066 PMCID: PMC8779232 DOI: 10.3390/ph15010009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
The biochemical relapse of prostate cancer is diagnostically challenging but of high clinical impact for subsequent patient treatment. PET/CT with radiolabeled PSMA ligands outperforms conventional diagnostic methods in the detection of tumor recurrence. Several radiopharmaceuticals were and are available for use. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the routinely applied [68Ga]Ga-PSMA ligands PSMA-617, -I&T and -11 (HBED-CC) differ in physiological and pathological distribution, or in tumor detection rate. A retrospective evaluation of 190 patients (39 patients received PSMA-617, 68 patients PSMA-I&T and 83 patients PSMA-11) showed significant differences in tracer accumulation within all organs examined. The low retention within the compartments blood pool, bone and muscle tissue is a theoretical advantage of PSMA-11. Evaluation of tumor lesion uptake and detection rate did not reveal superiority of one of the three radiopharmaceuticals, neither in the whole population, nor in particularly challenging subgroups like patients with very low PSA levels. We conclude that all three [68Ga]Ga-PSMA ligands are equally feasible in this clinically important scenario, and may replace each other in case of unavailability or production restrictions.
Collapse
|
40
|
de Sá Moreira E, Robinson D, Hawthorne S, Zhao L, Hanson M, Kanas G, Turnure M, Davis C, Clark O. Patterns of Care and Outcomes for Non-Metastatic Prostate Cancer in the United States: Results of the CancerMPact ® Survey 2018. Cancer Manag Res 2021; 13:9127-9137. [PMID: 34924773 PMCID: PMC8674664 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s343321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose We describe patterns of care and treatment outcomes for non-metastatic PCa (nmPCA), either hormone-sensitive or castration-resistant, in the United States of America (USA) in 2018. Methods A survey (CancerMPact®) recruited physicians nationwide to answer an online questionnaire about how they treated patients with nmPCA. Questions covered aspects of treatment at all disease stages. Board-certified urologists and oncologists with at least five years of clinical practice and who treated at least 30 PCa patients monthly were included. Results The survey included responses from ninety-four physicians with an average of 17.5 years of clinical practice, who had treated a combined average of 4415 patients with nmPCA per month in 2018. Approximately 40% of patients in stage I were managed with either active surveillance or observation/no therapy, decreasing to 20%, 8% and 6% in stages II, III and IV(M0), respectively. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy was favored over other radiotherapy modalities, with rates of use ranging between 60% and 69% depending on disease stage. Leuprolide as monotherapy or in combination with enzalutamide, abiraterone or bicalutamide were the most common systemic treatment options for non-metastatic hormone-sensitive PCa (nmHSPC) patients with the first or second recurrence. Only 16.5% of non-metastatic castration-resistant PCa (nmCRPC) patients did not relapse within five years of initial therapy for nmCRPC. Conclusion While PCa treatment recommendations are rapidly changing due to advances in treatment, we observed great concordance between their most current versions and real-world data treatment patterns reported by US physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Linda Zhao
- Health Division, Kantar, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Gena Kanas
- Health Division, Kantar, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Patrikidou A, Zilli T, Baciarello G, Terisse S, Hamilou Z, Fizazi K. Should androgen deprivation therapy and other systemic treatments be used in men with prostate cancer and a rising PSA post-local treatments? Ther Adv Med Oncol 2021; 13:17588359211051870. [PMID: 34707693 PMCID: PMC8543684 DOI: 10.1177/17588359211051870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Biochemical recurrence is an evolving space in prostate cancer, with increasing multidisciplinary involvement. Androgen deprivation therapy has shown proof of its value in complementing salvage radiotherapy in high-risk biochemical relapsing patients; ongoing trials aim to further refine this treatment combination. As systemic treatments, and notably next-generation androgen receptor targeted agents, have moved towards early hormone-sensitive and non-metastatic stages, the prostate specific antigen (PSA)-relapse disease stage will be undoubtedly challenged by future evidence from such ongoing clinical trials. With the use of modern imaging and newer molecular technologies, including integration of tumoral genomic profiling and liquid biopsies in risk stratification, a path towards a precision oncology-focused approach will become a reality to guide in the future decisions for patients with a diagnosis of biochemical recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Patrikidou
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Institute, Paris Saclay University, 114 rue Edouard Vaillant, Villejuif, 94800, FranceUCL Cancer Institute & University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Safae Terisse
- Department of Medical Oncology, Saint Louis Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Zineb Hamilou
- Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Karim Fizazi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Institute, Paris Saclay University, 114 rue Edouard Vaillant, Villejuif, 94800, France
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Moteabbed M, Harisinghani M, Paganetti H, Trofimov A, Lu HM, Efstathiou JA. Proton vs. photon radiotherapy for MR-guided dose escalation of intraprostatic lesions. Acta Oncol 2021; 60:1283-1290. [PMID: 34282708 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2021.1947523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dose escalation has been associated with improved biochemical control for prostate cancer. Focusing the high dose on the MRI-defined intraprostatic lesions (IL) could spare the surrounding organs at risk and hence allow further escalation. We compare treatment efficacy between state-of-the-art focally-boosted proton and photon-based radiotherapy, and investigate possible predictive guidelines regarding individualized treatment prescriptions. MATERIAL AND METHODS Ten prostate cancer patients with well-defined ILs were selected. Multiparametric MRI was used to delineate ILs, which were transferred to the planning CT via image registration. Pencil beam scanning proton therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment plans, were created for each patient. Each modality featured 6 plans: (1) moderately hypofractionated dose: 70 Gy to the prostate in 28 fractions, (2)-(6) plan 1 plus additional simultaneous-integrated-boost to ILs to 75.6, 81.2, 86.6, 98 and 112 Gy in 28 fractions. Equivalent dose to 2 Gy-per-fraction (EqD2) was used to calculate tumor control (TCP) and normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) for ILs and organs-at-risk. RESULTS For both modalities, the maximum necessary dose to achieve TCP > 99% was 98 Gy for very high-risk ILs. For lower risk ILs lower doses were sufficient. NTCP was <25% and 35% for protons and photons at the maximum dose escalation, respectively. For the cases and beam characteristics considered, proton therapy was dosimetrically superior when IL was >4 cc or located <2.5 mm from the rectum. CONCLUSION This work demonstrated the potential role for proton therapy in the setting of prostate focal dose escalation. We propose that anatomical characteristic could be used as criteria to identify patients who would benefit from proton treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Moteabbed
- Division of Radiation Biophysics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mukesh Harisinghani
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Harald Paganetti
- Division of Radiation Biophysics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alexei Trofimov
- Division of Radiation Biophysics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Jason A. Efstathiou
- Division of Radiation Biophysics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Bonfil RD, Chen W, Vranic S, Sohail A, Shi D, Jang H, Kim HR, Prunotto M, Fridman R. Expression and subcellular localization of Discoidin Domain Receptor 1 (DDR1) define prostate cancer aggressiveness. Cancer Cell Int 2021; 21:507. [PMID: 34548097 PMCID: PMC8456559 DOI: 10.1186/s12935-021-02206-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Discoidin Domain Receptor 1 (DDR1) is one of the two members of a unique family of receptor tyrosine kinase receptors that signal in response to collagen, which has been implicated in cancer progression. Here, we examined the expression of DDR1 in prostate cancer (PCa), and assessed its potential value as a prognostic marker, as a function of grade, stage and other clinicopathologic parameters. METHODS We investigated the association between the expression level and subcellular localization of DDR1 protein and PCa aggressiveness by immunohistochemistry, using tissue microarrays (TMAs) encompassing 200 cases of PCa with various Gleason scores (GS) and pathologic stages with matched normal tissue, and a highly specific monoclonal antibody. RESULTS DDR1 was found to be localized in the membrane, cytoplasm, and nuclear compartments of both normal and cancerous prostate epithelial cells. Analyses of DDR1 expression in low GS (≤ 7[3 + 4]) vs high GS (≥ 7[4 + 3]) tissues showed no differences in nuclear or cytoplasmic DDR1in either cancerous or adjacent normal tissue cores. However, relative to normal-matched tissue, the percentage of cases with higher membranous DDR1 expression was significantly lower in high vs. low GS cancers. Although nuclear localization of DDR1 was consistently detected in our tissue samples and also in cultured human PCa and normal prostate-derived cell lines, its presence in that site could not be associated with disease aggressiveness. No associations between DDR1 expression and overall survival or biochemical recurrence were found in this cohort of patients. CONCLUSION The data obtained through multivariate logistic regression model analysis suggest that the level of membranous DDR1 expression status may represent a potential biomarker of utility for better determination of PCa aggressiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Daniel Bonfil
- Division of Pathology, Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, 3200 S. University Drive, Terry Building # 1337, Fort Lauderdale, FL, 33328-2018, USA.
