Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors and other NSAIDs in urology: Current peril or future promise?

Management of ureteral obstruction due to advanced malignancy: optimizing therapeutic and palliative outcomes

PURPOSE

Treatment of ureteral obstruction due to advanced abdominal or pelvic malignancy is a clinical challenge. We discuss improvements and modern day outcomes in the palliative treatment of patients with ureteral obstruction by antegrade or retrograde ureteral decompression. Also, potential areas of clinical investigation involving ureteral stent improvement and pharmacological management of relief of symptoms resulting from ureteral obstruction are discussed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search was performed using the Entrez-PubMed(R) database. All relevant literature on ureteral obstruction, advanced malignancy and nephrostomy, ureteral stent and associated topics concerning palliative care and quality of life were reviewed and analyzed.

RESULTS

Presenting symptoms are varied and depend on the acuity of the underlying problem. Mechanisms underlying the pain and symptoms of extrinsic ureteral compression have not fully been explored but they may include prostaglandin and renin-angiotensin pathways with medical interventions potentially directed at such therapeutic targets. Progressive obstructive uropathy may likely lead to clinical manifestations, such as uremia, electrolyte imbalances and persistent urinary tract infections, if obstruction is not bypassed. New approaches to antegrade and retrograde stenting, and the evaluation of new stent materials may help minimize the complications and side effects of such procedures. Unfortunately the finding of ureteral obstruction due to malignancy carries a poor prognosis with a resulting median survival of 3 to 7 months. This prognosis highlights the importance of maintaining quality of life in these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients presenting with symptoms of ureteral obstruction due to advanced malignancy should be informed of the therapeutic options in the context of the poor prognosis. In the meantime research is needed to find methods of urinary diversion and pharmacological intervention for symptomatic relief without compromising quality of life in patients at the end of life.

LUTS treatment: Future treatment options

Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are commonly divided into storage, voiding, and postmicturition symptoms, and may occur in both men and women. Male LUTS have historically been linked to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), but are not necessarily prostate related. The focus of treatment for LUTS has thus shifted from the prostate to the bladder and other extraprostatic sites. LUTS include symptoms of the overactive bladder (OAB), which are often associated with detrusor overactivity. Treatment for LUTS suggestive of BPH has traditionally involved the use of alpha(1)-adrenoceptor (AR) antagonists; 5alpha-reductase inhibitors; and phytotherapy-however, several new therapeutic principles have shown promise. Selective beta(3)-adrenoceptor agonists and antimuscarinics are potentially useful agents for treating LUTS, particularly for storage symptoms secondary to outflow obstruction. Other agents of potential or actual importance are antagonists of P2X(3) receptors, botulinum toxin type A, endothelin (ET)-converting enzyme inhibitors, and drugs acting at vanilloid, angiotensin, and vitamin D(3) receptor sites. Drugs interfering with the nitric oxide/cGMP-cAMP pathway, Rho-kinase and COX inhibitors, as well as drugs targeting receptors and mechanisms within the CNS, are also of interest and deserving of further study for the treatment of LUTS.