| | - Wei Chen
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine and Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Semir Vranic
- College of Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.,Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Research Unit, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
| | - Anjum Sohail
- Department of Pathology, Wayne State University School of Medicine and Karmanos Cancer Institute, Scott Hall #8200, 540 E. Canfield St, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA
| | - Dongping Shi
- Department of Pathology, Wayne State University School of Medicine and Karmanos Cancer Institute, Scott Hall #8200, 540 E. Canfield St, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA
| | - Hyejeong Jang
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine and Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Hyeong-Reh Kim
- Department of Pathology, Wayne State University School of Medicine and Karmanos Cancer Institute, Scott Hall #8200, 540 E. Canfield St, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA
| | - Marco Prunotto
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Western Switzerland, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Rafael Fridman
- Department of Pathology, Wayne State University School of Medicine and Karmanos Cancer Institute, Scott Hall #8200, 540 E. Canfield St, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Lawal IO, Lengana T, Popoola GO, Orunmuyi AT, Kgatle MM, Mokoala KMG, Sathekge MM. Pattern of Prostate Cancer Recurrence Assessed by 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in Men Treated with Primary Local Therapy. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10173883. [PMID: 34501331 PMCID: PMC8432125 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10173883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Revised: 08/03/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Imaging plays a vital role in detecting the recurrence of prostate cancer (PCa) to guide the choice of salvage therapy. Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT) is useful for detecting PCa recurrence. We assessed the pattern of PCa recurrence stratified by serum prostate-specific antigen level and type of primary local treatment in men with biochemical recurrence (BCR) after primary local therapy with radical prostatectomy or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) using 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. We reviewed patients imaged with 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for the localization of the site of PCa recurrence. We determined the site and number of lesions due to PCa recurrence at different PSA levels. A total of 247 men (mean age of 65.72 ± 7.51 years and median PSA of 2.70 ng/mL (IQR = 0.78–5.80)) were included. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT detected the site of recurrence in 81.4% of patients with a median number of lesions per patient of 1 (range = 1–5). 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT positivity was 43.6%, 75.7%, 83.3%, 90.0%, and 95.8% at PSA levels of <0.5, 0.5–1.0., 1.1–2.0, 2.1–5.0, and 5.0–10.0, respectively. The most common site of recurrence was in the prostate gland/bed at all PSA levels. Pelvic, extra-pelvic, and combined pelvic and extra-pelvic sites of recurrence were seen in 118, 50, and 33 patients, respectively. The risk of extra-pelvic recurrence increases with rising PSA levels. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT has a high lesion detection rate for biochemical recurrence of PCa in patients previously treated with primary local therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ismaheel O. Lawal
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0001, South Africa; (I.O.L.); (T.L.); (M.M.K.); (K.M.G.M.)
- Nuclear Medicine Research Infrastructure (NuMeRI), Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
| | - Thabo Lengana
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0001, South Africa; (I.O.L.); (T.L.); (M.M.K.); (K.M.G.M.)
| | - Gbenga O. Popoola
- Department of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Ilorin, Ilorin 240102, Nigeria;
| | | | - Mankgopo M. Kgatle
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0001, South Africa; (I.O.L.); (T.L.); (M.M.K.); (K.M.G.M.)
- Nuclear Medicine Research Infrastructure (NuMeRI), Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
| | - Kgomotso M. G. Mokoala
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0001, South Africa; (I.O.L.); (T.L.); (M.M.K.); (K.M.G.M.)
- Nuclear Medicine Research Infrastructure (NuMeRI), Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
| | - Mike M. Sathekge
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0001, South Africa; (I.O.L.); (T.L.); (M.M.K.); (K.M.G.M.)
- Nuclear Medicine Research Infrastructure (NuMeRI), Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +27-12-354-1794
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Su Q, Liu Z, Chen C, Gao H, Zhu Y, Wang L, Pan M, Liu J, Yang X, Tian J. Gene signatures predict biochemical recurrence-free survival in primary prostate cancer patients after radical therapy. Cancer Med 2021; 10:6492-6502. [PMID: 34453418 PMCID: PMC8446568 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Revised: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This study evaluated the predictive value of gene signatures for biochemical recurrence (BCR) in primary prostate cancer (PCa) patients. Methods Clinical features and gene expression profiles of PCa patients were attained from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets, which were further classified into a training set (n = 419), a validation set (n = 403). The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox (LASSO‐Cox) method was used to select discriminative gene signatures in training set for biochemical recurrence‐free survival (BCRFS). Selected gene signatures established a risk score system. Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors about BCRFS were performed using the Cox proportional hazards regression models. A nomogram based on multivariate analysis was plotted to facilitate clinical application. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Gene and Genomes (KEGG) and Gene Ontology (GO) analyses were then executed for differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Results Notably, the risk score could significantly identify BCRFS by time‐dependent receiver operating characteristic (t‐ROC) curves in the training set (3‐year area under the curve (AUC) = 0.820, 5‐year AUC = 0.809) and the validation set (3‐year AUC = 0.723, 5‐year AUC = 0.733). Conclusions Clinically, the nomogram model, which incorporates Gleason score and the risk score, could effectively predict BCRFS and potentially be utilized as a useful tool for the screening of BCRFS in PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiang Su
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data-Based Precision Medicine, School of Medicine and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.,Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Urinary Cellular Molecular Diagnostics, Beijing, China.,Key Laboratory of Big Data-Based Precision Medicine (Beihang University), Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Beijing, China
| | - Zhenyu Liu
- CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, the State Key Laboratory of Management and Control for Complex Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.,CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.,School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Chi Chen
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data-Based Precision Medicine, School of Medicine and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.,Key Laboratory of Big Data-Based Precision Medicine (Beihang University), Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Beijing, China
| | - Han Gao
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data-Based Precision Medicine, School of Medicine and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.,Key Laboratory of Big Data-Based Precision Medicine (Beihang University), Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Beijing, China
| | - Yongbei Zhu
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data-Based Precision Medicine, School of Medicine and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.,Key Laboratory of Big Data-Based Precision Medicine (Beihang University), Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Beijing, China
| | - Liusu Wang
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data-Based Precision Medicine, School of Medicine and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.,Key Laboratory of Big Data-Based Precision Medicine (Beihang University), Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Beijing, China
| | - Meiqing Pan
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data-Based Precision Medicine, School of Medicine and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.,Key Laboratory of Big Data-Based Precision Medicine (Beihang University), Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Beijing, China
| | - Jiangang Liu
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data-Based Precision Medicine, School of Medicine and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.,Key Laboratory of Big Data-Based Precision Medicine (Beihang University), Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Beijing, China
| | - Xin Yang
- CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, the State Key Laboratory of Management and Control for Complex Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.,School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jie Tian
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data-Based Precision Medicine, School of Medicine and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.,Key Laboratory of Big Data-Based Precision Medicine (Beihang University), Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Beijing, China.,CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, the State Key Laboratory of Management and Control for Complex Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.,CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.,Engineering Research Center of Molecular and Neuro Imaging of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
18F-DCFPyL (PSMA) PET in the Management of Men with Biochemical Failure after Primary Therapy: Initial Clinical Experience of an Academic Cancer Center. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 28:3251-3258. [PMID: 34449586 PMCID: PMC8395487 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28050282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2021] [Revised: 08/13/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: To describe the initial experience of an academic center using 18F-DCFPyL PET in managing men with recurrent prostate cancer. Materials & Methods: This prospective, single-arm IRB-approved study included men with biochemical failure after primary therapy for prostate cancer and negative/equivocal CT and bone scintigraphy who were candidates for salvage therapy, as determined by a multidisciplinary panel of experts. 18F-DCFPyL PET was assessed for the presence and extent of recurrence: local, oligometastatic (≤4), or extensive. Post-PET management and clinical outcome, including PSA response, was documented. For patients who received PET-directed ablative therapies, response was categorized as “complete” if PSA became undetectable or “favorable” if PSA decreased ≥50%. Results: Forty-seven men with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy (n = 29), primary radiotherapy (n = 15) or focal tumor ablation (n = 3) were included. PET was positive in (43/47) 91.5%, including local recurrence in (9/47) 19.2%; oligometastatic disease in (16/47) 34%; and extensive metastatic disease in (18/47) 38.3%. PET-directed focal ablative therapies without systemic therapy were given to (13/29) 44.8% of patients without extensive metastases on PET with a mean PSA response of 69% (median, 74.5%; range: 35–100). Favorable biochemical response was observed in (10/13) 76.9% of patients with limited recurrence on PET, and in 23.1% (3/13), there was complete response. Conclusion: 18F-DCFPyL PET was positive in >90% of patients with biochemical failure. For those with limited recurrence, PSMA PET-directed local ablative therapies resulted in favorable outcome in more than 3 in 4 patients, and in nearly a quarter of them, there was complete biochemical response.
Collapse
|
47
|
Evolving Castration Resistance and Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Expression: Implications for Patient Management. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13143556. [PMID: 34298770 PMCID: PMC8307676 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13143556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Revised: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) remains an incurable disease, despite multiple novel treatment options. The role of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) in the process of mCRPC development has long been underestimated. During the last years, a new understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms of rising PSMA expression and its association with disease progression has emerged. Accurate understanding of these complex interactions is indispensable for a precise diagnostic process and ultimately successful treatment of advanced prostate cancer. The combination of different novel therapeutics such as androgen deprivation agents, 177LU-PSMA radioligand therapy and PARP inhibitors promises a new kind of efficacy. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge about the most relevant molecular mechanisms around PSMA in mCRPC development and how they can be implemented in mCRPC management.
Collapse
|
48
|
Lewin R, Amit U, Laufer M, Berger R, Dotan Z, Domachevsky L, Davidson T, Portnoy O, Tsvang L, Ben-Ayun M, Weiss I, Symon Z. Salvage re-irradiation using stereotactic body radiation therapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer: the impact of castration sensitivity on treatment outcomes. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:114. [PMID: 34162398 PMCID: PMC8220691 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01839-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Advances in imaging, biomaterials and precision radiotherapy provide new opportunities to salvage locally recurrent prostate cancer (PC). This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of re-irradiation using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). We hypothesized that patients with castrate-resistant PC (CRPC) would benefit less from local salvage. Methods A prospective clinical database was reviewed to extract 30 consecutive patients treated with prostate re-irradiation. Gallium prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligand positron emission tomography was performed following prostate-specific antigen failure in all patients and biopsy was obtained in 18 patients (60%). Re-irradiation was either focal (n = 13) or whole-gland (n = 17). Endo-rectal balloons were used in twenty-two patients and hydrogel spacers in eight patients. The median prescription dose was 5 fractions of 6.5 (range: 6–8) Gray (Gy). Results Median follow-up was 28 months. Failure occurred in 10 (out of 11) CRPC patients versus 6 (out of 19) castrate-sensitive patients (91% vs. 32%, p = 0.008) after a median of 13 and 23 months, respectively. Metastases occurred in 64% (n = 7) of CRPC patients versus 16% (n = 3) of castrate-sensitive patients (p = 0.007). Two patients experienced local in-field recurrence, thus local control was 93%. The 2 and 3-year recurrence-free survival were 84% and 79% for castrate-sensitive patients versus 18% and 9% for CRPC patients (p < 0.001), and 3-year metastasis-free survival was 90% versus 27% (p < 0.01) for castrate-sensitive and CRPC patients, respectively. Acute grade II and III genitourinary (GU) toxicity occurred in 27% and 3%, and late GU toxicity in 30% and 3%, respectively. No ≥ grade II acute gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity occurred, and only one patient (3%) developed late grade II toxicity. Conclusions Early delivery of salvage SBRT for local recurrence is associated with excellent 3-year disease control and acceptable toxicity in the castrate-sensitive phenotype. PSMA imaging for detection of local recurrence and the use of precision radiotherapy with rectal protective devices should be further investigated as a novel salvage strategy for radio-recurrent PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ron Lewin
- Radiation Oncology Department, Sheba Medical Center, 52621, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
| | - Uri Amit
- Radiation Oncology Department, Sheba Medical Center, 52621, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Menachem Laufer
- Institute of Urology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Raanan Berger
- Institute of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
| | - Zohar Dotan
- Institute of Urology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
| | - Liran Domachevsky
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Tima Davidson
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Orith Portnoy
- Department of Radiology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Lev Tsvang
- Radiation Oncology Department, Sheba Medical Center, 52621, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Maoz Ben-Ayun
- Radiation Oncology Department, Sheba Medical Center, 52621, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Ilana Weiss
- Radiation Oncology Department, Sheba Medical Center, 52621, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Zvi Symon
- Radiation Oncology Department, Sheba Medical Center, 52621, Ramat-Gan, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Sun J, Lin Y, Wei X, Ouyang J, Huang Y, Ling Z. Performance of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT Imaging in Early Detection of Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol 2021; 11:649171. [PMID: 33981607 PMCID: PMC8107478 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.649171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted 2-(3-{1-carboxy-5-[(6-[18F] fluoro-pyridine-3-carbonyl)-amino]-pentyl}-ureido)-pentanedioic acid (18F-DCFPyL) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has shown advantages in primary staging, restaging, and metastasis detection of prostate cancer (PCa). However, little is known about the role of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (BRPCa). Hence, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT as first-line imaging modality in early detection of BRPCa. Methods: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted until December 2020. The pooled detection rate on a per-person basis and together with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. Furthermore, a prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-stratified performance of detection positivity was obtained to assess the sensitivity of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in BRPCa with different PSA levels. Results: A total of nine eligible studies (844 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled detection rate (DR) of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in BRPCa was 81% (95% CI: 76.9-85.1%). The pooled DR was 88.8% for PSA ≥ 0.5 ng/ml (95% CI: 86.2-91.3%) and 47.2% for PSA < 0.5 ng/ml (95% CI: 32.6-61.8%). We also noticed that the regional lymph node was the most common site with local recurrence compared with other sites (45.8%, 95% CI: 42.1-49.6%). Statistical heterogeneity and publication bias were found. Conclusion: The results suggest that 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT has a relatively high detection rate in BRPCa. The results also indicate that imaging with 18F-DCFPyL may exhibit improved sensitivity in BRPCa with increased PSA levels. Considering the publication bias, further large-scale multicenter studies are warranted for validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiale Sun
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Yuxin Lin
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Xuedong Wei
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Jun Ouyang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Yuhua Huang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Zhixin Ling
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Lawhn-Heath C, Salavati A, Behr SC, Rowe SP, Calais J, Fendler WP, Eiber M, Emmett L, Hofman MS, Hope TA. Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen PET in Prostate Cancer. Radiology 2021; 299:248-260. [PMID: 33787338 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021202771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radiopharmaceuticals are playing a large role at the time of initial staging and biochemical recurrence for localizing prostate cancer, as well as in other emerging clinical settings. PSMA PET has demonstrated increased detection rate compared with conventional imaging and has been shown to change management plans in a substantial percentage of cases. The aims of this narrative review are to highlight the development and clinical impact of PSMA PET radiopharmaceuticals, to compare PSMA to other agents such as fluorine 18 fluciclovine and carbon 11 choline, and to highlight some of the individual PSMA PET agents that have contributed to the advancement of prostate cancer imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney Lawhn-Heath
- From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (C.L.H., S.C.B., T.A.H.) and Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center (S.C.B., T.A.H.), University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, M391, San Francisco, CA 94143; Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md (A.S., S.P.R.); Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (J.C.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany (W.P.F.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany (M.E.); Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia (L.E.); Prostate Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence (ProsTIC), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia (M.S.H.); and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (M.S.H.)
| | - Ali Salavati
- From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (C.L.H., S.C.B., T.A.H.) and Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center (S.C.B., T.A.H.), University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, M391, San Francisco, CA 94143; Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md (A.S., S.P.R.); Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (J.C.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany (W.P.F.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany (M.E.); Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia (L.E.); Prostate Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence (ProsTIC), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia (M.S.H.); and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (M.S.H.)
| | - Spencer C Behr
- From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (C.L.H., S.C.B., T.A.H.) and Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center (S.C.B., T.A.H.), University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, M391, San Francisco, CA 94143; Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md (A.S., S.P.R.); Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (J.C.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany (W.P.F.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany (M.E.); Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia (L.E.); Prostate Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence (ProsTIC), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia (M.S.H.); and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (M.S.H.)
| | - Steven P Rowe
- From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (C.L.H., S.C.B., T.A.H.) and Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center (S.C.B., T.A.H.), University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, M391, San Francisco, CA 94143; Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md (A.S., S.P.R.); Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (J.C.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany (W.P.F.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany (M.E.); Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia (L.E.); Prostate Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence (ProsTIC), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia (M.S.H.); and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (M.S.H.)
| | - Jeremie Calais
- From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (C.L.H., S.C.B., T.A.H.) and Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center (S.C.B., T.A.H.), University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, M391, San Francisco, CA 94143; Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md (A.S., S.P.R.); Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (J.C.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany (W.P.F.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany (M.E.); Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia (L.E.); Prostate Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence (ProsTIC), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia (M.S.H.); and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (M.S.H.)
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (C.L.H., S.C.B., T.A.H.) and Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center (S.C.B., T.A.H.), University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, M391, San Francisco, CA 94143; Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md (A.S., S.P.R.); Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (J.C.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany (W.P.F.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany (M.E.); Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia (L.E.); Prostate Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence (ProsTIC), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia (M.S.H.); and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (M.S.H.)
| | - Mattias Eiber
- From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (C.L.H., S.C.B., T.A.H.) and Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center (S.C.B., T.A.H.), University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, M391, San Francisco, CA 94143; Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md (A.S., S.P.R.); Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (J.C.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany (W.P.F.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany (M.E.); Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia (L.E.); Prostate Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence (ProsTIC), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia (M.S.H.); and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (M.S.H.)
| | - Louise Emmett
- From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (C.L.H., S.C.B., T.A.H.) and Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center (S.C.B., T.A.H.), University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, M391, San Francisco, CA 94143; Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md (A.S., S.P.R.); Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (J.C.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany (W.P.F.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany (M.E.); Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia (L.E.); Prostate Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence (ProsTIC), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia (M.S.H.); and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (M.S.H.)
| | - Michael S Hofman
- From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (C.L.H., S.C.B., T.A.H.) and Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center (S.C.B., T.A.H.), University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, M391, San Francisco, CA 94143; Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md (A.S., S.P.R.); Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (J.C.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany (W.P.F.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany (M.E.); Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia (L.E.); Prostate Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence (ProsTIC), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia (M.S.H.); and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (M.S.H.)
| | - Thomas A Hope
- From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (C.L.H., S.C.B., T.A.H.) and Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center (S.C.B., T.A.H.), University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, M391, San Francisco, CA 94143; Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md (A.S., S.P.R.); Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (J.C.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany (W.P.F.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany (M.E.); Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia (L.E.); Prostate Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence (ProsTIC), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia (M.S.H.); and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (M.S.H.)
| |
Collapse
|